Information about Annie
Absolutely Cynthia Marie
and if she was anything like her husband at all. Did she share
John's New Age philosophies as passionately as he did? From what
I've seen of her, she seems to be comparatively. . .mainstream.
Absolutely Cynthia Marie
http://mypage.goplay.com/BobbyDylan
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
ASLTsmile
from what I've read and what John has said, I don't believe Annie or Cassandra
shared his views on many subjects.
Just my take, of course,
Peace,
Tricia
summ...@my-deja.com
reservation back in the 70's, but he never mentioned that he brought
his wife with him.
In article <20000530084931...@ng-fc1.aol.com>,
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
summ...@my-deja.com
ever questioned the babies actual father? I am wondering because
someone sitting here next to me is saying that John was said to not be
able to have had children. Was this John who was not able to, or
Annie? Thank you
hiway3...@yahoo.com
> Since you have mentioned "Cassandra"...I was wondering if anyone has
> ever questioned the babies actual father? I am wondering because
> someone sitting here next to me is saying that John was said to not be
> able to have had children. Was this John who was not able to, or
> Annie? Thank you
Hi Summer,
Many of us feel uncomfortable discussing this subject, as this is an
open forum. There's always a possibility that one of Jesse's
schoolmates might read here... out of curiosity about the little girl's
father. They are just at that age!
It is public knowledge that the problem was not with Annie; John states
that clearly in his book. Cassie also made some rather cruel remarks in
public (Windstar), during the time of the divorce. That much is general
knowledge.
Best,
Hiway
summ...@my-deja.com
even go any further. And thank you very much! :-)
In article <8h1ci6$uss$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Laura
Summer.. do a deja search on the subject..
Let's leave this alone this time guys!
Laura
Ed Brown
here by saying they know the "real" truth about matters that have to do with
JD, but when pressed do not have anything substantial to back up those
claims and then try to hide behind the "we don't want to go there because
we are just too good" ploy...not to mention, all done under completely
hidden identities. Please....give us a break.
When it comes to the fantasy that a lot of women have here about the
undying
love John had for Annie......I'm sorry but I guess all of you must have had
your heads in the sand at all the concerts, etc.....if I recall correctly,
John had a penchant for pretty young blondes....and they didn't seem to have
any problem
getting close to him with the least bit of effort.
As far as JD being the biological father of Jesse Belle, there was
something about a DNA test that was done BEFORE JD died because Cassie kept
asking JD for more money all the time. What the results of that DNA test
were, if there was truely a test done, I do not think have been made public
for obvious reasons.
(It is my opinion that the results didn't matter at all when it comes to how
much
JD loved Jesse Belle. He still loved her with all his heart...that's
supposed to be one of the reasons he bought that damn plane...to be close to
Jesse Belle.)
Dee
Laura wrote in message <20000530174504...@ng-fz1.aol.com>...
summ...@my-deja.com
question and in truth, it doesn't matter...as for 'hidden
identities'..I've heard this several times now and I am beginning to
wonder what this NG is all about. I thought it was a place where we
could share thoughts and feelings on the memory of John Denver. What
the man stood for is far beyond bickering. I can not understand what
is within the hearts and minds of some of you, nor the spirit and
intent either. Yet, I see names such as yours..."Dee" and on the
header, it says "Ed", yet the irony of it all is that you make mention
of "hidden identities"...I take that and have to laugh for to me...I
don't care if you are an "Ed", a"Dee" or any other "Label" you wish to
be identified with. I'd rather look beyond the messenger and see the
message if there is any. Perhaps we can concentrate on that? Again,
my apologies for asking. I am quite new here with this NG and only
asked because I had a friend over my shoulder while I was reading one
post and she asked me...I in turn placed it out. It won't happen
again. :-)
In article <8h1p6a$u7u$1...@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>,
fz1.aol.com>...
> >Uh oh...
> >Summer.. do a deja search on the subject..
> >Let's leave this alone this time guys!
> >Laura
>
>
hiway3...@yahoo.com
> Love the way that certain ones on this ng like to "tease" others that
come
> here by saying they know the "real" truth about matters that have to
do with
> JD, but when pressed do not have anything substantial to back up those
> claims and then try to hide behind the "we don't want to go there
because
> we are just too good" ploy...not to mention, all done under completely
> hidden identities. Please....give us a break.
May I assume that these remarks are in reference to me? What exactly
would you like me to do - spill everything out in a public forum, for
the child and/or her classmates to see? I came too close to doing that
before, and I think it was a mistake on my part; I strongly believe
that Laura is right.
> When it comes to the fantasy that a lot of women have here about the
> undying
> love John had for Annie......I'm sorry but I guess all of you must
have had
> your heads in the sand at all the concerts, etc.....if I recall
correctly,
> John had a penchant for pretty young blondes....and they didn't seem
to have
> any problem
> getting close to him with the least bit of effort.
Absolutely true. As you said, he wasn't exactly discreet.
> As far as JD being the biological father of Jesse Belle, there was
> something about a DNA test that was done BEFORE JD died because Cassie
kept
> asking JD for more money all the time. What the results of that DNA
test
> were, if there was truely a test done, I do not think have been made
public
> for obvious reasons.
A DNA test was never done. John wouldn't allow it. This came up during
the divorce proceedings.
> (It is my opinion that the results didn't matter at all when it comes
to how
> much
> JD loved Jesse Belle. He still loved her with all his heart...that's
> supposed to be one of the reasons he bought that damn plane...to be
close to
> Jesse Belle.)
> Dee
Right again. (It's a shame to see a certain person profit from it,
though, but I guess there's no way of avoiding that)
Hiway
Diamondsnstones
>Summer.. do a deja search on the subject..
>Let's leave this alone this time guys!
>Laura
>
>
Would you be speaking to me? Sue
Laura
SUE!!!
Sue, that was all misunderstanding..
no hard feelings at all, none, nada.
