Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Allen (EOHOE)

8 views
Skip to first unread message

marston shores

unread,
May 6, 2016, 11:02:06 AM5/6/16
to
On 5/6/2016 2:54 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:

>>> I will, of course, post it to Photobucket and post a link to
>>> alt.conspiracy so that you might realize how you are mocked all over the
>>> world. And that your god, if he exists, is powerless to do anything about
>>> it.
>>> You're welcome.
>>
>> Kenty, what is all this?
>>
>
> Me mocking Allen and his false god.
> I know you're not a very smart man, but even you should be able
> to see it.

I mean the photobucket games, haven't you learned a thing from those
fake boarding passes and boat registrations you used to post, Kenty?


>> Do people here know about your years in alt.fan.bob-larson and the
>> failed garage burglary attempt?
>>
>
> Please tell us more. Most of us enjoy a good k00k rant.

Surely:

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.true-crime/2009-03/msg00329.html

Juicy, huh?


>> have they seen the near nude shots of Lin?
>>
>
> I've yet to see them, so it's unlikely anyone else has.
> BTW, I'm still waiting for you to produce just one such picture.
> You promised, years ago, that you would. But it, like all of your
> promises, was a lie.

Now Kenty, we all know you sanitized those right off the net when you
were caught.

Don't be so gauche.

>> How about the one of her in maternity blouse,
>
> My wife was pregnant. To any reasonably prudent person, this is a
> normal occurrence in life.
> What, exactly, about evidence of heterosexual sex offends you so
> much? This is a serious question that deserves an honest answer.

No Kenty, it's a serious odd thing for a man to post his wife in that
attire on the usenet.

>> or the boots,
>
> Huh? I don't recall ever taking pictures of any boots, let alone
> posting them anywhere on-line.
> Could you be more specific?


You remember very well friend, you choose not to admit it.

>> or the
>> yellow bikini?
>
> I'm still waiting to see that one as well. But, as with every
> promise you've made, your stating you'd produce it for viewing was a
> lie.

I never said such a thing.

> What do you believe is at the root of your constant lying? Is it
> something you can express in words?

Why did you take all those pics down?

What happened to the condo pics?


>>
>> How many pictures of that alleged townhome of yours did you leave up?
>>
>
> Zero.
> Anyone who saw the pictures would know it was, and presumably is,
> real. But continue to LIE and claim it was merely alleged to have
> existed, if you truly need to.

The "alleged" part is that it was ever yours.

Mommy and daddy owned it, didn't they?

>> The boat too?
>
> Which one? We've owned a few, as you know.
> Now we own boatercycles, or jet skies as Lindsay calls them :)

Pics please!

>>
>> The Beemer?
>
> What of it? It was sold years ago. It's time for you to move on.
> Unless your mental defects (plural) will not allow it.

So why is it still on your photobucket site?

>>
>> Where does the deception stop, friend?
>
> Ultimately, only you can know when you'll cease with the
> deception. The rest of us can only be entertained by your claiming I
> am several different people.

Which people do you imagine those to be Kenty?

How's the young lady, Maureen?

marston shores

unread,
May 7, 2016, 12:57:16 PM5/7/16
to
On 5/7/2016 2:48 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:

>> I mean the photobucket games, haven't you learned a thing from those
>> fake boarding passes and boat registrations you used to post, Kenty?
>>
>
> I've never posted any, so I couldn't have.
> Would you like to try a different lie?

The lie is all yours Kenty.

>>>> Do people here know about your years in alt.fan.bob-larson and the
>>>> failed garage burglary attempt?
>>>
>>> Please tell us more. Most of us enjoy a good k00k rant.
>>
>> Surely:
>>
>> http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
>>
>> http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.true-crime/2009-03/msg00329.html
>>
>> Juicy, huh?
>>
>
> I see you're still stuck on that which you KNOW isn't about me.
> So very sad.

Oh it's all you, and you know it too.

>>>> have they seen the near nude shots of Lin?
>>>
>>> I've yet to see them, so it's unlikely anyone else has.
>>> BTW, I'm still waiting for you to produce just one such picture.
>>> You promised, years ago, that you would. But it, like all of your
>>> promises, was a lie.
>>
>> Now Kenty, we all know you sanitized those right off the net when you
>> were caught.
>>
>> Don't be so gauche.
>>
>
> Since they never existed, that would be impossible.

A lie.

> Now, provide them, as you promised you would, or admit you've
> been lying, for whatever reason.

