Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Space Tourism

0 views
Skip to first unread message

eisme

unread,
Dec 31, 1995, 3:00:00 AM12/31/95
to
In article <E704wwUN...@sedona.net>, kei...@sedona.net says...
>
>In article <4bamj8$f...@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>,
>cia...@ix.netcom.com(WAYNE JOHNSON) wrote:
>[Edward V. Wright writes:
>[
>[>How many movie stars have died in plane crashes? They still travel in
>[>airplanes.
>
>[A good parallel is the idea that we should allow tourist rides on the
>[SR-71 - a thrill ride to the edge of space.
>
>You must not have heard of the movie "Apollo 13." Ron Howard shot all the
>zero-gee scenes aboard the Vomit Comet. The movie company had to pay
expenses.
>

I thought the SR-71 was a *Really* fast jet called the Blackbird? The
Vomit-Comit is a 727? Not really a big point( unless you want to get there
quick.)

__
E is Me {Has not the energy to summon the gods of Zeus, the burger king guy,
or the Wrath of old ex-future astronauts.


Edward V. Wright

unread,
Jan 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM1/2/96
to

>[A good parallel is the idea that we should allow tourist rides on the


>[SR-71 - a thrill ride to the edge of space.
>
>You must not have heard of the movie "Apollo 13." Ron Howard shot all the
>zero-gee scenes aboard the Vomit Comet. The movie company had to pay expenses.

Actually, they didn't. The producers of Apollo 13 initially contracted with a
private company that offers zero-gee flights in their commercial jetliner. NASA
heard about this and got very offended, so they offered the studio a better deal
-- free. Prior to the Challenger accident, they did the same thing with
commercial competitors to the Space Shuttle -- they would take any loss to
undercut the competition.


--
The opinions expressed in this message are my own personal views
and do not reflect the official views of Microsoft Corporation.


Cecil Rose

unread,
Jan 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM1/3/96
to
edwr...@microsoft.com (Edward V. Wright) wrote:

>>[A good parallel is the idea that we should allow tourist rides on the
>>[SR-71 - a thrill ride to the edge of space.
>>
>>You must not have heard of the movie "Apollo 13." Ron Howard shot all the
>>zero-gee scenes aboard the Vomit Comet. The movie company had to pay expenses.

>Actually, they didn't. The producers of Apollo 13 initially contracted with a
>private company that offers zero-gee flights in their commercial jetliner. NASA
>heard about this and got very offended, so they offered the studio a better deal
>-- free. Prior to the Challenger accident, they did the same thing with
>commercial competitors to the Space Shuttle -- they would take any loss to
>undercut the competition.

You gotta source for that? The article I read said they paid and paid
big.

Cecil Rose
ala...@earthlink.net
Carson, California


Cecil Rose

unread,
Jan 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM1/4/96
to
ei...@a2znet.com (eisme) wrote:

>In article <E704wwUN...@sedona.net>, kei...@sedona.net says...
>>

>>In article <4bamj8$f...@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>,
>>cia...@ix.netcom.com(WAYNE JOHNSON) wrote:
>>[Edward V. Wright writes:
>>[
>>[>How many movie stars have died in plane crashes? They still travel in
>>[>airplanes.
>>

>>[A good parallel is the idea that we should allow tourist rides on the
>>[SR-71 - a thrill ride to the edge of space.
>>
>>You must not have heard of the movie "Apollo 13." Ron Howard shot all the
>>zero-gee scenes aboard the Vomit Comet. The movie company had to pay
>expenses.
>>

>I thought the SR-71 was a *Really* fast jet called the Blackbird? The

>Vomit-Comit is a 727? Not really a big point( unless you want to get there
>quick.)

The VC is a Boeing 707 (or military C-135 version of it)

Keith Wood

unread,
Jan 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM1/4/96
to
In article <4ccg4h$a...@news.microsoft.com>,

edwr...@microsoft.com (Edward V. Wright) wrote:
[In article <E704wwUN...@sedona.net>, kei...@sedona.net says...
[
[>[A good parallel is the idea that we should allow tourist rides on the

[>[SR-71 - a thrill ride to the edge of space.
[>
[>You must not have heard of the movie "Apollo 13." Ron Howard shot all the
[>zero-gee scenes aboard the Vomit Comet. The movie company had to pay expenses.
[
[Actually, they didn't.

That's even better!


===============================================================
Keith Wood TV-18 News anchor
Host/Producer, The Computer Program, FLYING TIME!, and Infinity Focus.
Gunsite (Orange) alumnus, Team OS/2, Parrothead, N7JUZ, AZ0237 but not a
number (I'm a FREE MAN!), creator of FIRE TEAM and HERO SEEKER
===============================================================

"Ah yes, the infamous `Craw'!" "Not `Craw,' `CRAW!'"

d.carson

unread,
Jan 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM1/4/96
to
In article <rB36wwUN...@bctv.com>, kei...@bctv.com says...

>
>In article <4ccg4h$a...@news.microsoft.com>,
>edwr...@microsoft.com (Edward V. Wright) wrote:
>[In article <E704wwUN...@sedona.net>, kei...@sedona.net says...
>[
>[>[A good parallel is the idea that we should allow tourist rides on the
>[>[SR-71 - a thrill ride to the edge of space.

The only seat you could get (the back seat) doesn't have much of a view.


>[>
>[>You must not have heard of the movie "Apollo 13." Ron Howard shot all the
>[>zero-gee scenes aboard the Vomit Comet. The movie company had to pay
expenses.
>[
>[Actually, they didn't.

Many of the scenes WERE shot aboard the vomit comet, but many (especially in
the LM) were not. If you can see their breath, and it's a one- or two-shot, it was
done in the studio. If they're floating, it's on the comet.

cf "The Making of Apollo 13", and excellent reference on the program, as well
as the movie.

--David


Edward V. Wright

unread,
Jan 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM1/5/96
to
In article <4cdejk$4...@argentina.it.earthlink.net>, ala...@earthlink.net says...

> You gotta source for that? The article I read said they paid and paid
>big.

I hear this from someone affiliated with Interglobal Spaceways, the company that wanted to
do the zero-gee flights for Apollo 13. They weren't too happy about it. It's possible, I
suppose, that someone within NASA offered to do the flights for free, then got overruled by
someone in NASA headquarters.

0 new messages