Dean in major k00k meltdown! Re: CHUCK - IGNORE PETER Re: A gift from chuckles to his owner [Re: Kook of the Year]
±
>
> In article <Xns929CE3D...@207.14.113.17>, yp...@shotmail.com (Soapy) wrote:
> >Dandelion <dafu...@starspanglebannerd.net> wrote in
> ><7jappu4nngl032ure...@4ax.com>:
> >
> >>On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:38:42 GMT, j...@hell-flame-wars.net (jet)
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <8902d263.02100...@posting.google.com>,
> >>> dac...@starband.net (dAwN) wrote:
> >>>> j...@hell-flame-wars.net (jet) wrote in message
> >>>> news:<anaql3$tl7$1...@pita.alt.net>...
> >>>>> In article <m4nhpu46ud2b1jtvj...@4ax.com>,
> >>>> Optional...@meow.org wrote:
> >>>>>> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:12:49 GMT, the notorious netabuser
> >>>>>> Dandelion <dafu...@starspanglebannerd.net> attempted to break
> >>>>>> Usenet by posting this in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:23:33 +1000, Optional Identity
> >>>>>>> <troll4U...@meow.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 28 Sep 2002 17:17:15 GMT, the notorious netabuser
> >>>>>>>> yp...@shotmail.com (Soapy) attempted to break Usenet by
> >>>>>>>> posting this in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Optional Identity <troll4U...@meow.org> wrote in
> >>>>>>>>> <68b7puksv4iq5bjji...@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 27 Sep 2002 00:33:48 GMT, the notorious netabuser
> >>>>>>>>>> yp...@shotmail.com (Soapy) attempted to break Usenet by
> >>>>>>>>>> posting this in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk :
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Text Medium <Sho...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>> <3D930F9F...@hotmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Optional Identity wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 23:42:32 -1000, the notorious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> netabuser Text Medium <Sho...@hotmail.com> attempted to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> break Usenet by posting this in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Optional Identity wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:58:40 -1000, the notorious
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netabuser Text Medium <Sho...@hotmail.com> attempted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to break Usenet by posting this in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ą wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Sep 2002 15:45:37 -0700, the heavy rollers of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.arts.poetry.comments squeezed the following
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> precious droplets from c_ly...@bikerider.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Chuck Lysaght):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://chucklysaght.envy.nu/PJROnline.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Format stolen from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.geocites.com/alcatroll/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Photograph stolen from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.pjr-online.co.uk/bio.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Text stolen from his ex-Marine sleeping-partner's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pictorial dictionary.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yup, that's chuckles! Kook of the year? Maybe not,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but you must admit he's mildly amusing.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chuck, Peter supports Text "Leola Lentz" Medium, a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> woman that has by her own estimates netKKKoped at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 15 accounts. ^^^
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't mind posting proof or shutting the fuck up,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will you, Deano?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TIA.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He *never* posts proof and doesn't get the whole
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shutting the fuck up thing at all.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For one particular allegation he's made today, he'd
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *better* either post proof or else retract.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Certain things will not go un-noted into google without
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you notice he tried to imply that Little toad is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> behind his bullshit 100% in email?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This means either LT lied in her last posts or humpy is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> lying now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mmmhmm.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> And the attempted lynching of a UPA newbie by a small but
> >>>>>>>>>>>> determined mob proceeds...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nobody buys your "innocent newbie" line. You might as
> >>>>>>>>>>> well give it up.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If by "nobody" you mean all dean's little snuh bois, you
> >>>>>>>>>> are right. But then again all you snuh bois get told what
> >>>>>>>>>> to think.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If you claim to believe what Leola says, you're either an
> >>>>>>>>> idiot or a liar.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I actually read what Leola says, unlike you, you stupid
> >>>>>>>> fuckwit.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You know, I actually read it too though, God help me, I don't
> >>>>>>> know why.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My *unbiased* opinion is that Leola is a kook. A kook of a
> >>>>>>> much higher caliber than Kate.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> Why? What, specifically has she done or said tht's kooky? I'll
> >>>>> wait.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry to keep you waiting. My server missed this post.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've given this subject much thought, seeing how it's basically
> >>>> all anyone has talked about for months.
