Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

ron jeremy self suck cinema

475 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 1:47:21 AM6/18/01
to
does anyone have a pic of ron jermey going down on himself,or can tell me some
movies that hes done it in?

-
Check out my comedy site:
The Underground Outlaws Of Comedy
http://www.geocities.com/undergroundoutlaws

Ixion

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 5:06:35 AM6/18/01
to
<<<does anyone have a pic of ron jermey going down on himself,or can tell me
some
movies that hes done it in?>>>>

I believe DEVIL IN MISS JONES PART II has a scene of the Hedgehog pleasuring
himself. But there's no money shot, if that's what your looking for.

Though, wasn't he brilliant in KILLING ZOE?


EdGein15
A toast, Jedadiah. To love on my terms...


N Jill Marsh

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 9:44:54 AM6/18/01
to
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:18:14 -0500,
radioGO-SPAM-...@yahoo.comwrote:

>While we're on the subject of Ron Jeremy ...
>
>Why does he keep getting work? Is it because big, fat, creepy, ugly dudes watch
>his videos and figger "If he can get some p----, so can I"?

I saw an interview a few years ago, and that's basically what he said,
though in a slight less self-critical way. He said that the industry
doesn't really want guys who are too good looking. After all, most
male-oriented porn is really what happens after the beer commercial.

nj"when you're smiling"m

"When roosters fall in love,
they lose all reason."

Michael Lorton

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 10:32:03 AM6/18/01
to
N Jill Marsh <njm...@bigfoot.com> writes:

> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:18:14 -0500,
> radioGO-SPAM-...@yahoo.comwrote:
>
> >While we're on the subject of Ron Jeremy ...

>> Why does he keep getting work? Is it because big, fat, creepy, ugly
>> dudes watch his videos and figger "If he can get some p----, so can
>> I"?

> I saw an interview a few years ago, and that's basically what he said,
> though in a slight less self-critical way.

I wonder if we saw the same interview. He seemed charmingly
self-deprecating, but I still really, really did NOT want to see him
naked.

> He said that the industry doesn't really want guys who are too good
> looking. After all, most male-oriented porn is really what happens
> after the beer commercial.

Have you seen the beer commercial in which a pair of attractive
looking girls at a bar send a beer to the ordinary looking guy[1],
then spot a Handsome Guy at a table and have the beer redirected to
him at the last moment. Handsome Guy is joined by his boyfriend and
the two share a smile about the incident.

[1] By TV standards. I'm no judge of male attractiveness and the guys
the media hold up as officially handsome just look effeminate to me.

It's a great ad: for women, it's commisuration with the problems of
dating; for gay guys, it's normalization of homosexuality; for
straight males, it's revenge on every woman who ever snubbed them,
even in thought (all together now: Tom Cruise is gay).

M.

Jay R. Ashworth

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 11:25:44 AM6/18/01
to
*Right* in the middle of the appendectomy,
too-damn-long-a-user-name-to-make-slrn-happy turned

to Hawkeye and me and said:
> While we're on the subject of Ron Jeremy ...
>
> Why does he keep getting work? Is it because big, fat, creepy, ugly
> dudes watch his videos and figger "If he can get some p----, so can
> I"?

Partially that, and partially because he is or at least used to be)
pretty funny; that's uncommon among stunt cocks.

He hosts the Adult awards down here in Tampa every year, and reportedly
MC's it real well; his pic, amusingly enough, is on the wall of a
Cuban/Spanish joint I eat at occasionally -- in chef's uniform;
presumably he knows the owners.

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth j...@baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff Baylink
The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think
Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 804 5015

OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows

Lalbert1

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 12:06:15 PM6/18/01
to
In article <slrn9is7b...@dorothy.msas.net>, j...@dorothy.msas.net (Jay R.
Ashworth) writes:

>He hosts the Adult awards down here in Tampa every year, and reportedly
>MC's it real well; his pic, amusingly enough, is on the wall of a
>Cuban/Spanish joint I eat at occasionally -- in chef's uniform;

Tell him to wash his hands and make me a tuna fish sandwich.

Les

Jay R. Ashworth

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 12:20:28 PM6/18/01
to
*Right* in the middle of the appendectomy, Lalbert1 turned

to Hawkeye and me and said:

Probably medianoche. ISTR you're local; the place is Pipo's on Waters.

Rex Mundi

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 12:32:30 PM6/18/01
to

"Michael" <mickch...@aol.comblowme> wrote in message
news:20010618014721...@ng-ma1.aol.com...


Why would you want that?

How could a guy with such a gut do that to himself, I mean , IF he had a
fat gut. Didn't someone here say he is fat? There, someone did say it.
It's not just me. I would NEVER watch such filth.

