Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Kent thinks he's WINNING on usenet.

10 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 23, 2012, 8:14:55 PM5/23/12
to
Kent thinks he's WINNING on usenet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFriB2h03-A

Fred Hall

unread,
May 24, 2012, 2:27:04 AM5/24/12
to

Greegor

unread,
May 24, 2012, 2:54:18 AM5/24/12
to
On May 24, 1:27 am, Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:14:55 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in
> <36f4b0e0-e8ef-4c55-8fa9-ab1d8181f...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >Kent
>
> Is winning, founded child waterboarder

Glorbleflorb?

Gary Lee Burnore's confession to Police
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc3.JPG

Gary Lee's online confession
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/shmoo.com/jun99-msg00146.html

Official North Carolina Department Of Corrections web site
http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=4469+Still+Pines+Drive,+Raleigh,+NC+27613-3334

http://cbk3.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&cb_client=maps_sv&thumb=2&thumbfov=66&ll=35.865647,-78.710116&cbll=35.865692,-78.709956

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 Raleigh, NC DataBasix
(919) 785-1298 4469 Still Pines Dr Raleigh, NC 27613-3334
Associated: Stewart S Bryan, Susan B Bryan, Stephen S Bryan, Belinda
W Burnore 53
And Belinda Bryan <eri...@databasix.com>

http://archives.mfn.org

Probation Officer Report
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page3.JPG

"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.

Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.

The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,
suggests that risk for potential victims
may be high."

J. Puccinelli, Probation Officer, Unit IV
Municipal Court of the State of California,
Santa Clara County, People of the State
of California v. Gary Burnore
Probation Office No. DMU044
Court No. C9618225 DA No. 961131078
Santa Clara Police Department Case No. 9615185



SEVEN PAGE POLICE NARRATIVE

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page3.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page4.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page5.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page6.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page7.JPG

Police Narrative Pages 1-7
http://bayimg.com/haNigAaBd
http://bayimg.com/hanIIaaBd
http://bayimg.com/HaNIlAabd
http://bayimg.com/hAnimaaBD
http://bayimg.com/IANIaaAbD
http://bayimg.com/iaNicaabd
http://bayimg.com/iAnidaabd


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ff5d1d88630afa3f?hl=en&dmode=source


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ff5d1d88630afa3f?hl=en&

Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
From: Emmett BADASS Gulley <emmettgulle...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 16 2012 4:18 pm
Subject: Databasix.com

Domain report for databasix.com
Created by using DomainHostingView

Summary Information
Domain is registered with networksolutions.com
Domain is registered to Glorbleflorb, Fred
Web site is hosted by FDCservers.net, USA - Illinois
Mail Server is hosted by Charter Communications, USA - Missouri
Domain Name Server (DNS) is hosted by FDCservers.net, USA - Colorado
Domain was created on 5/30/1995
Domain was last updated on 5/16/2012
Domain expires on 5/31/2014
Web site is hosted on Linux/Unix server
Web server string: Apache/2.2.22 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/2.1
mod_bwlimited/1.4 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.2.22 OpenSSL/1.0.1a
mod_perl/2.0.5 Perl/v5.8.9
DNS Records
Record Type Host Name IP Address More Data Section
NS ns.packetderm.com 204.45.87.2 Answer
NS ns2.packetderm.com 208.53.131.243 Answer
MX mail.cotse.net 96.39.53.26 Preference: 0 Answer
A databasix.com 208.53.131.243 Answer
SOA ns2.packetderm.com 208.53.131.243 Admin: helpdesk.cotse.net,
Default TTL: 86400, Expire: 3600000, Refresh: 86400, Retry: 7200,
Serial: 2012020302 Answer
PTR h01.packetderm.com 208.53.131.243 Answer
PTR mx.packetderm.com 96.39.53.26 Answer


IP Addresses Information
Address Type IP Address Country Network Name Owner Name From IP
To IP Contact Name Address Email Abuse Email Phone Fax Whois
Source
Web Server 208.53.131.243 USA - Illinois FDCSERVERS
FDCservers.net 208.53.128.0 208.53.191.255 FDCservers.net 141 W
Jackson Blvd. #1135, Chicago supp...@fdcservers.net
ab...@fdcservers.net +1-312-423-6675 ARIN
Mail Server 96.39.53.26 USA - Missouri OXF-MA-96-39-48 Charter
Communications 96.39.48.0 96.39.63.255 Charter Communications
12405 Powerscourt Dr., St. Louis ipaddress...@chartercom.com
phish...@charter.net +1-314-288-3111 ARIN
Domain Name Server 204.45.87.2 USA - Colorado FDCSERVERS-DENVER
FDCservers.net 204.45.0.0 204.45.255.255 FDCservers.net 1500
Champa St #B200, Denver supp...@fdcservers.net ab...@fdcservers.net
+1-312-423-6675 ARIN


Raw Domain Information
Registrant:
Glorbleflorb, Fred
ATTN DATABASIX.COM
care of Network Solutions
PO Box 459
Drums, PA. US 18222


Domain Name: DATABASIX.COM


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Promote your business to millions of viewers for only $1 a month
Learn how you can get an Enhanced Business Listing here for your
domain name.
Learn more at http://www.NetworkSolutions.com/


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Glorbleflorb, Fred
qk5254dm...@networksolutionsprivateregistration.com
ATTN DATABASIX.COM
care of Network Solutions
PO Box 459
Drums, PA 18222
US
570-708-8780


Record expires on 31-May-2014.
Record created on 30-May-1995.
Database last updated on 16-May-2012 17:04:58 EDT.


Domain servers in listed order:


NS.PACKETDERM.COM
NS2.PACKETDERM.COM


This listing is a Network Solutions Private Registration. Mail
correspondence to this address must be sent via USPS Express Mail(TM)
or
USPS Certified Mail(R); all other mail will not be processed. Be sure
to
include the registrant's domain name in the address.


