info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Kent POSING as a school teacher again?
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Greegor
Jun 9, 2012, 8:04:32 AM6/9/12
to
KBW > Greg quit working for about a decade.
Kent lies.
And Kent lives off a trust fund, unable to work due to his two
thieving felonies.
Even most hard labor jobs don't want a guy like Kent who's
such a klepto he got two thieving felonies within 4 years.
> >>>>>> How long has it been since you last "taught", Kunt?
>
> >>>>> School ended in May. This means that in my capacity as a teacher,
> >>>>> it's been a few weeks.
> >>>>> BTW, Greg, your continued admission to being a gay man is no
> >>>>> longer necessary. Everyone, including you, seems to have accepted
> >>>>> this TRUTH about you.
> >>>>> And I see you're still using and abusing illegal drugs. You
> >>>>> openly admitted this is why you stalk the members of alt.friends.
>
> >>>> But you have no such capacity Kunt, it's a fraud, like your imaginary
> >>>> family ;-)
>
> >>> Since school is no longer in session, your claim is TECHNICALLY
> >>> true. At this time I'm not officially teaching anyone.
>
> >> You have never taught school, burgle-boi.
>
> > How do you explain away the evidence that I, and others, have
> > presented that shows I did and do?
>
> I see no evidence, do you see any evidence?
>
> Nope.
>
> Post it.
>
> >> Post piccies of "lin" please.
>
> > Why? She's a female past puberty.
>
> So?
>
> > You claim all such women are
> > as ugly as a Sasquatch.
>
> Never, even the Mole-ron has an earthy quality, lol!
Kent still thinks you are me, bit some rot.
I once called Moe Sasquatch and they've taken it hard ever since.
Kent thinks that his childish IKYABWAI tactic
is a cunning and devastating strategy that will
enable him to WIN on usenet.
http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/63269/photos/PHOTO_14204311_63269_25461334_ap.jpg
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.alien.visitors/msg/7bb21a6718c8504c
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 03:46:12 [...]
KBW 2003 > I was born in Krakow, Poland on
KBW 2003 > Jan. 8, 1969. I grew up there, and
KBW 2003 > in the mid 80's I came to the US.
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=1&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481
WHY would Kent try to claim that
his accomplice was a female when all of the
public records on Bilyeu clearly show male?
WHY would a guy who got two thieving felonies
and a misd for using a teen as an accomplice to his
famous garage burglary (conviction) want to
POSE online as a public school teacher?
Who is Kent trying to con this time and why?
Maybe Kent's new buddy Gary Burnore can offer a suggestion?
Gary's confession to Police was about
kissing the kid but later he came up
with a story that he woke up with the
teen riding on top of his pud.
Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg
GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages) Oct 1997
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page3.JPG
"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.
Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.
The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,
suggests that risk for potential victims
may be high."
J. Puccinelli, Probation Officer, Unit IV
Municipal Court of the State of California,
Santa Clara County, People of the State
of California v. Gary Burnore
Probation Office No. DMU044
Court No. C9618225 DA No. 961131078
Santa Clara Police Department Case No. 9615185
Gary Lee's Official ONLINE NC Department Of Corrections web page
http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483
Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE
SEVEN PAGE POLICE NARRATIVE
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page3.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page4.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page5.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page6.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page7.JPG
Police Narrative Pages 1-7
http://bayimg.com/haNigAaBd
http://bayimg.com/hanIIaaBd
http://bayimg.com/HaNIlAabd
http://bayimg.com/hAnimaaBD
http://bayimg.com/IANIaaAbD
http://bayimg.com/iaNicaabd
http://bayimg.com/iAnidaabd
Gary Mug shot with numbers
http://bayimg.com/PaNccaAbd
(Where Gary apparently LIVES)
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=4469+Still+Pines+Drive,+Raleigh,+NC+27613-3334
http://cbk3.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&cb_client=maps_sv&thumb=2&thumbfov=66&ll=35.865647,-78.710116&cbll=35.865692,-78.709956
(Apparently they RENT this out)
Belinda West 137 Meadowbrook Ln Davidson, NC 28036-8059
Parcel ID#: 00705124 GIS ID#: 00705124
GARY LEE BURNORE AND BELINDA W BURNORE
137 MEADOWBROOK LN DAVIDSON, NC 28036
http://meckcama.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/mvideo/20050208/D8083943.jpg
Kent lies.
