Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What has happened to this group?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Luis Rodriguez

unread,
Oct 15, 2009, 4:46:13 PM10/15/09
to
I haven't been here in a long time, so I thought I'd check in, and now
it's nothing but spam. What has happened to this once-great group?
Where are all of the regulars?

Matt L

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 4:12:09 PM10/16/09
to

There is typically a lull in posting between films. May be a year or
so until scripting and casting for Bond 23 moves ahead and posting
will pick back up around that time.

Would be good to have a new book to talk about in the meantime though.


Regards,
Matt

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 4:31:15 PM10/16/09
to

Well, we don't need a thread like this discussing the absense of
discussion, nor someone like Mr. Rodriguez to complain he's not
sufficiently entertained.

If Mr. Rodriguez would like to see on topic discussion in this
newsgroup, he's always free to begin a thread. And complaining about
WQ as he all too often does doesn't count.

The Shadow

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 10:15:55 PM10/16/09
to


I think that some lost the alt newsgroups.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Oct 16, 2009, 10:43:04 PM10/16/09
to

As it happens, the affected Verizon customers have no Usenet service at
all through their ISP and had to subscribe to a News Service Provider
separately. This was to be expected.

The era of receiving News as part of one's ISP subscription is pretty
much over.

Luis Rodriguez

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 4:14:43 PM10/19/09
to
"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>Well, we don't need a thread like this discussing the absense of
>discussion, nor someone like Mr. Rodriguez to complain he's not
>sufficiently entertained.

I wasn't trying to insult anyone, Adam, or imply anyone needed to
entertain me. My apologies if it came across that way. I simply
wondered if the board was still active, given that I logged in and
only spam downloaded to my Usenet reader, which was surprising given
how long it had been since I'd checked the group. I was simply
wondering if everyone had gone away, that's all. I wasn't trying to
pick a fight. This is a great group--I was just lamenting what I
perceived as it no longer existing. Apparently, I was incorrect.

>If Mr. Rodriguez would like to see on topic discussion in this
>newsgroup, he's always free to begin a thread.

Yes, I know--but first, I wanted to see if the group was still active.
I didn't see a point in doing so if the group had lost all of its
regulars during my long absence.

>And complaining about WQ as he all too often does doesn't count.

I'm afraid I don't understand what that means. Was it directed at me?
What is WQ an acronym for? I don't recognize the acronym.

Luis Rodriguez

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 4:15:37 PM10/19/09
to
Incidentally, Adam, I'm still only receiving spam in my reader when I
check this group. Apparently, my question was the only non-spam
posted. So I wasn't incorrect after all.

Fuoco Insensato

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 5:30:05 PM10/19/09
to
Well, yes all that spam is annoying, but on a lighter note, the Roger
Moore Post Office ads raise a smile, if not an eyebrow:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-uMG2kOQBI

"You couldn't tell me where I am, could you?" At least he can laugh at
himself, like William Shatner. Maybe Connery could do some ads for RBS.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 11:29:48 PM10/19/09
to
Luis Rodriguez <Lu...@aol.com> wrote:
>Adam wrote:

>I wasn't trying to insult anyone, Adam, or imply anyone needed to
>entertain me. My apologies if it came across that way. I simply
>wondered if the board was still active, given that I logged in and
>only spam downloaded to my Usenet reader, which was surprising given
>how long it had been since I'd checked the group.

Just post an on topic message! That's how you test interest.

>>If Mr. Rodriguez would like to see on topic discussion in this
>>newsgroup, he's always free to begin a thread.

>Yes, I know--but first, I wanted to see if the group was still active.

Then you ARE waiting for someone else to entertain you.

>I didn't see a point in doing so if the group had lost all of its
>regulars during my long absence.

That made it your turn to go first.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Oct 19, 2009, 11:31:04 PM10/19/09
to
Luis Rodriguez <Lu...@aol.com> wrote:

That's on your News service provider. If you have one that implements
spam countermeasures, then you'll see nearly no spam on Usenet in any group.

Luis Rodriguez

unread,
Oct 21, 2009, 2:01:48 PM10/21/09
to
"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>If Mr. Rodriguez would like to see on topic discussion in this
>>>newsgroup, he's always free to begin a thread.
>>Yes, I know--but first, I wanted to see if the group was still active.
>Then you ARE waiting for someone else to entertain you.

No, not at all--I was simply checking to see if this group was still
used by fans, that's all.

But I have no interest in turning this into a debate, so I'll make it
on-topic and say that I've recently begun rewatching all of the films
on DVD, from the Ultimate Edition boxsets. I'm amazed at how great
these films look all these years later--and how much more vibrant they
are, now that they've gone through the remastering process. Are they
all as improved as the first three, or did those just benefit the most
because they were the oldest?

The Shadow

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 5:35:35 PM10/27/09
to

They are all improvements, at least that is what I think.