Web Server IP Address Information
#
# The following results may also be obtained via:
# http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=208.53.131.243?showDetails=true&sho...
#


NetRange: 208.53.128.0 - 208.53.191.255
CIDR: 208.53.128.0/18 Direct Allocation
RegDate: 2004-07-07
Updated: 2012-02-24
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-208-53-128-0-1


OrgName: FDCservers.net
OrgId: FDCSE
Address: 141 W Jackson Blvd. #1135
City: Chicago
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 60604
Country: US
RegDate: 2003-05-20
Updated: 2012-03-28
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/FDCSE


ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.fdcservers.net:4321


OrgTechHandle: TECHS72-ARIN
OrgTechName: Tech Support
OrgTechPhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgTechEmail: supp...@fdcservers.net
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/TECHS72-ARIN


OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE438-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: ABUSE department
OrgAbusePhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@fdcservers.net
OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE438-ARIN


OrgNOCHandle: TECHS72-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Tech Support
OrgNOCPhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgNOCEmail: supp...@fdcservers.net
OrgNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/TECHS72-ARIN


#
# ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use
# available at: https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html
#


Mail Server IP Address Information
#
# The following results may also be obtained via:
# http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=96.39.53.26?showDetails=true&showAR...
#


# start


NetRange: 96.39.48.0 - 96.39.63.255
CIDR: 96.39.48.0/20
OriginAS:
NetName: OXF-MA-96-39-48
NetHandle: NET-96-39-48-0-1
Parent: NET-96-32-0-0-1
NetType: Reallocated
RegDate: 2008-08-18
Updated: 2008-08-18
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-96-39-48-0-1


OrgName: Charter Communications
OrgId: CC04
Address: 12405 Powerscourt Dr.
City: St. Louis
StateProv: MO
PostalCode: 63131
Country: US
RegDate:
Updated: 2008-10-04
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/CC04


OrgTechHandle: IPADD1-ARIN
OrgTechName: IPAddressing
OrgTechPhone: +1-314-288-3889
OrgTechEmail: ipaddress...@chartercom.com
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/IPADD1-ARIN


OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE19-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse
OrgAbusePhone: +1-314-288-3111
OrgAbuseEmail: phish...@charter.net
OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE19-ARIN


# end


# start


NetRange: 96.32.0.0 - 96.42.255.255
CIDR: 96.40.0.0/15, 96.42.0.0/16, 96.32.0.0/13
OriginAS:
NetName: NETBLK-CHARTER-NET
NetHandle: NET-96-32-0-0-1
Parent: NET-96-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
RegDate: 2007-12-19
Updated: 2012-03-02
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-96-32-0-0-1


OrgName: Charter Communications
OrgId: CC04
Address: 12405 Powerscourt Dr.
City: St. Louis
StateProv: MO
PostalCode: 63131
Country: US
RegDate:
Updated: 2008-10-04
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/CC04


OrgTechHandle: IPADD1-ARIN
OrgTechName: IPAddressing
OrgTechPhone: +1-314-288-3889
OrgTechEmail: ipaddress...@chartercom.com
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/IPADD1-ARIN


OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE19-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse
OrgAbusePhone: +1-314-288-3111
OrgAbuseEmail: phish...@charter.net
OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE19-ARIN


# end


#
# ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use
# available at: https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html
#


Name Server IP Address Information
#
# The following results may also be obtained via:
# http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=204.45.87.2?showDetails=true&showAR...
#


# start


NetRange: 204.45.0.0 - 204.45.255.255
CIDR: 204.45.0.0/16
OriginAS: AS30058
NetName: FDCSERVERS
NetHandle: NET-204-45-0-0-1
Parent: NET-204-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
RegDate: 2009-07-20
Updated: 2012-03-28
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-204-45-0-0-1


OrgName: FDCservers.net
OrgId: FDCSE
Address: 141 W Jackson Blvd. #1135
City: Chicago
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 60604
Country: US
RegDate: 2003-05-20
Updated: 2012-03-28
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/FDCSE


ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.fdcservers.net:4321


OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE438-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: ABUSE department
OrgAbusePhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@fdcservers.net
OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE438-ARIN


OrgTechHandle: TECHS72-ARIN
OrgTechName: Tech Support
OrgTechPhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgTechEmail: supp...@fdcservers.net
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/TECHS72-ARIN


OrgNOCHandle: TECHS72-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Tech Support
OrgNOCPhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgNOCEmail: supp...@fdcservers.net
OrgNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/TECHS72-ARIN


# end


# start


NetRange: 204.45.0.0 - 204.45.255.255
CIDR: 204.45.0.0/16
OriginAS: AS30058
NetName: FDCSERVERS-DENVER
NetHandle: NET-204-45-0-0-2
Parent: NET-204-45-0-0-1
NetType: Reallocated
RegDate: 2012-03-28
Updated: 2012-03-28
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-204-45-0-0-2


OrgName: FDCservers.net
OrgId: FDCSE-2
Address: 1500 Champa St #B200
City: Denver
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80202
Country: US
RegDate: 2012-03-27
Updated: 2012-03-28
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/FDCSE-2


ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.fdcservers.net:4321


OrgTechHandle: TECHS72-ARIN
OrgTechName: Tech Support
OrgTechPhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgTechEmail: supp...@fdcservers.net
OrgNOCPhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgNOCEmail: supp...@fdcservers.net
OrgNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/TECHS72-ARIN


OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE438-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: ABUSE department
OrgAbusePhone: +1-312-423-6675
OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@fdcservers.net
OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE438-ARIN


# end


#
# ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use
# available at: https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html
#

Fred Hall

unread,
May 24, 2012, 3:29:46 AM5/24/12
to
On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:54:18 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<7cb9668c-fa55-45ca...@j25g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>:

>Glorbleflorb?

So?
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan

"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall

KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
Pierre Salinger HL&S - February 2012
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006

Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 25, 2012, 12:00:53 AM5/25/12
to
G > Glorbleflorb?

GLB > So?

