Jenni/Dex/Courtney in the Washington Post
Susan
For once, no fluff.
neitzch...@my-deja.com
"Susan" <su...@nowhere.inv> wrote:
> http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
>
> For once, no fluff.
>
>
Washington Post article on the Jenni/Dex/Courtney ordeal. I knew from
her website that Courtney is her last name, but she gives the first name
out for the article. Also, it is mentioned that "Dex" is a nickname, not
his real name - and that both Jenni & Courtney wouldn't say what his
real name is. Dex didn't want to comment on the article either. Can you
blame him? Anything he could say would make him look like an asshole.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Theodoric of York, Medieval Barber
"Susan" <su...@nowhere.inv> wrote:
> http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
>
> For once, no fluff.
>
Interesting. The Post is pretty hard on Jenni, about as negative as
Jeff's piece was. Absolutely no fluff here; Jenni is never referred to
as a "freelance web designer" or a "programmer". There are none of the
references in the infamous Capture Magazine piece to "8 hours a day of
coding, 7 days a week". Instead, Libby Copeland observes, "the stunt
[Jennicam] got old." No worship a la Sheila Murphy in the Post piece;
it looks like Copeland did good groundwork and even tried to get Jenni
to fess up about what the cam brings in. Jenni admits to losing
a "couple of dozen members". And Jenni, we are told, has
problems "philosophically" with her critics.
Overall, a good piece. Should be on Sheila Murphy's required reading
list.
neitzch...@my-deja.com
Theodoric of York, Medieval Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
I am sure there will be people (especially in the JKR camp) who will cry
foul, but it was a fair piece. She got info from both Courtney & Jenni,
so it seems to be a pretty much complete picture (except for that COWARD
Dex who wouldn't talk, and would even say what his real name is, just
his "nickname" is Dex)
It's interesting that the article comes from Jenni's former town of
residence for so long. Guess there is no love for here there.
William Crow Feather Burke
>In article <sqfl83o...@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Susan" <su...@nowhere.inv> wrote:
>> http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
>>
>> For once, no fluff.
>>
>>
>Interesting enough, Courtney's first name is mentioned in that
>Washington Post article on the Jenni/Dex/Courtney ordeal. I knew from
>her website that Courtney is her last name, but she gives the first name
>out for the article. Also, it is mentioned that "Dex" is a nickname, not
>his real name - and that both Jenni & Courtney wouldn't say what his
>real name is. Dex didn't want to comment on the article either. Can you
>blame him? Anything he could say would make him look like an asshole.
It's GOTTA be "Poindexter", then! Poindexter LePew Rothanburger,
something like that....
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.
--
"Always remember, there's no place in vulgarity for bluegrass."
-- Steve Earle
yack
Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
latit...@my-deja.com
.. i like that too .. it makes the 'hefty' comment *almost*
palatable ...
yack
> In article <its-0310B7.1...@news.mts.net>,
> yack <i...@SPAMBEGONE.secret.com> wrote:
> > In article <8o8ps0$pvu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Theodoric of York, Medieval
> > Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
> >
> > I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
> >
> > --
> > http://surrealcams.com
>
> .. i like that too .. it makes the 'hefty' comment *almost*
> palatable ...
>
>
it's funny how I don't regard comments like 'hefty', I forget that
others might be more sensitive to them.
Being a 'hefty' person myself doesn't automatically make me give a shit
if others focus on that stuff. If someone makes a comment to me about
my weight, my usual response is 'Duh!, you think I don't know?'
It doesn't matter how big someone is, just how naked they are.
Mr. Sniffalottapuss
>http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
>
>
>For once, no fluff.
>
"She has difficulty "philosophically," she says, with "the idea that
people who don't even really know me, haven't ever met me, think that
they know enough about my life to know what they would do in the same
situation."
What a total idiot. What a total blithering idiot.
