To Attorney Charles Novin: I confess that I'm a dim-wit, screams Roz Ratzio..............
John "C"
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:36ebs45lpirulr4mt...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:16:15 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
> alt.usenet.kooks, Barbara Schwarz <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> got
> double secret probation for writing:
>
> >On Mar 21, 6:21 pm, Tigger <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net> wrote:
> >> On Mar 20, 9:24 pm, NewParadigmLawfirm <ocnj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Mar 20, 9:39 pm, Barbara Schwarz
<BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > > Mr. Novin,
> >>
> >> > > You might post on Usenet or not, it doesn't matter. I don't
expect you
> >> > > to answer because AUK and ARS are rotten snakepits of
newsgroups and
> >> > > many of the posters have nothing better to do than libeling
others per
> >> > > se.
> >>
> >> > > But if you want to know who your defamer Henri is (see his
posting
> >> > > below), here is some information.
> >>
> >> > > His name is Robert W. Clark, and he is an anti-religious
extremist
> >> > > with a psychiatric past who hacked into Los Alamos and in
university
> >> > > owned computers and called to firebomb a church. He was
arrested and
> >> > > drove and speeded under the influence.
> >>
> >> > > He doesn't just hate others. He also hates himself, which is
not
> >> > > surprising. With that character, I would hate myself too.
> >>
> >> > > He and his friends lie that the data on below website would be
not
> >> > > true. However, I have not yet caught this website with a lie.
> >>
> >> >
>http://religiousfreedomwatch.org/anti-religious-extremists/robert-w-c..
.
> >>
> >> > > If you or another attorney is in the process of suing the
Usenet
> >> > > libeler, I wish you the best of success.
> >> > > I hope you sue for the for highest possible amount of damage.
> >>
> >> > > I am convinced that a good attorney can win against these
libelers,
> >> > > defamers, and cyberstalkers in a heartbeat.
> >>
> >> > > Sincerely,
> >>
> >> > > Barbara Schwarz
> >>
> >> > > My current e-mail address is BarbaralovesMarty...@gmail.com
> >>
> >> > Hi Barbara, pleased to meet you. We should discuss this in
e-mail, or
> >> > even better, by phone. Since I'm public and very careful to
verify
> >> > facts, we'll have to talk at a bit more length.
> >>
> >> > Because most everyone here hides and lies, and most have nothing
to
> >> > lose, there's a basic asymmetry I have to contend with. That's
OK,
> >> > since an evenly-matched conflict tends to bore me.
> >>
> >> > The various reprobates change identities like I change a shirt
and
> >> > tie, so I immediately noticed "henri" and killfiled him before
reading
> >> > more than a couple of posts. It is almost impossible to tell one
hate-
> >> > monger from another.
> >>
> >> > If he's crossed the line and pulled any AUKtard stuff, I can
amend him
> >> > and his posts into the complaint trivially in NJ - an amended
> >> > complaint was intended from the outset anyway.
> >>
> >> > We should talk. Call or e-mail anytime. I'll be in the office
> >> > Monday, and you can even e-mail or call sooner, since I forward
from
> >> > office to cell whenever I'm not busy on weekends.
> >>
> >> > Thanks for any help!
> >>
> >> > Charles Novins, Esq.
> >> > 54 East Water Street
> >> > Toms River, New Jersey 08753
> >> > 732-341-4077www.novins.com-Hide quoted text -
> >>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
> >>
> >> LOL....are you for real? You really should do your homework before
> >> asking someone to contact you.
> >> Do a google search and see if you still want to chit chat with
Barbara
> >> Schwarz.
> >>
> >> Tigger
> >>
> >> P. S. I see Barbara has changed the subject title and cross posted
> >> again. You must be new to the internet.
> >> Anyone who's been around for a while knows what a nutcase Barbara
is.
> >> Maybe you should lurk more.
> >
> >Stop libeling me, Shirely Jean Wilson. Don't tell people that I have
> >your state of mind as this is libel too.
> >Get a life. You are a cyber stalker. Isn't there anything decent that
> >you and liar and defamer "Kat" can do for a change?
> >
> >
> >Barbara Schwarz
>
> LIBEL & STALK
TRANSLATION fer Roz Ratzio: LICK & SUCK
--
Your Pal,
HJ
chatnoir
> "Aratzio" <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:36ebs45lpirulr4mt...@4ax.com...> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:16:15 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
>
> > >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> LOL....are you for real? You really should do your homework before
> > >> asking someone to contact you.
> > >> Do a google search and see if you still want to chit chat with
> Barbara
> > >> Schwarz.
>
> > >> Tigger
>
> > >> P. S. I see Barbara has changed the subject title and cross posted
> > >> again. You must be new to the internet.
> > >> Anyone who's been around for a while knows what a nutcase Barbara
> is.
> > >> Maybe you should lurk more.
>
> > >Stop libeling me, Shirely Jean Wilson. Don't tell people that I have
> > >your state of mind as this is libel too.
> > >Get a life. You are a cyber stalker. Isn't there anything decent that
> > >you and liar and defamer "Kat" can do for a change?
>
> > >Barbara Schwarz
>
> > LIBEL & STALK
>
> TRANSLATION fer Roz Ratzio: LICK & SUCK
> --
> Your Pal,
>
> - Show quoted text -
It is the future!:
Flesh kicks off with a housewife and an exterminator dressed as a rat,
having sex in front of three men in high chairs, dressed in baby drag.