LOL

Fred Hall

unread,
May 25, 2012, 1:24:50 PM5/25/12
to
On Thu, 24 May 2012 21:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<e6ff8e65-721b-4efc...@w10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:

>G > Glorbleflorb?
>
>GLB > So?
>
>LOL

Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?

--

http://www.smbtech.com/ras/
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/03/ras-mikaere-eunuch-enoch-michael.html

Greegor

unread,
May 25, 2012, 2:46:52 PM5/25/12
to
G > Glorbleflorb?

GLB > So?

G > LOL

GLB > Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?

I didn't know Rachel was taken away from Nancy.
Rachel would be about 33 years old now.


Fred Hall

unread,
May 25, 2012, 5:08:32 PM5/25/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:46:52 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<0f08c034-a903-40e9...@o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com>:

> Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?

<crickets>

Greegor

unread,
May 25, 2012, 5:34:21 PM5/25/12
to

Fred Hall

unread,
May 25, 2012, 5:37:56 PM5/25/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<6819cb88-de53-4c5b...@oy3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:

>Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?

Greegor

unread,
May 25, 2012, 5:45:09 PM5/25/12
to
GLB > Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?

I didn't know Rachel was taken away from Nancy.
Rachel would be about 33 years old now, Gary Lee.

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

Fred Hall

unread,
May 25, 2012, 9:27:52 PM5/25/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:45:09 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<6b4652d7-c7df-42d8...@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>:

>GLB > Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?

Fucking coward. Why won't you answer my question?

Greegor

unread,
May 25, 2012, 10:45:48 PM5/25/12
to
GLB > Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?

GLB > Fucking coward.  Why won't you answer my question?

I didn't know Rachel was taken away from Nancy.
Rachel would be about 33 years old now, Gary Lee.

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

Do you have a more recent photo, Gary Lee?

This one is from 16 years ago!
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 26, 2012, 2:10:55 PM5/26/12
to
G > Glorbleflorb?

GLB > So?

GLB > That was fred, dumbass.

Your imaginary friend?

G > LOL

GLB > Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?

GLB > THat was Fred too, dumbass.

Your imaginary friend?

GLB > And you dind't answer! Why is that?

G > I didn't know [ Rachael ] was taken away from Nancy.
G > [ Rachael ] would be about 33 years old now.

GLB > If you're going to drag someone else in
GLB > to save you from answering, maybe you
GLB > should 1: ASK HER IF ITS OK and 2:
GLB > Spell her name right.

Your confession spells it Rachael but the
first page of the Police report spells it Rachel.

Greegor

unread,
May 26, 2012, 2:29:18 PM5/26/12
to
Message has been deleted

Fred Hall

unread,
May 26, 2012, 2:43:27 PM5/26/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:08:01 +0000 (UTC), Gary L Burnore
<gbur...@databasix.com> wrote in <jpr2lh$27c$4...@reader1.panix.com>:

>In alt.usenet.kooks Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:45:09 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
>> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> <6b4652d7-c7df-42d8...@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>>GLB > Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?
>>
>> Fucking coward. Why won't you answer my question?
>
>
>Do remind the putz that you are not me and I am not you, K?

Sure, for all the good it will do. RHS flunked out of SooperSleuth
University.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Fred Hall

unread,
May 26, 2012, 3:14:38 PM5/26/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 11:10:55 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<50c55919-3784-4464...@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>:

>G > Glorbleflorb?
>
>GLB > So?
>
>GLB > That was fred, dumbass.
>
>Your imaginary friend?
>
>G > LOL
>
>GLB > Why was the little girl not returned to her mother?
>
>GLB > THat was Fred too, dumbass.
>
>Your imaginary friend?
>
>GLB > And you dind't answer! Why is that?
>
>G > I didn't know [ Rachael ] was taken away from Nancy.
>G > [ Rachael ] would be about 33 years old now.
>
>GLB > If you're going to drag someone else in
>GLB > to save you from answering, maybe you
>GLB > should 1: ASK HER IF ITS OK and 2:
>GLB > Spell her name right.

Burnore obsession noted

--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan

"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." - Nellie Hall

KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Pierre Salinger HL&S - January 2012
Pierre Salinger HL&S - February 2012
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer Rasta Khan March 2006

Fred Hall

unread,
May 26, 2012, 3:30:03 PM5/26/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 11:29:18 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<108fdbba-90dc-4584...@v24g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>:

>Probation Officer Report

States that your home was unfit for a 7 year old girl.

Greegor

unread,
May 26, 2012, 3:51:53 PM5/26/12
to
Subject: Re: Greg Hanson was actually CONVICTED of CHILD MOLESTING

Not THIS Greg Hanson!
Iowa court docket information is online.

G > Probation Officer Report

GLB > States that your home was unfit for a 7 year old girl.

No probation officer ever entered my home.
Probation officers don't make such determinations.

Even CPS caseworkers have no STANDARDS to
use to make such determinations and they
sure as heck have no qualifications to
make such determinations.






http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/be93ecc5bf86c75b?hl=en&dmode=source

Received: by 10.68.211.103 with SMTP id nb7mr2757287pbc.
6.1338060686163;
Sat, 26 May 2012 12:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: pr3ni52071pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!
blackhelicopter.databasix.com!not-for-mail
From: Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.bob-larson,misc.legal,alt.law-
enforcement
Subject: Re: Greg Hanson was actually CONVICTED of CHILD MOLESTING
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 14:30:03 -0500
Organization: DataBasix - News Done Right.
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <jpra4u$rek$8...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
References: <joghuu$9eq$1...@dont-email.me>
<m7jpq7l8qkfimpti0...@4ax.com> <36f4b0e0-e8ef-4c55-8fa9-
ab1d81...@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com> <jpkjgp$jgt
$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <7cb9668c-fa55-45ca-b7c5-
efa12a...@j25g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <jpkn6b$o8b
$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
<e6ff8e65-721b-4efc...@w10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
<jpr21l$27c$2...@reader1.panix.com> <108fdbba-90dc-4584-
bb9b-2a3...@v24g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: blackhelicopter.databasix.com 1338059742 28116
blackhelicopter.databasix.com (26 May 2012 19:15:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ab...@databasix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 19:15:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
X-AOL-Abuser: Yes
X-CompuServe-Customer: Yes
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-
us) AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/
533.19.4,gzip(gfe)
X-Newreader: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.18 BETA/
60
X-WebTv-Abuser: Yes
X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, 26 May 2012 11:29:18 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<greego...@gmail.com> wrote in
<108fdbba-90dc-4584-bb9b-2a3b41ad7...@v24g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>:

Fred Hall

unread,
May 26, 2012, 4:09:43 PM5/26/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:51:53 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<a18b623f-1a65-4955...@j10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>:

>Subject: Re: Greg Hanson was actually CONVICTED of CHILD MOLESTING

>Even CPS caseworkers have no STANDARDS to
>use to make such determinations and they
>sure as heck have no qualifications to
>make such determinations.

