Kristen French Autopsy Results
nmm
I don't know why there is/was no mention of this, but it seems really
obvious to me.
From the stomach contents found in Kristen French Autopsy Results, it
could be determined who killed her.
If she had Swiss Challet, then Paul probably killed her. If She didn't,
then Karla killed her while Paul went out to get the food, like Paul said.
Like everything about this case it seems like they just missed it. And
the bitch will be free in a year or so.
Jess
Hi.
Very good point. Without sounding like an ego-maniac, I can't
believe I didn't think of this! BTW, as of yesterday (02-17-02), it
will have been nine years to the date that Paul Bernardo was arrested
for his crimes at 57 Bayview Drive. Please keep posting. These are
the kind of emails I like to read on this case.
Sincerely, Jess
Timothy Stenger
extended period of time- therefore I would wonder if her digestive system
would continue its process of breaking down food leaving no discernable
trace- certainly a question for a medical examiner and of course if you
remember your homolka books they did examine her stomach during the autopsy-
as they would do in any case of this sort- that said who knows? Consider how
Tammy's first autopsy uncovered no trace of drugs in her system etc. Even
though Paul and Karla had fed her halcion all evening to knock her
unconcious.
I might also add in response to a post that Kristen's body was found "little
more than a skeleton" that this is untrue. In fact- and this goes in the
direction of who killed Kristen- her body was livid enough to show two small
bruises on either side of her back lending to the speculation that Karla
knelt on her back to strangle her as the bruises were commensurate with
smaller not larger knees- I still subscribe to the belief that it was all
Paul especially as Paul was know to have skinny legs due to his focus on
building upper body strength only- at least it remains inconclusive.. Best
to all TS
"nmm" <voxma...@eol.ca> wrote in message
news:B89455B...@64.56.235.45...
Bob
point I was trying to make, was that her body was too decomposed to trace any
DNA samples. (sperm) As for the bruises on her back, the Doctors on the
defence believed that it was more consistent that Kristen got them them Karla
then Paul because Paul was a lot bigger then Karla. But, those injuries don't
point on who killed Kristen. The bottom line is that they BOTH tortured her.
The taped show that they BOTH showed no mercy.
Timothy Stenger
police reports and echoed in I believe all three books especially Invisible
Darkness Kristens body was found only "a short time after her death" due to
the lack of decomposition. In addition "Lethal marriage" notes that the
autopsy performed on Kristen used the development of blowfly larvae as an
indicator of the time she spent so horribly left alone in the woods- also
indicating only a few days. Furthermore other types of material such as skin
etc offer themselves as DNA proof not only sperm which can live for an
extended period of time in the body even though it loses it ability to
fertilize an egg after a period of hours- in addition Bernardo did his best
to remove any and all evidence of Kristen from their residence by burning
the bed sheets blanket etc. Having said this I believe the failure -if any -
lies with the fact that DNA testing was still in its infancy during
1990-1992 as supported by the almost 3-4 year period between the DNA sample
given by Paul in the Scarborough rapist case and its connection to him. You
are absolutely right regardless of this debate that both are culpable and
both showed no mercy- TSS
"nmm" <voxma...@eol.ca> wrote in message
news:B89455B...@64.56.235.45...