Ptui, Ptui.

Who is Ron Jeremy anyway? Don't you mean Ron K. Jeremy?


N Jill Marsh

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 12:38:51 PM6/18/01
to
On 18 Jun 2001 07:32:03 -0700, Michael Lorton
<mlo...@civetsystems.com>wrote:

>N Jill Marsh <njm...@bigfoot.com> writes:
>
>> I saw an interview a few years ago, and that's basically what he said,
>> though in a slight less self-critical way.
>
>I wonder if we saw the same interview. He seemed charmingly
>self-deprecating, but I still really, really did NOT want to see him
>naked.

This was in a documentary about the porn industry. There were a lot
of excellent interviews and behind the scenes stuff. I think it was
part of a series about human sexuality and behaviour.

>Have you seen the beer commercial in which a pair of attractive
>looking girls at a bar send a beer to the ordinary looking guy[1],
>then spot a Handsome Guy at a table and have the beer redirected to
>him at the last moment. Handsome Guy is joined by his boyfriend and
>the two share a smile about the incident.

No. There's something similar with girls in a liqueur commercial
though (Amaretto or something?).

>It's a great ad: for women, it's commisuration with the problems of
>dating; for gay guys, it's normalization of homosexuality; for
>straight males, it's revenge on every woman who ever snubbed them,
>even in thought (all together now: Tom Cruise is gay).

Many beer commercials have changed their aim wrt demographics. Does
the oral sex one air in the US? (Woman, discussing new boyfriend with
a couple of female friends, "does he ~~~~~~~?", before guy shows up to
meet them.)

nj"~~~is some sort of funny hand signal"m

Paul L. Madarasz

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 2:36:32 PM6/18/01
to
On 18 Jun 2001 07:32:03 -0700, Michael Lorton
<mlo...@civetsystems.com> wrote, perhaps among other things...


>
>It's a great ad: for women, it's commisuration with the problems of
>dating; for gay guys, it's normalization of homosexuality; for
>straight males, it's revenge on every woman who ever snubbed them,
>even in thought (all together now: Tom Cruise is gay).
>
>M.

Bette Midler says she has proof Tom Cruise is NOT gay: he's never been
to one of her shows.
--
Paul L. Madarasz
Tucson, Baja Arizona


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

Nostradamus (formerly Jingleheimerschmidt)

unread,
Jun 18, 2001, 3:15:19 PM6/18/01
to
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:18:14 -0500,
radioGO-SPAM-...@yahoo.com wrote:

>On 18 Jun 2001 05:47:21 GMT, mickch...@aol.comblowme (Michael) wrote:
>
>>does anyone have a pic of ron jermey going down on himself,or can tell me some
>>movies that hes done it in?
>
>

>While we're on the subject of Ron Jeremy ...
>
>Why does he keep getting work? Is it because big, fat, creepy, ugly dudes watch
>his videos and figger "If he can get some p----, so can I"?
>

Maybe he's proof of the old notion that girls like guys who can make
them laugh?

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 1:20:28 PM6/19/01
to
Good old Michael Lorton <mlo...@civetsystems.com> wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on 18 Jun 2001 07:32:03 -0700 that ...

>Have you seen the beer commercial in which a pair of attractive
>looking girls at a bar send a beer to the ordinary looking guy[1],
>then spot a Handsome Guy at a table and have the beer redirected to
>him at the last moment. Handsome Guy is joined by his boyfriend and
>the two share a smile about the incident.
>
>[1] By TV standards. I'm no judge of male attractiveness and the guys
>the media hold up as officially handsome just look effeminate to me.

We agree!
I also find most men gushed over as handsome to be big old nelly sissy
boys. Doesn't do a thing for me.

Ron Jeremy? Hole smokes. Given a choice between him and say Janet
Reno? I'd be dating the ugliest woman in America and LOVING IT.

Bill
"Were there no God, we would be in this
glorious world with grateful hearts: and no
one to thank." -Christina Rossetti

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 1:21:13 PM6/19/01
to
Good old Paul L. Madarasz <pl...@dakotacom.net> wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:36:32 -0700 that ...

>On 18 Jun 2001 07:32:03 -0700, Michael Lorton
><mlo...@civetsystems.com> wrote, perhaps among other things...
>
>
>>
>>It's a great ad: for women, it's commisuration with the problems of
>>dating; for gay guys, it's normalization of homosexuality; for
>>straight males, it's revenge on every woman who ever snubbed them,
>>even in thought (all together now: Tom Cruise is gay).
>>
>>M.
>
>Bette Midler says she has proof Tom Cruise is NOT gay: he's never been
>to one of her shows.