The law says otherwise, convicted waterboarder

Greegor

unread,
May 26, 2012, 4:12:07 PM5/26/12
to
GLB > If you're going to drag someone else in
GLB > to save you from answering, maybe you
GLB > should 1: ASK HER IF ITS OK and 2:
GLB > Spell her name right.

G > Your confession spells it Rachael but the

GLB > I didn't post a confession, dipshit.

That's OK, Gary, somebody else posted it FOR YOU!

GLB > If you weren't as rock hard poor as you
GLB > are rock hard stupid, I could sue you.

GLB > How about you post where you can be served?  Betcha won't.

I love it!
Threats of KOOK SUIT from Gary Lee Burnore!
That's funny!

Do you intend to use the EXCUSE that
my local Sherriff's Department doesn't
know where I am, Gary Lee?

You do know that THEY handle process service, right?

Your attorney should have no trouble.

I'll be looking for your return address
Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957
4469 Still Pines Dr Raleigh, NC 27613-3334

You could always ask Kent and Moe for
my address. They've posted about 4 for me
over the years. One address was from 1999!


GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages)Oct 1997
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 26, 2012, 8:57:40 PM5/26/12
to

This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use

unread,
May 26, 2012, 11:22:37 PM5/26/12
to
Greegor 'Rock Hard Stupid' Hanson <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

> more spam

--
MMFC's 'Jethro' of rec.radio.amateur.policy tries to forge-cancel in
MID <3dcd1b6eaaf...@alvillage.net> and screws it up -
"Cancel: <nct1k28co382t66d1...@4ax.com>
Canceled by HipCrime News Agent."
--
MMFC kook UberJacker <nohi...@houston-hunks.com> takes usenet to real life:
"It seems your telephone number is posted on Nim, Marc. I imagine that
your fans will be calling soon. Enjoy."
MID: <ee35aa1e-ee89-4e63...@r36g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>

Aratzio

unread,
May 26, 2012, 11:20:15 PM5/26/12
to
On May 26, 8:51 pm, Gary L Burnore <gburn...@databasix.com> wrote:
> In alt.usenet.kooks Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: Greg Hanson was actually CONVICTED of CHILD MOLESTING
>
> > Not THIS Greg Hanson!
> > Iowa court docket information is online.
>
> > G > Probation Officer Report
>
> > GLB > States that your home was unfit for a 7 year old girl.
>
> That wasn't me posting,
> --
> Garrry B.

Then who was it, Garrry ??

Greegor

unread,
May 27, 2012, 4:59:54 AM5/27/12
to
GLB > Subject: Re: Greg Hanson was actually CONVICTED of CHILD
MOLESTING

G > Not THIS Greg Hanson!
G > Iowa court docket information is online.

G > Probation Officer Report

GLB > States that your home was unfit for a 7 year old girl.

GLB > That wasn't me posting,

Aratzio > Then who was it, Garrry ??

Gary's confession to Police was about
kissing the kid but later he came up
with a story that he woke up with the
teen on top of his manly prong.
Official North Carolina Department Of Corrections web site
http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 27, 2012, 12:13:27 PM5/27/12
to
Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages)Oct 1997

Message has been deleted

Fred Glorbleflorb

unread,
May 27, 2012, 3:38:08 PM5/27/12
to
On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:13:27 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote in
<01cb93c0-2bde-4dee...@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>:

>Greg Hanson takes little responsibility for the
>occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
>blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
>appropriate. Likewise, the Greg Hanson appears to
>view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
>that he has done everything 'right'
>

About time you posted the truth
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 27, 2012, 4:51:07 PM5/27/12
to
Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg

GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages)Oct 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc1_Page3.JPG

"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.

Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.

The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,

bit some rot

unread,
May 27, 2012, 5:06:15 PM5/27/12
to
On 5/27/2012 2:01 PM, Kent Wills wrote:
> Greg blames everyone else for his action. Nothing is ever his
> fault. Ever.

Bilyeu syndrome?

bit some rot

unread,
May 27, 2012, 5:07:32 PM5/27/12
to
On 5/27/2012 1:54 PM, Kent Wills wrote:
> It's a man named Glen with whom Greg has been OBSESSED for more
> than 10 years. His sexual OBSESSION with me hasn't yet reach that
> level, though Greg is trying very hard to match it.

You sure seem to like the attention, burgledong.

Greegor

unread,
May 27, 2012, 10:18:21 PM5/27/12
to
One of my favorite mysteries is why Kent
tried to say that Sean Michael Bilyeu
is a girl. What did he hope to gain by that lie?

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973

Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 28, 2012, 1:00:17 PM5/28/12
to
KBW > Greg blames everyone else for his action.
KBW > Nothing is ever his fault.  Ever.

bsr > Bilyeu syndrome?

G > One of my favorite mysteries is why Kent
G > tried to say that Sean Michael Bilyeu
G > is a girl.   What did he hope to gain by that lie?

KBW > That was YOUR claim.  You linked
KBW > to Sean Bilyeu's Facebook account
KBW > every day for a few weeks even
KBW > after KSIC and I pointed out
KBW > she's female.