Dee...
I wonder if since you quoted me, that
you meant me?
I can assure you that my real name is
Laura... several people even know
my last name and even my physical
address. I assure you there is no
hidden identity here..as some can vouch.
Also, I don't claim to know ANY secrets..
I DO however feel that as adults we should
be considerate towards a child.
Especially the child of the man we all
admire.
Summer... yikes.. forgive us.. there
are some fantastic people here, and
then there aren't. lol! You'll be able
to tell us apart soon!
Absolutely Cynthia Marie
<snip>
> When it comes to the fantasy that a lot of women have here
about the
>undying
>love John had for Annie......I'm sorry but I guess all of you
must have had
>your heads in the sand at all the concerts, etc.....if I recall
correctly,
>John had a penchant for pretty young blondes....and they didn't
seem to have
>any problem
>getting close to him with the least bit of effort.
He liked to deal with the ladies, alright. Seriously though, I
think there are many women here (myself included) who would be
willing to be a John groupie, even though he was married. He
liked female attention, and he liked to flirt. Perhaps brunettes
reminded him too much of his wife?
So many times I've let you down
So many times I've played around
I tell you now, they don't mean a thing
summ...@my-deja.com
all this shows is that he was "Human" just like the rest of us. :-)
In article <0430be34...@usw-ex0106-045.remarq.com>,
Caro-Meow
If you haven't already, you might enjoy visiting Emily's Rocky
Mountain High website and it's posting board:
http://www.interlog.com/~4mowchuk/ngbk5/rmh.html
and The World Family of John Denver Gathering Page:
http://www.john-denver.org/JD/noframes.html
Love, Meow
summ...@my-deja.com
In article <008bd4e2...@usw-ex0101-007.remarq.com>,
CASHMEING
John and Dee wants to know Hiways real name otherwise she thinks Hiway has no
right to post anything about John. You know how much some people really hate
not knowing the name of someone. They hate it even more when some of us *know*
the real names of each other and most of them have to keep guessing.
Caro-Meow
believe anyone really cared in the first place. But just for the
record, you know.
CASHMEING
>believe anyone really cared in the first place.
Carol the problem is that there are people who will doubt your real name so its
a no win situation. Hiway can say her name is Melanie and there will be people
who believe it and people who won't so what difference does it make if she
signs Hiway or Melanie or Chris or anything else?
Cash
Jack
Bill
Caroline
Sharon
Pete or any other name you want to believe or not believe
Caro-Meow
Well the ones who know me (and I've met a whole buncha JD people)
know that I am Carol, and the one's who doubt me -- well that's
not my problem.
Love from Carol
CASHMEING
>not my problem.
My sentiments exactly!
Ed Brown
Actually I wasn't pointing my finger at just one person or the other, but
really basically those few of you that do like to do the "we know more than
you do,
and we are going to let you know that we do, but we aren't really going to
tell you what we know" kind of repartee that is meant to please only those
few and exclude everybody else. Makes me doubt that there really is all
that much to tell in the first place.
So far as the not wanting to say anything about Jesse Belle because you are
afraid that she might read it or that her classmates might read it... it's
too bad this same kind of consideration isn't extended to those
conversations that concern subjects like having THE picture of John with
that sexy bulge in his pants, the size of JD's penis, etc....sorry, I don't
find those all that tasteful....but I guess that is alright for those
innocent little children to read. Actually, I think it is rather ludicrous
to think that Cassie is going to allow Jesse Belle to access
any JD newsgroup especially since there are so many nastry remarks made
about Cassie herself. (By the way, the DNA test I was talking about
actually was supposed to have ocurred AFTER the divorce because Cassie was
not
satisfied with what she got FROM the divorce.....I know about the JD
refusing to have the test story....this is not what I was referring to.)
Laura's remark, though, that there are some good people to listen to and
others that aren't and you'll learn which ones does kind of sum up the
attitude that I was refering to. Kind of sad in a place where people are
congregating because they loved John Denver....I'd be willing to bet he
would have hated this kind of attitude.
Dee
hiway3...@yahoo.com wrote in message <8h1udb$c9p$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>Dee,
>
>> Love the way that certain ones on this ng like to "tease" others that
>come
>> here by saying they know the "real" truth about matters that have to
>do with
>> JD, but when pressed do not have anything substantial to back up those
>> claims and then try to hide behind the "we don't want to go there
>because
>> we are just too good" ploy...not to mention, all done under completely
>> hidden identities. Please....give us a break.
>
>May I assume that these remarks are in reference to me? What exactly
>would you like me to do - spill everything out in a public forum, for
>the child and/or her classmates to see? I came too close to doing that
>before, and I think it was a mistake on my part; I strongly believe
>that Laura is right.
>
>> When it comes to the fantasy that a lot of women have here about the
>> undying
>> love John had for Annie......I'm sorry but I guess all of you must
>have had
>> your heads in the sand at all the concerts, etc.....if I recall
>correctly,
>> John had a penchant for pretty young blondes....and they didn't seem
>to have
>> any problem
>> getting close to him with the least bit of effort.
>
>Absolutely true. As you said, he wasn't exactly discreet.
>
>> As far as JD being the biological father of Jesse Belle, there was
>> something about a DNA test that was done BEFORE JD died because Cassie
>kept
>> asking JD for more money all the time. What the results of that DNA
>test
>> were, if there was truely a test done, I do not think have been made
>public
>> for obvious reasons.
>
>A DNA test was never done. John wouldn't allow it. This came up during
>the divorce proceedings.
>
>> (It is my opinion that the results didn't matter at all when it comes
>to how
>> much
>> JD loved Jesse Belle. He still loved her with all his heart...that's
>> supposed to be one of the reasons he bought that damn plane...to be
>close to
>> Jesse Belle.)