> >>>>
> >>>> There are kooks on both sides of this bridge, some more extreme
> >>>> than others.
> >>>>
> >>>> I simply don't believe Leola's story. Any of it. She sets off my
> >>>> kookdar. I could be wrong, but we'll never really know. There's
> >>>> not any *one* thing she's done that I could name here for you.
> >>>> It's an overall feeling. I don't *know* Leola anymore than she
> >>>> *knows* me. The only reason I even mentioned my opinion was so
> >>>> OpI would know that some people could have a different opinion
> >>>> about her than he does, and NOT have that opinion controlled by
> >>>> Dean.
> >>>>
> >>> That's fair enough but I'd ask you to give her the benefit of a
> >>> doubt.
> >>
> >>I think you'll find that I'm an extremely fair person. I'm also
> >>constantly revising my opinions of the people I meet online.
> >>(especially the usenet peeps)
> >>
> >>
> >>> Nobody is at their best when they've been under virtual attack
> >>> from their first post.
> >>
> >>It's never any fun to be the new kid in school.
> >>
> >
> >Leola's first post here was an attack, and now all she does is cry
> >about being picked on.
> >
> That's a lie. Leola's first post was a crushing blow to Dean's ego and
> she's continued to make him look like an ass, ever since. I'd lose the
> fourth rate troll platitudes if i were you. You're bland enough without
> them.
Really?
Here are the posts - show how it was a crushing blow:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3CFDD796.5B4DB26B%40purr.meow&output=gplain
From: Jack Webb <me...@purr.meow>
Newsgroups:
alt.snuh,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.flame,alt.fan.karl-malden.nose
Subject: Re: A Question for Dean: Re: tEh nEw tIpPeR g0re Re: and I say
Hey
again and again and again
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 23:19:18 -1000
Organization: LaCageAuxFollesNet
Lines: 213
Message-ID: <3CFDD796...@purr.meow>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
Leola wrote:
>
> ą wrote:
> >
> > jet wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <3cf6c98b$1...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland" <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >Here is proof that ą isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
> > > >
> > > >> jet wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > In article <3cf4...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
> > > >> > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > Here is proof that jet isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > In article <3cf4...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
> > > >> > > > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > Here is proof that jet isn't the brightest bulb in the
> > > >> > > > > fitting :
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > In article <ad14r6$arq$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>,
> > > >> > > > > > Bort Flancrest <hotrev...@hawaii.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > They all laughed when morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net
> > > >> > > > > > > (jet) said:
> > > >> > > > > > > > In article
> > > >> > > > > > > > <ad1239$92c$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>, Bort
> > > >> > > > > > > > Flancrest
<hotrev...@hawaii.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > They all laughed when morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net
> > > >> > > > > > > > > (jet) said:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > In article
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > <ad0qi4$n8t$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>, Bort
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Flancrest
<hotrev...@hawaii.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > They all laughed when
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) said:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > In article <3cf36090$1...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Leyland"
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > [...]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ari has posted that someone with a mindspring
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > account has been trolling in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > alt.support.manic.depression. and my post
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > about this still remains unanswered, jet... I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot prove a negative FFS, and I stress
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > again that my civility towards you is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > becoming increasingly frail after being
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > falsely accused of dishonesty.... I think you
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > know my opinions on trolling in support
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > froups already, jet. If not, google me. You
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > are just too fucking obstinate to retract.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > If you expect apologies, I suggest you
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > immediately leave alt.flame and I have no
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > reason to believe in your honesty. Quite the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > contrary.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Grow a spine, Jet.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > I already have one
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Then act like it, you tiresome little quiff. Did
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Leyland make that post, or didn't he?