You are the liar here, friend.

>>>> How about the one of her in maternity blouse,
>>>
>>> My wife was pregnant. To any reasonably prudent person, this is a
>>> normal occurrence in life.
>>> What, exactly, about evidence of heterosexual sex offends you so
>>> much? This is a serious question that deserves an honest answer.
>>
>> No Kenty, it's a serious odd thing for a man to post his wife in that
>> attire on the usenet.
>>
>
> I didn't post the baby shower pictures to Usenet.

A non sequitur statement.

> As you already know, Datemas doesn't allow binaries. As such, it
> would be impossible for me to post them. And I've been using Datemas
> for posting since before Lin was pregnant.

You have used geocities and photobucket to post your pics of Lin.

> But, you'll provide evidence that I did post the baby shower
> pictures to Usenet. Unless, of course, you have been caught in yet
> another lie.
> I'm waiting...

No one said a thing about a baby shower, that's your pallid canard, Kenty.


>>>> or the boots,
>>>
>>> Huh? I don't recall ever taking pictures of any boots, let alone
>>> posting them anywhere on-line.
>>> Could you be more specific?
>>
>>
>> You remember very well friend, you choose not to admit it.
>>
>
> I await the valid, verifiable evidence you'll provide for your
> claim. If you're lying, you will not offer any since you will have
> none to offer.

Same as the Lin pics Kenty, you took all that material down years ago.

>>>> or the
>>>> yellow bikini?
>>>
>>> I'm still waiting to see that one as well. But, as with every
>>> promise you've made, your stating you'd produce it for viewing was a
>>> lie.
>>
>> I never said such a thing.
>>
>
> Message-ID: <le050f$f8$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
> Message-ID: <kt1652$l55$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>
>
> I could post more Message IDs, but two prove you the liar you
> are.

Your MIDs mean nothing.

>>> What do you believe is at the root of your constant lying? Is it
>>> something you can express in words?
>>
>> Why did you take all those pics down?
>>
>
> Your avoidance doesn't answer the questions asked.
> Your further proving you've been caught lying aside, the pictures
> never existed. Since they never existed in reality (you're still free
> to prove they did or do), they couldn't have been taken down.

No one believes you Kenty.

>> What happened to the condo pics?
>>
>
> What condo pics? Do you mean the time share in Aruba? I only ever
> put two on Photobucket.

No, I believe it was in Ankenny, Iowa.

> http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/Aruba%202010/SDC10350.jpg
>
> http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/Aruba%202010/SDC10360.jpg
>
> There are some others on Facebook, but you don't have access to
> them. Sucks to be you, still.

Oh the facebook posts, the ones with you riding the pony come to mind
easily.

>>>> How many pictures of that alleged townhome of yours did you leave up?
>>>
>>> Zero.
>>> Anyone who saw the pictures would know it was, and presumably is,
>>> real. But continue to LIE and claim it was merely alleged to have
>>> existed, if you truly need to.
>>
>> The "alleged" part is that it was ever yours.
>>
>
> That's not how you wrote it. Your sentence makes it clear the
> townhome's existence was/is alleged.

Existence?

Yes, it existed and exists today.

> Your very poor grasp of English aside, I await the evidence
> you'll present that counters what was presented over a decade ago. And
> you will present it, unless I just exposed another of your lies.

Kenty baby, it's all coming apart for you again, lol.

>> Mommy and daddy owned it, didn't they?
>>
>
> No.

Yes they did.

> But you're free to present any and all evidence you have that
> they did. If you've been caught in another act of deception, you won't
> offer any.

Still at that bungalow in Rogers, Ark. Kenty?

Does the young lady still stop by?


>>>> The boat too?
>>>
>>> Which one? We've owned a few, as you know.
>>> Now we own boatercycles, or jet skies as Lindsay calls them :)
>>
>> Pics please!
>>
>
> You claimed you saw the pictures of the boats. I haven't taken
> any pictures of the jet skies. And I don't have any plans on doing so.

Why not?

> Feel free to whine and cry about this, if you need. Maybe issue a
> demand that I make pictures of the jet skies available. It will prove
> a waste of time, of course.

Then you have no real proof, ok.

>>>>
>>>> The Beemer?
>>>
>>> What of it? It was sold years ago. It's time for you to move on.
>>> Unless your mental defects (plural) will not allow it.
>>
>> So why is it still on your photobucket site?
>>
>
> Because I rarely delete any pictures from it.

