Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
0 views
Skip to first unread message
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
Jun 18, 2013, 11:43:14 PM6/18/13
to
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new
documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of
crash is wrong
FoxNews.com
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
July 16, 2008: The remains of the TWA Flight 800 from New
York to Paris that exploded off Long Island, New York at
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Training
Facility in Ashburn,Virginia. (REUTERS/HYUNGWON KANG)
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation
experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim
that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight
800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down
the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago.
However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original
investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was
shot down.
Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK
airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute
to Paris when it exploded and crashed off the coast of
nearby East Moriches, Long Island, killing everyone on
the plane.
Continues at:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/18/twa-flight-800-investigators-break-silence-in-new-documentary-claim-original/?intcmp=trending
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of
crash is wrong
FoxNews.com
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
July 16, 2008: The remains of the TWA Flight 800 from New
York to Paris that exploded off Long Island, New York at
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Training
Facility in Ashburn,Virginia. (REUTERS/HYUNGWON KANG)
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation
experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim
that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight
800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down
the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago.
However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original
investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was
shot down.
Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK
airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute
to Paris when it exploded and crashed off the coast of
nearby East Moriches, Long Island, killing everyone on
the plane.
Continues at:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/18/twa-flight-800-investigators-break-silence-in-new-documentary-claim-original/?intcmp=trending
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Freedom Man
Jun 19, 2013, 1:19:37 PM6/19/13
to
Hundreds of people testified to seeing a MISSILE go up, explode near the
plane, and then the plane went down.
Then the coverup began, complete with the controlled media's complicity.
We were given a nonsensical official explanation that pretty much ignored
the witness's testimony, on the par with the government coverup lies about
9/11.
What did make the news later was that some investigator got ahold of remains
of the plane to test for high explosive residues, but he was arrested and
the evidence siezed by the government.
My take on all this? Either:
1) It was a successful terrorist strike that the government saw fit to
cover up.
2) It was a military "accident," which they always cover up when there are
civilian casualties.
3) It was a test, a false-flag attack, perpetrated to see how successfully
they could control the media, deceive the public, and go on to commit such
greater false-flag atrocities as 9/11.
plane, and then the plane went down.
Then the coverup began, complete with the controlled media's complicity.
We were given a nonsensical official explanation that pretty much ignored
the witness's testimony, on the par with the government coverup lies about
9/11.
What did make the news later was that some investigator got ahold of remains
of the plane to test for high explosive residues, but he was arrested and
the evidence siezed by the government.
My take on all this? Either:
1) It was a successful terrorist strike that the government saw fit to
cover up.
2) It was a military "accident," which they always cover up when there are
civilian casualties.
3) It was a test, a false-flag attack, perpetrated to see how successfully
they could control the media, deceive the public, and go on to commit such
greater false-flag atrocities as 9/11.
David Johnston
Jul 5, 2013, 7:13:58 PM7/5/13
to
On 6/18/2013 9:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new
> documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of
> crash is wrong
>
> FoxNews.com
> Tuesday, June 18, 2013
>
> July 16, 2008: The remains of the TWA Flight 800 from New
> York to Paris that exploded off Long Island, New York at
> National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Training
> Facility in Ashburn,Virginia. (REUTERS/HYUNGWON KANG)
>
> A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation
> experts,
In order to be a whistleblower, one must be part of the thing about
> TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new
> documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of
> crash is wrong
>
> FoxNews.com
> Tuesday, June 18, 2013
>
> July 16, 2008: The remains of the TWA Flight 800 from New
> York to Paris that exploded off Long Island, New York at
> National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Training
> Facility in Ashburn,Virginia. (REUTERS/HYUNGWON KANG)
>
> A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation
> experts,
which you are blowing a whistle. Reading the article I note that
apparently none of the "whistleblowers" had anything to do with the
investigation.
0 new messages