M.I'5.Persec ution - t heir me thods an d tacti cs
mfm...@bigfoot.com
-=. MI5: methods and tactics -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
They deliberately set out to harass in. a way that would resemble the
symptoms of schizophrenia, so that any report of the harassment would. be
taken as indicating mental. illness and "treated" accordingly. They never
show their own faces; they only. work through proxies, in the media, among
the public, and by manipulating people in. the workplace. Since they do not
declare their identity there is no evidence to initiate legal. action
against the security services or anyone else. The only people. you can
prosecute are the proxies and they will deny. knowledge of any conspiracy.
By repeatedly humiliating and abusing the victim, they. induced mental
illness.. This is the worst form of human rights violation: making any
statement of. the harassment appear to be symptomatic of the illness which
they cause through the harassment. That this can happen, and. people collude
by silence, is. absolutely horrifying.
From the beginning in June 1990 they set a pattern of harassment which. they
have followed without change for the last six years. They . paint me as a
"threat" to which people must "react" (shades of Nazi persecution. methods),
while simultaneously portraying their hate campaign on which. they have
spent over a million pounds of taxpayers’ money. as a "joke".
The MI5 that breaks the law with the silent complicity of the police. is the
same agency that is now seeking a role in the fight. against crime. Perhaps
the real joke is the proposed involvement. in the implementation of justice
of an. organisation which commits criminal acts with secrecy and disinterest
for the. legal process.
1201
mfm...@bigfoot.com
Jesus Christ spoke neither against God, nor against Moses.
Antichrist and the false prophets, foretold by both Testaments, will speak
openly against God and against Jesus Christ. Who is not hidden... God would
not allow him, who would be a secret enemy, to do miracles openly.
In a public dispute where the two parties profess to be for God, for Jesus
Christ, for the Church, miracles have never been on the side of the false
Christians, and the other side has never been without a miracle.
"He hath a devil." John 10:21. And others said, "Can a devil open the eyes
of the blind?"
The proofs which Jesus Christ and the apostles draw from Scripture are not
conclusive; for they say only that Moses foretold that a prophet should
come. But they do not thereby prove that this is He; and that is the whole
question. These passages, therefore, serve only to show that they are not
contrary to Scripture and that there appears no inconsistency, but not that
there is agreement. Now this is enough, namely, exclusion of inconsistency,
along with miracles.
There is a mutual duty between God and men. We must pardon Him this saying:
Quid debui?207 "Accuse me, " said God in Isaiah.
"God must fulfil His promises," etc.
Men owe it to God to accept the religion which He sends. God owes it to men
not to lead them into error. Now, they would be led into error, if the
workers of miracles announced a doctrine which should not appear evidently
false to the light of common sense, and if a greater worker of miracles had
not already wamed men not to believe them.
Thus, if there were divisions in the Church, and the Arians, for example,
who declared themselves founded on Scripture just as the Catholics, had done
mira
mfm...@bigfoot.com
they are fine speakers, when it is such a question.
It is therefore false praise to give a man when we say of him, on his entry,
that he is a very clever poet; and it is a bad sign when a man is not asked
to give his judgement on some verses.
35. We should not be able to say of a man, "He is a mathematician," or "a
preacher," or "eloquent"; but that he is "a gentleman." That universal
quality alone pleases me. It is a bad sign when, on seeing a person, you
remember his book. I would prefer you to see no quality till you meet it and
have occasion to use it (Ne quid minis),[3] for fear some one quality
prevail and designate the man. Let none think him a fine speaker, unless
oratory be in question, and then let them think it.
36. Man is full of wants: he loves only those who can satisfy them all.
"This one is a good mathematician," one will say. But I have nothing to do
with mathematics; he would take me for a proposition. "That one is a good
soldier." He would take me for a besieged town. I need, then, an upright man
who can accommodate himself generally to all my wants.
37. Since we cannot be universal and know all that is to be known of
everything, we ought to know a little about everything. For it is far better
to know something about everything than to know all about one thing. This
universality is the best. If we can have both, still better; but if we must
choose, we ought to choose the former. And the world feels this and does so;
for the world
mfm...@bigfoot.com
sooner, had I not been greatly hindered by illness in my family, and
also in my own person. It is probably much larger than you expected,
and, it may be, than you would have chosen. I thought that the
extraordinary nature of the thing, and the innumerable
misrepresentations which have gone abroad of it, many of which,
doubtless, have reached your ears, made it necessary that I should be
particular. But I would leave it entirely with your wisdom to make what
use of it you think best, to send a part of it to England, or all, or
none, if you think it not worthy; or otherwise to dispose of it as you
may think most for God's glory, and the interest of religion. If you are
pleased to send any thing to the Rev. Dr. Guyse, I should be glad to
have it signified to him, as my humble desire, that since he and the
congregation to which he preached, have been pleased to take so much
notice of us, as they have, that they would also think of us at the
throne of grace, and seek there for us, that God would not forsake us,
but enable us to bring forth fruit answerable to our profession, and our
mercies; and that our "light may so shine before men, that others seeing
our good works, may glorify our Father which is in heaven."
When I first heard of the notice the Rev. Dr. Watts and Dr. Guyse took
of God's mercies to us, I took oc