And Kent lives off a trust fund, unable to work due to his two
thieving felonies.
Even most hard labor jobs don't want a guy like Kent who's
such a klepto he got two thieving felonies within 4 years.
> >>>>>> How long has it been since you last "taught", Kunt?
>
> >>>>> School ended in May. This means that in my capacity as a teacher,
> >>>>> it's been a few weeks.
> >>>>> BTW, Greg, your continued admission to being a gay man is no
> >>>>> longer necessary. Everyone, including you, seems to have accepted
> >>>>> this TRUTH about you.
> >>>>> And I see you're still using and abusing illegal drugs. You
> >>>>> openly admitted this is why you stalk the members of alt.friends.
>
> >>>> But you have no such capacity Kunt, it's a fraud, like your imaginary
> >>>> family ;-)
>
> >>> Since school is no longer in session, your claim is TECHNICALLY
> >>> true. At this time I'm not officially teaching anyone.
>
> >> You have never taught school, burgle-boi.
>
> > How do you explain away the evidence that I, and others, have
> > presented that shows I did and do?
>
> I see no evidence, do you see any evidence?
>
> Nope.
>
> Post it.
>
> >> Post piccies of "lin" please.
>
> > Why? She's a female past puberty.
>
> So?
>
> > You claim all such women are
> > as ugly as a Sasquatch.
>
> Never, even the Mole-ron has an earthy quality, lol!
Kent still thinks you are me, bit some rot.
I once called Moe Sasquatch and they've taken it hard ever since.
Kent thinks that his childish IKYABWAI tactic
is a cunning and devastating strategy that will
enable him to WIN on usenet.
http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/63269/photos/PHOTO_14204311_63269_25461334_ap.jpg
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.alien.visitors/msg/7bb21a6718c8504c
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 03:46:12 [...]
KBW 2003 > I was born in Krakow, Poland on
KBW 2003 > Jan. 8, 1969. I grew up there, and
KBW 2003 > in the mid 80's I came to the US.
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=1&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481
WHY would Kent try to claim that
his accomplice was a female when all of the
public records on Bilyeu clearly show male?
WHY would a guy who got two thieving felonies
and a misd for using a teen as an accomplice to his
famous garage burglary (conviction) want to
POSE online as a public school teacher?
Who is Kent trying to con this time and why?
Maybe Kent's new buddy Gary Burnore can offer a suggestion?
Gary's confession to Police was about
kissing the kid but later he came up
with a story that he woke up with the
teen riding on top of his pud.
Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg
GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages) Oct 1997
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page3.JPG
"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.
Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.
The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,
suggests that risk for potential victims
may be high."
J. Puccinelli, Probation Officer, Unit IV
Municipal Court of the State of California,
Santa Clara County, People of the State
of California v. Gary Burnore
Probation Office No. DMU044
Court No. C9618225 DA No. 961131078
Santa Clara Police Department Case No. 9615185
Gary Lee's Official ONLINE NC Department Of Corrections web page
http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483
Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE
SEVEN PAGE POLICE NARRATIVE
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page3.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page4.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page5.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page6.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page7.JPG
Police Narrative Pages 1-7
http://bayimg.com/haNigAaBd
http://bayimg.com/hanIIaaBd
http://bayimg.com/HaNIlAabd
http://bayimg.com/hAnimaaBD
http://bayimg.com/IANIaaAbD
http://bayimg.com/iaNicaabd
http://bayimg.com/iAnidaabd
Gary Mug shot with numbers
http://bayimg.com/PaNccaAbd
(Where Gary apparently LIVES)
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=4469+Still+Pines+Drive,+Raleigh,+NC+27613-3334
http://cbk3.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&cb_client=maps_sv&thumb=2&thumbfov=66&ll=35.865647,-78.710116&cbll=35.865692,-78.709956
(Apparently they RENT this out)
Belinda West 137 Meadowbrook Ln Davidson, NC 28036-8059
Parcel ID#: 00705124 GIS ID#: 00705124
GARY LEE BURNORE AND BELINDA W BURNORE
137 MEADOWBROOK LN DAVIDSON, NC 28036
http://meckcama.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/mvideo/20050208/D8083943.jpg
Kent Wills
Jun 10, 2012, 9:43:20 AM6/10/12
to
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 05:04:32 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>KBW > Greg quit working for about a decade.
