Prophecies of Sollog. This series of Prophetic verses written December 14th, 1997.

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Sollog Rules!

unread,
Dec 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM12/30/97
to
971214.shtml

Sollog Rules!

unread,
Dec 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM12/30/97
to
WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!

New York City.

Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.

Many around the world will see it.

Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?


These are the XMAS PROPHECIES of Sollog that have been on our site since
12/14/97

They stated a plane would fall from the sky, it recently happened, and
the exact number appears in the riddle of the flight and plane.

Here is the quatrain about NEW YEARS EVE in New York City!

10


The EIGHT LIGHTS is a SYMBOL, the STAR is another


The START of the LIGHTINGS is the EVE of the STAR


On the SEVENTH DAY the BALL shall FALL


Many will die in the STREETS, as the world watches the sky to

see the FALL of the BALL


http://www.whatshotin.com/Sollog/prophecies/971214.shtml

971214.shtml

Sollog Rules!

unread,
Dec 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM12/30/97
to
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [Sollog's gif]
>
> [World Wide Web gif]
>
> Sollog's World Wide Web tm
>
> Click on Icon below to see Sollog's NUKE WARNING
>
> [STOP NUMES NOW! gif]
>
> CLICK ON ORIGINAL MUSICAL SCORE BY SOLLOG
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To UNDERSTAND these LIMERICKS
>
> Remember the NUMBERS of the MAJORIS ARCANA
>
> Subtract the NUMBER from the KEY of VINGT
>
> The SUM of the TWO equal to VINGT is the KEY
>
> The SYMBOLS of the TWO from the TARROCHI
>
> Explain what will be...
>
> 0
>
> Selene is Full for the last time this year of 19 and 97, as I
> pen these Prophetic sheets!
>
> Soon, the BLOOD of SACRIFICES shall flow through the STREETS!
>
> And, the SLAUGHTER of the INNOCENT shall be a great FEAST!
>
> To show man CHRESTUS claimed to be thee BEAST!
>
> 1
>
> LOOK to the EAST
>
> LOOK to what is always in the MIDDLE
>
> REMEMBER what happened,
>
> When NERO played his FIDDLE
>
> 2
>
> Look for a BEARD and for a LOST CIGAR
>
> The SOUL & BODY must DEPART
>
> Born on the IDES of AUGUSTUS
>
> Remember, JFK was killed because he played with SUS SCROFA
>
> 3
>
> De PLANE De PLANE
>
> They fall like flies from the SKY
>
> They bear NUMBERS
>
> The NUMBERS 727 & 1454
>
> 4
>
> What goes up... must come down...
>
> BAM, BOOM, CRASH...
>
> He sat on THE WALL
>
> Before his GREAT FALL
>
> 5
>
> Millions are given for playing games meant for boys.
>
> These BOYS like to buy NEW TOYS.
>
> From them, the FANS are brought such JOY.
>
> But BEWARE, of THE GAME that can't be PLAYED!
>
> 6
>
> THE PROPHECY foretold of the DEATH of a GODDESS
>
> THE PROPHECY foretold of the death of a PRINCESS
>
> THE PROPHECY foretold of the TRIP & FALL
>
> THE PROPHECY foretold of the DEATH
>
> 7
>
> BEWARE of 113
>
> BEWARE of 183
>
> BEWARE of 103
>
> BEWARE of 666
>
> 8
>
> The BLACK POPE died
>
> The WHITE POPE lives
>
> And the POPE of SATAN Reigns
>
> Remember, the WORD of ONE shall OVERCOME
>
> 9
>
> The Ground shall SHAKE on the LINE
>
> The Mountain shall WAKE on the LINE
>
> Teh powerful man shall DIE on the LINE
>
> The LINE, The LINE, The LINE...

>
> 10
>
> The EIGHT LIGHTS is a SYMBOL, the STAR is another
>
> The START of the LIGHTINGS is the EVE of the STAR
>
> On the SEVENTH DAY the BALL shall FALL
>
> Many will die in the STREETS, as the world watches the sky to
> see the FALL of the BALL
>
> 11
>
> The RING of FIRE is AWAKENED
>
> The Angels, Body of Chrestus, The Heart, Francis, and the
> city of IAM
>
> All the NAMES form LINES
>
> The LINES that control the RING of FIRE
>
> 12
>
> Beware of Pr IAM
>
> Beware of He CUBA
>
> Beware of PILGRAMAGES to KOO BEE YAH
>
> Mecca, Havana, both SEE DISATERS
>
> 13
>
> The Fading STARS shall be DARKENED
>
> The SPLINTER
>
> The VOICE
>
> The HOPE
>
> 14
>
> The WINDS shall BLOW, like never before
>
> The RIVERS shall FLOW, like never before
>
> The GROUND shall SHAKE, like never before
>
> The MOUNTAIN shall SMOKE, like never before
>
> 15
>
> Another COMET never SEEN before
>
> The DEATH and BIRTH of a STAR
>
> Watch for the METEOR
>
> Or is it just garbage from MAN...
>
> 16
>
> The ASSASSINS are RACISTS
>
> They shall SCOPE and FIRE
>
> BEWARE Mich a EL the arch angel
>
> BEWARE of the WOODS it has a TIGER
>
> 17
>
> They call it an ACCIDENT
>
> They call it an ACT of GOD
>
> They also say HE CALLED IT!
>
> Remember, 113 & 138...
>
> 18
>
> BEHOLD the CURE for CANCER
>
> BEHOLD the CURE for AIDS
>
> BEHOLD the CURE for DIABETES
>
> BEHOLD THE LORD has SPOKEN it!
>
> 19
>
> OPEN your HAND my TOUCH will HEAL
>
> OPEN your MIND my THOUGHT will HEAL
>
> OPEN your HEART my LOVE will HEAL
>
> OPEN your EARS my WORD will HEAL
>
> 20
>
> I GORE is his helper
>
> He makes a monster in REICH LAND
>
> He says he didn't INHALE while in ENGLAND
>
> REMEMBER, he shall choke on a WINGLESS BYRD
>
> 21
>
> The HEART is the HUB of the WHEEL
>
> The WHEEL connects all the MURDERS & TRAGEDIES
>
> THE LINE runs through THE HEART
>
> ON THE LINE a CITY shall be DESTROYED!
>
> To UNDERSTAND these LIMERICKS
>
> Remember the NUMBERS of the MAJORIS ARCANA
>
> Subtract the NUMBER from the KEY of VINGT
>
> The SUM of the TWO equal to VINGT is the KEY
>
> The SYMBOLS of the TWO from the TARROCHI
>
> Explain what will be...
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [Enter if Thee is a GOD!]
>
> [THE WORD OF THE LORD!]
>
> [Sollog's art gallery. Click on.]
>
> [Sollog's NINE books on mysticism! Enter]
>
> [STOP NUMES NOW! gif]
>
> [Tomorrow's News Today! GUARANTEED by Sollog. Enter!]
>
> [The HOTTEST UNDERGROUND NEWS on the WWW!]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Web site designed by Web Site Masters (tm) (c) 1996 - 1997
>
> For info on having Web Site Masters design your site click on here!
>
> [FREE 3D gallery. Click on!]
>
> Come Back
>
> BOOKMARK NOW!
>
> [Email Sollog]
>
> E mail s...@vdi.net
>
> (C) 1996 to 1997 A.S.S.I. Publishing
>
> All material stored on the pages of www.whatshotin.com are
> copyrighted.
>
> It may not be used in part or whole without written permission of ASSI
> Publishing.
>
> You may email ASSI Publishing from any Email link on our pages.
>
> Put attention Reprint Request.
>
> 800

