Don Stockbauer
neskaityta,2018-04-28 15:03:562018-04-28Neturite leidimo ištrinti pranešimų šioje grupėje
Jei norite pranešti apie pranešimą, prisijunkite
Arba el. pašto adresai šioje grupėje yra anoniminiai, arba jums reikia narių el. pašto adresų peržiūros leidimo, kad galėtumėte peržiūrėti pradinį pranešimą
kam:
Thomas Munnecke's, Riverside, Ca., letter to Scientific American,
August, 1981.
Sirs,
I am happy to see that there has been no response to Dr.
Hofstadter's column on self-reference ["Letters," SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN,
May]. Those who look at self-reference perch themselves precariously
on Ockham's Razor, tottering between hopeless confusion and fantastic
insight. One might as well open a dictionary and find, "recursion:
see recursion." He who is able to see recursion gains fresh insight
into it.
I am reminded of a conversation between an ancient philosopher,
Hee Hoo (whose epitaph reads , "Who is buried in Hoo's tomb?), and W.
V. Hee:
Hoo: What is a question that is also its own answer?
Hee: Why not, "Why not?"?
Hoo: "Why not?"? Why not!