>> Dee
>
>Right again. (It's a shame to see a certain person profit from it,
>though, but I guess there's no way of avoiding that)
>
>Hiway
>
>
>
Laura
>too bad this same kind of consideration isn't extended to those
>conversations that concern subjects like having THE picture of John with
>that sexy bulge in his pants, the size of JD's penis, etc....sorry, I don't
>find those all that tasteful....but I guess that is alright for those
>innocent little children to read.
Ok Dee...
You find me one place in which I was discussing *any* of that, and I'll
apologize.
I haven't tho, and as far as I can see, you are the one bringing it up at this
moment.
What that has to do with John and DNA
testing is beyond me.. why bring it up?
It certainly is NOT ok for small children to read things like that, and you
haven't seen
either Hiway nor myself in these conversations, yet you implied both of us.
As for THE picture.. since you emphasized the word THE.. I assume you mean my
joke about THE picture. Anyone here for that joke can tell you that I was
referring to the picture of him golfing. I love that picture.
As far as you think it ludicrous that Cassie
would allow Jesse on the ng... well..
thats naive.
11 year old are notorius for sneaking and
a newsgroup is awfully easy to access.
What attitude are you referring to that I sum up by saying there are good
people to listen to and not good people?
I would say Gloria, Christine, Wendy,
and MANY others are great to listen to, fantastic to learn from.. while posters
such as ImJohndenver, etc.. should be
ignored most of the time.
Do you disagree with this? Do you think
that I have an "attitude" by stating this?
Laura
>Laura's remark, though, that there are some good people to listen to and
>others that aren't and you'll learn which ones does kind of sum up the
>attitude that I was refering to. Kind of sad in a place where people are
>congregating because they loved John Denver....I'd be willing to bet he
>would have hated this kind of attitude.
>Dee
>
I
CASHMEING
>would have hated this kind of attitude.
I'd be willing to bet he would have hated 93% of the people who post here.
They're the reason why he had bodyguards.
Ladron23
I firmly believe that John would find 99% of any conversations taking place
here worthless. I find it so unbelievable that posters here find so little on
the positive side to post.I also find it very hard to believe that any of
John's very close friends would spend their most precious time on this message
board. Most of whom I am aware that were his very close friends are busy in
their lives helping to make the world a better place. And I am aware that he
enjoyed many dear friendships. A lot of what is written here has no bearing on
anything positive,only written to cause pain. That certainly was not what John
Denver believed in. John was very forthright about the messages and heartfelt
ideas that were inside of him to get out to those that stated they cared about
making a difference. How many here really care about making a difference in our
world today;how many really care about what exactly John believed in, and what
steps he took to make his commitments become realities?
I have mentioned to my sons some of what has been posted here------they just
roll their eyes back in wonderment and disgust-----
27, 25, and almost 20 years of age they are.
Most of the current postings, in my opinion,
have the age factor of about 7 here............
Most have NOTHING to do with John Denver...............You are right, it is
very sad in a place where people are congregating because they loved John
Denver.
I wonder if any of these posters that even refuse to post their name would want
others
*dissecting* their family members apart......
Will any of this matter 5, 10, even 15 years from now?
Wendy
Laura
>want
>others
>*dissecting* their family members apart......
YES WENDY!!! Thank You!
THAT is exactly what I meant by posting
'leave this alone".
Not quite sure why I came under attack for stating that we SHOULD NOT discuss
such private matters. Never claimed to have secrets, never said anything about
anyones anatomy, haven't a clue why
it got a negative response.
We should not dissect Jesse's life.
And please know, that just because I do
not post anything that blows my own horn,
does not mean that I am not very active
in several areas that better the planet.
Laura
Patty
Love,
Patty/Columbine
Caro-Meow wrote:
> Dear Cash Bob --
>
> Well the ones who know me (and I've met a whole buncha JD people)
> know that I am Carol, and the one's who doubt me -- well that's
> not my problem.
>
Ladron23
I didn't mean to imply in any way about
*tooting* one's own horn. I simply meant
to state once again about the works of many of John's friends, long established
friends that are making a positive difference
in our world-------David Brower and Earth Island Institute, Dr. David Suzuki
and The
David Suzuki Foundation, Lou Gold and The Siskiyou Project, Bruce Gordon and
Lighthawk, Olivia Newton-John and the CHEC Net organization, of which Joe Henry
is a member of the board of directors, Jean Michael Cousteau and OCEAN FUTURES,
Morley Nelson and the Snake River Birds of
Prey, Dennis Weaver and The Institute of Ecolonomics, Mardy Murie, and The
Murie Center, Charles Craighead, and the Craighead Environmental Research
Center,
Joe Henry and the newly formed foundation that he has started concerning the
Columbine survivors and their families, Jerry Jampolsky and Diane Cirincione,
The Network of Attitudinal Healing International,
W. Mitchell, "It's Not What Happens To You, It's What You Do About It", Tom
Crum and Aiki Works, Rolland Smith, Emmy winning commentator and Master of
Cermonies of Windstar Symposiums, even Melissa Poe of K.I.D.S Face, and Tara
Church of Tree Musketeers. These are just some of John's friends and associates
that are out in our world helping to make a positive difference. All of these
individuals
continue to honor the love and respect they had for John Denver in the most
wonderful ways........
Wendy
Laura
Didn't mean to imply that. Just
making a statement..
I cut my little finger of my left hand badly
tonight.. thought I could still easily type..
ha ha.. not quite so easy!
Off I go to hold my pinkie in the air and
look like I'm putting on airs!
Laura
Cheri057
>From: "Ed Brown" <edan...@mindspring.com>
>Date: Tue, May 30, 2000 21:11 EDT
<snip>
> When it comes to the fantasy that a lot of women have here about the
>undying
>love John had for Annie......I'm sorry but I guess all of you must have had
>your heads in the sand at all the concerts, etc.....if I recall correctly,
>John had a penchant for pretty young blondes....and they didn't seem to have
>any problem
>getting close to him with the least bit of effort.