_DrPostman

unread,
Dec 31, 1997, 3:00:00 AM12/31/97
to

"Sollog Rules!" <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote:

>Sollog Rules! wrote:
>>
Reposting its own drivel. Can we say "obsessive compulsive"?

I knew that you could.

Plonk bait.


--
Idiot the Bruce keeps us here.

Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
High Counselor of the New Usenet Order
Addicted to Art Bell? http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/1282
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, Lifetime member of the
Art Bell Internet Fan Club, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: jamiemps(at)mindspring.com
"I am inclined to exaggeration"
a direct quote from Dr Turi's web site
--


Metric Fastener

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to

Sollog Rules! <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote in article <34A91E...@theeunderground.net>...

Oh shit - here we go again, another goofy psychic on crack

> Sollog Rules! wrote:
> >
> > WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
> >
> > New York City.
> >
> > Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
> >
> > Many around the world will see it.
> >
> > Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?

No, it's Sollog the crackhead blowing off more bullshit to gullible Art Bell
listeners with no life and who'll spend New Years Eve at home jerking off
in bed to sticky porno mags.

> > Here is the quatrain about NEW YEARS EVE in New York City!
> >
> > 10
> > The EIGHT LIGHTS is a SYMBOL, the STAR is another
> > The START of the LIGHTINGS is the EVE of the STAR
> > On the SEVENTH DAY the BALL shall FALL
> > Many will die in the STREETS, as the world watches the sky to
> > see the FALL of the BALL

The only balls that's falling are the ones in your shriveled up
ballbag Sollog.

Get a life and a new male lover.

_DrPostman

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to

"Sollog Rules!" <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote:

>WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
>New York City.
>Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
>Many around the world will see it.
>Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?

Slogshit missed again - so what else is new?

FMCarroll

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to

>From: seem...@mindspring.com (_DrPostman)

>"Sollog Rules!" <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote:
>
>>WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
>>New York City.
>>Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
>>Many around the world will see it.
>>Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?
>
>Slogshit missed again - so what else is new?
>
>

Well, he didn't say which New Years eve. So I guess we'll just have to hold our
collective breaths.

Metric Fastener

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to

Sollog Rules! <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote in article <34A91E...@theeunderground.net>...
> Sollog Rules! wrote:

> > WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
> > New York City.
> > Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
> > Many around the world will see it.
> > Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?

Hey SHITHEAD Sollog! You readin this broski?

It's 1/1/98 and apart from a slight hangover, I and a
couple hundred thousand others were not the victims
of a terrorist action. Yes I WAS on Times Square
last night at 11:59 and had a freakin great time with
everyone else, although it was rather cold.

Are you another media shill for the upcomming 1998 Godzilla
movie? There were more film crews and pyrotechnics on T.S.
and Broadway last night than at a Hollywood celebrity wedding.
Mayor Guliaini was even there dressed up very chique in his
black cashmiere full length coat and matching Stetson.

Sollog is a -----> Media Putz <----- folks. Probably paid to spread the shit.


Matt Kriebel

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to

In article <68fidr$k...@camel20.mindspring.com>, seem...@mindspring.com wrote:

> "Sollog Rules!" <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote:
>
> >WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
> >New York City.
> >Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
> >Many around the world will see it.
> >Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?
>

> Slogshit missed again - so what else is new?

I still want to know if Sollog ever got his prison shoes.

--
Matt Kriebel * The Hessian Web Page:
got...@netaxs.com* http://www.netaxs.com/~gothic/Hessian.html
*********************************************************************
The truth is out there, but the speculation is way, *way* out there.

DrPostman

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to

"Metric Fastener" <mola...@gilisnet.com> wrote:

>Sollog Rules! <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote in article <34A91E...@theeunderground.net>...
>> Sollog Rules! wrote:

>> > WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
>> > New York City.
>> > Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
>> > Many around the world will see it.
>> > Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?

>Hey SHITHEAD Sollog! You readin this broski?

>It's 1/1/98 and apart from a slight hangover, I and a
>couple hundred thousand others were not the victims
>of a terrorist action. Yes I WAS on Times Square
>last night at 11:59 and had a freakin great time with
>everyone else, although it was rather cold.

