G > Perhaps you can help me!
G >
G > Where exactly did the story about Gary
G > waking up with the teen on his prong come from?
G > Was that usenet exaggeration or was that
G > in one of the documents? If so, which one?
Yeah, that's in the scan of Gary's confession to Police.
Interestingly enough though, Gary DENIES that confession!
Gary's online behavior does reveal that he's manipulative.
He's like the Pied Piper, leading his AUK'er psychos
and actually enabling them to anonymously harass others.
He is active and aggressive, not a good candidate for
the "momentary lapse" excuse he tried to arrange for
himself with that confession.
Gary recently tried to convince people that he had
sold his anonymous harasser posting service
Databasix, to a new owner/operator.
It was a laughably transparent effort at deception.
The text excerpt lifted from the scanned Parole
Officer document is consistent with his online
behavior and easily verifiable facts.
GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages) Oct 1997
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page3.JPG
"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.
Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.
The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,
suggests that risk for potential victims
may be high."
J. Puccinelli, Probation Officer, Unit IV
Municipal Court of the State of California,
Santa Clara County, People of the State
of California v. Gary Burnore
Probation Office No. DMU044
Court No. C9618225 DA No. 961131078
Santa Clara Police Department Case No. 9615185