>
>Kent lies.
Yet each time you've been asked to cite one lie, you've been
UNABLE. In order to try, you've ALWAYS had to LIE about what has been
posted.
You've been asked, numerous times, to prove you have a job. Each
and every time you've been asked, you've run away.
>And Kent lives off a trust fund, unable to work due to his two
>thieving felonies.
You've been asked to prove your claim that I have a trust fund.
As of my writing this, you've been unable to offer anything to prove
your LIE to be the truth.
All you ever did was show that two people we don't know have a
trust. Not a trust fund, but a trust. And as you probably already
know, a trust and a trust fund are two different things.
>Even most hard labor jobs don't want a guy like Kent who's
>such a klepto he got two thieving felonies within 4 years.
Since you slipped and admitted I have no record, your lie fails.
You've never explained how it feels to fail at each and every
thing you ever try, Greg. Are you not able to put the experience of
total failure into words?
You outted yourself, stupid. Unless you're going to claim that
your own outing was another of your MANY lies, you're stuck.
Was your outing of your self the truth, or another of your MANY
lies? I realize this is a no-win situation for you, Greg, but I don't
see that you've allowed yourself any other options.
If you see an option I don't, please offer it.
>I once called Moe Sasquatch and they've taken it hard ever since.
>
Your position is that all females who have entered and completed
puberty are as ugly as a Sasquatch. This has been proved a few times.
I can post the MIDs for a few of your posts where you made this
claim again. Of course, like before, you'll run away and HIDE from
the TRUTH.
Still, let me know if you want me to PROVE you a liar. I'll
waive the requirement I adopted from you for this matter.
>Kent thinks that his childish IKYABWAI tactic
>is a cunning and devastating strategy that will
>enable him to WIN on usenet.
Since you ALWAYS lose, I must, by default, win. I never actually
thought of it as a competition, but that you constantly admit you've
lost means you do. I point out your consistently losing because it
causes you to further expose your mental defects (plural) and
illnesses (plural). The post to which I am replying is a perfect
example.
You claimed that when Dan altered the group list, it was proof
that he had lost. You did so with your post, so according to you,
you've admitted you lost.
I know you HATE it when anyone uses The Hanson Standard against
you. In your drug addled mind, you alone are allowed to use The
Hanson Standard. It's a pity reality doesn't work that way.
[Snip of items you've openly admitted are not about me]
Again I'll ask, and again you'll not answer, why do you post that
which you've openly admitted isn't about me as if it is about me?
Information about inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson, wife and child
abuser:
Proof that inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson doesn't think he's
bound by criminal or civil law (note he's listed as the defendant in
each case):
Case ID Title Name DOB Role
06571 AGCR015216 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC123709 FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS CO VS GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC139229 EAGLE PROP MGT VS GREGORY HANSON & LISA WATKINS
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC139230 EAGLE PROP MGT VS GREGORY HANSON & LISA WATKINS
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC141447 EAGLE PROPERTY MNGT VS LISA WATKINS ET AL HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC141448 EAGLE PROPERTY MNGT VS LISA WATKINS ET AL HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SMSM004543 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SMSM008629 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREGORY S HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 STCR429489 STATE OF IOWA vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 STCR441449 STATE OF IOWA vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571CRSTCR146191 CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571CRSTCR214087 CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571MASTWG261061 CITY OF MARION vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg
"I am Bob Larson."
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
as mentally ill as he presents.
Message-ID:
<df610804-da3b-4aa8...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
that water is wet):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Wednesday, August 31, 2011:
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.
wrote:
>KBW > Greg quit working for about a decade.
>
>Kent lies.
UNABLE. In order to try, you've ALWAYS had to LIE about what has been
posted.