Part porno, part performance art, part Z-movie science fiction, Café
Flesh is set in a future where 99% of the human race have been
rendered “sex negative” by a nuclear holocaust, so that the touch of
another person makes them violently ill. ...
Atlas Bugged
news:Xns9BD8917C167AE...@208.90.168.18...
> Barbara Schwarz <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote in
> news:50e2af22-45a4-4920...@w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
> <mass snippage>
>>
>> Thanks, Gregory. Yes, people with big minds don't have to defame the
>> state of mind of others and don't feel threatened when a unusual
>> person appears. They rather enjoy the encounter instead of feeling
>> threatened. People like Rob Clark, Shirley, and other AUK and ARS and
>> Usenet defamers think that people have to be all alike, have the same
>> opinions. How boring the world would be if anybody would be alike.
>>
>> Barbara Schwarz
>>
>
>
> You're welcome, Barbara. You hit the nail right on the head.(as usual)
> The first post of yours here in AUK I read I noticed something about
> you that I found attractive. It can't be your physical appearance
> because at the time I'd not even seen a picture of you. So it was your
> mind. You have some power, girl. Some people fear this power when they
> see it. Not me. I have no need to fear the unusual. Rather, I consider
> it a blessing, a change from the mundane. Something I enjoy associating
> with from time to time.
>
> You're quite perceptive. I can see now how these stalkers of yours don't
> really cause you any grief. It's too bad, though, that they can't see
> fit to do something more constructive with their time.
>
Barbara has e-mailed me and we've had a bit of exchange.
You are correct, she's quite sharp, does just fine putting the illiterates
here in their place, thank you.
Naturally, her appearance is hardly a factor either way, but there does seem
to be a mild correlation between how folks look inside and how they look
outside.
Have you seen the photos of the various AUK reprobates that are known?
Cannon is obese at close to 300 pounds, at least according to the
process-server.
PJR looks like an alien species with vegetable DNA.
No surprise that Barbara looks proudly healthful.
And I've done a few hours appearing on TV, for various reasons.
Stinkin' camera *does* add 10 pounds, and I battle every morning (via
exercise regimen) with my weight - with reasonable success, but then that
DAMN CAMERA ruined everything.
But arguing before juries has a component of "show business," so even if I
didn't care about my look, I owe a certain duty to my clients. And although
we've never met, I'll wager you stay in shape.
In other news, worthy of newsgroup publication....
Google, Inc., attorneys spoke with me today regarding the lawsuit.
Among other discussions I won't make public, they are looking into some of
the tactics used by the "defamation club" here to utilize Google's
facilities for ill purposes.
I've provided them with some info on the various reprobates, and they don't
sound amused.
There may be some Google policy changes arising from my action, and this was
suggested by Google, I'm not simply speculating.
Google may also take legal action against some defamers, ultimately.
They're pretty much with me on this, even though we're nominally adversaries
at the moment.
I'm betting there will be a good shot at some law changes, too, because the
libel against me is so explicit and openly intended by the various posters;
but getting the law changed, that part is speculative.
Well over 90% of all cases settle, so there's not even a chance to "alter
the law," under ordinary circumstances.
But they may have pushed the envelope so far, in my case, they may wind up
with "new rules" they aren't going to like.
The efforts to LART me over at Comcast are similarly backfiring, a surprise
to me, and surely a surprise to them. Readers and lurkers can see what
they're whining and crying about here:
It does appear that their "free speech" talk is a little bit...ahhhh....full
of shit, since Cannon and fellow libelers are openly demanding that Comcast
silence me.
Definitely not the same-old same-old at AUK these days.
--
The Atlas Bugged Experience
miguel
You seem to be bringing your lawsuit into UseNet. Didn't you chide
Rhonda last week about that being unprofessional?
Gregory Hall
> "Greg Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
> news:Xns9BD8917C167AE...@208.90.168.18...
>> Barbara Schwarz <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote in
>> news:50e2af22-45a4-4920...@w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>> <mass snippage>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Gregory. Yes, people with big minds don't have to defame the
>>> state of mind of others and don't feel threatened when a unusual
>>> person appears. They rather enjoy the encounter instead of feeling
>>> threatened. People like Rob Clark, Shirley, and other AUK and ARS and
>>> Usenet defamers think that people have to be all alike, have the same
>>> opinions. How boring the world would be if anybody would be alike.
>>>
>>> Barbara Schwarz
>>>
>>
>>
>> You're welcome, Barbara. You hit the nail right on the head.(as usual)
>> The first post of yours here in AUK I read I noticed something about
>> you that I found attractive. It can't be your physical appearance
>> because at the time I'd not even seen a picture of you. So it was your
>> mind. You have some power, girl. Some people fear this power when they
>> see it. Not me. I have no need to fear the unusual. Rather, I consider
>> it a blessing, a change from the mundane. Something I enjoy associating
>> with from time to time.
>>
>> You're quite perceptive. I can see now how these stalkers of yours don't
>> really cause you any grief. It's too bad, though, that they can't see
>> fit to do something more constructive with their time.
>>
> Barbara has e-mailed me and we've had a bit of exchange.
<envy>
>
> You are correct, she's quite sharp, does just fine putting the illiterates
> here in their place, thank you.
She smacks them around like you smack the AUKer cabal around. <LOL>
>
> Naturally, her appearance is hardly a factor either way, but there does seem
> to be a mild correlation between how folks look inside and how they look
> outside.
>
> Have you seen the photos of the various AUK reprobates that are known?