>Dee
>
Hi Dee....
I really have to disagree with this part of your post....
I have no doubt that JD was probly "unfaithful" to Annie.....how often, or
how much, I have no idea.
Still doesn't mean that he didn't love Annie...or that people have thier
"heads in the sand" if they think so.
They say that "infidelity" in marriages today is at the very least, very
high, and we all know how high the divorce rate is. And thats with "normal"
folk. Celebrities seem to change marriage partners like we change underwear!
John was obviously distraught over his break-up with Annie...and the fact
that they became good friends AFTER the divorce is proof enough to me that
THEIR love, although maybe not on a romantic level anymore, prevailed.
Takes a lot of maturity, compassion and LOVE to forgive, and accept each
other as people really are.
I'm in no way defending John's actions, since he used very poor judgement and
poor "coping" skills sometimes.....but you can count me as one of those people
who beleives he TRULY loved Annie!
JMHO
Cheri:)
LiteofVega
> I'm in no way defending John's actions, since he used very poor judgement
>and
> poor "coping" skills sometimes.....but you can count me as one of those
>people
>who beleives he TRULY loved Annie!
Count me as one too, Cheri. IMHO, their mutal love had evolved to a deep and
abiding soulmate kind of love. Not a romantic love but a love far deeper than
that.
Peace,
Mary in Oklahoma
"Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday."
- George Carlin
Ed Brown
say things that should not be said in this kind of forum since it has become
quite obvious that the point I was trying to make has been turned into
something quite different than what I intended. But, I am going to
(against my better judgement again) try to explain again. The main gist of
what I was trying to get across is that there are some people that have been
lurking here for a long time and some people that are new. The new ones are
not privy to all the information that has been acquired by the old ones;
therefore, it does seem a bit snotty to try to "put them in their place" by
implying that their questions are already known by those that have been here
for awhile and that they should go somewhere else to look up that
information. It is only natural for people to be curious about the lives of
the people they admire...even the parts of those peoples lives that come
under what might be considered "gossip". This is supposed to be an "open"
forum. The question about whether John could have really been Jesse Belle's
father is a legitimate question anybody would be curious about considering
everything that John himself said not only about himself but about
Cassandra. I also think of this place as an adult forum...it's hard for me
to believe that any responsible adult would allow their child to come
here....not to mention I doubt that there are many children who would care
to come to a John Denver ng....it's not exactly "The Back Street Boys".
Dee
Laura wrote in message <20000531221202...@ng-bj1.aol.com>...
>>attitude that I was refering to. Kind of sad in a place where people are
>>congregating because they loved John Denver....I'd be willing to bet he
>>would have hated this kind of attitude.
>>Dee
>>
>
>I
RichardH
But can anyone vouch for you CASHMEING? Besides your mother! (knowing the
derogatory remark I may get)
~Richard
CASHMEING <cash...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000531144604...@ng-fm1.aol.com...
> > the one's who doubt me -- well that's
> >not my problem.
>
> My sentiments exactly!
CatTess
>The question about whether John <............> is a legitimate question...
This question comes under the category of "Let's Mind Our Own Business." Being
curious doesn't give one the right to question the paternity of someone else's
child.
This is so obviously a very personal, private matter, that it's hard for me to
understand why anyone would want to even ask that question. Whatever happened
to respect for another person's privacy and to just plain old good manners?
Tess
Ed Brown
bombed all the time.
CASHMEING wrote in message <20000531224056...@ng-cr1.aol.com>...
>>.I'd be willing to bet he
>>would have hated this kind of attitude.
>
Ed Brown
As I stated I was not pointing my finger as any *one* person but the little
group that seems to have formed that think they are the keepers of all the
JD trivia and want to dictate what or what cannot be discussed here. But
since you did bring up that you never post to anything that has to do with
the sexy stuff, you might want to visit the "bigger penis, better sex"
thread. Apparently, there is somebody posting there under your name and
Hiways.
Dee
Laura wrote in message <20000601230004...@ng-cg1.aol.com>...
>I definitely wasnt' trying to put Summer in her place. As a matter of
fact, I
>sent her a private email as to why I think this should remain a subject
that is
>none of our
>business.
>I certainly did not intend to sound "snotty".
>
>And again, I wouldn't allow an 11 year old on here, either. But I know a
lot
>of people that, at age 11, were learning to sneak
>around.
>
>Sorry if you felt I was snotty or putting
>someone in their place.
>
>Laura
Caro-Meow
Vouching right back atcha ...
Love, Carol
CASHMEING
Plenty of people who know me personally away from the computer can *vouch* for
me (whatever that proves in the fantasyland of the internet) but if you think
I'm about to get *up close and personal* with anyone in this group of wackos
other than the few sane ones I already have you can start imagining any
derogatory remark you want.
Laura
I suppose you missed the fact that I went
in there to jokingly say that I could have
guessed who was in that thread.
I didn't post much more than that.
What? You spend your time looking
for posts that you can disagree with me about?????
BTW.. you said we discussed JOHNS
anatomy..
NOT that we poked fun at a spam message.
Which is what that entire thread was about. BIG difference. (particularly
since
you were the one who made the accusation)
Done with this.
Laura
Laura
Guess you knew him really well.....
Laura
Laura
this subject.
I posted THREE messages..
one to jokingly say I could have guessed
who was participating in the thread (which was started by SPAM)
The second to say I was laughing at
a choice of words by Bill Berry.
Third to feign shock at KJs joke.
Nowhere did I discuss anyones anatomy.
Nowhere did I discuss a sexy pic of John
with a bulge in his pants, in ANY thread.
Nowhere did I discuss the size of his..
you get the picture.
THOSE were the accusations that YOU made. Not that I joked in a spam thread.
You have the problem Dee, not I.