That is a real lie too.

> I have a picture of
> Oliver, and he died in January of 2006.
> Should anyone reading care to see the picture:
>
> http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/Oct03-05.jpg

And Koska?


>>>> Where does the deception stop, friend?
>>>
>>> Ultimately, only you can know when you'll cease with the
>>> deception. The rest of us can only be entertained by your claiming I
>>> am several different people.
>>
>> Which people do you imagine those to be Kenty?
>>
>
> Interesting. You've claimed, many times, that I am different
> people, yet present *I* imagine I am different people.
> Maybe you need professional mental health care?

Maybe you ran too many socks here Kenty.

>> How's the young lady, Maureen?
>
> Last I knew, she was fine.

Oh good, but still a "born again pagan", true?

> You have an unhealthy fixation on people who are no longer
> posting to Usenet. Do you honestly believe this behavior of yours is a
> good thing?

It's all about letting your new "friends" know who you truly are, friend.


marston shores

unread,
May 8, 2016, 4:50:36 PM5/8/16
to
On 5/7/2016 5:40 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2016 10:57:09 -0600, marston shores <k...@fi.re> wrote:
>
>> On 5/7/2016 2:48 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>
>>>> I mean the photobucket games, haven't you learned a thing from those
>>>> fake boarding passes and boat registrations you used to post, Kenty?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've never posted any, so I couldn't have.
>>> Would you like to try a different lie?
>>
>> The lie is all yours Kenty.
>>
>
> Your use of projection is not benefiting you.

Your projection is trapping you kenty.

>>>>>> Do people here know about your years in alt.fan.bob-larson and the
>>>>>> failed garage burglary attempt?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please tell us more. Most of us enjoy a good k00k rant.
>>>>
>>>> Surely:
>>>>
>>>> http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
>>>>
>>>> http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.true-crime/2009-03/msg00329.html
>>>>
>>>> Juicy, huh?
>>>
>>> I see you're still stuck on that which you KNOW isn't about me.
>>> So very sad.
>>
>> Oh it's all you, and you know it too.
>>
>
> Do you honestly believe that if you present the same lie enough
> times, it will suddenly become the truth? Are you really that messed
> up?
> Serious questions that deserve honest answers. Not that you'll
> provide any.

Findlaw doesn't lie.

You can not erase your life kenty.

>>>>>> have they seen the near nude shots of Lin?
>>>>>
>>>>> I've yet to see them, so it's unlikely anyone else has.
>>>>> BTW, I'm still waiting for you to produce just one such picture.
>>>>> You promised, years ago, that you would. But it, like all of your
>>>>> promises, was a lie.
>>>>
>>>> Now Kenty, we all know you sanitized those right off the net when you
>>>> were caught.
>>>>
>>>> Don't be so gauche.
>>>
>>> Since they never existed, that would be impossible.
>>
>> A lie.
>>
>
> It is 100% true. It would be impossible to sanitize images off
> the net when they never existed.
> It is so sad that such a simple truth is beyond you.

The endless semantic games are tired too.

You put pics up, you took them down.

Many times too.

>>> Now, provide them, as you promised you would, or admit you've
>>> been lying, for whatever reason.
>>
>> You are the liar here, friend.
>>
>
> Your default admission is noted and accepted. I'll be sure to
> point it out from time to time.

Your lie is as naked as ever.

>>>>>> How about the one of her in maternity blouse,
>>>>>
>>>>> My wife was pregnant. To any reasonably prudent person, this is a
>>>>> normal occurrence in life.
>>>>> What, exactly, about evidence of heterosexual sex offends you so
>>>>> much? This is a serious question that deserves an honest answer.
>>>>
>>>> No Kenty, it's a serious odd thing for a man to post his wife in that
>>>> attire on the usenet.
>>>
>>> I didn't post the baby shower pictures to Usenet.
>>
>> A non sequitur statement.
>>
>
> You claimed I posted them to Usenet, knowing I did not.

You posted links for them to usenet.

You know what you did.

>>> As you already know, Datemas doesn't allow binaries. As such, it
>>> would be impossible for me to post them. And I've been using Datemas
>>> for posting since before Lin was pregnant.
>>
>> You have used geocities and photobucket to post your pics of Lin.
>>
>
> Neither of which are Usenet.

Never said they were.


> I could have accepted that your claim of Usenet was made in
> error. But clearly it was another of your many lies. Had it been made
> in error, you would have simply stated such and that would have been
> the end of it.

