Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

z-netz.sf+fantasy.startrek.allgemein moderation

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Perry@z-netz.sf+fantasy.startrek.allgemein

unread,
Jul 23, 2007, 7:21:03 PM7/23/07
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

could
* be conducted WITHOUT A JUDICIAL WARRANT simply by turning to the NSA."
*
* Under current laws, if the FBI wants to eavesdrop legally on the conversation
* of a criminal it must obtain a warrant from a Federal judge. In those cases
* where the FBI wants to eavesdrop on a specific individual who it believes
* is an agent of a foreign government, it can apply for a warrant from a
* special SECRET PANEL of Federal judges established just for that purpose.
*
* The special missions and advanced technology of the NSA however, make its
* operations more difficult to control within the restrictions of the Federal
* wiretapping and surveillance laws.
*
* According to the 1975 report of the Special Senate Intelligence Committee,
* the agency has equipment that "sweeps up enormous numbers of communications,
* not all of which can be reviewed by intelligence analysts."
*
* Using "watch lists" --- lists of words and phrases designed to identify
* communications of intelligence interest --- NSA computers scan the mass of
* acquired communications to select those which may be of specific foreign
* intelligence interest", the report said.
*
* The court ruled Fourth Amendment rights were not violated.
*
* The Senate investigation in 1975 uncovered evidence the overseas
* communications of a number of individuals engaged in organizing
* political protests against the war in Vietnam were subjected to
* surveillance by the NSA equipment.


Mini-recap:

o The NSA can listen in on all American citizens' border-crossing
communications of any sort without a warrant or any other court
procedure, and effectively distribute that information to any and
all local law-enforcement agencies. And foreign governments.

Loss of Fourth Amendment rights.

Not even discussed with the American public.

Not even debated by our elected representatives.

o Domestic law enforcement ag


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.8.5

blD3ot7RMuy4uIB6K+vgYnj2FMkOrZttdSargjpQtC3z6vsYKXremQ5qpibDTSj7
RHBRh3nDEi0WIZIkpdJJf828cVwoSyMqjWLqqwf89Ji6OhxW7jrHYjYnixiqrmgM
Qukl7bMunrwvw5FIyRpWYwhbBCkHNs6vhERcVh4SDcXuOddkgDi3DFY+C0+yzLE3
ss90uni6ivyS3/YAt9==
=HEDr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

0 new messages