On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 01:55:10 +0000, Yours Truly,Johnny Dollar wrote:
> Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote in
> news:kjtc8s$f7u$
3...@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 02:31:02 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> {One Of Four} wrote:
>>
>>> It'd probably not look too good if 'Fred Hall' was really Stephen K.
>>> Gielda, as he's involved in the field of ensuring that people are not
>>> cyberstalked and outed. That'd make Gielda look incompetent if he
>>> himself were outed. Imagine the amount of business Gielda would lose
>>> if people learned that he was *so* incompetent that he couldn't even
>>> keep his *own* socks a secret.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>
>> Oh, it's ever so much worse than that. If he, as his Ferd sock, was
>> actively making worse the very problem one of his businesses, in which
>> he had a fiduciary interest, existed to solve for its customers, that
>> goes way beyond "incompetence" and lands squarely in the territory
>> labeled "corruption".
>>
>> <snicker>
>
> You truly are a stupid cunt, you stupid cunt.
Notwithstanding your ad hominem "argument", there is still an appearance
of impropriety swirling around Gielda's corporation.
If you have something *useful* (and independently verifiable, of course)
to contribute in the way of information that might clarify the situation
regarding Packetderm, LLC., by all means, go ahead and post it.
Otherwise, shaddup, kook.
<snicker>