Why would I need to know *ANYTHING* about her in order to know what I
would do in a similar situation? I know what I (and the vast
majority of normal decent people) would do -- I wouldn't fuck my
friend's financee.
---------------------------------------------
Son: Dad, how do you spell "posse"?
Father: Well no wonder you can't spell it,
you're not even pronouncing it right.
-Llama Upp Yerass
Stephanie
happened.
James David Walley
>.. i like that too .. it makes the 'hefty' comment *almost*
>palatable ...
...almost...but not quite...
|==================================================================|
| James David Walley, a/BSG | "How do you know I'm mad?" |
|--------------------------------|said Alice. |
| jwa...@eskimo.com | "You must be," said the Cat, |
| http://www.eskimo.com/~jwalley/|"or you wouldn't have come here."|
|==================================================================|
| PGP Public Key available from home page. |
| Fingerprint: 923F 5B52 3023 C8B2 2F3E 436F 1C00 2533 F71D C715 |
|==================================================================|
James David Walley
>http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
>
>
>For once, no fluff.
-----------------------------------------
"'There's really no animosity between the two of us,' Jenni says over
the phone. 'Courtney and I firmly believe we'll be friends again.'"
-----------------------------------------
Boys and girls, can you say "delusional"...? Sure, you can!
EasyRiderSoltero
*definitely* not hefty. I personally view her as very attractive, both
physically and otherwise. More proof that nice people finish last (in some
people's opinions!) yet finish first with those who value sensitivity and
compassion. The karma wheel will roll over "Dex" (cowardly nickname) and
you-know-who!
"Susan" <su...@nowhere.inv> wrote in message
news:sqfl83o...@corp.supernews.com...
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Mr. Sniffalottapuss
<easyride...@aol.com> wrote:
>Excellent article, fair and balanced. However, Courtney (Pamela?) is most
>*definitely* not hefty.
Check out the JenniShow that has video of their trip from DC to CA.
"Hefty" is not the nicest or most politically correct way to describe
Courtney, but it's true. That doesn't mean she isn't a good person.
Fred the Redshirt
Uh, the entire article, indeed the entire subject matter of the
article is fluff.
Good article though.
--
Fred the Redshirt
Fallacies do the most damage when they are used in a well-intended
but ill-conceived effort to defend objective truth.
Fred the Redshirt
latit...@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <its-0310B7.1...@news.mts.net>,
> yack <i...@SPAMBEGONE.secret.com> wrote:
> > In article <8o8ps0$pvu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Theodoric of York,
Medieval
> > Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
> >
> > I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
> >
Right at the top of the article there are three large pics of
Jenni which is what caught my eye. I guess they had a lot of
white space to fill on that page.
yack
<fredf...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> In article <8o95q1$73h$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> latit...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > In article <its-0310B7.1...@news.mts.net>,
> > yack <i...@SPAMBEGONE.secret.com> wrote:
> > > In article <8o8ps0$pvu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Theodoric of York,
> Medieval
> > > Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
> > >
> > > I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
> > >
>
> Right at the top of the article there are three large pics of
> Jenni which is what caught my eye. I guess they had a lot of
> white space to fill on that page.
>
hmmm, must be the paper version, I sure don't see any jenni pics on the
link above.
AndiH
Fred the Redshirt <fredf...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8obnh7$sao$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <8o95q1$73h$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> latit...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > In article <its-0310B7.1...@news.mts.net>,
> > yack <i...@SPAMBEGONE.secret.com> wrote:
> > > In article <8o8ps0$pvu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Theodoric of York,
> Medieval
> > > Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
> > >
> > > I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
> > >
>
> Right at the top of the article there are three large pics of
> Jenni which is what caught my eye. I guess they had a lot of
> white space to fill on that page.