She's available on DVD. You can sing along at home to all her campy
classics. Call for Vicki Edie!

Mirhanda Sarko

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 2:56:58 PM6/19/01
to
Bill Diamond <bi...@nospambilldiamond.com> wrote in alt.fan.cecil-adams:

> Ron Jeremy? Hole smokes.

Freudian slip?

Mirhanda

--
Decapitate my addy to email me

Opus the Penguin

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 2:23:33 PM6/19/01
to
Bill Diamond wrote:
>Ron Jeremy? Hole smokes. Given a choice between him and say Janet
>Reno? I'd be dating the ugliest woman in America and LOVING IT.

Could someone please post a link to a picture of Ron Jeremy (preferably
clothed)? I'm dying of curiosity. Alternatively, someone want to explain
things to my wife when she finds me in the living room with a porn video in
the VCR and my eyeballs clawed out?


Al Yellon

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 3:53:54 PM6/19/01
to

"Opus the Penguin" <opusthe...@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
news:9go96r$a6c39$1...@ID-58324.news.dfncis.de...

A simple web search turned up this:

http://www.ronjeremy.com/

and you don't even have to go past the front page to see a (non-nude) photo.

HTH!


Opus the Penguin

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 4:58:30 PM6/19/01
to
Al Yellon wrote:

>Opus the Penguin wrote:
>> Bill Diamond wrote:
>> >Ron Jeremy? Hole smokes. Given a choice between him and say Janet
>> >Reno? I'd be dating the ugliest woman in America and LOVING IT.
>>
>> Could someone please post a link to a picture of Ron Jeremy (preferably
>> clothed)? I'm dying of curiosity. Alternatively, someone want to explain
>> things to my wife when she finds me in the living room with a porn video
>>in the VCR and my eyeballs clawed out?
>
> A simple web search turned up this:
>
> http://www.ronjeremy.com/
>
> and you don't even have to go past the front page to see a (non-nude) photo.
>
> HTH!

Aw geez. We'll file that under "Things Opus should've been able to figure out
for himself." Thanks.

That said, having looked at him, he doesn't seem THAT bad. I'd definitely
choose him over Janet Reno, and I don't even swing that way.

In fact, he reminds me of someone else whose picture I've seen. Who could it
be? Hmmmmmm....


http://www.communityzero.com/clubs/photos/view.cfm?id=326186&uid=F89C94F1-64EC-11D5-889600508BDCB652

(You can kill me if you must, but it's true, darn it!)

Al Yellon

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 6:35:37 PM6/19/01
to
"Opus the Penguin" <opusthe...@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
news:9goehg$9tsvp$1...@ID-58324.news.dfncis.de...

> >
> > http://www.ronjeremy.com/
> >
> > and you don't even have to go past the front page to see a (non-nude)
photo.
> >
> > HTH!
>
> Aw geez. We'll file that under "Things Opus should've been able to figure
out
> for himself." Thanks.
>
> That said, having looked at him, he doesn't seem THAT bad. I'd definitely
> choose him over Janet Reno, and I don't even swing that way.
>
> In fact, he reminds me of someone else whose picture I've seen. Who could
it
> be? Hmmmmmm....
>
>
>
http://www.communityzero.com/clubs/photos/view.cfm?id=326186&uid=F89C94F1-64
EC-11D5-889600508BDCB652
>
> (You can kill me if you must, but it's true, darn it!)

Okay, calling up this link takes me to the AFCA Family Album main page. What
am I missing?

(and I *know* Opus ain't talkin' 'bout me)


Big David

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 8:13:39 PM6/19/01
to
Al Yellon <aye...@REMOVETHIScolgatealumni.org> wrote in message
news:tivl15j...@corp.supernews.com...

> > > http://www.ronjeremy.com/

>
http://www.communityzero.com/clubs/photos/view.cfm?id=326186&uid=F89C94F1-6
4EC-11D5-889600508BDCB652

It took me to Bill's picture.
--
Big David
To send email, take out "et" and "spam". Emails of replies appreciated.
"The two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity."

Opus the Penguin

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 7:44:44 PM6/19/01
to
Al Yellon wrote:
>Opus the Penguin wrote
>>In fact, he reminds me of someone else whose picture I've seen. Who could
>>it be? Hmmmmmm....
>>
> http://www.communityzero.com/clubs/photos/view.cfm?id=326186&uid=F89C94F1-64
> EC-11D5-889600508BDCB652
>
>> (You can kill me if you must, but it's true, darn it!)
>
>Okay, calling up this link takes me to the AFCA Family Album main page. What
>am I missing?