NONONO - a vicious TERRORIST tree that could have had
seeds GROWN IN NEW YORK that were shaped in
a SQUARE had TIME to grow in Colorodo and attack
Kennedy by jumping in his path on NEW YEARS EVE!

--

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

On 1 Jan 1998 15:55:37 GMT, "Metric Fastener" <mola...@gilisnet.com>
wrote:

>Sollog Rules! <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote in article <34A91E...@theeunderground.net>...

>> Sollog Rules! wrote:
>
>> > WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
>> > New York City.
>> > Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
>> > Many around the world will see it.
>> > Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?
>

>Hey SHITHEAD Sollog! You readin this broski?
>
>It's 1/1/98 and apart from a slight hangover, I and a
>couple hundred thousand others were not the victims
>of a terrorist action. Yes I WAS on Times Square
>last night at 11:59 and had a freakin great time with
>everyone else, although it was rather cold.
>

>Are you another media shill for the upcomming 1998 Godzilla
>movie? There were more film crews and pyrotechnics on T.S.
>and Broadway last night than at a Hollywood celebrity wedding.
>Mayor Guliaini was even there dressed up very chique in his
>black cashmiere full length coat and matching Stetson.
>
>Sollog is a -----> Media Putz <----- folks. Probably paid to spread the shit.
>

Sollog also predicted that the pope was gonna die on October 15th,
1997. Guess what? Didn't happen, either.

I PREDICT that most sane and rational people will ignore Sollog and
designate him/her/it a big fat nothing.

Solong Sollog.

-Jason


If replying via email, do yourself a big favor
and remove the exclamation point from my address.

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

On Thu, 01 Jan 1998 22:51:50 GMT, inm...@mindspring.com (DrPostman)
wrote:

>>Sollog Rules! <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote in article <34A91E...@theeunderground.net>...

>>> Sollog Rules! wrote:
>
>>> > WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
>>> > New York City.
>>> > Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
>>> > Many around the world will see it.
>>> > Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?
>

>NONONO - a vicious TERRORIST tree that could have had

>seeds GROWN IN NEW YORK that were shaped in
>a SQUARE had TIME to grow in Colorodo and attack
>Kennedy by jumping in his path on NEW YEARS EVE!

That's fuckin' hysterical. Perfect response. Just beautiful. I
couldn't have said it any better.

This toast's for you. Here here, postman.

zzzzz

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 05:26:09 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:

>On Thu, 01 Jan 1998 22:51:50 GMT, inm...@mindspring.com (DrPostman)
>wrote:
>
>>>Sollog Rules! <sollo...@theeunderground.net> wrote in article <34A91E...@theeunderground.net>...

>>>> Sollog Rules! wrote:
>>
>>>> > WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
>>>> > New York City.
>>>> > Many die during the New Year's Eve celebration.
>>>> > Many around the world will see it.
>>>> > Is it a tragedy or TERRORISM?
>>
>

>>NONONO - a vicious TERRORIST tree that could have had
>>seeds GROWN IN NEW YORK that were shaped in
>>a SQUARE had TIME to grow in Colorodo and attack
>>Kennedy by jumping in his path on NEW YEARS EVE!
>
>That's fuckin' hysterical. Perfect response. Just beautiful. I
>couldn't have said it any better.

No suprise there.

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 12:37:42 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzzzz) wrote:

>On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 05:26:09 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 01 Jan 1998 22:51:50 GMT, inm...@mindspring.com (DrPostman)
>>wrote:

>>>NONONO - a vicious TERRORIST tree that could have had

>>>seeds GROWN IN NEW YORK that were shaped in
>>>a SQUARE had TIME to grow in Colorodo and attack
>>>Kennedy by jumping in his path on NEW YEARS EVE!
>>
>>That's fuckin' hysterical. Perfect response. Just beautiful. I
>>couldn't have said it any better.
>

>No suprise there.

Hmmm. Why the sudden attack to my compliment to that guys post?

If I posted the same thing three weeks ago, you wouldn't have thought
to do it. You're just pissed because I've pointed out how repetitive
and boring your little "insult" posts are. Get over it. I exposed
your boring behavior, yet you continue to tell Ira that he drools and
looks and sounds like Porky Pig- I'd like to hear from one person
(besides you) that enjoys your posts once they get past the fact that
you're attacking someone whom most people in the ng don't want here.

So, try to mount an attack on me, and your pitiful excuses for insults
and humor will be further exposed. Your "you're a faggot" and "shut
up, drooling homo" jokes will be embarrassed and destroyed by a far
superior wit (and that's not braggin', believe me folks).

God, I hate posting and responding to this crap. But like Ira has
done to you, you have done to me. You roped me in and I had to
respond. I can't control myself and I apologize for boring everyone
else with this shit.

Oh, yeah. Did you read my thing about how retarded, three-word insult
posts are ruining this ng? I'm just surprised you didn't use the word
"fuck" for more eighth-grade comedic effect.

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

zzzz

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 00:31:25 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann)
wrote:

>On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 12:37:42 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzzzz) wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 05:26:09 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 01 Jan 1998 22:51:50 GMT, inm...@mindspring.com (DrPostman)
>>>wrote:
>
>>>>NONONO - a vicious TERRORIST tree that could have had
>>>>seeds GROWN IN NEW YORK that were shaped in
>>>>a SQUARE had TIME to grow in Colorodo and attack
>>>>Kennedy by jumping in his path on NEW YEARS EVE!
>>>
>>>That's fuckin' hysterical. Perfect response. Just beautiful. I
>>>couldn't have said it any better.
>>
>
>>No suprise there.
>
>Hmmm. Why the sudden attack to my compliment to that guys post?

Because you're an idiot. That too difficult for you to figure out?
Probably.