I made a simple statement that many
understood as just that. You chose
to take that simple statement and make
accusations that are unfounded.
Why on earth a "this was discussed and
caused arguments, look it up on Deja"
post (plus a nice email to Summer from
myself of which you were unaware) ..
why that caused you to go off about
this other stuff, that I have nothing to do with.. is beyond me.
I feel pretty secure that I have NOT
done these things you talk about, and
I certainly didn't say anything derogatory
in the Bigger penis, better sex thread.
THAT is the first time I have used either
of those words on this ng. I keep it clean.
Find someone else and something else
to complain about.
>>plonk<<
Laura
CASHMEING
>Guess you knew him really well.....
>
Dee was his supplier. She got cut rate discounts down at Acme Liquor Barn.
CASHMEING
>in the Bigger penis, better sex thread.
>THAT is the first time I have used either
>of those words on this ng. I keep it clean.
I'm confused. Which of the above words were suppose to be dirty?
Diamondsnstones
>THOSE were the accusations that YOU made. Not that I joked in a spam thread.
>
As far as I know nowhere in that thread was there a mention (horrors, it was
off topic) of JD or any of his personal body parts!!!! If anyone read such a
thing into that thread then their problem is far bigger than any part mentioned
in the thread as needing to be bigger and/or better! Sue
PS Cash, no there was nothing dirty about the words Penis or sex unless the
person referred to had not taken a shower in weeks!!!!!!!!
LiteofVega
>Oh boy -- I've been double-vouched!!
I could triple vouch ya, Carol! LOL While we haven't met (yet) in person,
Carol was one of the very first people to welcome me when I first got on the
internet. First place I surfed to was the RMH Guestbook and I was so pleased
and surprised when I got the sweetest email from a fellow Okie. We may live
several hours from each other but it's nice to know there are other JD fans in
Oklahoma.
Love,
Mary in you-know-where ;-)
rockymou...@my-deja.com
cash...@aol.com (CASHMEING) wrote:
> >But can anyone vouch for you CASHMEING?
>
> Plenty of people who know me personally away from the computer can
*vouch* for
> me
ROFLMAO...Vouch for what? Your purple dick? You're a frigging joke.
I'd bet any of the women you like to bully could whip your
chickenshit ass in 20 seconds.
RMHIGH
rockymou...@my-deja.com
diamond...@aol.com (Diamondsnstones) wrote:
> PS Cash, no there was nothing dirty about the words Penis or sex
unless the
> person referred to had not taken a shower in weeks!!!!!!!!
Take another pill lady. Do you always kiss Cash's ass or is Dekalb
County running out of men who won't put up with pillheads? Another
frigging joke.
The Reverend Mary High
CASHMEING
Good because I have both and I'd hate to be doing something dirty.
CASHMEING
*HIGH* is right. Stay up there. The view is better from your frame of mind.
Have another snort.
CASHMEING
I see they gave the password for this name to the SandCrab too. Anybody want
to start up a pool to see how long it is before she gets the password to
wheneaglesfly and starts posting from that one too?
Bondini
Dee, you keep saying that you are not singling Laura out.
Let me help you to understand why you give that impression.
Your first post, in which you rant about several things,
you quote Laura.
Your second, in which you state you didn't imply Laura, you
also state that her remark was indicative of the attitude that
JD would hate.
I beg to differ. Laura is attempting to defend his child.
Her remark was "there are some great people here, and then there
aren't". You quoted her incorrectly and said that she said there
were good people to listen to. She didn't even catch that.
(Although it is correct.. I wouldn't bother listening to Rockymthigh,
Imjohndenver (WHAT a loser) or the others like that.)
I find it disgusting that you would actually act like you are judging
who JD would hate and wouldn't hate. I believe he would thank Laura
for her attempts. He would hate that you attempted to tell her and
others that he wouldn't care for her attitude. He hated people trying
to speak for him, unless maybe you knew him and knew his feelings.
Wendy, you seem to think JD's friends were ALL highly active in saving
the world. Many of the people you mention he did call friend, but
the people he saw on a regular basis, the people who he sat and
conversed with as a normal guy... they exist too. Do not make
a judgment that his "REAL" friends wouldn't be here, and would be
out saving the world rather than waste time here.
John actually kicked back and relaxed once in awhile. Life cannot
be 100% serious all the time. He wouldn't have written half his songs
if he was always serious.
I believe Lauras implication that she does not blow her own horn was
out of frustration. It seems as if the conversation always goes that
way, that some of you aren't "active".
Some even want to stand up and announce in public what they have done
to further JD's causes. (during the get togethers) I'm sorry, but I
don't feel that is right.
There are several people who may not have been ABLE to do what they
wanted, and some who just don't want to announce it publically out
of modesty.
Back to the topic at hand. So in your second post, you also singled
out Laura while at the same time saying you didn't.
Your third post, you again attempt to say you didn't single out Laura,
then you tell her that she posted in the "Bigger Penis, Better Sex"
thread.
Pray tell, who the hell cares? She didn't post anything about any of
the subjects of which you accuse her. She denied only what you accused
her of, she didn't say she never posted anything having to do with
having a bit of fun.
In going back to the beginning of this year, I don't see Laura
partaking in any of the anatomy discussions. Although she did
discuss a "yummy" picture of JD. BUT.. that was called that first,
by someone else. The picture contained no bulge of any kind.
Yet, you use very specific wording in your accusations. I can't find
an inkling that you had reason to say what you did.
If I were Laura and Hiway, I would by highly insulted by you.
You wore two faces throughout this thread, then claim that people took
it wrong. How can you say you aren't singling someone out, then quote
them EACH time?
Laura, I assure you, John would thank you for attempting to keep his
daughters personal business out of the limelight.
He hated for his children to be discussed in the publics eye.
And yes, I CAN say that Dee. I did know him, quite well.
And I will hide behind my screen name, and not tell you who I am.