You posted the urls for those pic sites in usenet, that is a fact.

>>> But, you'll provide evidence that I did post the baby shower
>>> pictures to Usenet. Unless, of course, you have been caught in yet
>>> another lie.
>>> I'm waiting...
>>
>> No one said a thing about a baby shower, that's your pallid canard, Kenty.
>>
>
> The pictures of Lindsay in her maternity dress were taken at the
> baby shower. I've mentioned this many, many times in the past. As
> such, there is no possible way you didn't know.

You lie so often it is hard to sort out the few truths.

>>>>>> or the boots,
>>>>>
>>>>> Huh? I don't recall ever taking pictures of any boots, let alone
>>>>> posting them anywhere on-line.
>>>>> Could you be more specific?
>>>>
>>>> You remember very well friend, you choose not to admit it.
>>>
>>> I await the valid, verifiable evidence you'll provide for your
>>> claim. If you're lying, you will not offer any since you will have
>>> none to offer.
>>
>> Same as the Lin pics Kenty, you took all that material down years ago.
>>
>
> Your default admission that you lied is noted and accepted.

Your lying conclusions are again rejected.

>>>>>> or the
>>>>>> yellow bikini?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still waiting to see that one as well. But, as with every
>>>>> promise you've made, your stating you'd produce it for viewing was a
>>>>> lie.
>>>>
>>>> I never said such a thing.
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <le050f$f8$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>>> Message-ID: <kt1652$l55$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> I could post more Message IDs, but two prove you the liar you
>>> are.
>>
>> Your MIDs mean nothing.
>>
>
> They are for two of the posts where you promised to make the
> images you claim exist available for viewing.

I had hoped to,

But you sanitized them.

Oh well.

> I have, once again, exposed you for the liar you are. Maybe you
> could give being honest a try? Or is it impossible for you?

We both know what you did kenty, those were your mania days.

>>>>> What do you believe is at the root of your constant lying? Is it
>>>>> something you can express in words?
>>>>
>>>> Why did you take all those pics down?
>>>
>>> Your avoidance doesn't answer the questions asked.
>>> Your further proving you've been caught lying aside, the pictures
>>> never existed. Since they never existed in reality (you're still free
>>> to prove they did or do), they couldn't have been taken down.
>>
>> No one believes you Kenty.
>>
>
> I expect some, possibly most, people here do.

I don't think so.

> Not that it matters
> much. It's a newsgroup. Just as I have no influence on their lives
> outside of Usenet, they have none on mine.

We can agree there, for now.

>>>> What happened to the condo pics?
>>>>
>>>
>>> What condo pics? Do you mean the time share in Aruba? I only ever
>>> put two on Photobucket.
>>
>> No, I believe it was in Ankenny, Iowa.
>>
>
> I've never taken any pictures of any condo in Ankeny.

Sure you did- it was a 3 story unit with clapboard siding, iirc. It was
described as a "townhome":

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/kent$20wills$20$2B$20condo$20$2B$20geocities/alt.fan.bob-larson/d6Ief1pOBB8/4VU0nCHTyvwJ

"Brian Johnson is the same name Kent
edited into the FRIENDS birthday page
for a few months before the provider went away.

Kent thought he was slick pretending
that nobody saw the birthday page
before he redacted his name and used
""Brian Johnson"" as webmaster.

He similarly substituted names on this geocities page.

That link went into an endless loop saying it was loading.

I reverse engineered the details and got to the archive
of it for Aug 22 2009, and October 26 and 27 of 2009.
All three crawls appear to be identical.

http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://geocities.com/compuelf/

http://geocities.com/compuelf/ has been crawled 3 times going all the
way back to August 22, 2009.

http://web.archive.org/web/20090822021129/http://geocities.com/compuelf/

I am Compuelf. Kind of lame, huh? I can't think of anything to write.

Well, let's see... What to write...
My name is Brian Johnson (Not really, but it's the nym I'm using at
this time). I sleep, I eat, I use the toilet as needed.

I'm using Geocities' page building software, so this is kind of lame
right now. I might add more some day, but don't hold your breath.

The Townhome.
Ours is the one on the left with the no parking sign.

http://web.archive.org/web/20090822021129im_/http://www.geocities.com/compuelf/front.jpg

231x189


Lots of people saw this same Geocities
page with the name Kent Wills on it.