>
>If I posted the same thing three weeks ago, you wouldn't have thought
>to do it. You're just pissed because I've pointed out how repetitive
>and boring your little "insult" posts are. Get over it.

You ok, Jason? A little paranoia setting in? Seems like you're
having a hard time dealing with criticism. Can dish it out, but can't
take it.

Doesn't suprise me at all from a juvenile fuck such as yourself.

Have a nice day!

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/5/98
to

On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 22:47:40 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzzz) wrote:

>On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 00:31:25 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann)
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 12:37:42 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzzzz) wrote:

>>>>That's fuckin' hysterical. Perfect response. Just beautiful. I
>>>>couldn't have said it any better.
>>>
>>
>>>No suprise there.
>>
>>Hmmm. Why the sudden attack to my compliment to that guys post?
>
>Because you're an idiot. That too difficult for you to figure out?
>Probably.

You didn't answer my question- though you did answer your own
immediately after asking it. That sounds way more idiotic than
anything I've written.

>>If I posted the same thing three weeks ago, you wouldn't have thought
>>to do it. You're just pissed because I've pointed out how repetitive
>>and boring your little "insult" posts are. Get over it.
>
>You ok, Jason? A little paranoia setting in? Seems like you're
>having a hard time dealing with criticism. Can dish it out, but can't
>take it.

The paranoia isn't setting in...it's always been there. It's a part
of me. As far as dealing with criticism, I don't think I've seen one
legitimate piece of criticism from you, except you calling me an
idiot, a "juvenile fuck", and hinting that I can't say things very
well (way above). Give me some actual criticism and we'll see if I
can take it.

(I've left you a great opportunity for a snide response just
there...my bet is you'll snip these parentheses and then drop the ball
by just calling me another lame name)

>Doesn't suprise me at all from a juvenile fuck such as yourself.

Nice sentence.

>Have a nice day!

You too.

zzz

unread,
Jan 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/5/98
to

On Mon, 05 Jan 1998 01:43:30 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann)
wrote:

>On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 22:47:40 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzzz) wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 00:31:25 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 12:37:42 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzzzz) wrote:
>
>>>>>That's fuckin' hysterical. Perfect response. Just beautiful. I
>>>>>couldn't have said it any better.
>>>>
>>>
>>>>No suprise there.
>>>
>>>Hmmm. Why the sudden attack to my compliment to that guys post?
>>
>>Because you're an idiot. That too difficult for you to figure out?
>>Probably.
>
>You didn't answer my question

Yes I did. I'm sorry you don't read English. Guess you're on your
own with this one.

>
>If I posted the same thing three weeks ago, you wouldn't have thought
>to do it.

Well, maybe that's because you weren't creative enough to catch my
attention. Life sucks, get over it. You're my new chew toy.

>>You ok, Jason? A little paranoia setting in? Seems like you're
>>having a hard time dealing with criticism. Can dish it out, but can't
>>take it.
>
>The paranoia isn't setting in...it's always been there. It's a part
>of me.

Explains a lot.

Living in western MA explains even more. Did you like UMass so much
that you deicded to move out there? Or are you on the 7 year program?
Seems to me that NY had lots more to offer.

What the hell do you do out there for fun? Do you hang out at the
tampon factory waiting for free samples?

Or, is this it?

At least I get PAID to be a miserable fuck in this NG.

>As far as dealing with criticism, I don't think I've seen one
>legitimate piece of criticism from you, except you calling me an
>idiot, a "juvenile fuck", and hinting that I can't say things very
>well (way above). Give me some actual criticism and we'll see if I
>can take it.

You seem to be having a hard time now. I don't think you could handle
much more.

>
>(I've left you a great opportunity for a snide response just
>there...my bet is you'll snip these parentheses and then drop the ball
>by just calling me another lame name)

Which particular 'snide response' should I have used? Seems like you
had a few in mind. Pay up.

Is there a reason you are making lame attempts to bait me? Is that
all you are capable of? It sure seems so. Guess you're living up to
the "juvenile fuck" label.

>
>>Doesn't suprise me at all from a juvenile fuck such as yourself.
>
>Nice sentence.

Pfffft! That's the best you can come up with? The sure sign of a
defeated juvenile - grammar and spelling corrections. Silly, silly
little boy......

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

On Mon, 05 Jan 1998 22:35:52 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:

>On Mon, 05 Jan 1998 01:43:30 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann)
>wrote:
>

>>>>Hmmm. Why the sudden attack to my compliment to that guys post?

>>>
>>>Because you're an idiot. That too difficult for you to figure out?
>>>Probably.
>>
>>You didn't answer my question
>
>Yes I did. I'm sorry you don't read English. Guess you're on your
>own with this one.

Clever how you keep cutting out the parts you're unable to respond to.
BTW, your "answer" (if you'd like to label it that) to my question was
a total non-sequitur. I asked you to comment on your own petty (and
almost sorrowful) post and you actually claimed it had something to do
with me. Do you honestly believe that my mere presence here is what
makes you post stupid things?

>>If I posted the same thing three weeks ago, you wouldn't have thought
>>to do it.
>
>Well, maybe that's because you weren't creative enough to catch my
>attention. Life sucks, get over it. You're my new chew toy.

Keep on chewin'. Grind your fucking teeth away for all I care. All
your gonna end up with is a lot of pain in that tender little jaw of
yours.

Once again, how nice of you to cut up my post and respond to something
from two posts ago because you've finally come up with a "clever"
response.

>Living in western MA explains even more. Did you like UMass so much
>that you deicded to move out there? Or are you on the 7 year program?
>Seems to me that NY had lots more to offer.

Yeah. Western MA is alright. Gee, how'd ya figure out that I went to
UMass? Did the fact that I posted from a UMass account for nearly a
year help you out with that, or did your feeble, decrepid brain still
require "something more" to let you know? Good try on the NY thing.

It's weird how you think that making wild claims about where I've been
and what I do is gonna matter to anyone else on USENET.