You've been asked, numerous times, to prove you have a job. Each
and every time you've been asked, you've run away.
>And Kent lives off a trust fund, unable to work due to his two
>thieving felonies.
As of my writing this, you've been unable to offer anything to prove
your LIE to be the truth.
All you ever did was show that two people we don't know have a
trust. Not a trust fund, but a trust. And as you probably already
know, a trust and a trust fund are two different things.
>Even most hard labor jobs don't want a guy like Kent who's
>such a klepto he got two thieving felonies within 4 years.
You've never explained how it feels to fail at each and every
thing you ever try, Greg. Are you not able to put the experience of
total failure into words?
your own outing was another of your MANY lies, you're stuck.
Was your outing of your self the truth, or another of your MANY
lies? I realize this is a no-win situation for you, Greg, but I don't
see that you've allowed yourself any other options.
If you see an option I don't, please offer it.
>I once called Moe Sasquatch and they've taken it hard ever since.
>
puberty are as ugly as a Sasquatch. This has been proved a few times.
I can post the MIDs for a few of your posts where you made this
claim again. Of course, like before, you'll run away and HIDE from
the TRUTH.
Still, let me know if you want me to PROVE you a liar. I'll
waive the requirement I adopted from you for this matter.
>Kent thinks that his childish IKYABWAI tactic
>is a cunning and devastating strategy that will
>enable him to WIN on usenet.
thought of it as a competition, but that you constantly admit you've
lost means you do. I point out your consistently losing because it
causes you to further expose your mental defects (plural) and
illnesses (plural). The post to which I am replying is a perfect
example.
You claimed that when Dan altered the group list, it was proof
that he had lost. You did so with your post, so according to you,
you've admitted you lost.
I know you HATE it when anyone uses The Hanson Standard against
you. In your drug addled mind, you alone are allowed to use The
Hanson Standard. It's a pity reality doesn't work that way.
[Snip of items you've openly admitted are not about me]
Again I'll ask, and again you'll not answer, why do you post that
which you've openly admitted isn't about me as if it is about me?
Information about inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson, wife and child
abuser:
Proof that inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson doesn't think he's
bound by criminal or civil law (note he's listed as the defendant in
each case):
Case ID Title Name DOB Role
06571 AGCR015216 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC123709 FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS CO VS GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC139229 EAGLE PROP MGT VS GREGORY HANSON & LISA WATKINS
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC139230 EAGLE PROP MGT VS GREGORY HANSON & LISA WATKINS
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC141447 EAGLE PROPERTY MNGT VS LISA WATKINS ET AL HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC141448 EAGLE PROPERTY MNGT VS LISA WATKINS ET AL HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SMSM004543 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SMSM008629 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREGORY S HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 STCR429489 STATE OF IOWA vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 STCR441449 STATE OF IOWA vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571CRSTCR146191 CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571CRSTCR214087 CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571MASTWG261061 CITY OF MARION vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg
"I am Bob Larson."
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
as mentally ill as he presents.
Message-ID:
<df610804-da3b-4aa8...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
that water is wet):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Wednesday, August 31, 2011:
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.
Kent Wills
Jun 10, 2012, 5:15:21 PM6/10/12
to
Group list restored.
Your admission, by your very own standards, that you lost, and by
default that I've once again bested you, is noted and accepted.
How does it feel to FAIL at each and every thing you ever try,
Greg?
>On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:43:20 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>KBW > Greg quit working for about a decade.
>>>
>>>Kent lies.
>>
>> Yet each time you've been asked to cite one lie, you've been
>>UNABLE. In order to try, you've ALWAYS had to LIE about what has been
>>posted.
>> You've been asked, numerous times, to prove you have a job. Each
>>and every time you've been asked, you've run away.
>>
>>>And Kent lives off a trust fund, unable to work due to his two
>>>thieving felonies.
>>
>> You've been asked to prove your claim that I have a trust fund.
>>As of my writing this, you've been unable to offer anything to prove
>>your LIE to be the truth.
>> All you ever did was show that two people we don't know have a
>>trust. Not a trust fund, but a trust. And as you probably already
>>know, a trust and a trust fund are two different things.