Tom

unread,
Nov 30, 2009, 8:21:21 PM11/30/09
to

I too have not been here in a long time and was also surprised at the
amount of spam, a phenomenon virtually non-existent. It's a shame. I
don't visit regularly anymore mostly because I lost Usenet access.

I'm still in touch with more than a few of the friends I've made on
this board, and Paul and I are still publishing HMSS. So that hasn't
changed.

Will look forward to 23 and share more thoughts as the date nears.

Best to all my old friends here. (If any of you are present!)


Tom Zielinski
"In Sparta we have no room for a spammed AFJB!"

Tom

unread,
Nov 30, 2009, 8:26:53 PM11/30/09
to

Should have read "virtually non-existent in years past."

Sorry.

Tom
"In Sparta we have no room for diminished typing skills while using an
iPhone!"

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Nov 30, 2009, 11:30:32 PM11/30/09
to
Tom <rt...@comcast.net> wrote:

>I too have not been here in a long time and was also surprised at the
>amount of spam, a phenomenon virtually non-existent. It's a shame. I
>don't visit regularly anymore mostly because I lost Usenet access.

Tom, please contact me so I can help you subscribe again to a proper
News server. I've been trying to get you signed up for two years!

Tom

unread,
Dec 1, 2009, 11:42:26 AM12/1/09
to

I know you have and appreciate it, Adam. Free Agent was a bust. What
else do you suggest?


Tom
"In Sparta we have no room for Forte's poor customer service!"

Big Craigie

unread,
Dec 1, 2009, 11:52:04 AM12/1/09
to

"Tom" <rt...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3a4a7d2e-a0b0-417d...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Sorry.

Tom

I posted a Bond question a couple of weeks ago entitled "Where are we with
the next film" or something along these lines. Spam sadly well is spam, but
there are ways to filter is out so that you dont see it.
Craig


Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 1, 2009, 7:41:36 PM12/1/09
to
Tom <rt...@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Nov 30, 10:30 pm, "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>Tom <rt...@comcast.net> wrote:

>>>I too have not been here in a long time and was also surprised at the
>>>amount of spam, a phenomenon virtually non-existent. It's a shame.

>>>don't visit regularly anymore mostly because I lost Usenet access.

>>Tom, please contact me so I can help you subscribe again to a proper
>>News server. I've been trying to get you signed up for two years!

>I know you have and appreciate it, Adam. Free Agent was a bust. What
>else do you suggest?

slrn runs on Windows and has a precompiled binary. It's not like
Free Agent but once you get used to it, you'll like it better.

http://slrn.sourceforge.net/

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 2, 2009, 12:02:32 AM12/2/09
to
Tom <rt...@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Nov 30, 10:30 pm, "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>Tom <rt...@comcast.net> wrote:

>>>I too have not been here in a long time and was also surprised at the
>>>amount of spam, a phenomenon virtually non-existent. It's a shame.

>>>don't visit regularly anymore mostly because I lost Usenet access.

>>Tom, please contact me so I can help you subscribe again to a proper
>>News server. I've been trying to get you signed up for two years!

>I know you have and appreciate it, Adam. Free Agent was a bust. What
>else do you suggest?

Actually, Gravity is probably a better option for a former Agent user than
slrn:

http://mpgravity.sourceforge.net/

Tom

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 10:41:43 AM12/3/09
to

Thanks for the info but in fact, I never used Free Agent. It was MS
Outlook. Also, I have an iMac.

Any other suggestions?


Tom

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 11:34:16 AM12/3/09
to

>>http://mpgravity.sourceforge.net/

>Any other suggestions?

I didn't know you needed Mac software. I'll ask again.

You should really hang out in news.software.readers.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 3, 2009, 12:19:07 PM12/3/09
to

>>>http://mpgravity.sourceforge.net/

>>Any other suggestions?

Some Mac users use MT-NewsWatcher

http://smfr.org/mtnw/

Here's a page of reviews of other newsreaders: http://macorchard.com/usenet/

The Shadow

unread,
Dec 5, 2009, 5:04:55 AM12/5/09
to

Hey Tom, still here and I am the one with the spam.


Buy now, pay later!

Paul Clarke

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 6:05:27 PM12/7/09
to

Yeah, I'm here off and on, mostly lurking. Glad to see you're still
around. When's then next HMSS due? (and need any articles?)

--

For another such kiss, I would invent an entire continent.

http://www.imagewordsound.wordpress.com/

Mac

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 3:01:06 PM12/16/09
to
Tom wrote:

> Thanks for the info but in fact, I never used Free Agent. It was MS
> Outlook. Also, I have an iMac.
>
> Any other suggestions?

I'm a Mac too (on a PC) and suggest you shell out the ridiculously small sum
for news.individual.net. You get all newsgroups and spam free to boot.

--Mac (popping in)


Mac

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 3:03:42 PM12/16/09
to

http://news.individual.net/

-- Mac (and again...)

0 new messages