Honest John has posted some links from time to time but I don't know if they are really pictures of those reprobates or not. The one with Cannon wearing the flower print mini dress and very stylish pumps shows him as thin so maybe it was taken at a way earlier date and he's gotten obese since???
>
> Cannon is obese at close to 300 pounds, at least according to the
> process-server.
>
> PJR looks like an alien species with vegetable DNA.
No surprise there. And Burnore, when viewing his mug shot which he claims isn't even him looks just like Chester the Molester.
>
> No surprise that Barbara looks proudly healthful.
She looks clean, natural and proud. Like she's got nothing to hide and knows what's she's all about. And she's got such a cute accent even when she writes.
>
> And I've done a few hours appearing on TV, for various reasons.
>
> Stinkin' camera *does* add 10 pounds, and I battle every morning (via
> exercise regimen) with my weight - with reasonable success, but then that
> DAMN CAMERA ruined everything.
I bet Rush Limbaugh identifies with you on that one. He's looking pretty porky lately.
>
> But arguing before juries has a component of "show business," so even if I
> didn't care about my look, I owe a certain duty to my clients. And although
> we've never met, I'll wager you stay in shape.
It's pretty well been proven that obese people are taken less seriously and treated worse than people who keep their weight in the normal range. A trim, well-dressed, well-spoken, charismatic attorney performing skillfully in front of a jury is a beautiful thing to behold. Substance and style trumps the alternatives every time.
You're correct about me. I'm in excellent physical shape (5'10" and 160-170 lbs depending on training and comptetion schedule) and I have to work hard at it to stay that way. Cycling's my activity. Last year I trained over 10,000 miles. Got half a dozen medals in individual time trials competition. Can ride a 40K in 62 minutes and a 16K in 22 minutes.
>
>
> In other news, worthy of newsgroup publication....
>
> Google, Inc., attorneys spoke with me today regarding the lawsuit.
>
> Among other discussions I won't make public, they are looking into some of
> the tactics used by the "defamation club" here to utilize Google's
> facilities for ill purposes.
>
> I've provided them with some info on the various reprobates, and they don't
> sound amused.
>
> There may be some Google policy changes arising from my action, and this was
> suggested by Google, I'm not simply speculating.
I hope the UDP DataBasux. :-)
>
> Google may also take legal action against some defamers, ultimately.
> They're pretty much with me on this, even though we're nominally adversaries
> at the moment.
Excellent! Why is it that Google is smart enough to respect you while the reprobates don't seem to have a clue as to their situation?
>
>
> I'm betting there will be a good shot at some law changes, too, because the
> libel against me is so explicit and openly intended by the various posters;
> but getting the law changed, that part is speculative.
>
> Well over 90% of all cases settle, so there's not even a chance to "alter
> the law," under ordinary circumstances.
>
> But they may have pushed the envelope so far, in my case, they may wind up
> with "new rules" they aren't going to like.
I get the feelings that those fools enjoy a good beating. Like that queer pervert in "Midnight Cowboy" if you've been around that long.
>
>
> The efforts to LART me over at Comcast are similarly backfiring, a surprise
> to me, and surely a surprise to them. Readers and lurkers can see what
> they're whining and crying about here:
>
> http://kukpedia.notlong.com
>
> It does appear that their "free speech" talk is a little bit...ahhhh....full
> of shit, since Cannon and fellow libelers are openly demanding that Comcast
> silence me.
>
> Definitely not the same-old same-old at AUK these days.
> --
> The Atlas Bugged Experience
>
>
And long may they experience the AB Experience and long may they rue the day the crossed paths with you. (now, you watch probably a half-dozen caballers typing "reacharound, slurp, get a room, etc")
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
> You seem to be bringing your lawsuit into UseNet. Didn't you chide
> Rhonda last week about that being unprofessional?
>
What don't you understand about the word "news" in news group?
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
> It does appear that their "free speech" talk is a little bit...ahhhh....full
> of shit, since Cannon and fellow libelers are openly demanding that Comcast
> silence me.
My very first experience with Cannon was being netKKKopped out of the blue by him for "morphing to avoid killfiles" when I never did any such a thing with DataBasux. I had a bunch of sock puppets which is allowed under their TOS but I never morphed them, not a one, to avoid kill files. Anybody who killfiled a sock never had it come back out again because of a change in name or email. Yet, Cannon snitched and lied to Gary about it and Gary believed his little 'enforcer' without even checking for the veracity of his claims. Gary wanted me shut up for the same reason Cannon did.
Cannon mainly wanted to shut me up because I'm a conservative and he's a liberal and I was tearing him and all the other liberals in their local groups a new asshole with my arguments. He decided if he couldn't best me in debate he'd get me booted and that's what he did. He's not a nice person at all.
--
Gregory Hall
henri
<greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>And long may they experience the AB Experience and long may they rue the day the crossed paths with you. (now, you watch probably a half-dozen caballers typing "reacharound, slurp, get a room, etc")
Remember to use a condom!
miguel
<atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Google may also take legal action against some defamers, ultimately.
>They're pretty much with me on this, even though we're nominally adversaries
>at the moment.
In order for you and Google to be adversaries, you need to have stated
a claim against them. So, what is your claim against Google?
atlas bugged
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
news:2m8euk....@news.alt.net...
------------------------
Well, let's do the math. Hypocrisy? Check. Dishonesty? Check. Low IQ,
followed by cowardice? Check? Physically repulsive? Check. Sociopathic?
Check. Productive citizen? So long as Dad is the boss, check.
