Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Yet here we are two years later and you still can't prove shit Tiny.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mike F'in Thacker!

unread,
Mar 17, 2002, 7:32:20 PM3/17/02
to

"Timmay!" <specia...@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in message
news:3ca9bfe1...@news.alt.net...
> "Mike F'in Thacker!" <mthack...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >"The Spectre Of Timothy McVeigh" <gur...@terre.haute> wrote
> >
> >> I spanked you, didn't I?
> >
> >*Yawn*
>
> You can yawn to your little hearts content, but you were still
> forcibly ejected from alt.flame and ceased posting of your own
> volition. You know what that means, Mikey? Yes, that's right. SPANK!
>
> >> >Leaving AF when it's not fun anymore does not a spank claim make.
> >>
> >> When you exit alt.flame crying about getting flamed it does.
> >
> >What a laugh. I purely left because it wasn't fun anymore, that and I got
> >sick and tired of getting "Plonk Him" e-mails constantly.
>
> What a piss poor feeble excuse to cover up your spank.
>
> >Yet here we are Timbo, 2 years later and it's the same old same old
> >from you: What's a spank?
>
> This:
>
> >From: "EditorinChief" <mth...@swbell.net>
> >Subject: I retire
> >Date: 08/12/98
> >Message ID: <01be223s$fb159e40$e001c1cf@default>
> >
> >Since obviously noone thinks of me as worthy anymore, I am of this time
> >retiring from the game of flame. I have valued the opinion of others,
> >offered encouragement to those in need of a helping hand, even
cryptically
> >to those I've flamed intensely. Perhaps I've been wrong in doing so.
> >Therefore I feel I have been rendered ineffective by all this. So I quit.
> >It's was fun when there was stuff happening in here, but it no longer
feels
> >fun anymore. Later.

You want reposts, fuckhead...how could I have left in '98 when in 1999 the
conversation was still ongoing?

Begin repost:

From: Mike Thacker (mth...@kctera.net)
Subject: Re: Hey Thacker, I thought you were retiring?
Newsgroups: alt.flame, alt.flame.niggers
View this article only
Date: 1999/04/09


Tim Thorne wrote in message <378828e7...@alpha.news.global.net.uk>...
>"Mike Thacker" <mth...@kctera.net> wrote:
>>Tim Thorne wrote
>>>"Mike Thacker" <mth...@kctera.net> wrote:
>>>>Tim Thorne wrote [...]
>>>>>Killfile me if I upset you.
>>>>
>>>>You don't upset me, Tiny.
>>>
>>>But you still can't bring yourself to answer anything about the
>>>tearful set of posts after Bullock posted what everyone knew about
>>>your flaming abilities.
>>
>>We're not here to discuss that old news.
>
>We're here to discuss whatever the hell I want to discuss. If you want
>to run from it that's fine, I'll just bring it up in every other
>thread we currently have going.


So you'll contine to make an utter annoyance of yourself, in an off-kilter
way of getting me to drop posts? What a laugh Tiny.

>So, did you and Bullock kiss and make up?


It was never an issue of our friendship, son. It was a motivational post to
get me to drop your dumb ass. Needless to say, however...I still refuse to
plonk you as one day I'm sure I'll break through your defenses..I already
know how to push your buttons. I rather like watching you turn into a
frothing maniac.

>>If you're going to flame, boy, flame. If not STFU.
>
>You're so dumb you wouldn't recognised a flame if it gouged out your
>eyes and skull fucked you.


Now there you go Tiny, expound on the insults. That is flaming. Keep it up.

>>>>You bore me to tears with the same tired old garbage.
>>>
>>>Killfile me if you don't like them.
>
>You forgot to answer this part.
>
>>>>I should take amphetemines to stay awake.
>>>
>>>Try it. It might do wonders for your lack of creativity.
>>
>>Face it Tiny, you're a tired cunt with no flaming ability.
>


--
Doom <do...@REMhell-flame-wars.org> wrote in article
<3594e4e...@hell-flame-wars.org>...
> "Editor in chief" <mth...@swbell.net> wrote:
> >I especially loved when you were all begging me to go find you some .sig
> >material and you jocularly referred to the "Make shake" post.
>
> It's called being friendly, Mike.

0 new messages