>
> Fred the Redshirt
Hmmm...I see no Jenni pics. On the other hand there is a small ad right
next to the article "Adopt a pet from the ASPCA" with a picture of a very
cute little kitten. Maybe the cat's pleas have been heard? :)
--
AndiH - Wants a kitty that won't make her snuffle and ah-choo
http://www.andih.com
William Crow Feather Burke
<fredf...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>In article <sqfl83o...@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Susan" <su...@nowhere.inv> wrote:
>> http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
>>
>> For once, no fluff.
>>
>
>Uh, the entire article, indeed the entire subject matter of the
>article is fluff.
>
>Good article though.
>
>--
>Fred the Redshirt
So you're telling us you like fluff, Red, er... Fred? That's very revealing.
>
>Fallacies do the most damage when they are used in a well-intended
>but ill-conceived effort to defend objective truth.
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.
--
Widlwant
Susan <su...@nowhere.inv> wrote in message
news:sqfl83o...@corp.supernews.com...
> http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
Hey jenni.... more publicity! What are you waiting for?
Put the link up! <wink>
William Rothanburg
And the reporter was smart enough to NOT give the URL for
Jennicam. Too bad others weren't that bright.
Bill
Michael L. McLean
<Bit...@Herbutt.net> wrote:
*Wheee* and article about *Meeee*
neitzch...@my-deja.com
yack <i...@SPAMBEGONE.secret.com> wrote:
> In article <8o8ps0$pvu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Theodoric of York, Medieval
> Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
>
> I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
>
ONE gripe I have is that the author makes reference to Courtney's
weight, calling her fat basically. From the pics I have seen of her, she
looks good enough to eat!! I like them with some curves to 'em!! :)
Why did the author have to say that about Courtney though?
Christopher Zguris
the slender, sexy, Jenni... Personally, I don't agree, but Courtney said as
much when she posted something about not being able to compete w/the slim,
sexy, famous Jenni, so perhaps the author picked it up from the journal.
To me, there's more to "attractive" than just pretty. I can think of plenty
of gorgous women w/personalities than make them damned unattractive. I'm in
midtown Manhattan, heart of model country, so I've seen unattractive
personalities up close.
neitzch...@my-deja.com wrote in message <8odoup$366$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
Jeff
most would consider her moderately attractive (until she opened her mouth),
but hardly a slim, sexy vamp. It was really sad reading Courtney's post last
month that she couldn't compete. Celebrity - even on the "Jenni" level - can
really skew our perceptions.
In article <sql0iv1...@corp.supernews.com>, "Christopher Zguris"
neitzch...@my-deja.com
"Christopher Zguris" <czg...@SPAM-ME-NOTchristopherzguris.com> wrote:
> Perhaps to make Jenni look more vamp-sh and Courtney more of a victim?
ie -
> the slender, sexy, Jenni... Personally, I don't agree, but Courtney
said as
> much when she posted something about not being able to compete w/the
slim,
> sexy, famous Jenni, so perhaps the author picked it up from the
journal.
>
> To me, there's more to "attractive" than just pretty. I can think of
plenty
> of gorgous women w/personalities than make them damned unattractive.
I'm in
> midtown Manhattan, heart of model country, so I've seen unattractive
> personalities up close.
>
I would HARDLY call Jenni thin at all!!! I happen to think that Courtney
is quite voluptous, I think she is very well put together!!
neitzch...@my-deja.com
<8s3iqs8votmgeqglf...@news.sniffalottapuss.edu>,
I think Courtney is beautiful, just the way she is!!!
I am publicly making a play for her right here & now. :)
Stay away you fools, once her mourning period is over I plan on wooing
her & treating her like the woman she is. She deserves a man who is
kind, caring and willing to go the extra mile to treat her like a lady!!
Dex doesn't even deserve to breathe the same air as Courtney...
yack
wrote:
> In article <its-0310B7.1...@news.mts.net>,
> yack <i...@SPAMBEGONE.secret.com> wrote:
> > In article <8o8ps0$pvu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Theodoric of York, Medieval
> > Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
> >
> > I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
> >
>
>
>
> ONE gripe I have is that the author makes reference to Courtney's
> weight, calling her fat basically. From the pics I have seen of her, she
> looks good enough to eat!! I like them with some curves to 'em!! :)
>
> Why did the author have to say that about Courtney though?