>
>
>Scroll to bottom right OWNER NAME input and type in
>Wills Family Trust and hit enter.
>Or put in a name of Wills, or put a parcel ID like
>02-00444-000 or 15-09938-000 in the blank
>marked parcel ID and then hit enter.
Again, a trust and a trust fund are two different things. Anyone
who's taken a high school level economics class will know this.
And again, proving that two people we don't know have a trust
does not prove your LIE that I have a trust fund to be the truth.
Aren't you tired of having this LIE of your exposed? I've been
PROVING it the LIE it is for about two years, yet you are COMPELLED to
repeat it.
Is this more PROOF of your Asperger's? Is it more PROOF that you
are so mentally ill that you honestly believe that if you present the
same lie enough times, it will somehow become the truth?
If you see an option that would explain your compulsive NEED to
have the same LIE exposed that I do not, present it.
By way of contrast, here is information that is 100% true,
accurate and about you:
Greegor
Jun 11, 2012, 5:33:06 AM6/11/12
to
On Jun 10, 4:15 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
difference between a trust and a trust fund, Kent!
[...]
> Again, a trust and a trust fund are two different things. Anyone
> who's taken a high school level economics class will know this.
I can hardly wait for your explanation of the
> who's taken a high school level economics class will know this.
difference between a trust and a trust fund, Kent!
Kent Wills
Jun 11, 2012, 7:20:32 AM6/11/12
to
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:33:06 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
Context restored at no additional cost.
Has this means of deception ever worked for you, Greg? I'm not
aware of a single time where it has, but I must admit, it is possible.
Please cite a time when this means of deception has worked for you.
>On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:15:21 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Group list restored.
>> Your admission, by your very own standards, that you lost, and by
>>default that I've once again bested you, is noted and accepted.
>> How does it feel to FAIL at each and every thing you ever try,
>>Greg?
>>
Greg? How does it feel?
This is a serious question I've asked of you MANY times. As of
my writing this, you've only been able to acknowledge it once, and you
played an avoidance game then.
>>
>>>On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:43:20 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>KBW > Greg quit working for about a decade.
>>>>>
>>>>>Kent lies.
>>>>
>>>> Yet each time you've been asked to cite one lie, you've been
>>>>UNABLE. In order to try, you've ALWAYS had to LIE about what has been
>>>>posted.
>>>> You've been asked, numerous times, to prove you have a job. Each
>>>>and every time you've been asked, you've run away.
>>>>
Greg? You've tried, and failed, to run away from this matter
once again.
Will you please prove your claim that you have a job? If you wish
to once again given the tacit admission, by The Hanson Standard, that
due to the garnishment order, you don't risk getting a job, that's
fine.
>>>>>And Kent lives off a trust fund, unable to work due to his two
>>>>>thieving felonies.
>>>>
>>>> You've been asked to prove your claim that I have a trust fund.
>>>>As of my writing this, you've been unable to offer anything to prove
>>>>your LIE to be the truth.
>>>> All you ever did was show that two people we don't know have a
>>>>trust. Not a trust fund, but a trust. And as you probably already
>>>>know, a trust and a trust fund are two different things.
>>>
>>>http://gis.co.benton.ar.us/website/basemap/viewer.htm
>>>
>>>Scroll to bottom right OWNER NAME input and type in
>>>Wills Family Trust and hit enter.
>>>Or put in a name of Wills, or put a parcel ID like
>>>02-00444-000 or 15-09938-000 in the blank
>>>marked parcel ID and then hit enter.
>>
the two options I mentioned is accepted, however, I'd like to know
which it is.
Which of the two is the reason?
>> By way of contrast, here is information that is 100% true,
>>accurate and about you:
>>
>>
>>Information about inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson, wife and child
>>abuser:
>
Will you prove your claim that I have a trust fund, or once again
acknowledge that it's nothing more than another of your MANY lies?
The choice is yours.
And proving two people, neither of whom we know, have a trust
will not prove your LIE to be the truth, Greg.
To ruin your hope of continuing your deception:
Simply put, a trust exists where one person, or entity if a
corporation or proprietorship, hold real or personal property for the
benefit of another.