Only YOU claimed Bilyeu is female, Kent.

The mystery is what you hoped to gain
by this particular idiotic lie.

Did you two have more than a
working (thieving) relationship
with your teen accomplice to the
famous garage burglary?

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973

Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985


[ These notes are still ONLINE and verifiable under CHARGES ]
[ Text compressed for presentation on usenet ]

Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:

Count 01
08/12/2003 Offense Date BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
12/17/2003 Adj.Date: GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence 10 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Count 02
08/12/2003 Offense BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR VEHICLE
(AGMS)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 2 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION Duration: 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE Duration: 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
Count 03
08/12/2003 USING JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE(FELC)709A.
6(2)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09

http://fifthdcs.com/addresses.cfm?location=fort

Fifth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services

Fort Des Moines Community Corrections Complex
Main Phone Number: (515) 242-6900

http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW


http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005

STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk
County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge.

Defendant appeals claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.

Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender,
and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State
Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin
Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P.
Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

WIGGINS, Justice.

Kent Wills appeals his conviction for
second-degree burglary contending that
an attached garage is a separate occupied
structure from that of the living quarters
of the residence. In this appeal, we must
determine whether trial counsel was
ineffective for (1) failing to move for
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to convict Wills
of second-degree burglary when he entered
an attached garage of a residence when no
persons were present in the garage, but
when persons were present in the living
quarters; and (2) failing to object to a
jury instruction based on this same
argument. Because we find there was no
legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury
instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not
ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called
the local police to report that a car
alarm sounded in the resident's
neighborhood. The city dispatched a police
officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only
to be stopped a couple of blocks later
by a person who informed the officer he
had witnessed someone running from the
area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the
car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the
person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody
running from the area. The minor answered
that he had not. While the officer and
another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood
arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people,
one of whom was heavy set with a blinking
light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She
observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's
attached garage through an unlocked service
door. She further observed a smaller
individual standing by a van parked in
the neighbor's driveway.

The officers eventually let the minor leave
even though they found a large amount of
coins, a flashlight, and an electronic
pocket organizer in his pockets. After
releasing the minor, the police officers
drove to the residence where the neighbor
observed the two suspicious people and
woke the owner. The owner, his wife,
and two daughters were in the residence
sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered
change and an electronic pocket organizer
were missing from the vehicles. The
owner's daughter reported a diamond ring
and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the
officers the minor was with Wills. After
the officers questioned the minor again,
he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the
burglary, the officers arrested him.

The State filed a trial information
charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the
information to include two additional
charges of burglary in the third degree
and using a juvenile to commit an
indictable offense.

The jury returned a verdict finding Wills
guilty of the crimes of burglary in the
second degree, burglary in the third
degree, and using a juvenile to commit
an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary
claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel.

II. Scope of Review.

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the
United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.
Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93
(1984). Our review for a claim involving
violations of the Constitution is de novo.
State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
for postconviction relief actions. State
v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999).
However, we will address such claims on
direct appeal when the record is sufficient
to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer,
609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The
appellate record in the present case is
sufficient to allow us to address Wills'
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
on direct appeal.

In order for a defendant to succeed on a
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the defendant must prove: (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty and
(2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice
results when "there is a reasonable
probability that, but for the counsel's
unprofessional errors, the result of the
proceeding would have been different."
State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466
U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments
also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for
correction of errors at law. State v.
Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).

III. Analysis.

To find Wills guilty of burglary in the
second degree, the State had to prove
Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or
upon an occupied structure in which one
or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa
Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).

In this appeal, Wills first contends his
trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to move for a judgment of acquittal on
the basis there was insufficient evidence
to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons
present in or upon the occupied structure.
Wills concedes the garage was an occupied
structure, but argues the living quarters
and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore,
the jury could not have found there were
people present in the attached garage
at the time of the burglary.

The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:

[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances
to buildings and structures, land, water
or air vehicle, or similar place adapted
for overnight accommodation of persons,
or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity
therein, or for the storage or safekeeping
of anything of value. Such a structure
is an "occupied structure" whether or not
a person is actually present.

Id. § 702.12.

Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590
N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the
garage and the living quarters are separate
and independent occupied structures. In
Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors
were operated in the same structure.
590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant
committed two burglaries by entering each
business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up
demonstrate that the portions are
independent working units which constitute
'[a] combination of materials to form a
construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id.
Smothers is not at odds with the present
case because the living quarters and the
garage are not separate or independent
units of the residence.

Our review of the record reveals the garage
in question was a three-car attached garage
separated from the living quarters by a
door. The same roof covered the garage as
the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides.
It was structurally no different from any
other room in the residence.

The garage was a functional part of the
residence. On the night of the incident,
the door was unlocked. The owner of the
residence used two stalls in the garage to
park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As
such, the garage and the living quarters
are a single "structure" or "building"
functioning as an integral part of the
family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single
"occupied structure" under section 702.12.
See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr.
2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's
entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage
was attached to the house; therefore,
burglary of the garage was burglary of
an inhabited dwelling house); People v.
Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an
attached garage is a 'dwelling' because
it is part of the structure in which
the owner or occupant lives");
State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53
(N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary
of the [attached] garage was burglary of
the dwelling house because the garage was
a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d
760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding
"[s]ince the garage in the present case
was structurally part of a building
which was used for overnight lodging of
various persons, it must be considered
as part of a dwelling"); White v. State,
630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982)
(holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered
a habitation within the purview of the
penal code because the garage is a
structure appurtenant to and connected
to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.
2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993)
(holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute
included an attached garage).

Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to support
a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage there were no persons
present in or upon the occupied
structure, it would have been overruled
by the court because the owner and his
family were present in the residence at
the time of the burglary.

Wills also claims his counsel was
ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district
court on the same ground; that the
living quarters were a separate and
independent occupied structure from the
attached garage. The instruction as
given stated:

The State must prove all of the following
elements of Burglary in the Second
Degree as to Count I:

1. On or about the 12th day of August,
2003, the defendant or someone he aided
and abetted broke into or entered the
residence at . . . .