>
I thought the vague point was that d'ex took the first opportunity he
had to go to 'greener pastures', with jenni being younger, thinner,
famous (relatively), and perhaps rich. I do agree with many however
that Courtney is great looking. I think most of us here would desire a
relationship with her before jenni.
neitzch...@my-deja.com
> I thought the vague point was that d'ex took the first opportunity he
> had to go to 'greener pastures', with jenni being younger, thinner,
> famous (relatively), and perhaps rich. I do agree with many however
> that Courtney is great looking. I think most of us here would desire
a
> relationship with her before jenni.
>
I think Courtney has alot more to offer a man in a positive way, where
Jenni has shown negative & destructive behavior. She seems to use men
until she fills her need of them (maybe she is a succubus???)
Courtney has brains, charm, beauty, a sense of humor, and class - things
Jenni will never have no matter how long & hard she tries.
Sam
<czg...@SPAM-ME-NOTchristopherzguris.com> wrote:
>
>To me, there's more to "attractive" than just pretty. I can think of plenty
>of gorgous women w/personalities than make them damned unattractive. I'm in
>midtown Manhattan, heart of model country, so I've seen unattractive
>personalities up close.
>
work in television with the occasional foray into films. Out of all
the people I've worked with (and I've worked as an Assistant Director
and Cinematographer before writing) I've found that the "middle tier"
of celebrities (you know, the ones who are 'second bananas' or star in
inferior shows -- my apologies to the WB and UPN...) are the biggest
assholes!
Not that JenniScam would even be in THAT bracket, but she is
prototypical of those who think the world revolves around them and
can't even tie their own shoes or break wind without an assistant --
and those assistants are usually really pathetic wannabes who will
never make it past the boot-licking level.
As far as physical looks go, some of the most 'beautiful' women in
Hollywood are so ugly on the inside -- bitchy, rude, inconsiderate,
nasty -- that any 'average' woman on the street in L.A. is ten times
more desirable.
JenniScam was a cute, likeable young woman in college who had a great
idea at the right time. What we see on the camera now is a hollow
shell of a woman who flew to close to the light of "fame" and got
burned.
If D'ex were half a man (insert your own joke here...) he'd grab a
fire extinguisher...
National Audio Visual Conservation Center
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
Ooooh, this is *exciting*! Our first afj affair... well, since Ludwig
and Toddy, anyway.
National Audio Visual Conservation Center
yack wrote:
>
> In article <8odoup$366$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, neitzch...@my-deja.com
> wrote:
>
> > In article <its-0310B7.1...@news.mts.net>,
> > yack <i...@SPAMBEGONE.secret.com> wrote:
> > > In article <8o8ps0$pvu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Theodoric of York, Medieval
> > > Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
> > >
> > > I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ONE gripe I have is that the author makes reference to Courtney's
> > weight, calling her fat basically. From the pics I have seen of her, she
> > looks good enough to eat!! I like them with some curves to 'em!! :)
> >
> > Why did the author have to say that about Courtney though?
> >
>
> I thought the vague point was that d'ex took the first opportunity he
> had to go to 'greener pastures', with jenni being younger, thinner,
> famous (relatively), and perhaps rich. I do agree with many however
> that Courtney is great looking. I think most of us here would desire a
> relationship with her before jenni.
If it's a show of hands you were suggesting, mine is up! ME! MINE!!
>
> --
> http://surrealcams.com
Mr. Sniffalottapuss
wrote:
>> ONE gripe I have is that the author makes reference to Courtney's
>> weight, calling her fat basically. From the pics I have seen of her, she
>> looks good enough to eat!! I like them with some curves to 'em!! :)
>>
>> Why did the author have to say that about Courtney though?
