Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

alt.fan.demon-local.sig-wars moderation

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Wedn...@alt.fan.demon-local.sig-wars

unread,
Jul 23, 2007, 9:47:14 PM7/23/07
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

* than Administration draft.
*
* Requires Pres. to negotiate for
* international key recovery.
* No. Yes. [Title 6]
*
* New Commerce Dept. enforcement
* powers
* No. Yes. [701-702]
*
* Information Security Board
* No. Yes. [801]
*
* Waiver of any provision of Act by
* Executive Order.
* No. Yes [901]
*
*
* *The Encrypted Data Security Act, draft dated April 29, 1997.
*
* **The Secure Public Networks Act, as released on June 17
* by Senator Kerrey's office.


Crypto is either GAK crackable, or it is real crypto.

There is no such thing as "good faith attempts to balance".

You either have to choose between the best interests of the people,
or the best interests of the ever-paranoid Militia.

I mean the ever-paranoid Military.


******************************************************************************

Feds' Wacky Pro-GAK Logic
---- ----- --- --- -----

Here are a couple of the wacky reasons they give for everyone wanting GAK.


o Business Will Demand It

They say setting up a GAK infrastructure will form a defacto standard for
interchange of public encryption keys, which business need for
interoperability of the various cryptography produ


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 9.7.1

FciwlvWuauRgBjMRhENvUhsJ+fltChdspWYuQ2Pi4d1+idOco1kbrWV7zGWUudFB
w0V19O5Jy23wzku1OhqlmRRQNaNZ4DsH1UOdgJSCc/h83cyMtJHnH2ApZOHotGFF
sMLG/oeJoxXXyBbwncdyV56JSHXPqexJmttHdrGucyBh4Ih9EaKqkM9aOYKiSW7o
1R7ZsF1+moxLfztpeI==
=5uvc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Phil Carmody

unread,
Jul 25, 2007, 3:53:55 AM7/25/07
to
"news.cvc.net" <fake.email.com> writes:

> <Wedn...@alt.fan.demon-local.sig-wars> wrote:
> <cryptology stuff...
>
> Wouldn't this be better off in a cryptology NG?

Nope, because it's part of an massive sporgery attack on sci.crypt.
The attacker has decided that in order to amplify his tens of
thousands of messages to sci.crypt, he will cross-post to random
other newsgroups, and thus cause thousands of replies such as yours.

Please resist the temptation of replying to these kinds of messages,
as it only harms the victim of the original attack even more. If you
can filter messages cross-posted to sci.crypt please do so, as I'm
sure these attacks will continue.

Thanks,
Phil Carmody, reader of sci.crypt

--
"Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank
so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of
/In God We Trust, Inc./.

0 new messages