I never saw the bikini photos of Kent's ""wife"".
I did see the same GEOCITIES page with the
Townhouse and the name Kent Wills."


http://web.archive.org/web/20090803201732im_/http://www.geocities.com/compuelf/front.jpg


>>> http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/Aruba%202010/SDC10350.jpg
>>>
>>> http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/Aruba%202010/SDC10360.jpg
>>>
>>> There are some others on Facebook, but you don't have access to
>>> them. Sucks to be you, still.
>>
>> Oh the facebook posts, the ones with you riding the pony come to mind
>> easily.
>>
>
> Since there is no such picture, I fail to see how.
>
>>>>>> How many pictures of that alleged townhome of yours did you leave up?
>>>>>
>>>>> Zero.
>>>>> Anyone who saw the pictures would know it was, and presumably is,
>>>>> real. But continue to LIE and claim it was merely alleged to have
>>>>> existed, if you truly need to.
>>>>
>>>> The "alleged" part is that it was ever yours.
>>>
>>> That's not how you wrote it. Your sentence makes it clear the
>>> townhome's existence was/is alleged.
>>
>> Existence?
>>
>> Yes, it existed and exists today.
>>
>
> But above you suggested it did not.

http://web.archive.org/web/20090822021129/http://geocities.com/compuelf/

>>> Your very poor grasp of English aside, I await the evidence
>>> you'll present that counters what was presented over a decade ago. And
>>> you will present it, unless I just exposed another of your lies.
>>
>> Kenty baby, it's all coming apart for you again, lol.
>>
>
> Your default admission that you lied is noted and accepted.

http://web.archive.org/web/20090822021129/http://geocities.c/compuelf/

>>>> Mommy and daddy owned it, didn't they?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> Yes they did.
>>
>
> You've already admitted above you lied.
>
>>> But you're free to present any and all evidence you have that
>>> they did. If you've been caught in another act of deception, you won't
>>> offer any.
>>
>> Still at that bungalow in Rogers, Ark. Kenty?
>>
>
> I don't own a bungalow anywhere. I've never lived in Rogers.
> You may recall being proved a liar about that already.

1110 South F Street, Rogers, Arkansas 72756-5520

And you did a great job getting google to blur it too.

http://www.trulia.com/homes/Arkansas/Rogers/sold/1000532445-1110-S-F-St-Rogers-AR-72756

Price History for 1110 S F St
Date Event Price Source Agents
11/08/2005 Sold view detail $21,000 Public recordsPublic records


>> Does the young lady still stop by?
>>
>
> Since I don't have a place in Rogers, bungalow or other, no. And
> no young lady ever has.
> What lie will you post next?

No lie:

http://www.trulia.com/homes/Arkansas/Rogers/sold/1000532445-1110-S-F-St-Rogers-AR-72756

>>
>>>>>> The boat too?
>>>>>
>>>>> Which one? We've owned a few, as you know.
>>>>> Now we own boatercycles, or jet skies as Lindsay calls them :)
>>>>
>>>> Pics please!
>>>
>>> You claimed you saw the pictures of the boats. I haven't taken
>>> any pictures of the jet skies. And I don't have any plans on doing so.
>>
>> Why not?
>>
>
> I have no desire to.

Do it anyway, friend.

>>> Feel free to whine and cry about this, if you need. Maybe issue a
>>> demand that I make pictures of the jet skies available. It will prove
>>> a waste of time, of course.
>>
>> Then you have no real proof, ok.
>>
>
> Meh. It's not like it matters if people believe that Lin and I
> have jet skies. Until now, I've not felt the need to mention them, so
> it's clearly not a major aspect of my life.
> What do you believe is at the root of your obsession with posting
> about items I owned in the past? I would honestly like to know.

I'd like to see that ski boat again too.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Beemer?
>>>>>
>>>>> What of it? It was sold years ago. It's time for you to move on.
>>>>> Unless your mental defects (plural) will not allow it.
>>>>
>>>> So why is it still on your photobucket site?
>>>
>>> Because I rarely delete any pictures from it.
>>
>> That is a real lie too.
>>
>
> Yet I prove it is not below.

No you don't.

>>> I have a picture of
>>> Oliver, and he died in January of 2006.
>>> Should anyone reading care to see the picture:
>>>
>>> http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/Oct03-05.jpg
>>
>> And Koska?
>>
>
> There is the picture of him there as well.

But not your ski boat.