Huh. I just clicked on it and it worked fine even with the last third of the
link lopped off as above. Oh well. Go to photo 16 and compare it to
www.ronjeremy.com.

>(and I *know* Opus ain't talkin' 'bout me)

You got that right.


A Texas Girl...

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 8:38:41 PM6/19/01
to
It was written by... hell, I don't know:

>> > That said, having looked at him, he doesn't seem THAT bad. I'd
>definitely
>> > choose him over Janet Reno, and I don't even swing that way.

I looked at the picture. This guy didn't get hit with the ugly stick, he fell
off the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down. Sheesh! But anyway,
here is my question:

I am not all that familiar with porn, having had but very limited experience
with it. So I am wondering why would there ever be a porn made with this
person... umm.... doing that to himself? I mean, what marketability does that
have? Who would find that arousing? Is it just the weird "ewww" factor, like
Stupid Human Tricks or something? I mean, it doesn't even matter that he's so
goofy looking... I think Mel Gibson is too hot for words, and I wouldn't want
to see him doing that. What's the deal?

Julie

GrapeApe

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 9:08:37 PM6/19/01
to
>I am not all that familiar with porn, having had but very limited experience
>with it. So I am wondering why would there ever be a porn made with this
>person... umm.... doing that to himself?

Comic relief and Shock.

Someone already ventured the excuse that ugly people are in porn flicks to make
the folks watching feel better about themselves. I knew a conselor that worked
at the local funny farm that kept a video in the office of people with all
sorts of oddly shaped members at various extremes (professional 'porn stars'
all) just so clients in the institution wouldn't feel so badly about theirs
being possible outside the norm.

Apparently at one point Ron Jeremy wasn't quite as obese, and was certainly
younger.

Many times, if you see someone that is relatively less 'attractive' in such a
film, they may be the executive producer.

Lars Eighner

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 9:22:12 PM6/19/01
to
In our last episode, <9go96r$a6c39$1...@ID-58324.news.dfncis.de>,
the lovely and talented Opus the Penguin
broadcast on alt.fan.cecil-adams:

OtP> Bill Diamond wrote:
>> Ron Jeremy? Hole smokes. Given a choice between him and say Janet
>> Reno? I'd be dating the ugliest woman in America and LOVING IT.

OtP> Could someone please post a link to a picture of Ron Jeremy
OtP> (preferably clothed)? I'm dying of curiosity.

Did you ever have an NES? Think Mario.

--
Lars Eighner eig...@io.com http://www.io.com/~eighner/
Maintain thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee.

StarChaser_Tyger

unread,
Jun 19, 2001, 10:15:29 PM6/19/01
to
We get signal. What you say? It's Bill Diamond
<bi...@nospambilldiamond.com>,

>
>Ron Jeremy? Hole smokes.

<giggles> I know, it's a typo, but...
--
Visit the Furry Artist InFURmation Page! Contact information, which artists
do and don't want their work posted. http://web.tampabay.rr.com/starchsr/
Address no longer munged for the inconvienence of spammers.
(Yes, this really is me.)

Jay R. Ashworth

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 12:50:17 AM6/20/01
to
*Right* in the middle of the appendectomy, A Texas Girl... turned

to Hawkeye and me and said:
> I am not all that familiar with porn, having had but very limited experience
> with it. So I am wondering why would there ever be a porn made with this
> person... umm.... doing that to himself? I mean, what marketability does that
> have? Who would find that arousing? Is it just the weird "ewww" factor, like
> Stupid Human Tricks or something? I mean, it doesn't even matter that he's so
> goofy looking... I think Mel Gibson is too hot for words, and I wouldn't want
> to see him doing that. What's the deal?

It has differing appeals to different folks, just like every other part
of porn, including the good old American-man-on-top-get-it-over-with-quick.

Happens he has a very long straight penis, and can come on cue, a
requirement for males in porn. And he *is* funny (for sufficiently
small values of funny), and didn't *used* to be that heavy... though,
TTBOMK, he's *always* been that hairy.

Quoting William Riker in Imzadi: "Traction."

I've always thought it amusing that the men get paid less, but
{get,have} to come, whereas the women get paid substiantially more, but
almost never do. You can tell the films where they do; those are the
ones that are never on the shelf cause someone else has already rented
them. :-)

N Jill Marsh

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 2:46:03 AM6/20/01
to
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 04:50:17 GMT, j...@dorothy.msas.net (Jay R.
Ashworth)wrote:

>
>Quoting William Riker in Imzadi: "Traction."
>
>I've always thought it amusing that the men get paid less, but
>{get,have} to come, whereas the women get paid substiantially more, but
>almost never do. You can tell the films where they do; those are the
>ones that are never on the shelf cause someone else has already rented
>them. :-)

There was something along the same lines with the Ron Jeremy interview
I saw. He said that the women were there for the money, and the guys
were there for the women, and the pay differential would never go
away, because the guys would do it for free if need be.

nj"$"m

"And she reached out again;
she braved the filth and
rested her hand on my hair."

