Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Nude Pics Exchange

131 views
Skip to first unread message

trancer

unread,
Oct 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/8/98
to
Hey guys,

For everyone that wants to see nude pics of Hudson, I have a *great*
idea. Send me pics of you in your skivvies and I'll send you nude pics
of Hudson. Its only fair right? If you're going to "ogle" Hudson like a
pack of lascivious, hormonal wanks you should return the favor right?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. So, come on guys,
whip'em out and lay'em on the table. I mean, 'cuz you're the *real* fans
right. You respect Hudson for her body, screw her mind, screw her acting
talents, hell, ya'll ain't even about to slice your wrists with a dull
butter knife because she cut her hair!! At least her tits are still
intact, right. Yeah, you guys are the real fans. Real "manly men" who
can appreciate a woman's "assets". Besides, if she didn't want them
looked at she wouldn't have posed nude right? If she's okay with her
body, why not look right? It's part of human nature. Yup, goes right up
there next to 'respect'.

Oh yeah, and please remember, don't hold those scans too close. Don't
want them ruined with excessive protein extract.

trancer


Maddux3l

unread,
Oct 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/8/98
to

I can't speak for anyone else but......YEP!

Randel J. August

unread,
Oct 9, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/9/98
to
Subject: Re: Nude Pics Exchange

I'll send you nude pics
> of Hudson. Its only fair right?

got a nude vidcap of her already.


For everyone that wants to see nude pics of Hudson, I have a *great*
> idea. Send me pics of you in your skivvies

> of Hudson. Its only fair right? If you're going to "ogle" Hudson like
a
> pack of lascivious, hormonal wanks you should return the favor right?

It`s fair enough. But one thing trancer. YOU`RE NOT HUDSON LEICK. I`d
send a nude pic to her (don`t think she`d appreciate it)


You respect Hudson for her body, screw her mind, screw her acting
> talents, hell,

Well the first thing cartoonist Will Eisner told me about
actors/actresses is that they have three personalities: 1 the
personalty you see in movies and tv shows. The second in interviews and
public appearances and the third personalty is the real one. So far I
never saw personalty #3(and I don`t think you saw it either). And as
far as her acting ability ,I notice that too. And it`s excellent


hell, ya'll ain't even about to slice your wrists with a dull
> butter knife because she cut her hair!

The new hairdo looks just as pretty as the long hair style. In fact I
have that style as wallpaper(and still keeping it despite the fact that
actress Christina Applegate sent me a personalized autograph of
herself)


Besides, if she didn't want them
> looked at she wouldn't have posed nude right?

Then tell me why did she do that scene. she`s no dummy. She`d damn well
knew if she did any nudity it would get noticed. It would cause all the
perverts like me to oggle over it. She`s part of a cult following now
and that would get noticed. LL will not look at the fanmail because too
may people asked her if they`d come over to there houses and spank them
with a whip.


If she's okay with her
> body, why not look right? It's part of human nature. Yup, goes right
up
> there next to 'respect'.

Don`t know her so I can`t respect her. and what`s your beef? Do you
know her?


C.D. Trevino

unread,
Oct 9, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/9/98
to

trancer

unread,
Oct 9, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/9/98
to
Randel J. August wrote:

> It`s fair enough. But one thing trancer. YOU`RE NOT HUDSON LEICK. I`d
> send a nude pic to her (don`t think she`d appreciate it)

::shudder:: No, I don't think she would

> You respect Hudson for her body, screw her mind, screw her acting
>
> > talents, hell,
>
> Well the first thing cartoonist Will Eisner told me about
> actors/actresses is that they have three personalities: 1 the personalty
> you see in movies and tv shows. The second in interviews and
> public appearances and the third personalty is the real one. So far I
> never saw personalty #3(and I don`t think you saw it either). And as far
> as her acting ability ,I notice that too. And it`s excellent

Hrmm, so what's the point here Randy? Because you don't know her it's okay
for you to exploit "personality t&a"? Yeah, you're a great fan.

> Besides, if she didn't want them > looked at she wouldn't have posed
> nude right?
>
> Then tell me why did she do that scene. she`s no dummy. She`d damn well
> knew if she did any nudity it would get noticed. It would cause all the
> perverts like me to oggle over it. She`s part of a cult following now and
> that would get noticed. LL will not look at the fanmail because too may
> people asked her if they`d come over to there houses and spank them
> with a whip.