>>>>>> Where does the deception stop, friend?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ultimately, only you can know when you'll cease with the
>>>>> deception. The rest of us can only be entertained by your claiming I
>>>>> am several different people.
>>>>
>>>> Which people do you imagine those to be Kenty?
>>>
>>> Interesting. You've claimed, many times, that I am different
>>> people, yet present *I* imagine I am different people.
>>> Maybe you need professional mental health care?
>>
>> Maybe you ran too many socks here Kenty.
>>
>
> I've not run any. But prove I did.

AFB-L archives prove all.

>>>> How's the young lady, Maureen?
>>>
>>> Last I knew, she was fine.
>>
>> Oh good, but still a "born again pagan", true?
>>
>
> I presume so.

Yes.

>
>>> You have an unhealthy fixation on people who are no longer
>>> posting to Usenet. Do you honestly believe this behavior of yours is a
>>> good thing?
>>
>> It's all about letting your new "friends" know who you truly are, friend.
>
> But you've never offered anything about me, except my last name.

Then let them learn of you.

> Come on. You can provide some better k00k material. I'm sure of
> it.

1. Kent posted links to photos of his boat.
2. Kent made public claims about his boat registration.
3. Kent lied about boat registration some more.
4. Kent posted link to a youtube video of his boat.
5. posted Oct 6 2007 purchase weeks before (Sep purchase)
6. The boat registration was plainly visible. IA 6312 WW
(1989 Bluefin)
7. Iowa boat registration revealed it was registered
to Dale and Judy Caquelin 105 Southfield Webster City, Iowa


marston shores

unread,
May 9, 2016, 11:13:19 AM5/9/16
to
On 5/9/2016 3:08 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> >http://web.archive.org/web/20090803201732im_/http://www.geocities.com/compuelf/front.jpg
>> >
> Way to PROVE you lied.
> It's always great when you provide the undeniable PROOF that you
> lied. You can't counter it, since you provided it.
> Yes, Lin and I owned a town home. This was never a secret.
> I've never seen the geocities site with the name Kent Wills. Odds
> are, it never existed. But you'll prove that it did, lest you admit,
> again, to lying.
>

You can see the same page I have friend, stop the lies.

marston shores

unread,
May 9, 2016, 11:15:22 AM5/9/16
to
On 5/9/2016 3:08 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> I'd like to see that ski boat again too.
>> >
> Since I've not owned a ski boat, I don't see how you could see it
> again.


But you just admitted to owning that blue ski boat:

> Here's something you thought you'd erased:
>
> http://s230.photobucket.com/user/ascps/library/?sort=3&page=1
>
>
http://s230.photobucket.com/user/ascps/media/Wills-yacht.jpg.html?sort=3&o=0
>
> Still denying you put pics of your boat up Kenty?
>

Since I've never denied doing so, your deceptive question fails.
I do deny that being a boat I've ever owned. You'll note it's
blue, not red.

marston shores

unread,
May 12, 2016, 11:33:24 AM5/12/16
to
On 5/12/2016 2:30 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016 09:07:58 -0600, marston shores <k...@fi.re> wrote:
>>>>> It claims Brian Johnson.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://web.archive.org/web/20090822021129im_/http://geocities.com/compuelf/
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again you are proved a lair.
>>>>
>>>> Are you daft, fiend?
>>>
>>> Obviously not. I not only state you lied, I provide absolute
>>> proof that you lied.
>>>
>>>> It says:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My Info:
>>>> Name: Brian Johnson
>>>
>>> Way to add PROOF you lied.
>>> It's always so refreshing when you provide the proof that you
>>> lied. You can't counter it.
>>
>> The lie is all yours, fiend.
>
> As seen above, I wrote, "It claims Brian Johnson." You have
> confirmed this, proving yourself a liar in doing so.

Kenty, that makes no sense at all!

> When will you be making the pictures of Lindsay you claim exist,
> specifically the one of her in a yellow bikini, the one of her in her
> underwear, and the one where she is sitting while wearing a maternity

When ||you|| put them back up.

Shall I just paste this on ALL your stupid replies, fiend?


marston shores

unread,
May 13, 2016, 10:16:26 AM5/13/16
to
On 5/13/2016 3:18 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> Shall I just paste this on ALL your stupid replies, fiend?
>> >
> If you NEED to be proved the mentally ill liar you are, sure. I
> don't mind.
> When will you be making the pictures of Lindsay you claim exist,

0 new messages