I think we can skip the DNA tests, the fingerprints, and the line-up - Kevin
A. Cannon appears to be the guy alright.
But trying to LART me, with it backfiring, re Comcast - now we have to add
impotence. Check. And at 300 pounds, it tends to get more, ahhh, literal.
Poor Carol.
http://kassc.notlong.com
Gregory Hall
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:27:28 -0400, Charles "Do as I say not as I do"
> Novins, posting as "Atlas Bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>In other news, worthy of newsgroup publication....
>>
>>Google, Inc., attorneys spoke with me today regarding the lawsuit.
>>
>>Among other discussions I won't make public, they are looking into some of
>>the tactics used by the "defamation club" here to utilize Google's
>>facilities for ill purposes.
>>
>>I've provided them with some info on the various reprobates, and they don't
>>sound amused.
>>
>>There may be some Google policy changes arising from my action, and this was
>>suggested by Google, I'm not simply speculating.
>>
>>Google may also take legal action against some defamers, ultimately.
>>They're pretty much with me on this, even though we're nominally adversaries
>>at the moment.
>>
>>
>>I'm betting there will be a good shot at some law changes, too, because the
>>libel against me is so explicit and openly intended by the various posters;
>>but getting the law changed, that part is speculative.
>>
>>Well over 90% of all cases settle, so there's not even a chance to "alter
>>the law," under ordinary circumstances.
>>
>>But they may have pushed the envelope so far, in my case, they may wind up
>>with "new rules" they aren't going to like.
>
> Google was even remotely cordial with you? You've named them in a
> lawsuit. They were gathering info to slam you against the wall with
> and I bet you gave it up freely.
>
> Did you promise to un-name them if they promise not to counter-sue you
> right out of business?
>
> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
> --
> Fatass Shrugged <notn...@comcrap.n3t>
At least he has faith enough in his convictions that he doesn't hide behind an anon remailer.
So, tell me, who's the real pussy here, Kevin?
--
Gregory Hall
henri
<notn...@comcrap.n3t> wrote:
[kook bjoi raved]
>>Google may also take legal action against some defamers, ultimately.
>>They're pretty much with me on this, even though we're nominally adversaries
>>at the moment.
The only reason they'd have to do that is if they had to implead third
parties. Since they'll never be liable for jack shit, they won't have
to implead anyone. Read Zeran v. AOL you retard.
>Do you really think anyone other than your fellow kook squad believes
>Google was even remotely cordial with you? You've named them in a
>lawsuit. They were gathering info to slam you against the wall with
>and I bet you gave it up freely.
>Did you promise to un-name them if they promise not to counter-sue you
>right out of business?
>Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
He's never even going to serve papers on them. Unless he's even
dumber than I think. He's just listed them as a defendant. It's a
common k00ks00t tactic to list everyone in the universe as a defendant
and then serve one or two people at most.
John "C"
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
"Şhlatærse" <ŞA...@kooks.at.home.null> wrote in message
news:gs2js4hop3v4pitfg...@4ax.com...
> barbaralov...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On Mar 23, 11:09 am, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
>
> [...]
>>>
>>> Here we go again. Another demonstration of the bankrupt, AUKer
methodology.
>>> Smear, libel, slander, marginalize, intimidate - all the typical
liberal
>>> political tricks displayed on a newsgroup. A bunch of simple-minded
drones
>>> following a leader who has abandoned them (Pinky Sue Lamb).
>>>
>>> You fools can't even hope to engage in reasoned debate with somebody
as
>>> intelligent as Barbara so, like a bunch of little spoiled brat
children, you
>>> resort to name-calling gone wild. You fools are so transparent and
so
>>> pathetic. Get a clue why don't you?
>>>
>>> Barbara makes you all look silly.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gregory Hall
>>
>>Thanks, Gregory, I appreciate your posting.
>>My defamers are green with envy as they are nobody. In my shadow they
>>feel like little dried out flowers... But it is not my fault.
>>
>>I don't care what people think about me.
>>
> Then why respond in such a quasi salacious way to Hall..?
>
> There are holes all through your logic Barbara, any of it.
> I am not in the habit of addressing every nutcase I stumble
> across,, however you have inadvertently stumbled into a
> current project of mine own.
> Hence my post as a "heads up" only.
> I really do not expect a result here.
>
> As you did with that SLCT reporter you have grabbed hold
> of a passing suit handing out PoBs.. like you have hope
> it is genuine praise.
> Your 'trust' will again be sorely wronged.. just as you believe
> it was by that SLCT guy.
> Take that to the Bank :-/
>
> Here is Halls view on Women. He cites mature women but
> take it as dinkum he holds the same dictum for any Woman.
> =======================================================
> <2congh....@news.alt.net>
> Some say I, Gregory Hall, should be a little more tolerant of women in
their
> fading years when they become bitter and disillusioned because the
beauty
> and sex appeal they once relied upon to get their way has turned into
> ugliness and skankhood almighty which causes them to be tossed aside
like a
> used condom - relegated to handing out imaginary awards in a loser
newsgroup
> frequented by potty-mouthed degenerate retards, moral reprobates and
crass
> cowards.
> =======================================================
> Interestingly enough he is writing the monologue around Pinku-Sensei.
> Now I have not followed Pinku-Sensei postings enough to determine
gender so I
> tell you all Hall has done is change the byline, the Body remains the
> same whenever he addresses anybody he *thinks* is FEM who has dared to
> challenge his BS.
>
> You are the researcher type so you are well able to do the legwork in
> building your own picture. You are well advised to do so before
entertaining
> this arsehole any further.
