Re: Atheists claim a 'thing' happened.

[Peter Pan]

Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:

> On 11/02/2020 11:23 am, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ

> >>>> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself.  :-).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> You are wankers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Michael Christ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why you
> >>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
> >>
> >> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
> >> have a good look at it. :-).
> >>
> >> But you haven't got one have you.
>
> Pete piped:
> > You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
> > state your case already.
> >
> > Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
> > if you are Christ Lite.
>
> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> insanely ignorant.

You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.

"Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.

"I can't understand, so it's impossible" is not a case.

"I'm christ and i said so" is not a case.

You don't respond well to rational discussion. You flop
around from non-sequitur to leap of illogic to science
denialism to name-calling to masturbation to dick
fantasies. You are incoherent, never mind the case.

A real christ at least uses parables and illustrative
metaphors. It's time to accept that you suck at this
christing thing.

> Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??

Ted can take care of you on his own. I am free to jump
in and speak my TRVTH, and let the cards fall where they
may, as someone often says. Dry your tears, cupcake.
Take it like a christ.

[Michael Christ]

On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2020 11:23 am, Peter Pan wrote:
>>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>>>> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
>
>>>>>> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself.  :-).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are wankers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Christ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why you
>>>>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
>>>>
>>>> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
>>>> have a good look at it. :-).
>>>>
>>>> But you haven't got one have you.
>>
>> Pete piped:
>>> You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
>>> state your case already.
>>>
>>> Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
>>> if you are Christ Lite.
>>
>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
>> insanely ignorant.
>
> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.

Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.

Believe it or not.

And you are not the case master of the universe, Poopy.

>
> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.

Not the way I put it.

I put it this way, if that is alright with you??

Eternal God or nothing would be here.

Why?

No thing, nothing can create itself.

Take it or leave it, Oh Glorious Case Master of the Universe.

>
> "I can't understand, so it's impossible" is not a case.

Huh, Poopdom stuff?!

> "I'm christ and i said so" is not a case.

More Poopdom.

>
> You don't respond well to rational discussion.

You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
God of Cases.

You flop
> around from non-sequitur to leap of illogic to science
> denialism to name-calling to masturbation to dick
> fantasies. You are incoherent, never mind the case.

You can believe what you want but you don't tell me what to do and what
is and what isn't, Poopy. You should know that by now.

>
> A real christ at least uses parables and illustrative
> metaphors. It's time to accept that you suck at this
> christing thing.

As above.

>
>> Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??
>
> Ted can take care of you on his own. I am free to jump
> in and speak my TRVTH, and let the cards fall where they
> may, as someone often says. Dry your tears, cupcake.
> Take it like a christ.

Of course, you got nothing but Poopdom poop. Poor Ted is left
floundering with you, you heartless ape.




Michael Christ

--
Rom 5:8  But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.

"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."

[Peter Pan]

Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:

> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:

> >> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> >> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> >> insanely ignorant.
> >
> > You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> > is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
>
> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
>
> Believe it or not.

Thanks, I'll take "or not".

> > "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
>
> Not the way I put it.

Of course. Nothing makes sense the way you put it.

> I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
>
> Eternal God or nothing would be here.
>
> Why?
>
> No thing, nothing can create itself.

Is that a deductive argument? Or an inductive one.
Or merely an infallible ex cathedra christly decree?

> Take it or leave it, Oh Glorious Case Master of the Universe.

Wow. I'm promoted to Glorious Case Master of the
Universe. Does that come with annointment to the office
of Junior Christ?

> > You don't respond well to rational discussion.
>
> You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
> God of Cases.

You're demanding that I explain what rational discussion
is, so you can finally win an argument? What kind of
christ are you anyway?

[Michael Christ]

On 11/02/2020 2:56 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
>>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>>>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
>>>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
>>>> insanely ignorant.
>>>
>>> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
>>> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
>>
>> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
>>
>> Believe it or not.
>
> Thanks, I'll take "or not".
>
>
>>> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
>>
>> Not the way I put it.
>
> Of course. Nothing makes sense the way you put it.
>
>> I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
>>
>> Eternal God or nothing would be here.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> No thing, nothing can create itself.

Pete popped:

> Is that a deductive argument? Or an inductive one.
> Or merely an infallible ex cathedra christly decree?

Its an un-challengeable reality.

>
>
>> Take it or leave it, Oh Glorious Case Master of the Universe.
>
> Wow. I'm promoted to Glorious Case Master of the
> Universe. Does that come with annointment to the office
> of Junior Christ?

You can be whatever you want. Just say whatever you want.

>
>
>>> You don't respond well to rational discussion.
>>
>> You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
>> God of Cases.
>
> You're demanding that I explain what rational discussion
> is, so you can finally win an argument? What kind of
> christ are you anyway?
>

You are just another snipping coward, Peter Poop, dancing around in the
shadows hoping to be light.