A trust fund pays benefits, typically money, to an individual or
entity. Payment typically occurs after the death of the person who set
up the trust fund.
These are very simplistic explanations, but given the limited
intellect you are COMPELLED to prove you have, I hope you are able to
understand. If not, there is nothing more I can do as I am unable to
dumb it down any more than I have.
Now, prove your LIE that I have a trust fund to be true. Your
continued avoidance by proving two people we don't know have a trust,
while ultimately beneficial to me since I'm able to expose you for the
drug addled LIAR you are, does get boring.
I'm waiting...
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
Context restored at no additional cost.
Has this means of deception ever worked for you, Greg? I'm not
aware of a single time where it has, but I must admit, it is possible.
Please cite a time when this means of deception has worked for you.
>On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:15:21 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Group list restored.
>> Your admission, by your very own standards, that you lost, and by
>>default that I've once again bested you, is noted and accepted.
>> How does it feel to FAIL at each and every thing you ever try,
>>Greg?
>>
This is a serious question I've asked of you MANY times. As of
my writing this, you've only been able to acknowledge it once, and you
played an avoidance game then.
>>
>>>On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:43:20 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>KBW > Greg quit working for about a decade.
>>>>>
>>>>>Kent lies.
>>>>
>>>> Yet each time you've been asked to cite one lie, you've been
>>>>UNABLE. In order to try, you've ALWAYS had to LIE about what has been
>>>>posted.
>>>> You've been asked, numerous times, to prove you have a job. Each
>>>>and every time you've been asked, you've run away.
>>>>
once again.
Will you please prove your claim that you have a job? If you wish
to once again given the tacit admission, by The Hanson Standard, that
due to the garnishment order, you don't risk getting a job, that's
fine.
>>>>>And Kent lives off a trust fund, unable to work due to his two
>>>>>thieving felonies.
>>>>
>>>> You've been asked to prove your claim that I have a trust fund.
>>>>As of my writing this, you've been unable to offer anything to prove
>>>>your LIE to be the truth.
>>>> All you ever did was show that two people we don't know have a
>>>>trust. Not a trust fund, but a trust. And as you probably already
>>>>know, a trust and a trust fund are two different things.
>>>
>>>http://gis.co.benton.ar.us/website/basemap/viewer.htm
>>>
>>>Scroll to bottom right OWNER NAME input and type in
>>>Wills Family Trust and hit enter.
>>>Or put in a name of Wills, or put a parcel ID like
>>>02-00444-000 or 15-09938-000 in the blank
>>>marked parcel ID and then hit enter.
>>
>> Again, a trust and a trust fund are two different things. Anyone
>>who's taken a high school level economics class will know this.
>>who's taken a high school level economics class will know this.
>> And again, proving that two people we don't know have a trust
>>does not prove your LIE that I have a trust fund to be the truth.
>> Aren't you tired of having this LIE of your exposed? I've been
>>PROVING it the LIE it is for about two years, yet you are COMPELLED to
>>repeat it.
>> Is this more PROOF of your Asperger's? Is it more PROOF that you
>>are so mentally ill that you honestly believe that if you present the
>>same lie enough times, it will somehow become the truth?
>> If you see an option that would explain your compulsive NEED to
>>have the same LIE exposed that I do not, present it.
Greg? Your admission, by The Hanson Standard, that it is one of
>>does not prove your LIE that I have a trust fund to be the truth.
>> Aren't you tired of having this LIE of your exposed? I've been
>>PROVING it the LIE it is for about two years, yet you are COMPELLED to
>>repeat it.
>> Is this more PROOF of your Asperger's? Is it more PROOF that you
>>are so mentally ill that you honestly believe that if you present the
>>same lie enough times, it will somehow become the truth?
>> If you see an option that would explain your compulsive NEED to
>>have the same LIE exposed that I do not, present it.
the two options I mentioned is accepted, however, I'd like to know
which it is.
Which of the two is the reason?
>> By way of contrast, here is information that is 100% true,
>>accurate and about you:
>>
>>
>>Information about inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson, wife and child
>>abuser:
>
>I can hardly wait for your explanation of the
>difference between a trust and a trust fund, Kent!