> And believe me,, the arsehole IS laughing at you.
Negative, I am laughing at the arsehole and that arsehole is you,
Phlat_arse hole! There's one thing you need to learn, provided your pea
brain can handle it. Half of what I write is bullshit the other half is
truth. People bright enough to discern which is which I consider my
friends. My friends find me to be kind, loyal and a positive asset. My
enemies learn to fear me as they should. I defeat them each and every
time.
Dullards who cannot discern, I reject. Insight is a valuable commodity
these days and one you lack. You failed my bullshit filter test. You
lack imagination. You are dull witted, paranoid and delusional.
So pity my enemies as they get what you get from me - no respect, no
respect at all. In other words, you small minds get just what you
deserve. Rabble like you are good only for a doormat when I wish to wipe
the dirt from my feet.
--
Gregory Hall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IAWTP !!
--
King John I of AUK
Son of Serpent Esq
> "Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
God I love this! Here, have another apple. You will all become as
gods. Billions of you. Billions and billions and... etc., etc...
All like bumping into each other on this little dwarf of a planet.
Pop was a genius!
atlas bugged
"Fatass Shrugged" <notn...@comcrap.n3t> wrote in message
news:0cdfd4c41bcc3b80...@pseudo.borked.net...
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:27:28 -0400, Charles "Do as I say not as I do"
> Novins, posting as "Atlas Bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Google was even remotely cordial with you? You've named them in a
> lawsuit. They were gathering info to slam you against the wall with
> and I bet you gave it up freely.
>
> Did you promise to un-name them if they promise not to counter-sue you
> right out of business?
>
> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
Hi, Kevin.
*Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
And everything I said was 100% true.
What "everyone believes" in a group full of scared hiders hardly matters,
but the my readers know that I've been called a liar about a dozen times now
and my words have been subsequently confirmed in every instance where
confirmation was possible.
People like truth, except when it's not so good, and it's about them.
Folks who've been around a little tend to welcome truth *especially* when
it's bad and about them.
At any rate, I have site stats. For whatever reason, hundreds are at least
*seeing* the truth - whether they want to believe it or not:
Stealth Tuba
> "Greg Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
> news:Xns9BD8917C167AE...@208.90.168.18...
> In other news, worthy of newsgroup publication....
>
> Google, Inc., attorneys spoke with me today regarding the lawsuit.
>
> Among other discussions I won't make public, they are looking into
> some of the tactics used by the "defamation club" here to utilize
> Google's facilities for ill purposes.
>
> I've provided them with some info on the various reprobates, and they
> don't sound amused.
>
> There may be some Google policy changes arising from my action, and
> this was suggested by Google, I'm not simply speculating.
>
> Google may also take legal action against some defamers, ultimately.
> They're pretty much with me on this, even though we're nominally
> adversaries at the moment.
>
>
> I'm betting there will be a good shot at some law changes, too,
> because the libel against me is so explicit and openly intended by
> the various posters; but getting the law changed, that part is
> speculative.
That's very funny. And I mean that in the _laughing at_ rather than
_laughing with_ sense.
Lamey
barbaralov...@gmail.com
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:24:42 -0400, Fatass Shrugged
Hey Rob, how many other anti-religious extremists libel on AUK? I know
it is you, Dave Rice, Frederic Rice, Garry Scarff...
How about Keith Henson and Android Cat (Ron Sharp)?
Who else?
Barbara Schwarz
Scientology hate mongers outnumbered by all kinds of religous
scholars
http://www.scientologytoday.org/experts/
Gregory Hall
news:849c9c1f422834e8...@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info...
> In article <2m9j9g....@news.alt.net>
> "atlas bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Fatass Shrugged" <notn...@comcrap.n3t> wrote in message
>> news:0cdfd4c41bcc3b80...@pseudo.borked.net...
>> >
>>
>> Hi, Kevin.
>>
>> *Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
>>
>> And everything I said was 100% true.
>>
>> The Atlas Bugged Experience
>
> is a serious offense. You could be disbarred.
Kevin, you're such a dummy. Rhonda already let the cat out of the bag in a
recent post that a friend of hers created that newsgroup as a joke.
I don't think she calls Atlas a friend.
--
Gregory Hall
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Yes, in 1995 or 1996. I have the control message. Shall I post it?
> I don't think she calls Atlas a friend.
Who?
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
henri
<atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
[K00k sues G00gle.]
>> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
>Hi, Kevin.
>*Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
>And everything I said was 100% true.
I dare you to serve that POS on Google. You're too much of a pussy,
though.
ah
ah
Bob Larter
He'll never do it. Google would chew him up & spit him out.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
My Conscience
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:27:28 -0400, "Atlas Bugged"
> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Greg Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9BD8917C167AE...@208.90.168.18...
>>> news:50e2af22-45a4-4920...@w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>>> <mass snippage>
>>>> Thanks, Gregory. Yes, people with big minds don't have to defame the
>>>> state of mind of others and don't feel threatened when a unusual
>>>> person appears. They rather enjoy the encounter instead of feeling
>>>> threatened. People like Rob Clark, Shirley, and other AUK and ARS and
>>>> Usenet defamers think that people have to be all alike, have the same
>>>> opinions. How boring the world would be if anybody would be alike.