[Peter Pan]

Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:

> On 11/02/2020 2:56 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> >>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >
> >>>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> >>>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> >>>> insanely ignorant.
> >>>
> >>> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> >>> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
> >>
> >> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
> >>
> >> Believe it or not.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll take "or not".
> >
> >
> >>> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
> >>
> >> Not the way I put it.
> >
> > Of course. Nothing makes sense the way you put it.
> >
> >> I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
> >>
> >> Eternal God or nothing would be here.
> >>
> >> Why?
> >>
> >> No thing, nothing can create itself.
>
> Pete popped:
> > Is that a deductive argument? Or an inductive one.
> > Or merely an infallible ex cathedra christly decree?
>
> Its an un-challengeable reality.

I have challenged it a thousand times, and you can't
explain how you made your leap of illogic.

So much for your christly unchallengeability.

> >>> You don't respond well to rational discussion.
> >>
> >> You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
> >> God of Cases.
> >
> > You're demanding that I explain what rational discussion
> > is, so you can finally win an argument? What kind of
> > christ are you anyway?
> >
>
> You are just another snipping coward, Peter Poop, dancing around in the
> shadows hoping to be light.

Oh, cry me a river. What I snipped was what I wrote,
plus your content-free poop-talk reply. If you want to
see your poop talk again, go back and read it. It's
still there, waste of electrons though it is.

[Michael Christ]

Why is that? :-).

You can challenge Le Bron too but reality is not going to yield to you!
:-).

> and you can't
> explain how you made your leap of illogic.
>
> So much for your christly unchallengeability.

As above.

You can't challenge reality with delusion, Bud.

>
>
>>>>> You don't respond well to rational discussion.
>>>>
>>>> You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
>>>> God of Cases.
>>>
>>> You're demanding that I explain what rational discussion
>>> is, so you can finally win an argument? What kind of
>>> christ are you anyway?
>>>
>>
>> You are just another snipping coward, Peter Poop, dancing around in the
>> shadows hoping to be light.
>
> Oh, cry me a river. What I snipped was what I wrote,
> plus your content-free poop-talk reply.

Yeah.

If you want to
> see your poop talk again, go back and read it. It's
> still there, waste of electrons though it is.
>

Peter Poopdom is not my King.

[Peter Pan]

Here's the difference between you and LeBron: When
LeBron is challenged at hoops, he is ready and willing to
come out onto the court and play the game.

When Michael the Christ is challenged on his silly ex
cathedra assertions, he repeats himself, equivocates,
dances around, then goes into pooptalk mode.

Your unchallengeable reality loses the challenge by
forfeit.

<snippage of more pooptalk>

[Ted]

Well said, Peter, thank you.

> You don't respond well to rational discussion. You flop
> around from non-sequitur to leap of illogic to science
> denialism to name-calling to masturbation to dick
> fantasies. You are incoherent, never mind the case.


> A real christ at least uses parables and illustrative
> metaphors. It's time to accept that you suck at this
> christing thing.


> > Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??


> Ted can take care of you on his own. I am free to jump
> in and speak my TRVTH, and let the cards fall where they
> may, as someone often says. Dry your tears, cupcake.
> Take it like a christ.

LOL.

[Michael Christ]

An implant of pooptalk, by Peter Poop.

If I told you LeBron was bouncing a ball on your head, you would still
go what, where?? It wouldn't matter how many basketballs were to wear out!

So flog yourself to death, unless you have an attitude change, nothing
is going to change. It is not me preventing you, it is you.

[Michael Christ]

Yes, thank you Peter.




Michael Christ

>
>> You don't respond well to rational discussion.  You flop
>> around from non-sequitur to leap of illogic to science
>> denialism to name-calling to masturbation to dick
>> fantasies.  You are incoherent, never mind the case.
>
>
>> A real christ at least uses parables and illustrative
>> metaphors.  It's time to accept that you suck at this
>> christing thing.
>
>
>> > Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??
>
>
>> Ted can take care of you on his own.  I am free to jump
>> in and speak my TRVTH, and let the cards fall where they
>> may, as someone often says.  Dry your tears, cupcake.
>> Take it like a christ.
>
> LOL.

[Peter Pan]

It's not me preventing you from accepting the tangy
tomatoey grace of The FSM. It's only you.

Ramen.

[Ted]

On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:59:39 +1100, Michael Christ

Yep. Peter is very intelligent. Much more intelligent than my ass,
and I'm intelligent like a muthafucka.

[Teh Barfing Yak]

And you comprise a wan Pack O'bullies and 'bullyettes.

[temm]

pass the sauce