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > I have no idea
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > You retract, then, do you?
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > If Steve wants a forced, insincere apology, he's got it.
> > > >> > > > > > Too bad he forfeited the sincere one he was going to get
> > > >> > > > > > after I read Ari's post.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > I forfeited it how, exactly?
> > > >> > > > > by posting my objections to your false accusations?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > What does it matter to you? You get your insincere apology and
> > > >> > > > I get to laugh at you.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > he who laughs last laughs longest....and I don't think it'll be
> > > >> > > you! I will accept nothing but teh so-called *sincere* apology.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > Cool! Then I can count on you making a horses ass of yourself, in
> > > >> > alt.flame, for some time to come.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > and still await your proof of my alleged dishonesty.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > and I told you to read your posts in alt.config about Christina and
> > > >> > tell me if they were true. They should be right there on your drive,
> > > >> > somewhere.
> > > >>
> > > >> Whoa, wait a second!
> > > >>
> > > >> WTF does this have to do with the fact that you claim Steve made that
> > > >> post to support groups?
> > > >>
> > > >> Why do you always pull shit out of your ass when the truth hits you
> > > >> square in the face?
> > > >
> > > >methinks possibly coz she's afraid to admit a new-meower ie. *non netcop &
> > > >protector of the sacred fucking network* like me has her backed into a
> > > >corner?
> > > >
> > > You have it backwards Steve. It's the new-meowers, like you, who think
> > > meow is about destruction.
> > >
> > > >I must admit, its fun to watch her squirming...
> > > >
> > > In your dreams, net abuser.
> >
> > Remember, Steve, she's "Jus' trollin', Guv".
>
> Pardon me, Dean, but I have a question:
>
> Exactly who is it that you are quoting, right there, with those
> quotation marks, please?
Well?
> Did I miss seeing a post from Jet, somewhere, I wonder? I don't recall
> seeing Jet posting that comment you appear to be quoting, above. I also
> don't recall seeing any post where Jet used the term "Guv", either, but
> it sure looks to me like you _must_ be quoting Jet, right up there,
> since that's the only "she['s]" who you've been fussing and fighting
> with here, of late, that I know of.
>
> And I have been trying real hard to watch real carefully and follow all
> those > > angle thingies, (attribution lines?) and all. Just trying to
> keep up with all these conversations, here, yanno?
>
> I'm quite certain that you would never deliberately attempt to try to
> make it look like anyone said anything that they didn't actually _say_,
> right, Deano? (I feel like I know this about you because that would be
> sort of, well, dishonest, and you've been sort of braggin' on your own
> honesty, just a bit, and about truth, and credibility, and all ... so I
> sort of feel like I ought to be able to trust that when I see you quote
> someone, that means that they actually did say what you're quoting,
> right?) You know, credible, like.
>
> So, is it Jet who you're quoting there, please?
Well?
> Here, here's the exact quote I'm asking about: You just said to Steve
> (and I'm quoting you now), quote: "Remember, Steve, she's "Jus'
> trollin', Guv"." ... (and that ends my quote of what you said to
> Steve). So within my quote of what _you_ said, was a quote from you,
> quoting someone apparently saying (quote): "Jus' trollin', Guv". (close
> quote), which actually looks to me a whole lot more like the kind of
> hillbilly-type writing (typing, to be really precise) that Liberalminded
> Dana does when he's not off 'resting' somewhere than the way Jet usually
> writes, ... but hey! If you're quoting Jet, (and it sure looks to me
> like you must be) then, by gosh, she _must_ have said that, because
> you're a really honest guy, right? And if so, I'll just have to go back
> over each and every one of the posts she made, to see where I might have
> missed her having said that.
>
> So, who is that, please, who you are quoting, up there, where you tell
> Steve (quote): ""Remember, Steve, she's "Jus' trollin', Guv"."?
Well?