Opus the Penguin

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 2:36:08 AM6/20/01
to
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
>It has differing appeals to different folks, just like every other part
>of porn, including the good old American-man-on-top-get-it-over-with-quick.

This reminds me of the old joke about the Frenchman and the American comparing
notes. (It helps if you read the Frenchmen's part with your best fake French
accent.)


Frenchman: In France we have one-hundred different positions in which to make
love.

American: A hundred! Wow. I don't think we have nearly that many.

Frenchman: How many do you have?

American: Well, let's see. There's man on top....

Frenchman: Aha! One-hundred and ONE.


Jason

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 4:50:28 AM6/20/01
to
>OtP> Could someone please post a link to a picture of Ron Jeremy
>OtP> (preferably clothed)? I'm dying of curiosity.
>
>Did you ever have an NES? Think Mario.

He was the star of the porn film "Super Hornio Bros." There was also a video
game on the internet called "Ron Jeremy Land" that was a clone of Mario Bros.


Barbara

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 9:47:00 AM6/20/01
to
>A simple web search turned up this:
>
>http://www.ronjeremy.com/
>
>and you don't even have to go past the front page to see a (non-nude) photo.
>

Anyone else think he looks like Jon Lovitz doing a porn star sketch?
Barbara -

"I've got something inside me
Not what my life's about
Cause I've been letting my outside tide me
Over 'til my time runs out."

Taxi
Harry Chapin


Jay R. Ashworth

unread,
Jun 20, 2001, 11:09:54 AM6/20/01
to
*Right* in the middle of the appendectomy, N Jill Marsh turned

to Hawkeye and me and said:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 04:50:17 GMT, j...@dorothy.msas.net (Jay R.
> Ashworth)wrote:
> >I've always thought it amusing that the men get paid less, but
> >{get,have} to come, whereas the women get paid substiantially more, but
> >almost never do. You can tell the films where they do; those are the
> >ones that are never on the shelf cause someone else has already rented
> >them. :-)
>
> There was something along the same lines with the Ron Jeremy interview
> I saw. He said that the women were there for the money, and the guys
> were there for the women, and the pay differential would never go
> away, because the guys would do it for free if need be.

And if *those* guys wouldn't do it for free (and I suspect that the
sex qua sex pales after a while, even if you *do* get to fuck Jenna
Jameson (who was much prettier before the job -- see Up'n'Cummers 10 or
11 if you like this sort of thing) there are *other* guys who would.

But of course, some of these directors, strangs as this may seem,
actually want people who can *act*, and they're *much* harder to come
by.

Cheers,
-- jr 'no pun intended' a

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 12:19:53 AM6/21/01
to
Good old "Al Yellon" <aye...@REMOVETHIScolgatealumni.org> wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:35:37 -0500 that ...

Oh, you awful vulgar nasty she-bitch in plastic shoes.

N Jill Marsh

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 1:09:08 AM6/21/01
to
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:19:53 -0400, Bill Diamond
<bi...@nospambilldiamond.com>wrote:

>>"Opus the Penguin" <opusthe...@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
>>news:9goehg$9tsvp$1...@ID-58324.news.dfncis.de...

>>> In fact, he reminds me of someone else whose picture I've seen. Who could
>>it
>>> be? Hmmmmmm....
>


>Oh, you awful vulgar nasty she-bitch in plastic shoes.
>

Well, that solves that mystery. FWIW, I don't see much of a
resemblance.

nj"from the neck up, at least"m

Big David

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 1:14:00 AM6/21/01
to
Bill Diamond <bi...@nospambilldiamond.com> wrote in message
news:oet2jtkhdn4dcqder...@4ax.com...

Oh, that had to hurt!

Dutch Jingleheimerschmidt

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 1:30:57 AM6/21/01
to
Velma Marsh njm...@bigfoot.com.TOENAILS
Date: 6/21/2001 1:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time writes:

>Well, that solves that mystery.

Let's go get a pizza pie, Scoob.


-"Ain't gonna hang no picture, ain't gonna hang no picture frame
ain't gonna hang no picture, ain't gonna hang no picture frame
Well, I might look like Robert Ford, but I feel just like Jesse James"

Opus the Penguin

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 3:37:23 AM6/21/01
to
Big David wrote:

>Bill Diamond wrote:
>>>Opus the Penguin wrote:
> > >> > http://www.ronjeremy.com/

>>>>In fact, he reminds me of someone else whose picture I've seen. Who
>>>> could it be? Hmmmmmm....
>>
>>http://www.communityzero.com/clubs/photos/view.cfm?id=326186&uid=F89C94F1-
>>64 EC-11D5-889600508BDCB652
>>>>
>>>> (You can kill me if you must, but it's true, darn it!)
>>
>>Oh, you awful vulgar nasty she-bitch in plastic shoes.
>
>Oh, that had to hurt!

Well, the plastic shoes part stung. On the other hand, I'm lucky to be alive.

And I apologize profusely, Mr. Diamond. You are the man who recommended "Lily, Rosemary, and the Jack of Hearts" to me. I have secured a copy and am enthralled.

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 8:14:42 AM6/21/01
to
Good old N Jill Marsh <njm...@bigfoot.com.TOENAILS> wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:09:08 -0400 that ...

>On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:19:53 -0400, Bill Diamond
><bi...@nospambilldiamond.com>wrote:
>
>>>"Opus the Penguin" <opusthe...@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
>>>news:9goehg$9tsvp$1...@ID-58324.news.dfncis.de...
>
>>>> In fact, he reminds me of someone else whose picture I've seen. Who could
>>>it
>>>> be? Hmmmmmm....
>>
>>Oh, you awful vulgar nasty she-bitch in plastic shoes.
>>
>
>Well, that solves that mystery. FWIW, I don't see much of a
>resemblance.

Thank you. I think.

Bill

>
>nj"from the neck up, at least"m
>
>"And she reached out again;
> she braved the filth and
> rested her hand on my hair."

"Were there no God, we would be in this

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 8:14:41 AM6/21/01
to
Good old "Big David" <dbo...@etspamhome.com> wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:14:00 GMT that ...

>> Oh, you awful vulgar nasty she-bitch in plastic shoes.
>
>Oh, that had to hurt!

Not as much as my revenge will be. Oh yes, this I vow.

Briar Rose

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 4:15:12 PM6/21/01
to
<radioGO-SPAM-...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>While we're on the subject of Ron Jeremy ...
>
>Why does he keep getting work? Is it because big, fat, creepy, ugly dudes watch
>his videos and figger "If he can get some p----, so can I"?

Well, he has a big penis. Back in the day, men
didn't have to be hot to be in porn, they just
needed to have huge schlongs.

Also, he has a reputation in the biz as a nice
and funny guy. So, he's popular, and he's managed
to make a name for himself even in mainstream USA,
so they keep giving him work.

:) Connie-Lynne
--
"Thank God for Frito-Lay. It did not market Chee-tos as 'dangerously
cheesy' until after, and ONLY after, it had developed a Chee-to whose
cheesiness exceeded acceptable safety standards."
-- The Onion

Fred Simons

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 6:32:09 PM6/21/01
to

"Bill Diamond" <bi...@nospambilldiamond.com> wrote in message
news:4go3jt4gm6nlap6pr...@4ax.com...

> Good old "Big David" <dbo...@etspamhome.com> wrote in
> alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:14:00 GMT that ...
> >> Oh, you awful vulgar nasty she-bitch in plastic shoes.
> >
> >Oh, that had to hurt!
>
> Not as much as my revenge will be. Oh yes, this I vow.

Bill, I know this is gonna hurt, but I think Opus is right.
You two look at a casual glance to be approximately the same in general age,
size and build; same hair color, similar hairstyle; and the mustache is the
clincher.
I'm sure that at any closer look the two of you will never be mistaken for
one another, but from the viewpoint of someone who knows you visually only
from a casual look at a single photo, the resemblance is close enough to
merit a double-take, at first glance.

Fred Simons


Boron Elgar

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 6:43:13 PM6/21/01
to
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:32:09 GMT, "Fred Simons" <sim...@wctc.net>
wrote:

Bill, darling...you are going to provide us with a GIF! GIF! of any
real similarities, aren't you?

Boron

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 8:11:53 PM6/21/01
to
Good old Boron Elgar <boron...@hotmail.com> wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:43:13 GMT that ...

I'd need to get the wide-angle lens out. But I certainly can't
perform auto-eroticism. If I could, why would I ever leave the house?

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 8:12:30 PM6/21/01
to
Good old "Fred Simons" <sim...@wctc.net> wrote in alt.fan.cecil-adams
back on Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:32:09 GMT that ...


Such evil people. I will be patient, but this will come back to haunt
you.

Opus the Penguin

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 8:33:32 PM6/21/01
to
Bill Diamond wrote:

>Good old Fred Simons wrote:
>>Bill, I know this is gonna hurt, but I think Opus is right.
>>You two look at a casual glance to be approximately the same in general age,
>>size and build; same hair color, similar hairstyle; and the mustache is the
>>clincher.
>>I'm sure that at any closer look the two of you will never be mistaken for
>>one another, but from the viewpoint of someone who knows you visually only
>>from a casual look at a single photo, the resemblance is close enough to
>>merit a double-take, at first glance.
>
>Such evil people. I will be patient, but this will come back to haunt
>you.

Hey, I apologized. Take him! He's the evil one! Not me.


Alec Horgan

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 10:15:02 PM6/21/01
to
Briar Rose <cly...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> <radioGO-SPAM-...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >Why does he keep getting work? Is it because big, fat, creepy, ugly dudes watch
> >his videos and figger "If he can get some p----, so can I"?
>
> Well, he has a big penis. Back in the day, men
> didn't have to be hot to be in porn, they just
> needed to have huge schlongs.

Actually, size isn't particularly important.
Much more significant is the ability to get
and sustain an erection for as long as need
be, and then to ejaculate when told to do
so, not too early and not too late. Ron
can go as long as needed and come on cue,
and that's what makes him a valuable porn
commodity.

Which goes back to the point about guys
doing porn for free. There are, no doubt,
lots who would like to, but very, very few
who could.


Alec

Sean Houtman

unread,
Jun 21, 2001, 11:12:58 PM6/21/01
to
From: mrmrs...@aol.comdiespam (A Texas Girl...)

>
>I am not all that familiar with porn, having had but very limited experience
>with it. So I am wondering why would there ever be a porn made with this
>person... umm.... doing that to himself? I mean, what marketability does that
>have?

Nostalgia perhaps? I used to be able to, but can't anymore.

Sean

Never, um, finished though...

--
Visit my photolog page; http://members.aol.com/grommit383/myhomepage
Last updated 04-15-01 with 65 pictures of Carlsbad Caverns "Big Room".

Boron Elgar

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 9:05:56 AM6/22/01
to
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:11:53 -0400, Bill Diamond
<bi...@nospambilldiamond.com> wrote:


>
>I'd need to get the wide-angle lens out. But I certainly can't
>perform auto-eroticism. If I could, why would I ever leave the house?
>

Mother Nature was one sharp cookie in that respect.

Boron

RM Mentock

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 8:58:51 AM6/22/01
to

Nonsense. Dogs still bark

--
RM Mentock

Leave out a couple comma's and the average 11 line sentence
can get hard to read. -- Casady

RM Mentock

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 9:00:12 AM6/22/01
to
Sean Houtman wrote:
>
> From: mrmrs...@aol.comdiespam (A Texas Girl...)
>
> >
> >I am not all that familiar with porn, having had but very limited experience
> >with it. So I am wondering why would there ever be a porn made with this
> >person... umm.... doing that to himself? I mean, what marketability does that
> >have?
>
> Nostalgia perhaps? I used to be able to, but can't anymore.
>
> Sean
>
> Never, um, finished though...

See? Mother Nature had nothing to do with it.

Boron Elgar

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 1:15:06 PM6/22/01
to
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:58:51 +0000, RM Mentock
<men...@mindspring.com> wrote:

>Boron Elgar wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:11:53 -0400, Bill Diamond
>> <bi...@nospambilldiamond.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >I'd need to get the wide-angle lens out. But I certainly can't
>> >perform auto-eroticism. If I could, why would I ever leave the house?
>> >
>> Mother Nature was one sharp cookie in that respect.
>
>Nonsense. Dogs still bark

Yes, indeed they do, but never while they are licking their balls.

Boron

Dhubghall

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 3:21:39 PM6/22/01
to
Briar Rose <cly...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> <radioGO-SPAM-...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>While we're on the subject of Ron Jeremy ...
>>
>>Why does he keep getting work? Is it because big, fat, creepy, ugly dudes watch
>>his videos and figger "If he can get some p----, so can I"?

> Well, he has a big penis. Back in the day, men
> didn't have to be hot to be in porn, they just
> needed to have huge schlongs.

> Also, he has a reputation in the biz as a nice
> and funny guy. So, he's popular, and he's managed
> to make a name for himself even in mainstream USA,
> so they keep giving him work.


What I think is frightening is his first screen credit, at least according
to IMDB, was in Jesus Christ Superstar. To me that pretty much pegs the
cosmic irony meter.

Dougall

Dance like it hurts. Love like you need money. Work when people are
watching - Dogbert

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 9:20:11 PM6/22/01
to
Good old "Opus the Penguin" <opusthe...@nettaxi.com> wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:33:32 -0700 that ...

Well, you I'll forgive. The rest of you better lay low. I'm in a
mean, mean mood.

Big David

unread,
Jun 22, 2001, 10:16:22 PM6/22/01
to
Bill Diamond <bi...@nospambilldiamond.com> wrote in message
news:nlr7jtgjkidrh36jq...@4ax.com...

> Good old "Opus the Penguin" <opusthe...@nettaxi.com> wrote in

> >Hey, I apologized. Take him! He's the evil one! Not me.

> Well, you I'll forgive. The rest of you better lay low. I'm in a
> mean, mean mood.


Just please remember that I was empathizing with you, not insulting you.
--
Big David (still looking forward to piece of that promised cheesecake)

Bob E.

unread,
Jun 23, 2001, 1:42:56 PM6/23/01
to
ket...@seemysig.com wrote:
>
> We all know what dogs are saying when they bark. "Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey!"
> That cartoon by Kliban got it right on the nose.

Nah, it was Gary "Far Side" Larson, it was on my calendar just the
other day. One of my favorites. --Bob

P.S. Kliban's pinnacle was "Mousey-dung" with the Communist Cats.

================================================================================
Bob Ellingson bo...@halted.com
Halted Specialties Co., Inc. http://www.halted.com
3500 Ryder St. (408) 732-1573
Santa Clara, Calif. 95051 USA (408) 732-6428 (FAX)

Dana Carpender

unread,
Jun 23, 2001, 3:51:49 PM6/23/01
to

Sean Houtman wrote:
>
> From: mrmrs...@aol.comdiespam (A Texas Girl...)
>
> >
> >I am not all that familiar with porn, having had but very limited experience
> >with it. So I am wondering why would there ever be a porn made with this
> >person... umm.... doing that to himself? I mean, what marketability does that
> >have?
>
> Nostalgia perhaps? I used to be able to, but can't anymore.

GIF! GIF!
--
Dana W. Carpender
Author, How I Gave Up My Low Fat Diet -- And Lost Forty Pounds!
http://www.holdthetoast.com
Check out our FREE Low Carb Ezine!

Jay R. Ashworth

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 2:21:32 AM6/24/01
to
*Right* in the middle of the appendectomy, Bob E. turned

to Hawkeye and me and said:
> ket...@seemysig.com wrote:
> >
> > We all know what dogs are saying when they bark. "Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey!"
> > That cartoon by Kliban got it right on the nose.
>
> Nah, it was Gary "Far Side" Larson, it was on my calendar just the
> other day. One of my favorites. --Bob

"blah-blah-blah-Ginger"

Cheers,
-- jr 'woof' a

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 6:55:09 PM6/24/01
to
Good old j...@dorothy.msas.net (Jay R. Ashworth) wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Sun, 24 Jun 2001 06:21:32 GMT that ...

>*Right* in the middle of the appendectomy, Bob E. turned
> to Hawkeye and me and said:
>> ket...@seemysig.com wrote:
>> >
>> > We all know what dogs are saying when they bark. "Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey!"
>> > That cartoon by Kliban got it right on the nose.
>>
>> Nah, it was Gary "Far Side" Larson, it was on my calendar just the
>> other day. One of my favorites. --Bob
>
>"blah-blah-blah-Ginger"

"On the third pass, Edna failed to clear the mountains"
Bill

>
>Cheers,
>-- jr 'woof' a

"You never know what is enough unless you
know what is more than enough." --William Blake

Sean Houtman

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 7:19:42 PM6/26/01
to
From: Dana Carpender dcar...@kiva.net

>> Nostalgia perhaps? I used to be able to, but can't anymore.
>
>GIF! GIF!

I didn't have a digital camera 20 years ago, or even 10.

Sean

Dana Carpender

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 7:53:33 PM6/26/01
to

Sean Houtman wrote:
>
> From: Dana Carpender dcar...@kiva.net
>
> >> Nostalgia perhaps? I used to be able to, but can't anymore.
> >
> >GIF! GIF!
>
> I didn't have a digital camera 20 years ago, or even 10.

That's why God invented the flatbed scanner.

Bill Diamond

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 9:34:32 PM6/26/01
to
Good old Dana Carpender <dcar...@kiva.net> wrote in
alt.fan.cecil-adams back on Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:53:33 -0500 that ...

>
>
>Sean Houtman wrote:
>>
>> From: Dana Carpender dcar...@kiva.net
>>
>> >> Nostalgia perhaps? I used to be able to, but can't anymore.
>> >
>> >GIF! GIF!
>>
>> I didn't have a digital camera 20 years ago, or even 10.
>
>That's why God invented the flatbed scanner.

Some of us need that upgrade to the fatass scanner to pull this trick
off!

Bill

0 new messages