info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: RAF
2 views
Skip to first unread message
marston shores
May 23, 2016, 10:58:40 AM5/23/16
to
On 5/23/2016 2:22 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> There is no NWO. It's a complete myth.
Trying to change the subject again, Kenty?
https://plus.google.com/101980802427884289689
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report that
a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer started
driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he had
noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he had
not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people, one of whom was heavy set
with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the area of her
neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached garage through an
unlocked service door. She further observed a smaller individual
standing by a van parked in the neighbor's driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket organizer
in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police officers drove
to the residence where the neighbor observed the two suspicious people
and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two daughters were in the
residence sleeping at the time. After a search of his vehicles, the
owner discovered change and an electronic pocket organizer were missing
from the vehicles. The owner's daughter reported a diamond ring and
some change were missing from her vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the officers the minor was with Wills.
After the officers questioned the minor again, he admitted his
involvement in the theft and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested
him.
The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a juvenile
to commit an indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.
> There is no NWO. It's a complete myth.
Trying to change the subject again, Kenty?
https://plus.google.com/101980802427884289689
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report that
a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer started
driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he had
noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he had
not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people, one of whom was heavy set
with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the area of her
neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached garage through an
unlocked service door. She further observed a smaller individual
standing by a van parked in the neighbor's driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket organizer
in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police officers drove
to the residence where the neighbor observed the two suspicious people
and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two daughters were in the
residence sleeping at the time. After a search of his vehicles, the
owner discovered change and an electronic pocket organizer were missing
from the vehicles. The owner's daughter reported a diamond ring and
some change were missing from her vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the officers the minor was with Wills.
After the officers questioned the minor again, he admitted his
involvement in the theft and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested
him.
The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a juvenile
to commit an indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.
marston shores
May 24, 2016, 6:18:12 PM5/24/16
to
On 5/24/2016 2:39 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> Yes. And?
And...this is not going away, Kenty:
> Yes. And?
And...this is not going away, Kenty:
0 new messages