Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Rainbow Flag

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Omni Vore

unread,
Jun 17, 2021, 2:36:45 PM6/17/21
to
On 6/17/2021 12:20 PM, Bill Flett wrote:
> On 6/17/2021 11:10 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 6/17/21 9:02 AM, Bill Flett wrote:
>>> On 6/17/2021 6:09 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 6/17/21 7:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> David Hartung <d_ha...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:pfednWYan_TBjlb9...@giganews.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/16/21 10:25 PM, Omni Vore wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/13/2021 5:37 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have never explained just how there is a right for same sex
>>>>>>>> marriage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 5–4 decision
>>>>>>> that the Fourteenth Amendment requires all states to grant same-sex
>>>>>>> marriages and recognize same-sex marriages granted in other states.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That explains the legal right, what is the moral and social
>>>>>> foundation
>>>>>> for same sex marriage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>       Why does *anything* need a "moral and social foundation"?
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps because it ultimately makes for a stronger culture?
>>>
>>> Forbidding queers from marrying does not strengthen the culture.  It
>>> weakens it.
>>
>> In what way?
>
> Queers enjoy better mental and physical health when they are married,
> the same as straight people do.  The improvement in their mental and
> physical health does not affect your own.
>
>>
>> To answer that question properly, you must be able to explain what
>> marriage is, and why every society for over 4,000 years has had
>> marriage, and has understood it to be a heterosexual union.
>
> Marriage is a state-sanctioned legal union between (in most societies)
> two persons.  It is bullshit when you bleat "marriage 'is' between one
> man and one woman" — that's what you want it to be, but that is not a
> necessary definition of it.
>
> Queers should be allowed to marry.

Absolutely, boss. The best reason is that faggots married to faggots
means is less likely that faggotism will be spread abroad into the gene
pool What's not to lick!?
0 new messages