韓首爾大學黃禹錫(
Hwang Woo-Suk)教授事件中,有一件事非常值得深刻思考!
Phenomenon of Collective Nobel-Prize Paranoid vs
Phenomenon of Nobel-Prize Hunger
Phenomenon:
1.the country do the legislative work for the researcher
2.support as much money as the researcher request
3.even deviation,to be patriotic,people take it as granted,
4.people donate everything the researcher need
5.people take it as a glory to serve the researcher,
even researcher commit crime,
the people protect the
researcher with any excuse they can
imagine
6.take the researcher as a national hero
7.to reveal the scandal, people would offend you in patriotic
fervor
for the truth,to inspect,you must act as Sherlock Holmes,as
cool as a cucumber,
perhaps you must prepare to sacrifice
Who is Hwang Woo-Suk
Hwang Woo-Suk born 29,January 1953,Buyeo gun,Chungnam
province, (South Korea)
a South Korean biomedical scientist.
He is a fan of the 17th century Italian physicist Galileo Galilei
Hwang commented :
"Galileo dared to take on the powerful church authorities of the
day
to prove that the planets orbit the sun. At the risk of losing his life,
he was brave enough to make a stand for science."
Hwang first caught media attention in South Korea when
he announced
he successfully created a cloned milk cow, in February 1999.
and In the year 2004, rose to international fame after claiming
a series of remarkable breakthroughs in the field of stem cell
research,
World take him as:
1.one of the pioneering experts in the
field of stem cell research
Korean people considered the
researcher :
1.a national hero
2.a best candidate for Nobel Prize
3.Pride of Korea,
they organized a group "I love Hwang woo-suk" to support
him
Goventment support him with state
funds
1.annual stipend of US$ 3 millions and other research
plan fee
From 1998 to 2005 up to US$ 39.9 million
2.the post office made a commemorative stamp on
Hwang's research
3.make the bioethics law for Hwang
Woo-Suk
4.launches the World Stem Cell Hub ,an international
network
what's wrong with his research?
1.Hwang conspicuously failed to provide any
supporting paper for the research,
Scientist can not find any data that can
probe the validity of the research.
2.He denied coercing his researchers into donating eggs and claimed
that he found out about the
situation only after it had occurred.He
added that he had lied about the source of the eggs donated to
protect the privacy of his female
researchers, and that he was not aware of the Declaration of Helsinki,
which clearly enumerates his actions as
a breach of ethical conduct.
Evidence:
December 8, 2005. Hwang's claim of not having known
about the donation of eggs by his own female
researchers was also denied by the
panel; in fact, it was discovered that Hwang himself had distributed
egg
donation consent forms to his
researchers and personally escorted one to the MizMedi Hospital to take the
egg
extraction procedure.
3.December 23,2005, Hwang apologized on that
day and admitted he fabricated results
in stem-cell research .
4. On December 29, 2005, the university determined
that all 11 of Hwang's stem cell lines were
fabricated.
The university announced on January 10
,2006 that Hwang's 2004 and 2005 papers on Science were
both
fabricated. Following on the
confirmation of scientific misconduct.
Why can this terrible thing keep that long
time?
ie,How Hwang woo-suk protect
himself?
1.revelation:On November 22, "PD Su-cheop"
(Producer's Notebook), a popular MBC investigative reporting show,
raised the possibility of unethical conduct in the egg cell acquiring
process.
defense:Despite the factual accuracy of the
report, news media as well as people caught up in
nationalistic
fervor in their unwavering support for Hwang
asserted that criticism of Hwang's work was
"unpatriotic,"
so
much so that the major companies who were sponsoring the show immediately
withdrew their support.
2. Hwang actively sought to establish every possible tie to
political and economic institutions in the country.
Hwang especially tried to win favor from the
Roh Moo-hyun government,
3.some lawmakers revealed that Hwang made several campaign
donations to them and other lawmakers.
The description above is
the
Phenomenon of Collective
Nobel-Prize Hunger
and if they don't introspect they would become
Collective Nobel-Prize Paranoid
but they got the ability to introspect , and follow the pace of
the world to become a developped country,
they said:
[Seong added:
"Researchers of our country were newly awakened to the fact that we have to take every
precaution
to ensure we don't fall behind
international ethics (guidelines) while researching."
]
they got the national confidence
.
Hannah Arendt said about the
situation:
"the psyche (or
character) can be destroyed even without the destruction of the physical man."
To
survive the family have no choice,but do the immoral
thing.
5.the Member of Academia
Sinica didn't feel sorry
6.he is an officer before,so he has good
relation with the authority to cover the
crime,
7.some colleague even do some terrible
thing worse than the Huang-woo-suk
coercing his
colleague to take the egg
extraction procedure
What would happen in Taiwan?
'Patriotism,'
'Criticism of Member of Academia Sinica 's work was
"unpatriotic," '
'The officers using every possible intrigues to blackmail the guy
who revealed the facts '
What a country that's why people said 'an
abnormal country'
no self-confidence,malicious intrigued people who is
against them.
Collective
Nobel-Prize Paranoid-----
The old Member of Academia Sinica and the guys
who
intrigue