Your avoidance is noted, Greg.
>difference between a trust and a trust fund, Kent!
Will you prove your claim that I have a trust fund, or once again
acknowledge that it's nothing more than another of your MANY lies?
The choice is yours.
And proving two people, neither of whom we know, have a trust
will not prove your LIE to be the truth, Greg.
To ruin your hope of continuing your deception:
Simply put, a trust exists where one person, or entity if a
corporation or proprietorship, hold real or personal property for the
benefit of another.
A trust fund pays benefits, typically money, to an individual or
entity. Payment typically occurs after the death of the person who set
up the trust fund.
These are very simplistic explanations, but given the limited
intellect you are COMPELLED to prove you have, I hope you are able to
understand. If not, there is nothing more I can do as I am unable to
dumb it down any more than I have.
Now, prove your LIE that I have a trust fund to be true. Your
continued avoidance by proving two people we don't know have a trust,
while ultimately beneficial to me since I'm able to expose you for the
drug addled LIAR you are, does get boring.
I'm waiting...
Greegor
Jun 13, 2012, 3:53:42 PM6/13/12
to
Kent is a two time convicted thieving felon who
also got a misd for using a teen as an accomplice
to his latest felony, garage burglary.
He resorts to posting my 2001 traffic citations.
also got a misd for using a teen as an accomplice
to his latest felony, garage burglary.
He resorts to posting my 2001 traffic citations.
Kent Wills
Jun 13, 2012, 5:00:59 PM6/13/12
to
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:53:42 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
lie, Greg?
I've asked this of you MANY times, and aside from your admission,
by The Hanson Standard, that your claim of my having a record is a
lie, you've not answered.
>
>He resorts to posting my 2001 traffic citations.
There is no such mention of any such thing in the post to which
you replied.
What is at the root of your psychological NEED to lie?
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Kent is a two time convicted thieving felon who
>also got a misd for using a teen as an accomplice
>to his latest felony, garage burglary.
You admitted, openly, I have no such record. Which claim is the
>also got a misd for using a teen as an accomplice
>to his latest felony, garage burglary.
lie, Greg?
I've asked this of you MANY times, and aside from your admission,
by The Hanson Standard, that your claim of my having a record is a
lie, you've not answered.
>
>He resorts to posting my 2001 traffic citations.
you replied.
What is at the root of your psychological NEED to lie?
Greegor
Jun 15, 2012, 5:33:41 PM6/15/12
to
You claimed there is difference between a trust and a trust fund,
Kent.
Please explain the difference!
Kent.
Please explain the difference!
Kent Wills
Jun 16, 2012, 11:25:01 AM6/16/12
to
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:33:41 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
Now that you've played that game, and once again FAILED, please
answer the question I asked.
>
>Please explain the difference!
Message-ID: <3dhct7dgdih7ecb1o...@4ax.com>
That's the MID for the post where I point out your asking me
about the difference in a reply to the post when I explain the
difference. Your actions now only served to further PROVE you have a
deeply rooted psychological NEED to lie.
Now, please explain why you are COMPELLED to ask the same
question, or in this case make the same demand, so many times AFTER
the question/demand has been answered. I know I'd like to know your
motivation for this act of dishonesty on your part. Others may as
well.
[Cue Greg running away to HIDE or attempting some means of
distraction]
Information about inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson, wife and child
abuser:
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>You claimed there is difference between a trust and a trust fund,
>Kent.
Avoidance noted.
>Kent.
Now that you've played that game, and once again FAILED, please
answer the question I asked.
>
>Please explain the difference!
Message-ID: <3dhct7dgdih7ecb1o...@4ax.com>
That's the MID for the post where I point out your asking me
about the difference in a reply to the post when I explain the
difference. Your actions now only served to further PROVE you have a
deeply rooted psychological NEED to lie.
Now, please explain why you are COMPELLED to ask the same
question, or in this case make the same demand, so many times AFTER
the question/demand has been answered. I know I'd like to know your
motivation for this act of dishonesty on your part. Others may as
well.
[Cue Greg running away to HIDE or attempting some means of
distraction]
Information about inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson, wife and child
abuser:
0 new messages