>>>>
>>>> Barbara Schwarz
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're welcome, Barbara. You hit the nail right on the head.(as usual)
>>> The first post of yours here in AUK I read I noticed something about
>>> you that I found attractive. It can't be your physical appearance
>>> because at the time I'd not even seen a picture of you. So it was your
>>> mind. You have some power, girl. Some people fear this power when they
>>> see it. Not me. I have no need to fear the unusual. Rather, I consider
>>> it a blessing, a change from the mundane. Something I enjoy associating
>>> with from time to time.
>>>
>>> You're quite perceptive. I can see now how these stalkers of yours don't
>>> really cause you any grief. It's too bad, though, that they can't see
>>> fit to do something more constructive with their time.
>>>
>> Barbara has e-mailed me and we've had a bit of exchange.
>>
>> You are correct, she's quite sharp, does just fine putting the illiterates
>> here in their place, thank you.
>>
>> Naturally, her appearance is hardly a factor either way, but there does seem
>> to be a mild correlation between how folks look inside and how they look
>> outside.
>>
>> Have you seen the photos of the various AUK reprobates that are known?
>>
>> Cannon is obese at close to 300 pounds, at least according to the
>> process-server.
>>
>> PJR looks like an alien species with vegetable DNA.
>>
>> No surprise that Barbara looks proudly healthful.
>>
>> And I've done a few hours appearing on TV, for various reasons.
>>
>> Stinkin' camera *does* add 10 pounds, and I battle every morning (via
>> exercise regimen) with my weight - with reasonable success, but then that
>> DAMN CAMERA ruined everything.
>>
>> But arguing before juries has a component of "show business," so even if I
>> didn't care about my look, I owe a certain duty to my clients. And although
>> we've never met, I'll wager you stay in shape.
>>
>>
>> In other news, worthy of newsgroup publication....
>>
>> Google, Inc., attorneys spoke with me today regarding the lawsuit.
>>
>> Among other discussions I won't make public, they are looking into some of
>> the tactics used by the "defamation club" here to utilize Google's
>> facilities for ill purposes.
>>
>> I've provided them with some info on the various reprobates, and they don't
>> sound amused.
>>
>> There may be some Google policy changes arising from my action, and this was
>> suggested by Google, I'm not simply speculating.
>>
>> Google may also take legal action against some defamers, ultimately.
>> They're pretty much with me on this, even though we're nominally adversaries
>> at the moment.
>>
>>
>> I'm betting there will be a good shot at some law changes, too, because the
>> libel against me is so explicit and openly intended by the various posters;
>> but getting the law changed, that part is speculative.
>>
>> the law," under ordinary circumstances.
>>
>> But they may have pushed the envelope so far, in my case, they may wind up
>> with "new rules" they aren't going to like.
>>
>>
>> to me, and surely a surprise to them. Readers and lurkers can see what
>> they're whining and crying about here:
>>
>> http://kukpedia.notlong.com
>>
>> It does appear that their "free speech" talk is a little bit...ahhhh....full
>> of shit, since Cannon and fellow libelers are openly demanding that Comcast
>> silence me.
>>
>
> You seem to be bringing your lawsuit into UseNet. Didn't you chide
> Rhonda last week about that being unprofessional?
>
On page 2 of his letter to Kevin, as published on the Web site you
posted, he says he won't post to Usenet anymore once the suit is filed.
What do you make of that?
King John I of AUK
"My Conscience" <thatdarns...@myheels.invalid> wrote in message
news:QYHyl.80777$Zp.2...@newsfe21.iad...
Very Funny, Deco !!
--
KJ
Barbara Schwarz
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:32:58 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>
>
> [K00k sues G00gle.]
>
> >> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
> >Hi, Kevin.
> >*Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
> >And everything I said was 100% true.
>
> I dare you to serve that POS on Google. You're too much of a pussy,
> though.
The attorney isn't a coward, Rob. And Google isn't the Almightly.
Google's legal unit wrote once to me (after I complained about my
defamers and cyberstalkers to them) that they will change things when
a federal judge rules that they should change something. In other
words, Google basically wrote that they will obey federal rulings.
Nothing to fear....
Barbara Schwarz
--
King John I of AUK
"Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:8a5f1777-a009-4606...@f19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 10:04 am, Bob Larter <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 8:15 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> >>> On Mar 25, 5:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> On Mar 23, 11:06 pm, realpch <real...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Mar 23, 7:04 pm, realpch <real...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
> >>>>>>> Peach, I don't need a formosa rule. I am not an invalid. I
have
> >>>>>>> more courage to stand up than anybody.
> >>>>>>> Give me your best shot, people, fire away...
> >>>>>>> When you people fall, I am still standing.
> >>>>>>> Barbara Schwarz
> >>>>>> Barbara, any one of us can use a Formosa rule from time to
time!
> >>>>>>> D
> >>>>>> Peach
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Extra! Extra! Read All About It!
> >>>>>> Save some dough, save some
> >>>>>> grief:http://www.xenu.nethttp://www.scientology-lies.com
> >>>>> Have they defamed you as a kook,
> >>>> Calling someone a kook is not defamation, Barbara.
> >>> It the person is not a kook, it is defamation.
> >> No it isn't. Calling someone a kook does not fit the definition of
> >> defamation.
>
> > This must be all seen in relation. The judge will have to look at
the
> > whole picture: the sytematical destroyal of one's reputation and
> > business or possibility to make a living. I know people. If
> > "Kookologist" Cannon is indeed as overweight, he might live on
> > disability checks. But most other people need employers, customers,
or
> > clients.
>
> > Most people check Google when they want to know something about
> > another person. When they read many entries in which posters
> > conspiratively defame, the judge has to consider that such a
> > conspiracy (voting, in other words campaining to libel) is harming
the
> > earning capabilities of person.