2. The residence at . . . was an occupied
structure as defined in Instruction No. 29.

3. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did not have permission or
authority to break into the residence at ...

4. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did so with the specific
intent to commit a theft therein.

5. During the incident persons were present
in or upon the occupied structure.

If the State has proved all of the elements,
the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not
guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and
you will then consider the charge of
Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree
explained in Instruction No. 21.

(Emphasis added.)

Wills' claim is without merit. As we have
discussed, the residence is the one and
only "occupied structure" under the facts
of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel
made this objection to the instruction,
it would have been overruled.

Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not
ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting
to the instruction because there was no
legal basis for the motion or objection.
See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234,
238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an
issue that has no merit).

IV. Disposition.

We affirm the judgment of the district
court because Wills' trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise
meritless issues.

AFFIRMED.
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 29, 2012, 12:42:34 AM5/29/12
to
KBW > Greg blames everyone else for his action.
KBW > Nothing is ever his fault.  Ever.

bsr > Bilyeu syndrome?

G > One of my favorite mysteries is why Kent
G > tried to say that Sean Michael Bilyeu
G > is a girl.   What did he hope to gain by that lie?

KBW > That was YOUR claim.  You linked to Sean
KBW > Bilyeu's Facebook account every day for a
KBW > few weeks even after KSIC and I pointed out
KBW > she's female.

Got a LINK to where KSIC claimed that
Bilyeu is female?

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973

Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985

>  Her profile claimed, and probably claims, Sean is
> >>female.

Nope.
Stupid pointless lie from you, Kent.

KBW > You claimed she was a juvenile.

Got a LINk to where I claimed Bilyeu
is a female?

KBW > You never did explain why you were
KBW > so OBSESSED with a juvenile
KBW > female who, in her picture, tried
KBW > to look male, though a reasonable
KBW > guess can be made.

Please post a LINK to where I ever
claimed that Bilyeu is/was female.
I presume you just lied.

Sean Bilyeu has not been a minor
for quite some time, Kent.

[ Kent repeated his idiotic
lie two or three more times. ]

Gary Lee's Official ONLINE NC Department Of Corrections web page
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 29, 2012, 4:32:55 PM5/29/12
to
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 30, 2012, 1:13:36 AM5/30/12
to
I looked into the usenet archive and noticed
that quite a few people have publicized your
sex offender history on usenet.
A large number of your responses are gone.
Did somebody ELSE delete all of your posts, Gary?

I once claimed that you haven't denied this
stuff and you retorted that you had.
Were you expecting me to account for messages you DELETED?

Have you posted threats to SUE lots of other
people who publicized your sex offense conviction?

Do you honestly wish people to believe that all
of those documents that have been online for
all of these years are FAKE?

Even the NC Corrections listing that is STILL ONLINE?

http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

Do you claim that these scans of Probation Officer
Puccinelli's report on you have been photo altered?

GLB Probation Officer Report (3 pages) Oct 1997
Please declare what parts of the online dossier on you
are false, faked or fraudulent, and what parts are
real, accurate and true, Gary Lee.

If you were to claim that ALL of it is fake, then the
online NC Corrections page is enough to prove that you lied.

Kent Wills has tried to claim FOR YOU that all of
the scanned documents were photo-edited.
Is this YOUR claim as well, Gary?
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
May 30, 2012, 12:29:26 PM5/30/12
to

offenderID=0594483

unread,
May 30, 2012, 3:55:56 PM5/30/12
to
perhaps everybody in north carolina has an offenderID?

yep. that's the ticket...

Greegor

unread,
May 30, 2012, 6:10:28 PM5/30/12
to

Greegor

unread,
May 30, 2012, 9:25:17 PM5/30/12
to
> Considering the NC corrections page matches
> your California conviction, I am having a tough time
> believing that the scanned records are false in any way.
>
> You threatened to sue me, so please help me
> do some "due diligence" fact checking, Gary!
> Or was that just an idle threat, Gary?
>
> Maybe it would just be easier if you send me
> your attorney's contact info and bar card #, Gary Lee?

Or should I ask Charles Novins? He would know, right?

Greegor

unread,
May 31, 2012, 6:32:04 AM5/31/12
to
G > Considering the NC corrections page matches
G > your California conviction, I am having a tough time
G > believing that the scanned records are false in any way.

G > > You threatened to sue me, so please help me
G > > do some "due diligence" fact checking, Gary!
G > > Or was that just an idle threat, Gary?

G > > Maybe it would just be easier if you send me
G > > your attorney's contact info and bar card #, Gary Lee?

G > Or should I ask Charles Novins?   He would know, right?

I'll give you another day to answer my "due diligence"
questions, Gary, and if you don't I'll be forced to
conclude that the scanned in documents are accurate.

Greegor

unread,
May 31, 2012, 5:02:12 PM5/31/12
to
G > You threatened to sue me, so please help me
G > do some "due diligence" fact checking, Gary!
G > Or was that just an idle threat, Gary?

Rot > You're flat broke Hanson, less assets than Emmett Gulley.
Rot > You can't squeeze blood from a stupid rock

KBW > Greg does get SSI because of his Asperger's.
KBW > By the very standards Greg DEMANDS be
KBW > held to others, he's admitted this.

ie: Both assertions are Kent Wills lies.
I neither have Aspergers nor collect SSI.

G > Maybe it would just be easier if you send me
G > your attorney's contact info and bar card #, Gary Lee?

Rot > Why not post your address for service <snip>

KBW > Greg's current address was posted not
KBW > too long ago.  It's a slum apartment in Cedar Rapids.
KBW > I didn't bother to commit the address to memory.

Despite many attempts Kent hasn't got my address right yet.

How many other people has Gary threatened
to sue, out of the DOZENS of people who have
pointed out his sex offense records on usenet?