What the hell are you talking about? Why did she *do* the scene? She's an
'actress'! I find it rather ironic that everyone is talking about 'nude
vidcaps' and scans, yet *noone* has asked what the part she was playing is
about. Or what was her part. Or hell, why she was nude. That doesn't seem
to matter. All that matters is that "woo-hoo, I got nude pics of Hudson".

FYI, there *are* fans who have seen the film..gasp! Who know what the plot
is. What the intention of the script is. Who know the "purpose" of Hudsons
role. be gald to tell ya'll about it. Don't think you'd be interested -
don't use the words "Hudson's hooters" in my sysnopsis. And, you admit,
you're a pervert. What I find rather ironic, is that the character Hudson
plays is a "direct" slam on the pervert, neanderthal mentality that people
seem to be exuding.

And for your information, the reason LL doesn't read her fan nail isn't
because of the "spank-me wanks" its because she was getting too many
heartstring tuggers that she couldn't possibly fulfill. Secondly, the fan
mail was getting so large she couldn't possibly read them all, and still
have time for a life. (Amazing what you can learn when you have the facts,
eh)

> If she's okay with her body, why not look right? It's part of human
> nature. Yup, goes right
> up > there next to 'respect'.
>
> Don`t know her so I can`t respect her. and what`s your beef? Do you know
> her?

Wow, now there's something special. So...let me get this straight.
*Because* you've only seen "personality 1" and "personality 2", and you
"admire" her as an actresss, because you've *never* seen "personality 3"
you "can't respect her". That's nice. So, how do you meet new friends? Wait
and hover, hoping that "personality 3" will pop up so you can make your
introductions. Or since you don't know them, you can show all kinds of
"disrespect" and chalk it up to 'unfamiliarity'? Hurray - one giant leap
for the evolution of mankind. Since we don't "know someone, we don't have
to respect them". ::snif:: I'm getting all misty-eyed. I don't need no
stinkin' common courtesy - I don't know you.

As far as "do I know her"? Would it make a difference if I said yes?
Apparently not. You don't know me either, therefore you don't have to
respect me. or anyone for that matter.

trancer
Who doesn't "know" alot of people, yet still "admires and repects" them.


Randel J. August

unread,
Oct 9, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/9/98
to
Subject: Re: Nude Pics Exchange

>

> ::shudder:: No, I don't think she would
>

My body is so ugly it scared the ghosts from my house when I got naked.


> Hrmm, so what's the point here Randy? Because you don't know her it's
okay
> for you to exploit "personality t&a"? Yeah, you're a great fan.
>

I`m not the one that started this. and trust me. This is getting
attention for her.

> for you to exploit "personality t&a"? Yeah, you're a great fan.
>

I`m no one`s fan.

> What the hell are you talking about? Why did she *do* the scene?
She's an
> 'actress'! I find it rather ironic that everyone is talking about
'nude
> vidcaps' and scans, yet *noone* has asked what the part she was
playing is
> about. Or what was her part. Or hell, why she was nude. That doesn't
seem
> to matter. All that matters is that "woo-hoo, I got nude pics of
Hudson".
>

That`s why Christina Applegate won`t do nudity and a few other
actresses that are known as well. All they gotta do is show something
and people are gonna notice that. And not the acting,script or anything
else. even in art it makes a big difference. Scantily clad and nudity
are two distinct things to the average person. To a more cultured
groups you could do nudity,but not to the lower levels. In STREETS, it
was an excellent story and excellent acting. But all that was
remembered was Christina Applegate`s fake breasts in a love scene.
And from the IMDB HL plays Bambi Hollow in Denial

> FYI, there *are* fans who have seen the film..gasp!

Who???? The IMDB stated the film was soon to be released. NO ONE I
heard of seen it. It didn`t hit threaters yet. If it let me know.
Because it might have been kept on low profile.

Who know what the plot
> is. What the intention of the script is. Who know the "purpose" of
Hudsons
> role. be gald to tell ya'll about it. Don't think you'd be interested

try me. you won`t be wasting your typing here.

> don't use the words "Hudson's hooters" in my sysnopsis.

didn`t . But you did. Actually I never heard that expression about her
Pectoralis major

And, you admit,
> you're a pervert.

The biggest one that GOD has created

What I find rather ironic, is that the character Hudson
> plays is a "direct" slam on the pervert, neanderthal mentality that
people
> seem to be exuding.

Be more percific since you also trying to promote the film let`s here
about it. I`d normally try to rent it or see it in the threaters. But
since I`m a lowly boggart or even a malenbranche . I don`t deserve to
see this film. In fact Michael and his angels should throw me into the
abyss or the sea of burning sulfur.

