Re: "Do You Realize You Are Describing A Tool"?

[Geroge Plimptin]

On 10 Jan 2022, Rudy Canoza <j...@phendrie.con> posted some
news:20_CJ.186101$VS2....@fx44.iad:

> On 1/10/2022 5:38 AM, scooter, drunken Virginia Camper and lifelong
> liar, lied:
>>
>>
>> "Rudy Canoza" <j...@phendrie.con> wrote in message
>> news:AJ_BJ.60707$bn2....@fx12.iad...
>>> On 1/7/2022 6:46 AM, scooter, drunken Virginia Camper and lifelong
>>> liar, lied:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Rudy Canoza" <notg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1SIBJ.102813$hm7....@fx07.iad...
>>>>> On 1/6/2022 12:15 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/6/22 12:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/6/2022 10:36 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/6/22 12:26 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/2022 9:48 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/22 11:34 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/2022 9:27 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/2022 5:53 AM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" <j...@phendrie.con> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:WqmBJ.189498$6a3....@fx41.iad...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/2022 10:42 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/22 10:19 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Do you realize you are describing a coup?'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MSNBC host challenges Trump aide after he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> described plans to overturn the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan 5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The MSNBC host Ari Melber on Tuesday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenged Peter Navarro, a former
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump White House economic advisor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over his description of plans to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge the 2020 presidential
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election result, saying Navarro was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually "describing a coup."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Navarro has promoted former President
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump's baseless claims that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President Joe Biden, who has been in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> office for nearly a year, did not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually win the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Navarro said the plan was to use over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 US representatives and senators
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to "challenge the results of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election in the six battleground
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states," including Michigan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nevada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Melber shot back: "You just described
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this plan as a way to take an election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the outcome was established by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent secretaries of state, by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the voters of those states, and legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remedies had been exhausted with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Supreme Court never even taking, let
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alone siding with, any of the claims
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you just referred to. So legally,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they went nowhere."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Melber then described the plan Navarro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had outlined. "Do you realize you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> describing a coup?" he said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.businessinsider.com/ari-melber-challenge-pet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> er-navarro-says-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> describing-coup-2022-1?utm_source=reddit.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Trump campaign acted within the law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not in proposing to reject the electoral votes of states.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no provision in any law for that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually there is. See the electors have NO legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> obligation to vote in any particular way. They can decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to vote however they chose.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In some states, they are obligated and SCOTUS upheld that
>>>>>>>>>>>> obligation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-465_i425.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And I left out in this case, the electors already had voted
>>>>>>>>>>> for Biden, and there is no provision in law for the VP to
>>>>>>>>>>> reject those already-cast votes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Which is likely why Pence made no such attempt.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Indeed. But, what does it say about Trump who pressured Pence
>>>>>>>>> to act without legal authority?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who cares?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patriotic Americans care.  Patriotic Americans don't want the
>>>>>>> president organizing/financing/directing insurrections or
>>>>>>> attempting coups to stay in office illegally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You still have not provided evidence that there was an
>>>>>> insurrection.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was an insurrection by definition.
>>>>
>>>> In which Dictionary? [sic]
>>>
>>> No, scooter.  I don't need dictionaries, scooter.  Only illiterate
>>> uneducated morons like you need them, scooter.
>>
>> Then you can't show what you really mean by "insurrection"
>
> All educated persons already know what it is, scooter. I guess that's
> a problem for you, isn't it?

Admission that you don't know what an insurrection is noted.