Truth speaks whether or not I post my name.
Thank you, Tess, Sue, Cashmeing, Hiway, Absolutely Cynthia, Wendy,
and the rest who also spoke up in defense of a young girl.
Jesse Belle thanks you also.
Bondini, James Bondini ;-)
In article <8h88i8$vpu$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>,
"Ed Brown" <edan...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Laura,
> As I stated I was not pointing my finger as any *one* person but the
little
> group that seems to have formed that think they are the keepers of
all the
> JD trivia and want to dictate what or what cannot be discussed here.
But
> since you did bring up that you never post to anything that has to do
with
> the sexy stuff, you might want to visit the "bigger penis, better sex"
> thread. Apparently, there is somebody posting there under your name
and
> Hiways.
> Dee
> Laura wrote in message <20000601230004.18393.00002496@ng-
cg1.aol.com>...
> >I definitely wasnt' trying to put Summer in her place. As a matter
of
> fact, I
> >sent her a private email as to why I think this should remain a
subject
> that is
> >none of our
> >business.
> >I certainly did not intend to sound "snotty".
> >
> >And again, I wouldn't allow an 11 year old on here, either. But I
know a
> lot
> >of people that, at age 11, were learning to sneak
> >around.
> >
> >Sorry if you felt I was snotty or putting
> >someone in their place.
> >
> >Laura
>
>
Bondini
rockymou...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > person referred to had not taken a shower in weeks!!!!!!!!
>
> Take another pill lady. Do you always kiss Cash's ass or is Dekalb
> County running out of men who won't put up with pillheads? Another
> frigging joke.
>
> The Reverend Mary High
Take note, Dee. THIS is the kind of crap that JD hated.
I must also wonder about the "Reverend". Isn't the reverend
or priestess or someone the one who was sick enough to buy and
worship his plane parts.
That one left us reeling, and still turns my stomach.
Sue, if this is the county you are actually in, may I suggest you
contact Deja and turn this person in for announcing it and slandering
your name. Good luck to you.
Diamondsnstones
>Take another pill lady. Do you always kiss Cash's ass or is Dekalb
>County running out of men who won't put up with pillheads? Another
>frigging joke.
>
Have no idea what is going on in Dekalb county nor do I care and jokes are a
lot better than the filth you and your buddies spew out all over the place!!!!
Ed Brown
Thanks guys, for making my point so much better than I did in all my
ramblings.
Dee
"My brothers at opposite tables
Like fire and water against each other
Only a fool can't see the obvious ending
If they only knew the things that I know
If they only could see the things that I see....
Is there no vision of love that binds us all together"
(John Denver)
Bondini wrote in message <8h96s7$97g$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
Summer
then anything about John Denver. What is this ng about here? This is
very discouraging really. I personally don't care if Carol's name is
Karen or Conga for that matter...It's a label attached to her whether
on or off the computer...Call her "kitten" and I bet she wouldn't care.
Why not just focus on John Denver then names and name calling? I am
not understanding this.
In article <0fd77081...@usw-ex0102-014.remarq.com>,
Caro-Meow <carolsN...@ptsi.net.invalid> wrote:
> Dear Cash Bob --
>
> Well the ones who know me (and I've met a whole buncha JD people)
> know that I am Carol, and the one's who doubt me -- well that's
> not my problem.
>
> Love from Carol
>
> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion
Network *
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet -
Free!
>
>
Christine Moon
It was me who suggested we get together to share what each of us was doing
to further John's causes. In no way did I mean it the way you suggest,
although I can understand that it could be seen that way. All I had in mind
was for a group of people to discuss what they were doing with each other
and anyone else who might need a little inspiration. Some people would love
to be "doing something" but simply can't come up with any ideas. And of
course we can't all do exactly what we would like to do - but I am sure we
can all do something, even if it is only picking up a piece of litter. I
agree entirely that it is not appropriate to "toot one's own horn" in this
respect, I know that John himself often chose to remain anonymous in his
generosity. You will know that better than I - obviously there are many
good deeds that he did about which the public know nothing.
--
Peace, in John's memory,
Christine
*********************************
moon...@netcomuk.co.uk
"Friends of John Denver"
http://www.fojd.org.uk
*********************************
Bondini <bon...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8h96s7$97g$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Laura
It's not so much the names of people.
It's the people who use more than one
name, and use several names to stir
up trouble.
Posting under false identities like that.
Not so much that (making names up here)
Bills name might really be Frank.. who would care?
BUT.. when Bill posts as Bill, and
as Imjohndenver, Rockymthigh and so on,
for the sole purpose of attacking good people.. thats where the "hidden
identities"
come in.
I know.. horrible waste of energy, isn't it.
Laura
Caro-Meow
That's why I suggested WAY back on this thread that you might
enjoy visiting Emily's or Rory's (or Mumze's) posting boards.
Those boards are generally much more, ummmm .... gentle than this
one. There are also a few JD clubs over at Yahoo.
Love -- Kitten
Joe Keenan
>
>ROFLMAO...Vouch for what? Your purple dick? You're a frigging joke.
>I'd bet any of the women you like to bully could whip your
>chickenshit ass in 20 seconds.
>
Oooooo. Which women is Cash bullying? Just anon names on a ng of a deceased
popstar. And I would say that Cash is hardly bullying anyone. One can always
filter out what one does not want to read.
Joe Keenan
>Sue, if this is the county you are actually in, may I suggest you
>contact Deja and turn this person in for announcing it and slandering
>your name. Good luck to you.
>
A certain poster who shall go nameless {Ladewig} tried to post the STREET I
live on. Others post where I work. Oh what fun! Would anyone care to know
where I shop for groceries? The school my kids go to? Seems obsessed people
always want too much.
Nanci124
>Would anyone care to know
>where I shop for groceries?
Hi Joe...I'm sure that we are ALL interested in where you shop for groceries.
