On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Eric lin <
liner...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 02:17:45 UTC+5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 15:08:31 -0700, Roger House wrote:
> >
> > > I would make a federal law that makes it illegal for a restaurant food item to cost more through a restaurant delivery service, than it does from the restaurant itself. In other words, using a fake example, if a medium ham sub sandwich with mayo, lettuce, and tomato from Sub World U.S.A., costs $6.00 from Sub World U.S.A., it could *NOT* cost *ANY* more than that from the restaurant delivery service when comes to the before tax and before delivery charge "actual item price", for lack of a better way of saying that. As for the delivery service's "We have to make it worth our while to do this service" type of comment that they might say, I thought that that was what a delivery charge was for.
> > Makes sense, I'm in favor of disclosure, and
> > not secretive price schemes or *gotcha* fees.
> > > Christmas joke: Q.) How come you never see any nativity scenes in Washington, D.C.?
> > > A.) Because they can't find 3 wise men.
> > Because the 3 wise men would be arrested at the DC border.
>
>
> xxxx is the best solar companies in china they make sure to provide their clients the xxxx solar products.
How nostalic it is to see handcrafted spam on Usenet. Cunningly avoiding