Have they ALL been law suit proof?
What does that say about usenet?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Black Bitch

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 1:04:47 PM6/1/12
to
On 5/31/2012 5:00 PM, Kent Wills wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 03:32:04 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Even the NC Corrections listing that is STILL ONLINE?
>>
>> I looked into the usenet archive and noticed
>
> Replying to yourself, claiming you are Gary? Really?
It was because he was some kind of moron. Who cares? He's gone now!
Thank God!

--
Set(h). HTH.

Black Bitch

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 1:17:47 PM6/1/12
to
On 5/31/2012 3:02 PM, Greegor wrote:
> Gary> You threatened to blow me off, so help me God
> Gary> do some "due diligence" fact checking, G!
> Gary> Or was that just an idle threat, G?
> Gary> Homeboy you're just gonna get your assss kicked.
>
> Rot> You're flat broke G, less assets than Emmett Gulley.
> Rot> You can't squeeze turnip juice from a stupid rock
>
> KBW> Greg does get SSI because of his Asperger's.
> KBW> By the very standards Greg DEMANDS be
> KBW> held to others, he's admitted this.
>
> ie: Both assertions are G lies.
> I neither have Alzheimers' Die Syndrome nor can I remember if I do.
>
> Gary> Maybe it would just be easier if you send me
> Gary> your attorney's contact info and bar card #, G?
> Gary> Say goodbye to your lawyer your girl and your accountant, G.
>
> Rot> Why not post your address for service<snip>
>
> KBW> Greg's current address was posted not
> KBW> too long ago. It's a slum apartment in Cedar Rapids.
> KBW> I didn't bother to commit the address to memory.
>
> Despite many attempts G hasn't got his address right yet. He is between jobs and has all his possessions laid out on the lawn.
>
> How many other people has G threatened
> to sue, out of the eight people who have
> pointed out his toddler-cannibalism records on USENET?
>
> Have they ALL been law-suit proof?
> What does that say about USENET?
> Shit man, even Rip Torn could not have got out of that shit, G.
> You will have to teach me something someday, G. ==
It rhymes, except I want three more takes before twilight.

--
Set(h). HTH.

Black Bitch

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 2:31:46 PM6/1/12
to
On 5/31/2012 4:57 PM, Kent Wills wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:02:12 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> G> You threatened to sue me, so please help me
>> G> do some "due diligence" fact checking, Gary!
>> G> Or was that just an idle threat, Gary?
>>
>> Rot> You're flat broke Hanson, less assets than Emmett Gulley.
>> Rot> You can't squeeze blood from a stupid rock
>>
>> KBW> Greg does get SSI because of his Asperger's.
>> KBW> By the very standards Greg DEMANDS be
>> KBW> held to others, he's admitted this.
>>
>> ie: Both assertions are Kent Wills lies.
>> I neither have Aspergers nor collect SSI.
>
> You've PROVED you have Asperger's. You claim the pointing out of
> spelling errors and typos is PROOF (emphasis yours) of Asperger's. You
> frequently pointed them out.
> Are you trying to claim when you stated such is PROOF, you were
> lying? If that is the claim you are making now, please explain why
> you LIED about it.
> Since you've not denied the claim you receive SSI each time the
> claim has been made, by YOUR standards, you have admitted the claim is
> true.
> Yes, you've since slipped and admitted you DEMANDED that
> standards, in addition to all of your others, was nothing more than an
> act of deception. Still, I'm holding you to it.
>
>>
>> G> Maybe it would just be easier if you send me
>> G> your attorney's contact info and bar card #, Gary Lee?
>>
>> Rot> Why not post your address for service<snip>
>>
>> KBW> Greg's current address was posted not
>> KBW> too long ago. It's a slum apartment in Cedar Rapids.
>> KBW> I didn't bother to commit the address to memory.
>>
>> Despite many attempts Kent hasn't got my address right yet.
>>
>
> I didn't post the apartment address, Greg.
> What is at the root of your NEED to lie, Greg? This is a serious
> question.
>
>> How many other people has Gary threatened
>> to sue, out of the DOZENS of people who have
>> pointed out his sex offense records on usenet?
>>
>
> Uh huh.
> According to you, posting a claim without a link is proof of
> psychopathic reasoning.
> How long have you been psychopathic, Greg? Does your mental
> health care professional, no matter his/her title, know that by YOUR
> standards, you are psychopathic?
>
>> Have they ALL been law suit proof?
>
> You've yet to prove he made such a claim.
> You also have yet to prove your claim that he plead up from a
> misdemeanor to a felony.
> Please see MID
> 7b457537-4371-4cb...@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com for
> just ONE example of your presenting that he did such.
>
> To everyone else: Hurry and check the post that is connected to
> the MID. When Greg realizes I've offered PROOF of his lying, the post
> will vanish. It almost always does.
>
>> What does that say about usenet?
>
> That only those as mentally unbalanced as you've once again
> PROVED you are think it's real life.
>
> Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
>
> http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg
>
> "I am Bob Larson."
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
> as mentally ill as he presents.
> Message-ID:
> <df610804-da3b-4aa8...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
>
> A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
> Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
> that water is wet):
>
> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
> (DOB 05/22/1959)
> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
> OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 2 SPEED
> Disposition Status
> GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
>
> "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
> Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
> attacking my first wife (deceased).
> http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
>
> Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
> drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
> alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
>
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
> "Of course."
>
> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
> in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
> the Child Abuse registry, for example."
> -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
> abuser
>
> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
> minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
> minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
> the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
> address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
> April 2000, Gregory Hanson
> http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
>
> Path:
> news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Greegor<gree...@gmail.com>
> Newsgroups:
> misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
>
> With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
> into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
> videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
> was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
> water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
> a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
> gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
> were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
> She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
> prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
>
> "Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
> triumphantly.
>
> --a true story
>
> As of Wednesday, August 31, 2011:
>
> SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
> Comments: OPA $2805.04
> COPIES TO PA
> VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
>
> JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
> Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
> + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98& $45.00 COSTS.
>
> Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
> TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
> FEES $35.60
>
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
> him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
> has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
> can't risk getting a job due to it.
You say he's a Chosen ONE?