(but, Beware of the lady outside of the grocery store with the purple handbag!)
Personally, I just want to know whether you clip coupons!!!!!!!
Nancy
Ain't Life Grand?
KJ
paper or plastic :-) hee hee
Thanks for your good humor, Joe.
KJ
Nanci124 <nanc...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000603194818...@ng-fa1.aol.com...
Absolutely Cynthia Marie
like, someone said neither she nor Cassandra shared John's
passions (which I believe), THEN just because Cassandra was
mentioned someone had to mention the old "John is not Jesse
Belle's biological father" thing. I really wish whoever said
that didn't say it. Now we're talking about flamewars, fake
names, and beans.
Absolutely Cynthia Marie
http://mypage.goplay.com/BobbyDylan
John Denver Shrine coming soon!
Theresa
"Joe Keenan" <jkeen...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20000604001155...@ng-bh1.aol.com...
> >He shops on Wednesdays which are senior citizen discount days and cheap
meat
> >days so there is no need for coupons. LOL
>
> Ouch!
>
> I do have a funny story to tell, though. Last week I took my fiance to
the mall
> to buy her a necklace. The jeweler asked if the necklace was a gift for
> graduation. I deadpanned, "No, it's for our wedding".
>
> The clerk's face froze. I winked at her and told her "It's okay, she
looks
> younger than she really is". Let me tell you, my ribs are still sore
where my
> fiance nailed me!
Get used to it Joe <g> Flustering the masses and sore ribs that is ;) My
hubby and I have had to go through the same thing....I rather doubt though
that you're older than her parents. Hubby Jim is 2 yrs. older than my
mother and 4 yrs. older than my dad!
Theresa
Diamondsnstones
>
>(but, Beware of the lady outside of the grocery store with the purple
>handbag!)
>Personally, I just want to know whether you clip coupons!!!!!!!
>
>Nancy
>Ain't Life Grand?
>
days so there is no need for coupons. LOL
Nanci124
>paper or plastic :-) hee hee
The paper or plastic issue could turn into quite a debate, I'm afraid. Maybe
we should try and "squash" this thread before it starts. I can see it
now......all the new posters......."plasticman@deja" "paperdoll@deja" This
could get really ugly. Don't tell them Joe......after all....it's noneof their
business. By the way.....do you buy Campbells Pork and Beans or B & M?
Diamondsnstones
>business. By the way.....do you buy Campbells Pork and Beans or B & M?
>
started this thread a movin'. Joe are you gonna get posts on this
one!!!!!!!!!!!! Sue
Nanci124
I can't.
I've fallen and I can't get up!!!!!!!!!
Nancy
Diamondsnstones
>I can't.
>I've fallen and I can't get up!!!!!!!!!
>
Well you best get up before the onslaught of posts hits ya' in the butt and
that is not Kitty's butt! Love Sue
Joe Keenan
>
Hy-Vee or Cub on Thursdays!
>(but, Beware of the lady outside of the grocery store with the purple
>handbag!)
It's okay. I gave her a quarter and told her to call someone who cared. She's
still standing there thinking of a phone number.
>Personally, I just want to know whether you clip coupons!!!!!!!
>
Yes.
Joe Keenan
>days so there is no need for coupons. LOL
Ouch!
Joe Keenan
Diamondsnstones
>The clerk's face froze. I winked at her and told her "It's okay, she looks
>younger than she really is". Let me tell you, my ribs are still sore where my
>fiance nailed me!
>
Uhhhhhh and just how old is this young lady, enquiring minds want to know?
Diamondsnstones
>Plastic! Good for cleaning up after the cat!
>
Train the cat like Nancy trained Kitty Butt. She did such a good job of it!
LOL Sue
Joe Keenan
>Uhhhhhh and just how old is this young lady, enquiring minds want to know?
Legal!
Diamondsnstones
>names, and beans.
>
Notice however, Cynthia, that all this variety is being discussed without major
cussing or blasphemy. And I really must commend you on this post which does
not appear to be in your usual vocabulary. It is nice! Thank you And isn't
it nice to have choices in your reading material? Sue
Diamondsnstones
>
And I have been meaning to ask politely whether your name is Absolutely or if
this has some other meaning that you might share with us. Sue
Joe Keenan
>>
>>Legal!
>>
>>
>
>In what country?
>
Diamondsnstones
>Legal!
>
>
In what country?
Joe Keenan
because they know he's a lucky man! (major brown-nosing there!)
We do get casual looks. Must be my sparkling charm and personality radiating
about me about my humble self like a glowing aura. No?. It's just the way I
walk in my tight jeans! No?. My zipper is open? Sometimes!
Her parents are about 15 years older than I. She is the youngest of eight. I am
older than her oldest sibling by about 10 years though. Gee, this sounds like a
math test!
Diamondsnstones
>older than her oldest sibling by about 10 years though. Gee, this sounds like
>a
>math test!
>
So what's the right answer? Sue
Theresa
"Joe Keenan" <jkeen...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
> I remember you talking about this before. But we know people stare at you
guys
> because they know he's a lucky man! (major brown-nosing there!)
ROTFLOL! <snicker giggle> You bet you he is....and I'm a lucky gal ;)
> We do get casual looks. Must be my sparkling charm and personality
radiating
> about me about my humble self like a glowing aura. No?. It's just the way
I
> walk in my tight jeans! No?. My zipper is open? Sometimes!
No Joe...they're lookin' at her and contemplating "all that gorgeous
with...that?! hmmmmmm" ;)
> Her parents are about 15 years older than I. She is the youngest of
eight. I am
> older than her oldest sibling by about 10 years though. Gee, this sounds
like a
> math test!
>
You're math test is easier than mine! He was born in '36 and I was born in
'64. And his oldest son (of a total of six for him, two with me...our kids
half brother) has three kids which makes me a gramma! Yikes!! <g>
Theresa
Joe Keenan
>>older than her oldest sibling by about 10 years though. Gee, this sounds
>like
>>a
>>math test!