We've seen you play that game before with Ira. It's unimpressive and
TOTALLY juvenile (to use your own word). It looks to me like you
can't match up with the wit, so you did some lame "research" to cover
up.

>What the hell do you do out there for fun? Do you hang out at the
>tampon factory waiting for free samples?
>
>Or, is this it?

That tampon joke sounds like something from the Martling Archives.
Although, my guess is you came up with it yourself because it makes
about as much sense as the physics in an Escher painting.

Oops. That reference wasn't at all appropriate for this discussion-
maybe I should have brought up "poopy" and "doody".

>At least I get PAID to be a miserable fuck in this NG.

Congratulations. I'm sure you're very proud.

>Give me some actual criticism and we'll see if I can take it.

>You seem to be having a hard time now. I don't think you could handle
>much more.

Awwwhh...so nice of you to think of me again. But, how about taking
some credit for your OWN actions for once instead of blaming them on
me? Actually, strike that. I understand perfectly why you would want
to distance yourself from your own actions.



>>(I've left you a great opportunity for a snide response just
>>there...my bet is you'll snip these parentheses and then drop the ball
>>by just calling me another lame name)
>
>Which particular 'snide response' should I have used?

How about another joke about "the tampon factory"? It seemed to go
over well the first time.

>>>Doesn't suprise me at all from a juvenile fuck such as yourself.
>>
>>Nice sentence.
>
>Pfffft! That's the best you can come up with? The sure sign of a
>defeated juvenile - grammar and spelling corrections. Silly, silly
>little boy......

Hardly. That sentence had nothing of SUBSTANCE to respond to! I
almost deleted it, but discovered that its frighteningly warped
structure deserved a much closer look. If there was a Grammar PHd
that one could earn through years of schooling, this would be the only
question on the eight hour final exam:

Grammar- Final Exam

Essay 1

What the fuck is up with this sentence?

---->Doesn't suprise me at all from a juvenile fuck such as
yourself.<-----

Respond with no less than 50 pages.

End of Exam.

zzz

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

Care to elaborate on where I cut your posts up, Sonny boy? Everything
in my last post was complete. Looks like your paranoia is catching up
to you.

You seem to be losing it. You're confusing me with someone else, but
that's ok. I understand with the admitted paranoia and all.

You seem to take offense to almost everything I say, too. Good for
you!

Oh, you can exam that take of your and ass it up your shove. State
college boy.

On Tue, 06 Jan 1998 02:39:28 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann)

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

On Tue, 06 Jan 1998 03:43:28 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:

>Care to elaborate on where I cut your posts up, Sonny boy? Everything
>in my last post was complete.

Well, lets see:

"You didn't answer my question- though you did answer your own
immediately after asking it. That sounds way more idiotic than
anything I've written."

magically becomes...

"You didn't answer my question"

"I don't think I've seen one legitimate piece of criticism from you,
except you calling me an idiot, a "juvenile fuck", and hinting that I
can't say things very well (way above)."

mysteriously becomes...

"..........."

>Looks like your paranoia is catching up to you

Maybe.....but you're still not.

>You seem to be losing it. You're confusing me with someone else, but
>that's ok.

You're right. I was confusing you with another anonymous douchebag on
the newsgroup, so we got off on the wrong foot. Given your original
post to me, and the semi-retarded followups, I still stand by just
about everything I've said.

>I understand with the admitted paranoia and all.

Good. You understand something. Now you can move on and continue
with your plight to understand TWO things at once.

>You seem to take offense to almost everything I say, too. Good for
>you!

Your original post to me was a three word insult. I take offense to
anything and everything that follows that tripe.

>Oh, you can exam that take of your and ass it up your shove.

That sentence *still* isn't as bad as the first one.

>State college boy.

Uh-huh.

zzz

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

Do you feel better yet? You seem to be going to quite a bit of trouble to make
your point with me, when you seem to be missing MY point.

Here it is. I'll type it very slow so you have time to comprehend it:

"I don't give a fuck what you think."

I hope it sunk in. Doubtful, but I can only hope.

Pssst. Who's that behind you?! Careful!!

Nobody's there. Don't let your paranoia get the better side of you, sonny boy.

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 7, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/7/98
to

On Tue, 06 Jan 1998 23:29:05 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:

>Do you feel better yet? You seem to be going to quite a bit of trouble to make
>your point with me, when you seem to be missing MY point.
>
>Here it is. I'll type it very slow so you have time to comprehend it:
>
>"I don't give a fuck what you think."

I missed that while I was beating you....I mean.... making my point
with you. I'm sorry.

>I hope it sunk in. Doubtful, but I can only hope.

Consider it sunk.

>Pssst. Who's that behind you?! Careful!!

That's pretty funny.

>Nobody's there. Don't let your paranoia get the better side of you, sonny boy.

Why are you calling me "sonny boy"? That means you're out to get
me!!! You're all out to get me!!!

zzz

unread,
Jan 7, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/7/98
to

On Wed, 07 Jan 1998 01:30:25 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann)
wrote:

>On Tue, 06 Jan 1998 23:29:05 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:


>
>>Do you feel better yet? You seem to be going to quite a bit of trouble to make
>>your point with me, when you seem to be missing MY point.
>>
>>Here it is. I'll type it very slow so you have time to comprehend it:
>>
>>"I don't give a fuck what you think."
>
>I missed that while I was beating you....I mean.... making my point
>with you. I'm sorry.

Um....that wasn't me you were beating. Not unless you started calling
me "Little Jason".

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/8/98
to

Ahhhhh, a masturbation joke. Is that what that was supposed to be?
Yikes.

All I know is two days ago, you were yelling that I was your new "chew
toy". Then, after receiving a thorough verbal beating, your tune
quickly changed to, "I don't give a fuck what you think".