>
> > People usually rather hire a person who is not defamed as a kook and
> > else than somebody who comes with a label.
>
> >>> I find it rather odd
> >>> that adult people are so occupied with this subject. I think that
just
> >>> kooks are occupied with "kooks", Rhonda.
> >> Hey Barbara, I have two kook awards because auk doesn't like me.
>
> >> It's still not defamation.
>
> > Rhonda, I don't know your case. How they libeled me, it sure was
> > defamation under genderal libel laws and the Torts. I also have seen
> > other cases in which they defamed other people and it was
defamation.
>
> > It all depends how the judge(s) will see it. But I am telling you
that
> > attorneys know how to talk to judges and I think that you guys will
> > even find a hard time to find a lawyer who wants to take your case
> > because most of them will think that you would do to them what you
did
> > to Mr. Novins.
>
> >>>>> Peach? And they did not apply the
> >>>>> Formosa rule? How rude. ;)
> >>>>> Anyway, as you very well know, I rather have good argments with
an
> >>>>> intelligent enemy instead of somebody running defeated from one
of
> >>>>> my threads and lying elsehwere that I would be such a helpless
> >>>>> little Formosa girl and that people should pity me.
> >>>>> AUK defamed me in both version.
> >>>> None of what I've seen you complain about so far is defamation.
If
> >>>> you're so damn smart, perhaps you should learn the standard
> >>>> definitions
> >>>> of words and apply them correctly.
> >>> I sticked my nose in law books. I know the libel laws and torts.
> >> And yet you fail to understand what libel is and isn't.
>
> >> Try this:
>
> >>http://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/defamation
>
> >> Calling you a kook, which, in fact, you are, is not defamation.
>
> > You should read the law books not Bloggers, which says that you guys
> > are the defamers and a libelers.
>
> > But be reminded that the case that Mr. Novins filed has nothing to
do
> > with me. My claims are not covered because when he filed the case,
he
> > didn't know of me.
>
> > You are in deep hot legal water because of you libeling the
attorney.
>
> > However, the ruling that Mr. Novin might archive can help other
libel/
> > defamation victims.
>
> >>> And I
> >>> am not the one who is sued. I have read some of the kook of the
year
> >>> "awards" it is defamation particularly when a person is defamed
who
> >>> posts with a real name or established pen name, e.g. author name.
> >> No it isn't.
>
> > Of course it is. You are just afraid of taking responsibility.
>
> > If I would be you, Rhonda, I would turn around. You should apologize
> > to Mr. Novin and would ask him what you can do to turn this around.
> > It doesn't mean that he will forgive you and let you off the hook
but
> > at least would show some remorse.
>
> >>> Then
> >>> it is not a game anymore. And this is why the attorney will win.
Real
> >>> people have to suffer with the defamation about them all over the
> >>> net.
> >> There is a lot of hyperbole all over the net. Hyperbole is not
> >> defamation.
>
> > Again, most people go to Google and check names. If you want to hire
a
> > law firm, you check on Google too. Attorneys have competitions too,
> > which are other lawyers. If people find lots of negative entries
about
> > one attorney, then they don't hire him but rather the attorney who
is
> > nit defamed as kook, etc.
>
> > But it is not just about high amounts of monies that the attorney
> > doesn't earn because of your defamation campaign against him. (And
> > note that I said not just defamation but defamation campaign.) It is
> > also about what his (and any such other person's) family and friends
> > and neighbors have to read by going to Google.
>
> > And people who need a job, how do they find jobs coming with Google
> > pages full of vicious lies?
>
> > You guys are harming people's lives because you have no lives on
your
> > own.
>
> > It is hard to stay out of flame wars when one is defamed but a judge
> > has to ask: who threw the first stone. From my own experiences with
> > you "kookologists" and others, it is you who simply target people by
> > lying about them and libeling them. You are the people who are
> > throwing the first stones. You are the instigators. You can't live
in
> > peace with others. You are harming people who never did anything
> > against you.
>
> >>>>> They never got anything right about
> >>>>> me.
> >>>> There ya go. No one here got it right, and the Supreme Court of
the
> >>>> United States fucked up too.
> >>> But don't forget that nobody who meets me in real life would dare
to
> >>> call me what usenet posters do behind the anonymity.
> >> Trust me. If I ever met you, I would call you a kook to your face.
>
> > Trust me, I never would let you close to me, Rhonda. I do not
> > socialize with the likes of you.
> > And yes, I believe you that you would call me names in my face
because
> > you are primitive.
>
> >>> The Supreme Court made no wise decisions. They asked me to pay
filing
> >>> fees. I just have to pay fees and then I can file any day a
petition
> >>> of Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court. (Which is kinda waste
of
> >>> time because most petitions for Writ of Certiorari are not heard
by
> >>> the court anyway.)
> >> There's a reason for that.
>
> >>> But you guys will have a problem with the lower courts. These are
the
> >>> courts who make decisions that can have great significances in
your
> >>> lives.
> >> We can discuss this again after the defendants prevail.
>
> > You will not win this case, Rhonda. The attorney will.
>
> > Barbara Schwarz
>
> /me makes popcorn...
>
> --
> W
> . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
> \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
> ---^----^-------------------------------------------------------------
>
> - Show quoted text -
This signature line of your tells a lot about you. It is creepy.
Barbara Schwarz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But he just posted that he left Usenet for a couple of years because he
is "Pussy-Whipped" !!
What does that tell you ??