>>
>
I forget. What was the question?
Joe Keenan
>No Joe...they're lookin' at her and contemplating "all that gorgeous
>with...that?! hmmmmmm" ;)
>
Rats! The truth!
>You're math test is easier than mine! He was born in '36 and I was born in
>'64. And his oldest son (of a total of six for him, two with me...our kids
>half brother) has three kids which makes me a gramma! Yikes!! <g>
>
I was born in '60. My fiance in '80. My daughter in '83 and my son in '86. And,
yes, they are cool with it. Or as my son would say, "jiggy with it". Now the
cat's out of the bag. No more math tests!
Mary L. Wallace
Regarding your post defending Laura and your comments about John --
BLESS YOU!
"Nuff said! :-))))
Mary Lou
PS -- Love your name pun!
rockymou...@my-deja.com
jkeen...@aol.comnospam (Joe Keenan) wrote:
> >
> >
>
> I was born in '60. My fiance in '80.
Are you going to potti train her too?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Laura
been afraid to say anything! lol!
Thanks Mr Bondini... (do you look like
Sean Connery? I like him... ;-)
Laura
Joe Keenan
>>
>> I was born in '60. My fiance in '80.
>
>
>Are you going to potti train her too?
>
Well, well. An immature remark from someone who is going to bed alone tonight.
And last night. And tomorrow night. Me, I'll be all snug and warm and not alone
tonight. Nor was I last night nor will I be tomorrow night. And Cash, you know
that does not mean you!
Diamondsnstones
>that does not mean you!
>
He'll be so hurt and Hollie move over. There is going to be a big splash in
the Hollietub when Cash reads this!!!!!!! Sue
Summer
Yes, it is a horrible waste of energy and childs play at that! Yet, if
this turns their crank...what the heck! I'll just keep picking and
choosing. Thanks
In article <20000603174750...@ng-cg1.aol.com>,
chipan...@aol.comnospam (Laura) wrote:
> Summer..
> It's not so much the names of people.
> It's the people who use more than one
> name, and use several names to stir
> up trouble.
> Posting under false identities like that.
> Not so much that (making names up here)
> Bills name might really be Frank.. who would care?
> BUT.. when Bill posts as Bill, and
> as Imjohndenver, Rockymthigh and so on,
> for the sole purpose of attacking good people.. thats where
the "hidden
> identities"
> come in.
>
> I know.. horrible waste of energy, isn't it.
> Laura
rockymou...@my-deja.com
Bondini <bon...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> Take note, Dee. THIS is the kind of crap that JD hated.
Like you knew him really cool man.
> That one left us reeling, and still turns my stomach.
Take those tums sweety, we have more to come.
> Sue, if this is the county you are actually in, may I suggest you
> contact Deja and turn this person in for announcing it and slandering
> your name. Good luck to you.
Deja would laugh in her drugged up face. SHE posted it publicly when
all the idiots were confessing their self imposed addictions. What you
ought to be concerned about is this pillhead/mental case is allowed to
screw up children's minds in a classroom. So much for "the children"
sweety.
The Reverand Mary High
rockymou...@my-deja.com
jkeen...@aol.comnospam (Joe Keenan) wrote:
> >rockymou...@my-deja.com
>
> >>
> >> I was born in '60. My fiance in '80.
> >
> >
> >Are you going to potti train her too?
> >
>
> Well, well. An immature remark from someone who is going to bed alone
tonight.
> And last night. And tomorrow night. Me, I'll be all snug and warm and
not alone
you know
> that does not mean you!
All these old hags here are going to talk about you now. Tsk tsk. Did
you use the old "I'll show you my candy bars" line to get her into bed?
rockymou...@my-deja.com
Bondini <bon...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> If I were Laura and Hiway, I would by highly insulted by you.
> You wore two faces throughout this thread, then claim that people took
> it wrong. How can you say you aren't singling someone out, then quote
> them EACH time?
>
> Laura, I assure you, John would thank you for attempting to keep his
> daughters personal business out of the limelight.
> He hated for his children to be discussed in the publics eye.
> And yes, I CAN say that Dee. I did know him, quite well.
> And I will hide behind my screen name, and not tell you who I am.
> Truth speaks whether or not I post my name.
> Bondini, James Bondini ;-)
ROFLMAO. They are all hiding behind their screen names these days. And
all this time, I thought Hiway was on vacation. Fly Away comes to mind.
The Reverand Mary High
Taptotap
>all the idiots were confessing their self imposed addictions. What you
>ought to be concerned about is this pillhead/mental case is allowed to
>screw up children's minds in a classroom. So much for "the children"
>sweety.
>The Reverand Mary High
You are too pathetic and so transparent.
Get yourself into a 12 step program and quick.
Robin
CASHMEING
>that does not mean you!
>
I know and I'm already over it. ROFL
Cheri057
>From: Absolutely Cynthia Marie <bobby...@goplay.com>
> Now we're talking about flamewars, fake
>names, and beans.
>
>Absolutely Cynthia Marie
And fat kitty butts, and senior discounts, and.....LOL!
Cheri:)
Laura
Laura
Diamondsnstones
>You're right!! Must be time to change the subject line!!
>Laura
>
We can do that can't we Laura and Nancy and Cheri? We are really good at
this!!!!!!!!!!! Sue
Diamondsnstones
>ROFLMAO. They are all hiding behind their screen names these days. And
>all this time, I thought Hiway was on vacation. Fly Away comes to mind.
>
>The Reverand Mary High
>
>
the same way all the time. I don't think he meant he was entering your
league!!!!!!!!! I am almost sure of it. Sue
Diamondsnstones
>I know and I'm already over it. ROFL
>
>
No, he really isn't. He was crying all over the computer just hours ago! Sue