Don't fret, though. Those grapes are probably sour, anyway.

zzz

unread,
Jan 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/8/98
to

On Thu, 08 Jan 1998 02:14:35 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:

>On Wed, 07 Jan 1998 23:00:41 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 07 Jan 1998 01:30:25 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 06 Jan 1998 23:29:05 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do you feel better yet? You seem to be going to quite a bit of trouble to make
>>>>your point with me, when you seem to be missing MY point.
>>>>
>>>>Here it is. I'll type it very slow so you have time to comprehend it:
>>>>
>>>>"I don't give a fuck what you think."
>>>
>>>I missed that while I was beating you....I mean.... making my point
>>>with you. I'm sorry.
>>
>>Um....that wasn't me you were beating. Not unless you started calling
>>me "Little Jason".
>
>Ahhhhh, a masturbation joke. Is that what that was supposed to be?

Yea, I figured it might take a while to sink in.

>All I know is two days ago, you were yelling that I was your new "chew
>toy". Then, after receiving a thorough verbal beating, your tune
>quickly changed to, "I don't give a fuck what you think".

And I'm sure that's 'all you know'.


You just aren't giving me much to work with. I'm sure you hear that quite
often, though. I guess you're used to it by now.

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/8/98
to

Good one. How about responding with something substantial? Possibly
regarding that verbal beating you keep returning for? Or the sudden
change in attitude (from offensive- "You're my chew toy!!" to
apathetic- "I don't care what you think, anyway (sniffle)") after
being outmatched?

>You just aren't giving me much to work with. I'm sure you hear that quite
>often, though. I guess you're used to it by now.

A poorly phrased wack-off joke followed by a poorly phrased small dick
joke... yup... this thread's just about had it. You're grabbing at
straws now (<---- look!!! I said straws!! and grabbing!!! another
opportunity for a joke about my penis!!! GO FOR IT!!!). You've got
nothing (<--- there's another!! GO GET'EM TIGER!!!).

Stop embarrassing yourself by repeatedly putting your total lack of
wit on display. We can hear your IQ sinking with each successive
reply to this thread. If it sinks any further, you'll be confined to
a wheelchair, drooling on yourself, trying to figure out why everyone
is talking so slowly to you.

zzz

unread,
Jan 8, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/8/98
to

On Thu, 08 Jan 1998 23:20:57 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:

>On Thu, 08 Jan 1998 12:36:44 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 08 Jan 1998 02:14:35 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 07 Jan 1998 23:00:41 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:
>
>>>>Um....that wasn't me you were beating. Not unless you started calling
>>>>me "Little Jason".
>>>
>>>Ahhhhh, a masturbation joke. Is that what that was supposed to be?
>>
>>Yea, I figured it might take a while to sink in.
>>
>>>All I know is two days ago, you were yelling that I was your new "chew
>>>toy". Then, after receiving a thorough verbal beating, your tune
>>>quickly changed to, "I don't give a fuck what you think".
>>
>>And I'm sure that's 'all you know'.
>
>Good one. How about responding with something substantial? Possibly
>regarding that verbal beating you keep returning for?

How about providing me with something? You just bitch and bitch and whine like
a little cunt. But, you are good at it. I'll give you that.

For a child, you do have a pretty wild imagination.

>Or the sudden change in attitude (from offensive- "You're my chew toy!!" to
>apathetic- "I don't care what you think, anyway (sniffle)") after
>being outmatched?

Yep. Pretty wild imagination indeed.

The only attitude change you've seen is the one you're imagining. That's ok. I
understand with the Prozac and all.

>>You just aren't giving me much to work with. I'm sure you hear that quite
>>often, though. I guess you're used to it by now.
>
>A poorly phrased wack-off joke followed by a poorly phrased small dick
>joke... yup... this thread's just about had it.

Gee, that wasn't even a 'small dick' joke. I guess you weren't kidding when you
said you were a paranoid loser.

Why are you so self conscious about the size of your member? IS there, in fact,
something we should know about? I wouldn't want to push the loony over the
edge.


> You're grabbing at straws now (<---- look!!! I said straws!! and grabbing!!! another
>opportunity for a joke about my penis!!!

Thanks for doing it for me, Bevis. At least you're open about it. Christ,
you're more immature than I first figured.

>We can hear your IQ sinking with each successive
>reply to this thread. If it sinks any further, you'll be confined to
>a wheelchair, drooling on yourself, trying to figure out why everyone
>is talking so slowly to you.

Shit. If that's true, I'll be in your league sooner than I thought. Thanks for
the heads up, genius!

You're killing me!


> -Jason
"Schizo Boy"


You keep trying to drive me away with your lame and childish attempts at
'bashing'. Unfortunately (for you), you haven't figured out what a FOOL you are
making yourself out to be!!

Keep 'em comin' !!

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 9, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/9/98
to

On Thu, 08 Jan 1998 23:47:53 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:

>On Thu, 08 Jan 1998 23:20:57 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 08 Jan 1998 12:36:44 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:
>>

>>Good one. How about responding with something substantial? Possibly
>>regarding that verbal beating you keep returning for?
>
>How about providing me with something? You just bitch and bitch and whine like
>a little cunt. But, you are good at it. I'll give you that.
>
>For a child, you do have a pretty wild imagination.

I don't think it's that wild. I keep trying to imagine that YOU'RE
actually intelligent and witty. Although, I guess there are some
things even the boldest imagination can't fathom.

>>Or the sudden change in attitude (from offensive- "You're my chew toy!!" to
>>apathetic- "I don't care what you think, anyway (sniffle)") after
>>being outmatched?
>
>Yep. Pretty wild imagination indeed.

That's not imagination there, sparky. You posted stuff nearly
identical to that. Do a dejanews search and take a peak inside my
"imagination".

>>A poorly phrased wack-off joke followed by a poorly phrased small dick
>>joke... yup... this thread's just about had it.
>
>Gee, that wasn't even a 'small dick' joke. I guess you weren't kidding when you
>said you were a paranoid loser.
>
>Why are you so self conscious about the size of your member? IS there, in fact,
>something we should know about?