>>
>
>I thought the vague point was that d'ex took the first opportunity he
>had to go to 'greener pastures', with jenni being younger, thinner,
>famous (relatively), and perhaps rich. I do agree with many however
>that Courtney is great looking. I think most of us here would desire a
>relationship with her before jenni.
I thinks there's no question that Courtney would be a far more
desirable person once you got to know her -- in terms of personality
she is light years away from Jenni. However, all the pictures I seen
of Courtney (JenniShow and cam shots when Jenni first moved to CA)
show Courtney to be quite.....um.....hefty (as the Washington Post
writer put it). But that doesn't make her undesirable -- there's
more to a relationship than looks and everybody can't have a
supermodel as a wife/girlfriend -- nor does everybody even want one.
But, if you didn't know either of them, and just judged them on
appearance (which all of us do, whether we want to admit it or not)
then Jenni would certainly appear to be the younger, more attractive
and more desirable of the two. And it's clear that Courntey felt the
same way. Although Jenni would certainly not be called "slender",
she is when compared to Courtney (at least the pictures I've seen)
and, knowing how men tend to be, Courtney felt she couldn't "compete"
against a younger, more attractive woman who also just happened to be
(somewhat) famous.
In the end, however, Courtney wins because a Karma explosion of
volcanic proportions is building. And, best of all, Dex will not go
quietly. Unlike his alleged plans for Courtney, he will not simply
drive away in his van, with nothing but his guitar and underwear. He
has hitched his wagon to the Jennicam gravy train, and Jenni will be
in for quite a surprise when she tries to simply walk away, like she
did with Jawfree, Bawb, Mr. Radio, the Hospice, etc.......
It will be loud and messy. And we'll all enjoy the show.
Jeff
<snip>
>In the end, however, Courtney wins because a Karma explosion of
>volcanic proportions is building. And, best of all, Dex will not go
>quietly. Unlike his alleged plans for Courtney, he will not simply
>drive away in his van, with nothing but his guitar and underwear. He
>has hitched his wagon to the Jennicam gravy train, and Jenni will be
>in for quite a surprise when she tries to simply walk away, like she
>did with Jawfree, Bawb, Mr. Radio, the Hospice, etc.......
>
>It will be loud and messy. And we'll all enjoy the show.
Any bets, when the time comes, there will be days on end of "Jennicam is
experiencing technical difficulties"?
William Crow Feather Burke
Mr. Sniffalottapuss <placebo...@sniffalottapuss.edu> wrote:
>In the end, however, Courtney wins because a Karma explosion of
>volcanic proportions is building. And, best of all, Dex will not go
>quietly. Unlike his alleged plans for Courtney, he will not simply
>drive away in his van, with nothing but his guitar and underwear. He
>has hitched his wagon to the Jennicam gravy train, and Jenni will be
>in for quite a surprise when she tries to simply walk away, like she
>did with Jawfree, Bawb, Mr. Radio, the Hospice, etc.......
>
>It will be loud and messy. And we'll all enjoy the show.
It'll be Hell in a Kitchen, and World War III together... I'll start
watching again. Maybe.
Ludwig
Conservation Center <culp...@erols.com> wrote:
>
> > I thought the vague point was that d'ex took the first opportunity he
> > had to go to 'greener pastures', with jenni being younger, thinner,
> > famous (relatively), and perhaps rich. I do agree with many however
> > that Courtney is great looking. I think most of us here would desire a
> > relationship with her before jenni.
>
> If it's a show of hands you were suggesting, mine is up! ME! MINE!!
> >
I've thought this several times. Courtney is almost enough to make a
gay man go straight.
I mean this.
Ludwig.
--
Visit JonniCAM Live!
http://go.to/jonnicam
National Audio Visual Conservation Center
If I didn't think "worship sites" were inherently absurd, I'd put one up
to Courtney.
