Re: whispers via email and all that strategy going on (WAS: Re: Uhmurikin Gulag Stories)

[Oldus Fartus]

Jenn expressed precisely :
> Eagle wrote:
>> Jenn was thinking very hard :
>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>> on 5/23/2013, Jenn supposed :
>>>>> On 5/23/2013 10:43 PM, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>> SeaNymph formulated on Thursday :
>>>>>>> On 5/23/2013 7:33 PM, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>> SeaNymph expects you to read this :
>>>>>>>>> On 5/23/2013 6:33 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:22:58 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/23/2013 6:11 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:06:14 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/23/2013 5:39 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:46:10 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark formulated on Thursday :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:17:08 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The truth is that eagle and jenn and bd all claim to be
>>>>>>>>>>> "friends". We've
>>>>>>>>>>> never made that claim.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course not. It's not as if we have any shared RL
>>>>>>>>>> experiences. All we
>>>>>>>>>> know of each other, all we need to know of each other, is
>>>>>>>>>> the pixels we
>>>>>>>>>> both cause to appear on the other's monitor screen. I
>>>>>>>>>> certainly wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>> characterise that as anything approaching friendship. Even
>>>>>>>>>> more ridiculous is the notion that we're 'paramours'.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's just another thing that certain posters use in an effort
>>>>>>>>> to be insulting, which is just childish. Truth be told, they
>>>>>>>>> should tread a little more carefully sometimes, imo, because
>>>>>>>>> there are some interesting questions out there about some of
>>>>>>>>> their "relationships". Just saying
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh do tell...buhahahahahahaha!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, I could tell plenty, as could others. But I won't and for
>>>>>>> the simple reason that I don't believe that sort of thing should
>>>>>>> be discussed in a place like this. I don't think that ridiculous
>>>>>>> nonsense like you're so fond of has any place in here. But think
>>>>>>> about it a bit, and think of some of the things you, and some of
>>>>>>> your friends, have posted in here about what you do. You give
>>>>>>> away a lot, without even realizing it I believe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah...uh huh...right.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I wonder why they are so proud that they are not friends?? Says a
>>>>> lot about them, don't you think?
>>
>>>> I don't understand their reasoning in this matter. Their idea of
>>>> 'friendship' is very different from how we see friendship. The only
>>
>>> Evidently, they are still living in the past.
>>
>>
>>>> thing missing is the face to face interaction, and that is only a
>>>> part of the whole. When you and I finally meet, it will be like
>>>> long lost friends getting together. That, and sharing a drink or
>>>> two...
>>
>>
>>> yeah!!
>>
>>>> No SN, this is not a ^5, just two friends [and two non-whatever]
>>>> discussing the topic at hand.
>>
>>> ... non-enemies? haahaha
>>
>> I suppose. I really don't know what they see their 'relationship'? as
>> being. They get along here, and I won't assume how they get on in
>> email or skype, that would be for ron to slime about.
>
> I imagine their email conversations are all to do with strategy on how they
> will slam someone on usenet!

Oh looky, Jenn screws it up again!

--
Cheers
Oldus Fartus