Okay. So you didn't make the "small dick" joke before, so you do it
now? Yikes...... actually, make that a double yikes.

>I wouldn't want to push the loony over the edge.

Yup, all that logic, coherent writing, and fairly witty humor makes me
such a loony. I should go to the CRAZY HOUSE for being so.... so....
sane! Actually, responding to your retarded ass again is about as
loony as I can get.

>> You're grabbing at straws now (<---- look!!! I said straws!! and grabbing!!! another
>>opportunity for a joke about my penis!!!
>
>Thanks for doing it for me, Bevis. At least you're open about it. Christ,
>you're more immature than I first figured.

Ahhhh. Now I'M the immature one. How clever of you to turn my
analysis of you around on me. I was so busy pointing my finger, I
forgot I had four more pointing back at me. Actually, including
yours, make that fourteen.

>>We can hear your IQ sinking with each successive
>>reply to this thread. If it sinks any further, you'll be confined to
>>a wheelchair, drooling on yourself, trying to figure out why everyone
>>is talking so slowly to you.
>
>Shit. If that's true, I'll be in your league sooner than I thought. Thanks for
>the heads up, genius!

Does the sheer cleverness of the "I'm rubber, you're glue" comeback
ever fail to impress anyone?

>You're killing me!

Right.

>You keep trying to drive me away with your lame and childish attempts at
>'bashing'. Unfortunately (for you), you haven't figured out what a FOOL you are
>making yourself out to be!!

Yup. I'm such a fool. For a fool who's thoughts you "don't give a
fuck about", I sure managed to fan your flames.

>Keep 'em comin' !!

When I didn't crumble under your massive wit to become your "chew
toy", you, like a little girl forced to go to bed without her dinner,
shouted "I don't care!". Outmatched again, like a big loser, you
shouted, "Keep 'em comin!", as if you wanted me to do it all along.
Good try, but Helen Keller would see right through that tactic.

TROOPS: "General Custer, the Indians are surrounding you!!!"

CUSTER: "Ahhh....Keep 'em comin'!!"

zzz

unread,
Jan 9, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/9/98
to

On Fri, 09 Jan 1998 03:09:10 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:

>>>Or the sudden change in attitude (from offensive- "You're my chew toy!!" to
>>>apathetic- "I don't care what you think, anyway (sniffle)") after
>>>being outmatched?
>>
>>Yep. Pretty wild imagination indeed.
>
>That's not imagination there, sparky. You posted stuff nearly
>identical to that. Do a dejanews search and take a peak inside my
>"imagination".

Well, considering you're full of shit and we both know it. You can do the
search to your heart's content. Let me know how you make out, sonny boy.


>>>A poorly phrased wack-off joke followed by a poorly phrased small dick
>>>joke... yup... this thread's just about had it.
>>
>>Gee, that wasn't even a 'small dick' joke. I guess you weren't kidding when you
>>said you were a paranoid loser.
>>
>>Why are you so self conscious about the size of your member? IS there, in fact,
>>something we should know about?
>
>Okay. So you didn't make the "small dick" joke before, so you do it
>now? Yikes...... actually, make that a double yikes.

I think the 'yikes' belongs in your arena for your predictability. Nothing to
come back with, so just pretend you expected such a comment. What a laugh.

>>I wouldn't want to push the loony over the edge.
>
>Yup, all that logic, coherent writing, and fairly witty humor makes me
>such a loony. I should go to the CRAZY HOUSE for being so.... so....
>sane! Actually, responding to your retarded ass again is about as
>loony as I can get.

Shall I throw one of you 'yikes' comments here? Resorting to calling me
'retarded'? Again - predictable. You're really starting to bore the piss out
of me.

>>> You're grabbing at straws now (<---- look!!! I said straws!! and grabbing!!! another
>>>opportunity for a joke about my penis!!!
>>
>>Thanks for doing it for me, Bevis. At least you're open about it. Christ,
>>you're more immature than I first figured.
>
>Ahhhh. Now I'M the immature one.

Not even close.

[some brain fart snipped]

Sorry. I had to include the above '[]' or you'd accuse me of attempting to chop
up your reply, or some other smoke.

>>>We can hear your IQ sinking with each successive
>>>reply to this thread. If it sinks any further, you'll be confined to
>>>a wheelchair, drooling on yourself, trying to figure out why everyone
>>>is talking so slowly to you.
>>
>>Shit. If that's true, I'll be in your league sooner than I thought. Thanks for
>>the heads up, genius!
>
>Does the sheer cleverness of the "I'm rubber, you're glue" comeback
>ever fail to impress anyone?

I don't know. Do ANY of your comebacks impress ANYONE (besides you, that is)?


>>You keep trying to drive me away with your lame and childish attempts at
>>'bashing'. Unfortunately (for you), you haven't figured out what a FOOL you are
>>making yourself out to be!!
>
>Yup. I'm such a fool. For a fool who's thoughts you "don't give a
>fuck about", I sure managed to fan your flames.

And how have you managed to do that? Care to let the rest of us in on it? You
seem to be the only one with this wild impression of your great comebacks!

>>Keep 'em comin' !!
>
>When I didn't crumble under your massive wit to become your "chew
>toy", you, like a little girl forced to go to bed without her dinner,
>shouted "I don't care!".

Unique view on the situation. But, that's the only way you can justify yourself
as being the 'winner' of whatever it is you are trying to win.

>Outmatched again, like a big loser, you shouted, "Keep 'em comin!",

Looks like I was successful again in goading you into yet another predictable
comeback! Man, you're easy!

>Good try, but Helen Keller would see right through that tactic.

What tactic? I suppose you think I have a 'grand scheme' in dealing with a
Schizo? Nope. Sorry to disappoint you. I just jump all over your sorry ass
with all the openings you give me. You're so easy and predictable.