> And for your information, the reason LL doesn't read her fan nail
isn't
> because of the "spank-me wanks" its because she was getting too many
> heartstring tuggers that she couldn't possibly fulfill. Secondly, the
fan
> mail was getting so large she couldn't possibly read them all, and
still
> have time for a life. (Amazing what you can learn when you have the
facts,
> eh)
>

Oh trust me. She probably looked through a few of them. No one could be
that conceded. Of course she has people screen the mails.

> you "can't respect her". That's nice. So, how do you meet new
friends? Wait

I don`t . I live in NYC.

Hurray - one giant leap
> for the evolution of mankind. Since we don't "know someone, we don't
have
> to respect them"

That`s the way a lot of people in NYC are trained.

> As far as "do I know her"? Would it make a difference if I said yes?
> Apparently not. You don't know me either, therefore you don't have
to
> respect me. or anyone for that matter.
>

You got that right. And since you don`t know her. Your making HL into
something she`s not. If you know personalty#3 fine. Otherwise it`s just
your opinion.


Peyton01

unread,
Oct 10, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/10/98
to

>I find it rather ironic that everyone is talking about 'nude
>vidcaps' and scans, yet *noone* has asked what the part she was playing is
>about. Or what was her part. Or hell, why she was nude. That doesn't seem
>to matter. All that matters is that "woo-hoo, I got nude pics of Hudson".

Even the guy who has seen the bootleg copy hasn't said a word about who what
her character is..and what her parts is, etc..so instead of the smut, lets hear
the STORY! what is the movie about? what is her character? etc...

Leicky

Randel J. August

unread,
Oct 11, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/11/98
to
> the STORY! what is the movie about? what is her character? etc...
>
> Leicky
As far as I was able to gather. The movie hasn`t been released yet. She
wasn`t one of the main characters. That I know. Some of the main
characters are Seinfield`s Jason Alexandra and Christine Taylor. It
was rated R for sexual situtaions and strong language. The plot is
about couples revealing their sexual morals. HL`s character is named
Bambi Hollow. That is all for now. A little later I`ll post everything
about it from the IMDb.

Peyton01

unread,
Oct 11, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/11/98
to

yeah I got that..I heard some more on it, that her part was only like 15
minutes, adn 8 or which was the sex scene..I think most of her role ended up on
the cutting room floor..well Chill Factor looks like it will have more of her
in it..I hope..


Rage

unread,
Oct 16, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/16/98
to
One of the best damn posts I've read on this subject. To tell the truth,
I'm still not convinced it's her. The picture quality just isn't consistant
(of course, I could be wrong).

Doesn't matter anyway. If she did a nude scene, more power to her. She's
an actress. Her job is to perform a role. Most roles are about fairly
normal people, and normal people (gasp!) get naked now and again.

I'm not one to detract from the possibility that she's done a nude scene,
because I think she's without a doubt one of the most beautiful women on the
planet. I also think she's a great actress, and a very personable
personality. I can't make any judgements on her "true inner being" because
I don't know the woman, but she seems to be radically different from most of
the stereotypical Hollywood types, as do her co-stars on Xena.

Concentrating on a nude scene takes away from the role she played in the
movie. It shouldn't be looked at as some kind of basis for judgement of the
poor woman's character or morality. It's a job, and it's one she does very
well.

Not trying to start World War III here (probably too late), just tossing out
an opinion. Like I said, I haven't read all of the posts on this subject
just because most of them are crap, so I'm still not convinced that it's
really her.


trancer wrote in message <361CB26C...@alaska.net>...
>Hey guys,


>
>For everyone that wants to see nude pics of Hudson, I have a *great*

>idea. Send me pics of you in your skivvies and I'll send you nude pics


>of Hudson. Its only fair right? If you're going to "ogle" Hudson like a
>pack of lascivious, hormonal wanks you should return the favor right?

>What's good for the goose is good for the gander. So, come on guys,
>whip'em out and lay'em on the table. I mean, 'cuz you're the *real* fans
>right. You respect Hudson for her body, screw her mind, screw her acting
>talents, hell, ya'll ain't even about to slice your wrists with a dull
>butter knife because she cut her hair!! At least her tits are still
>intact, right. Yeah, you guys are the real fans. Real "manly men" who

>can appreciate a woman's "assets". Besides, if she didn't want them
>looked at she wouldn't have posed nude right? If she's okay with her


>body, why not look right? It's part of human nature. Yup, goes right up
>there next to 'respect'.
>

imarm...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 17, 2014, 4:34:46 AM1/17/14
to
0 new messages