In article <
f76ec45d-aec3-4584...@googlegroups.com>,
<
edrh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>(Quote)
>>Very good! As Bond films go, it's kind of a "guilty pleasure." It
>>doesn't make a lot of sense as a film, but I like Connery and it's
>>interesting to see Jimmy Dean acting again.
>
>Ever saw the many version of Casino Royale?
>(End Quote)
>
>Yes! Barry Nelson as American gambler "Jimmy Bond," approached by MI6
>operator Felix Leiter! It was laughable!
>
>The 1967 film with David Niven was just too chaotic to make any sense of.
>
>Daniel Craig's first outing as Bond was very good, although one critic
>thought the character should have been named James BOURNE!
On for the James Bond Group.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@
nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@
nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Flattery is like cologne water, to be smelt of, not swallowed. -Josh Billings