All you seem to be able to do is throw 'little girl' comments. That's pretty
impressive, for a little boy. I'm sorry you can't come up with anything
substantial or original.

I'm outmatched in your little mind, loony boy. You aren't even coming close.


>-Jason
>
>
>If replying via email, do yourself a big favor
>and remove the exclamation point from my address.

Are you really THIS fucking thick, BTW? Take a good hard look at your reply
address. And, no, I didn't change it. If I did, you'd just go off cryin' to
your momma.

Jason Mann

unread,
Jan 9, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/9/98
to

On Fri, 09 Jan 1998 12:15:34 GMT, e...@my.fuck (zzz) wrote:

>On Fri, 09 Jan 1998 03:09:10 GMT, jscr...@vgernet.net (Jason Mann) wrote:
>

>>That's not imagination there, sparky. You posted stuff nearly
>>identical to that. Do a dejanews search and take a peak inside my
>>"imagination".
>
>Well, considering you're full of shit and we both know it. You can do the
>search to your heart's content. Let me know how you make out, sonny boy.
>

I'm tired of shooting your ass down and having you ignore it, only to
see you utter more stupidity. *You* do the fucking search, asshole- I
have both posts cached in my newsreader.

>>Okay. So you didn't make the "small dick" joke before, so you do it
>>now? Yikes...... actually, make that a double yikes.
>
>I think the 'yikes' belongs in your arena for your predictability. Nothing to
>come back with, so just pretend you expected such a comment. What a laugh.

There was no PRETENDING, you moron!! I criticized you for making a
small dick joke... you said you didn't, and then proceeded to make a
small dick joke.

Then you tell me how predictable I AM, and immediately tell me how
wrong I am for saying that YOU'RE predictable (which, BTW, I didn't
even say in the part you were responding to). That's totally
hypocritical and makes no sense.

>>>I wouldn't want to push the loony over the edge.

Then go away.

>Shall I throw one of you 'yikes' comments here? Resorting to calling me
>'retarded'?

You act as if that's the only thing I said. Besides, can that really
be considered "resorting"?

>Again - predictable. You're really starting to bore the piss out
>of me.

Go do something else, then.

>[some brain fart snipped]
>
>Sorry. I had to include the above '[]' or you'd accuse me of attempting to chop
>up your reply, or some other smoke.

What you should be sorry for is wasting all this space with "replies"
that hardly touch anything I've actually said. You've put nothing
else in this newsgroup lately except for crap you've written to me.
Feel free to take your last jabs here and now, cause I'm ending this
shit.

>>Does the sheer cleverness of the "I'm rubber, you're glue" comeback
>>ever fail to impress anyone?
>
>I don't know. Do ANY of your comebacks impress ANYONE (besides you, that is)?

Once again, that's not the issue. How impressive my comebacks are
shouldn't affect the impressiveness of yours (actually, they would
conceivably make yours BETTER). You've replied with another stupid
non-sequitur. There's no longer anymore use in responding to you.

>>Yup. I'm such a fool. For a fool who's thoughts you "don't give a
>>fuck about", I sure managed to fan your flames.
>
>And how have you managed to do that? Care to let the rest of us in on it? You
>seem to be the only one with this wild impression of your great comebacks!

You went from dinky masturbation jokes back to lengthy replies
(including a couple that weren't even in this thread!! Wow!!) after I
pointed out how much you evaded one of my posts. Those flames were
fanned, boy.

>>>Keep 'em comin' !!
>>
>>When I didn't crumble under your massive wit to become your "chew
>>toy", you, like a little girl forced to go to bed without her dinner,
>>shouted "I don't care!".
>
>Unique view on the situation. But, that's the only way you can justify yourself
>as being the 'winner' of whatever it is you are trying to win.

I justify myself as being the "winner" by actually responding to what
you said with creativity and intelligence. Take your lame responses
to someone who'll continue to respond to them. I'm so done with you.


>>Outmatched again, like a big loser, you shouted, "Keep 'em comin!",
>
>Looks like I was successful again in goading you into yet another predictable
>comeback! Man, you're easy!

Right. Go away.

>What tactic? I suppose you think I have a 'grand scheme' in dealing with a
>Schizo? Nope. Sorry to disappoint you. I just jump all over your sorry ass
>with all the openings you give me. You're so easy and predictable.

Right. Go the fuck away.

>All you seem to be able to do is throw 'little girl' comments. That's pretty
>impressive, for a little boy. I'm sorry you can't come up with anything
>substantial or original.

Right. Have I told you to go away, yet?

>I'm outmatched in your little mind, loony boy. You aren't even coming close.

Speaking of "openings you give me", how's this:

You're right. I'm *not* coming close to you. You're wandering around
in the flat, Uncreative Nonsense Desert, while I sit atop Beatdown
Mountain, doling out my (final) beatdowns to you.

Go away. Pretty please...with sugar on top?

>>If replying via email, do yourself a big favor
>>and remove the exclamation point from my address.
>
>Are you really THIS fucking thick, BTW? Take a good hard look at your reply
>address. And, no, I didn't change it. If I did, you'd just go off cryin' to
>your momma.

I'm glad I got ONE thing useful out of this nonsense. Thanks for
telling me.


After one or two more unsubstantial, accusatory, name-calling
responses, and a few more cheap shots to my *actual* posts in this ng,
can you please go away? Be sure to cut out this part before you post,
though.

The last word is all you want anyway- I'm giving it to you. Run with
it and be funny, intelligent, and entertaining. <snicker>

Ayl...@webtv.net

unread,
Jan 9, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/9/98
to

I don't know about you other posters to this NG....but we may not need
to listen to Howard anymore to be rolling on the floor laughing...Jason
Mann and Eat My F___ have me in stitches. The funniest part of their
flame war is that they both agree with each other and don't recognize
it!

Aylana Ciane

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages