info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
If YOU were in charge, part 572901276454
61 views
Skip to first unread message
Roger House
Jun 11, 2023, 6:08:32 PM6/11/23
to
I would make a federal law that makes it illegal for a restaurant food item to cost more through a restaurant delivery service, than it does from the restaurant itself. In other words, using a fake example, if a medium ham sub sandwich with mayo, lettuce, and tomato from Sub World U.S.A., costs $6.00 from Sub World U.S.A., it could *NOT* cost *ANY* more than that from the restaurant delivery service when comes to the before tax and before delivery charge "actual item price", for lack of a better way of saying that. As for the delivery service's "We have to make it worth our while to do this service" type of comment that they might say, I thought that that was what a delivery charge was for.
--
R.
Christmas joke: Q.) How come you never see any nativity scenes in Washington, D.C.? A.) Because they can't find 3 wise men.
--
R.
Christmas joke: Q.) How come you never see any nativity scenes in Washington, D.C.? A.) Because they can't find 3 wise men.
Pluted Pup
Jul 10, 2023, 5:17:45 PM7/10/23
to
On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 15:08:31 -0700, Roger House wrote:
> I would make a federal law that makes it illegal for a restaurant food item to cost more through a restaurant delivery service, than it does from the restaurant itself. In other words, using a fake example, if a medium ham sub sandwich with mayo, lettuce, and tomato from Sub World U.S.A., costs $6.00 from Sub World U.S.A., it could *NOT* cost *ANY* more than that from the restaurant delivery service when comes to the before tax and before delivery charge "actual item price", for lack of a better way of saying that. As for the delivery service's "We have to make it worth our while to do this service" type of comment that they might say, I thought that that was what a delivery charge was for.
Makes sense, I'm in favor of disclosure, and
> I would make a federal law that makes it illegal for a restaurant food item to cost more through a restaurant delivery service, than it does from the restaurant itself. In other words, using a fake example, if a medium ham sub sandwich with mayo, lettuce, and tomato from Sub World U.S.A., costs $6.00 from Sub World U.S.A., it could *NOT* cost *ANY* more than that from the restaurant delivery service when comes to the before tax and before delivery charge "actual item price", for lack of a better way of saying that. As for the delivery service's "We have to make it worth our while to do this service" type of comment that they might say, I thought that that was what a delivery charge was for.
not secretive price schemes or *gotcha* fees.
> Christmas joke: Q.) How come you never see any nativity scenes in Washington, D.C.?
> A.) Because they can't find 3 wise men.
Eric lin
Nov 16, 2023, 1:01:13 AM11/16/23
to
https://sunluz.com/
Kerr-Mudd, John
Nov 16, 2023, 4:42:28 AM11/16/23
to
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Eric lin <liner...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 02:17:45 UTC+5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 15:08:31 -0700, Roger House wrote:
> >
> > > I would make a federal law that makes it illegal for a restaurant food item to cost more through a restaurant delivery service, than it does from the restaurant itself. In other words, using a fake example, if a medium ham sub sandwich with mayo, lettuce, and tomato from Sub World U.S.A., costs $6.00 from Sub World U.S.A., it could *NOT* cost *ANY* more than that from the restaurant delivery service when comes to the before tax and before delivery charge "actual item price", for lack of a better way of saying that. As for the delivery service's "We have to make it worth our while to do this service" type of comment that they might say, I thought that that was what a delivery charge was for.
> > Makes sense, I'm in favor of disclosure, and
> > not secretive price schemes or *gotcha* fees.
> > > Christmas joke: Q.) How come you never see any nativity scenes in Washington, D.C.?
> > > A.) Because they can't find 3 wise men.
> > Because the 3 wise men would be arrested at the DC border.
>
>
> xxxx is the best solar companies in china they make sure to provide their clients the xxxx solar products.
Eric lin <liner...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 02:17:45 UTC+5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 15:08:31 -0700, Roger House wrote:
> >
> > > I would make a federal law that makes it illegal for a restaurant food item to cost more through a restaurant delivery service, than it does from the restaurant itself. In other words, using a fake example, if a medium ham sub sandwich with mayo, lettuce, and tomato from Sub World U.S.A., costs $6.00 from Sub World U.S.A., it could *NOT* cost *ANY* more than that from the restaurant delivery service when comes to the before tax and before delivery charge "actual item price", for lack of a better way of saying that. As for the delivery service's "We have to make it worth our while to do this service" type of comment that they might say, I thought that that was what a delivery charge was for.
> > Makes sense, I'm in favor of disclosure, and
> > not secretive price schemes or *gotcha* fees.
> > > Christmas joke: Q.) How come you never see any nativity scenes in Washington, D.C.?
> > > A.) Because they can't find 3 wise men.
> > Because the 3 wise men would be arrested at the DC border.
>
>
> https://xxxx.com/
How nostalic it is to see handcrafted spam on Usenet. Cunningly avoiding
Ray's gmail filter!
--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.
0 new messages