Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Sum of three cubes problem solved
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Kerr-Mudd,John
Apr 6, 2019, 4:09:25 AM4/6/19
to
On Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:43:38 GMT, Jan van den Broek <fort...@xs4all.nl>
wrote:
> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:16:51 -0000 (UTC)
> "Kerr-Mudd,John" <nots...@invalid.org> schrieb:
>
> [Schnipp]
>
>>Quote:
>>Until Booker found his solution, it was one of only two integers left
>>below 100 (excluding the ones for which solutions definitely don’t
>>exist) that still couldn’t be expressed as a sum of three cubes. With
>>33 out of the way, the only one left is 42.
>>xposted for afda types.
>
> It's likely that you're not aware of the existence of
> alt.fan.douglas-adams.forty-two[1], which was created for
> 42-sightings.
>
> [1] f'up-to set
I wasn't, But now I am. Sorry to have posted to the wrong NG.
--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
wrote:
> Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:16:51 -0000 (UTC)
> "Kerr-Mudd,John" <nots...@invalid.org> schrieb:
>
> [Schnipp]
>
>>Quote:
>>Until Booker found his solution, it was one of only two integers left
>>below 100 (excluding the ones for which solutions definitely don’t
>>exist) that still couldn’t be expressed as a sum of three cubes. With
>>33 out of the way, the only one left is 42.
>>xposted for afda types.
>
> It's likely that you're not aware of the existence of
> alt.fan.douglas-adams.forty-two[1], which was created for
> 42-sightings.
>
> [1] f'up-to set
I wasn't, But now I am. Sorry to have posted to the wrong NG.
--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
0 new messages