--
Set(h). HTH.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
Jun 4, 2012, 11:11:20 PM6/4/12
to
"Appearing before the Court for Violation of Probation
is 40-year-old Gary Burnore. The defendant was
convicted of violation of Sec. 647.6(a) PC (Annoying/
Molesting a Child Under the Age of 18). He is allegedly
in violation for failure to register, failure to make
payments, failure to participate in counseling, and
leaving the state of California without permission.
The defendant takes little responsibility for the
occurring offense, minimizing the part he played,
blaming others, and justifying his behavior as being
appropriate. Likewise, the defendant appears to
view himself as the victim, vocalizing his distress
that he has done everything 'right' and that the
Probation Department is preventing him from moving.
It is his belief that the probation officer is
'harassing' him.

Although the defendant verbalizes his compliance
with the terms and conditions of probation, it
seems clear that his actions speak louder than
his words, especially in the light of his recent
absconding from Santa Clara County. In secret,
the defendant moved to another state, fully
realizing he could not move from California
until Interstate Compact had finished their
investigation and the new state accepted his
case. The defendant's behavior can only be
characterized as manipulative and self-serving.
It appears the defendant does not believe he
needs to follow the rules, but rather that he
is a victim of the system and can, therefore,
do as he pleases.

The defendant's attitude, failure to comply,
and the point that he takes only minimal
responsibility for the occurring offense,
suggests that risk for potential victims
may be high."

J. Puccinelli, Probation Officer, Unit IV
Municipal Court of the State of California,
Santa Clara County, People of the State
of California v. Gary Burnore
Probation Office No. DMU044
Court No. C9618225 DA No. 961131078
Santa Clara Police Department Case No. 9615185
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
Jun 5, 2012, 4:14:01 PM6/5/12
to
Ding!
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Greegor

unread,
Jun 6, 2012, 3:42:08 AM6/6/12
to
Ding!

Greegor

unread,
Jun 6, 2012, 6:11:13 PM6/6/12
to
Gary's confession to Police was about
kissing the kid but later he came up
with a story that he woke up with the
teen riding on top of his Vienna sausage.

Gary Lee Burnore DOB 10/13/1957 mugshot 1997

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/defectgb.jpg
Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE

SEVEN PAGE POLICE NARRATIVE

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page1.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page2.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page3.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page4.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page5.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page6.JPG
http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc2_Page7.JPG

Police Narrative Pages 1-7
http://bayimg.com/haNigAaBd
http://bayimg.com/hanIIaaBd
http://bayimg.com/HaNIlAabd
http://bayimg.com/hAnimaaBD
http://bayimg.com/IANIaaAbD
http://bayimg.com/iaNicaabd
http://bayimg.com/iAnidaabd



Gary Mug shot with numbers
http://bayimg.com/PaNccaAbd


http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&biw=1020&bih=602&q=4469+Still+Pines+Drive,+Raleigh,+NC+27613-3334

http://cbk3.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&cb_client=maps_sv&thumb=2&thumbfov=66&ll=35.865647,-78.710116&cbll=35.865692,-78.709956

Belinda West 137 Meadowbrook Ln Davidson, NC 28036-8059
Parcel ID#: 00705124 GIS ID#: 00705124
GARY LEE BURNORE AND BELINDA W BURNORE
137 MEADOWBROOK LN DAVIDSON, NC 28036
http://meckcama.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/mvideo/20050208/D8083943.jpg
Message has been deleted

offenderID=0594483

unread,
Jun 7, 2012, 11:03:13 AM6/7/12
to
Kent Wills wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:11:13 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:47:55 -0500, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Greg is still around. He's been posting via his sock puppet more
>>>often during the past few days.
>>
>>Gary's confession to Police was about
>>kissing the kid but later he came up
>>with a story that he woke up with the
>>teen riding on top of his Vienna sausage.
>
> Your attempt to distract from the TRUTH about your use of sock
> puppets is more likely to draw attention to it.
> You're very stupid, Greg.
> + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
>
> Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
> TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
> FEES $35.60
>
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
> him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
> has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
> can't risk getting a job due to it.


why do you suck "burnore cock" so much?

Greegor

unread,
Jun 7, 2012, 2:58:16 PM6/7/12
to
Kent Wills wrote: [...]

offenderID=0594483 > why do you suck "burnore cock" so much?

Kent and Gary both have criminal convictions they
DENY even though it's easily proveable online.

Why would somebody with Gary's record want
to be the ring-leader to a bunch of harassers
and run an anonymous posting service to enable
his groupies to harass others anonymously?

Who would want to use an anonymous posting
service run by a guy with an actual criminal
conviction for child molesting in California?

Why would motivate Kent to post his own
Date Of Birth on usenet and on a birthday
web page he webmastered but later remove
his Date Of Birth from his birthday web page
and deny his own ID?

What motivated Kent to pretend that his 2003
garage burglary teen accomplice Bilyeu was a girl?
(Then reverse his position and blame others?)



Gary Lee Burnore's NC Corrections listing that is STILL ONLINE

http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

Interstate Compact State: CALIFORNIA
INITIAL 00000000 ASSAULT ON FEMALE (PRINCIPAL) 01/01/1996 UNKN. NON
CLASS CODE

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.alien.visitors/msg/7bb21a6718c8504c

Sun, 15 Jun 2003 03:46:12 [...]
KBW 2003 > I was born in Krakow, Poland on
KBW 2003 > Jan. 8, 1969. I grew up there, and
KBW 2003 > in the mid 80's I came to the US.


Iowa Department of Corrections listing for Kent Wills

http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Message has been deleted

bit some rot

unread,
Jun 8, 2012, 1:48:03 PM6/8/12
to
>> + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98& $45.00 COSTS.
>>
>> Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
>> TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
>> FEES $35.60
>>
>> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
>> him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
>> has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
>> can't risk getting a job due to it.
>
>
> why do you suck "burnore cock" so much?


...birds of a feather...
0 new messages