> It can get so confusing, what with so many of these "new asshole"[s]
> you're trying to "tear" Jet every day. (That's me, quoting _you_, here,
> Dean, about "tearing [...] a new asshole", because I recall in another
> article you did say something about how much you enjoy "tearing [Jet] a
> new asshole [....] twice a day", remember?) Gosh, what with you trying
> to tear all those new 'ones' (pardon my euphimism) so many times every
> single day, it makes it kind of hard for a simple torll just to keep up
> with it all. It gets pretty tiring to read, but hey! No-one is making me
> or anyone else read anything, right? We could just all ignore you.
>
> > Just ignore her, she's trolling you.
>
> I must have missed Jet's 'troll alert' (I refer to them as 'troll
> alerts'(1), those things to make sure we all know when someone is
> trolling) on her post to Steve, too, and I'm sure sorry about that.
> Dang! I'll just have to pay closer attention.
>
> <me leans forward intently>
>
> Thanks in advance for your kind understanding.
>
> That nice big sigline down here, must be what's called UPA[rt], yes?
> Just look at all that! My, my!
>
> Oh, and BTW, I have one little footnote down below your nice sigline,
> from 5 paragraphs up (well, 6 paragraphs, if you're counting this one).
>
> Oh, ... (and this is so sort of petty that I almost hesitate to mention
> it)... but, if you don't help set this little confusion straight, here,
> it would look pretty silly for you if it looked like you're avoiding
> answering a direct little question, and maybe might end up getting
> spanked for that by someone who just entered this thread, right?
>
> [....]
>
> > Nobody can control the snuh.
>
> (1)One could also use the term 'smoke signals' instead of 'troll alerts'
> if one wanted to, but speaking strictly for my own self(2) I find that
> using the term 'troll alerts' when one is happening makes things real
> clear, so there's no possible misunderstanding.
> (2)Which, after all, is all I(3) can really do, isn't it?
> (3)That's usually pretty much true for everyone else, too, eh?(4)
> (4)Not that I am presuming to speak for everyone else. (See (2))
> BTW, what are your views on forgery?
The same as yours.
>
> --
> jet mhm 32x30 |
> HELL FLAME WARS |
> wee saul disciple #32 |
> fluffy ate my meow |
--
Ready to create a new newsgroup? It's easier than ever.
Download control message program and maybe find out
what Snuh means at spiffy new Snuh site.
~NEW~
Snuh web mail:
http://www.geocities.com/snuhsite
-
From: en_mog <en_...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Goodbye :-)
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 08:05:45 -0500
If I have any integrity at all, I must leave.
I welcome others to do so as well if they refuse to be led by a group
of unthinking drones that are stuck in such a mindnumbingly predictable
pattern of snuh/attack/snuh/attack/penises/attack/snuh/rectum/attack/.
-
From: TGOS <tg...@spamcop.net>
Newsgroups: alt.hentai.sailor-moon
Subject: Re: Great Newsgroup!
Date: 27 Nov 2000 02:23:19 -0600
Nobody can control the snuh.
ad88888ba 88 ad88888ba
d8" "8b 88 d8" "8b
Y8, 88 "" a8P
`Y8aaaaa, 8b,YHBTba, 88 88 88,dPPYba, ,a8P"
`"""""8b, 88P' `"8a 88 88 88P' "8a d8"
`8b 88 88 88 88 88 88 ""
Y8a a8P 88 88 "8a, ,a88 88 88 88
"Y88888P" 88 88 `"YbbdP'Y8 88 Get Snuhy!
------------------------------------------------------->news:alt.snuh
------------------------------------------------->news:alt.swnet.snuh
------------------------------------------------->news:alt.music.snuh
----------------------------------------------->news:alt.snuh.kwyjibo
---------------------------------------------->news:alt.binaries.snuh
---------------------------------------------->news:alt.ozdebate.snuh
---------------------------------------------->news:alt.folklore.snuh
------------------------------------------->news:alt.tv.simpsons.snuh
----------------------------------------->news:alt.snuh-made-cascades