http://www.thewomaninthechild.com/
--
Anon news web interface. FAQ available for review at:
http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
>> If this is what you call fine art why do we lock people up for
>sexually
>> exploiting children? I guess we should release all those fine
>artist's who are
>> currently serving time! After all it is only art!!!!!
>
>Her mother is a lousy parent for allowing him to take the naked pics
>of Brooke when she was 10.
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.
>^heaven:863 alt.fan.brooke-shields:266 alt.fan.britney-spears:7310
alt.fan.jennifer-love-hewitt:1770
>
>In article <20000307215815...@ng-fn1.aol.com>,
> mrd...@aol.com (MrDDDon) wrote:
>> If this is what you call fine art why do we lock people up for
>sexually
>> exploiting children? I guess we should release all those fine
>artist's who are
>> currently serving time! After all it is only art!!!!!
>
>Her mother is a lousy parent for allowing him to take the naked pics
>of Brooke when she was 10.
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.
After completing his series of nude photographs of ten-
year-old Brooke Shields, Garry became a focus of
mainstream media attention. The highly publicized
photographs sparked a heated controversy over the tenuous
line between fine art photography and pornography. A
protracted court battle resulted in a landmark decision
that ensured him the legal right to market these dramatic
and timeless photographs. You can read the court's
finding here.
All photos are printed on archival grade Kodak paper and
are reproduced from the original (1975) Kodachrome 35mm
transparency film, one of the finest films ever
produced.
He must be making a lot of money by selling those nude pics of Brooke
of when she was 10.
Her mother is a lousy parent for allowing him to take the naked pics
of Brooke when she was 10.
>of when she was 10.
>In article <20000307215815...@ng-fn1.aol.com>,
> mrd...@aol.com (MrDDDon) wrote:
>> If this is what you call fine art why do we lock people up for
>sexually
>> exploiting children? I guess we should release all those fine
>artist's who are
>> currently serving time! After all it is only art!!!!!
>
>Her mother is a lousy parent for allowing him to take the naked pics
>of Brooke when she was 10.
>of when she was 10.
>In article <20000307215815...@ng-fn1.aol.com>,
> mrd...@aol.com (MrDDDon) wrote:
>> If this is what you call fine art why do we lock people up for
>sexually
>> exploiting children? I guess we should release all those fine
>artist's who are
>> currently serving time! After all it is only art!!!!!
>
>Her mother is a lousy parent for allowing him to take the naked pics
>of Brooke when she was 10.
Do something positive or protest in the correct groups.