And if I didn't "know better", I'd say you, Ludwig Teugels, aren't gay
at all...
But of course, that's not "true"! :)
William Rothanburg
1. Courtney is definitely NOT supermodel-thin. IMHO, not a big
deal, it's a fact, NOT a criticism.
2. Obviously, the reporter (or the editor) wanted to pad the
article a little, and was to lazy to find a less offensive word.
Bill
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:20:43 GMT, neitzch...@my-deja.com wrote:
>In article <its-0310B7.1...@news.mts.net>,
> yack <i...@SPAMBEGONE.secret.com> wrote:
>> In article <8o8ps0$pvu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Theodoric of York, Medieval
>> Barber <theodori...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>
>> > http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27035-2000Aug25.html
>>
>> I like how there is no picture of jenni, just Dex and Courtney.
>>
>
>
>
>ONE gripe I have is that the author makes reference to Courtney's
>weight, calling her fat basically. From the pics I have seen of her, she
>looks good enough to eat!! I like them with some curves to 'em!! :)
>
>Why did the author have to say that about Courtney though?
>
>
neitzch...@my-deja.com
William Rothanburg <william.r...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> Neitzche,
>
> 1. Courtney is definitely NOT supermodel-thin. IMHO, not a big
> deal, it's a fact, NOT a criticism.
>
> 2. Obviously, the reporter (or the editor) wanted to pad the
> article a little, and was to lazy to find a less offensive word.
>
> Bill
>
It was odd that they chose that as the negative item about Courtney. I
mean, the fact she was played by Jenni & Dex is obvious, but that showed
a lack of professionalism on the writer's part to call her 'hefty'. That
didn't make any sense, or are we to believe that it was ok for Dex to
dump her since she is hefty? Like that one thing (even though I don't
agree with it, she isn't hefty, she is voluptous) makes everything that
happened ok.
Ludwig
Anonymous <nob...@noisebox.remailer.org> wrote:
> Ludwig straightly says:
>
> >I've thought this several times. Courtney is almost enough to make a
> >gay man go straight.
>
> Or a straight woman go gay!
You're turning lesbian?
Congratulations! Should we send flowers?
William Crow Feather Burke
Anonymous <nob...@noisebox.remailer.org> wrote:
>Ludwig straightly says:
>
>>I've thought this several times. Courtney is almost enough to make a
>>gay man go straight.
>
>Or a straight woman go gay!
>
>>I mean this.
>
>Me too!
>
>Pamela Courtney, we'd pay good money to see you naked!
>
>I wish PLAYBOY would make Pamela an offer!
>
>Screw Ringley! Give us Pamela Courtney any day!
I think we should move on and discuss more important issues of the day,
such as "WHY is Doug Flutie having a meal with Terry Bradshaw?"
Robert Taylor
Ludwig wrote:
> You're turning lesbian?
>
> Congratulations! Should we send flowers?
I thought the appropriate gift was a toaster oven.
Robert Taylor
William Crow Feather Burke wrote:
>
> I think we should move on and discuss more important issues of the day,
> such as "WHY is Doug Flutie having a meal with Terry Bradshaw?"
Will Pinball Clemons lure Doug Flutie back to the Argonauts where he is
really needed?
William Crow Feather Burke
<tayl...@idirect.com> wrote:
You can only use so many toaster ovens. HOWEVER, Wal-Mart WILL give you
"your" money back on return (no matter where you bought it!), if you are
assertive enough. I once saw them exchange a broken shovel that the owner
had left outside over the winter. This guy had the chutzpah to exchange
an $8 broken shovel that was HIS FAULT.
Hand-crocheted potholders hold up well under winter wear and tear. That's
what I'm sending!
William Crow Feather Burke
<tayl...@idirect.com> wrote:
Why would ANYONE have a meal with Terry Bradshaw?