--
KJ
Lamey
a203-4776-b40...@c9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
> On Mar 25, 8:07 pm, henri <he...@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:32:58 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>>
>> <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [K00k sues G00gle.]
>>
>> >> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
>> >Hi, Kevin.
>> >*Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
>> >And everything I said was 100% true.
>>
>> I dare you to serve that POS on Google. You're too much of a pussy,
>> though.
>
> The attorney isn't a coward, Rob. And Google isn't the Almightly.
> Google's legal unit wrote once to me (after I complained about my
> defamers and cyberstalkers to them) that they will change things when
> a federal judge rules that they should change something. In other
> words, Google basically wrote that they will obey federal rulings.
> Nothing to fear....
>
>
> Barbara Schwarz
>
<translation> Google will kick Novins ass.
miguel
It must be Bowtie then.
Kadaitcha Man
pride, ye fussed:
> henri wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:32:58 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [K00k sues G00gle.]
>>
>>>> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
>>
>>> Hi, Kevin.
>>
>>> *Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
>>
>>> And everything I said was 100% true.
>>
>> I dare you to serve that POS on Google. You're too much of a pussy,
>> though.
>
> He'll never do it. Google would chew him up & spit him out.
http://www.google.com.au/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=charles+novins&btnG=Google+Search
It already has.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List
Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E
Join me for dinner. I'm cooking grungy diseased body parts accompanied
with corrupted earthworm head with turnip garnish, cooked in a turbid
pannikin containing dried medley of turnip, avocado and peanut in dog
pee, a side of horned toad cervix and a can of moonshine.
King John I of AUK
"imp" <i...@tioat.net> wrote in message news:gqg8qj$sfr$1...@tioat.net...
> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> > It all depends how the judge(s) will see it. But I am telling you
that
> > attorneys know how to talk to judges and I think that you guys will
> > even find a hard time to find a lawyer who wants to take your case
> > because most of them will think that you would do to them what you
did
> > to Mr. Novins.
> > <please don't sue me for snipping>
> > ...
> > It is hard to stay out of flame wars when one is defamed but a judge
> > has to ask: who threw the first stone. From my own experiences with
> > you "kookologists" and others, it is you who simply target people by
> > lying about them and libeling them. You are the people who are
> > throwing the first stones. You are the instigators. You can't live
in
> > peace with others. You are harming people who never did anything
> > against you.
>
> or telling me to read a bunch of old posts?
>
> How did Novin catch the attention of AUK? I mean, there had to be
> some reason this all started. I'm not asking this to put the blame
> anywhere; I'm just trying to figure out how this started.
>
> In what way was he libeled? Was the libel directed at his
> profession, or was it more of a personal nature? Is it related to a
> case he is involved in?
>
> Just grabbing at straws to try to find the right question that might
> have an answer that would explain what is going on here.
>
> The first stone; what exactly was that? Whatever this first stone
> was, it might help in understanding the motive. And the initial
> reaction will help tell the story, I would think.
> --
> imp
Dear imp,
A couple of ass holes from a sci. fi. group (Kent & Roger)? made a post
that they thought was funny about the caliber of people that Atlas hired
at his law office and Atlas didn't like it, and said so.
Then the "Gay Caballers" of AUK (a.k.a. Ko0kologists) started in on
Atlas for complaining by reposting the original post and referring to
the original post constantly.
Then Atlas filed a law-suit against the "Gay Caballers" for playing
"dog-pile" on top of Atlas and all the "Gay Caballers" have run off and
are in hiding, like Pinku-Sensei and Art Deco and a bunch of other ass
holes who liked to "poke fun" at posters who they deemed "odd" by their
standards.
Since Coward Pinky Sue (The FNVW) has run-off with her tail between her
legs, I have taken-over AUK and "Outlawed" the extremely stupid practice
of Award elections !!
'alt.usenet.kooks' (AUK) is a lot nicer place to post to now.....
This should bring you "up-to-date"....
King John I of AUK
"Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:zwmqle$x1o$a...@alt.culture.incapacitated-turrets.org.papua-new-guinea...
> Bob Larter, ye insane fell-serpent, that were to enlard thy fat
already
> pride, ye fussed:
>
> > henri wrote:
> >> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:32:58 -0400, "atlas bugged"
> >> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> [K00k sues G00gle.]
> >>
> >>>> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
> >>
> >>> Hi, Kevin.
> >>
> >>> *Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
> >>
> >>> And everything I said was 100% true.
> >>
> >> I dare you to serve that POS on Google. You're too much of a
pussy,
> >> though.
> >
> > He'll never do it. Google would chew him up & spit him out.
>
> --
> lil Ricky Mather
That's right lil Ricky.......isn't it past your bed-time over there in
OZ ??
--
Your pal,
KJ
Bob Larter
> Bob Larter, ye insane fell-serpent, that were to enlard thy fat already
> pride, ye fussed:
>
>> henri wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:32:58 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>>> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [K00k sues G00gle.]
>>>
>>>>> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
>>>> Hi, Kevin.
>>>> *Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
>>>> And everything I said was 100% true.
>>> I dare you to serve that POS on Google. You're too much of a pussy,
>>> though.
>> He'll never do it. Google would chew him up & spit him out.
>
> http://www.google.com.au/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=charles+novins&btnG=Google+Search
>
> It already has.
Oh dear. Poor Mr Novins.
King John I of AUK
"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49cc...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> > Bob Larter, ye insane fell-serpent, that were to enlard thy fat
already
> > pride, ye fussed:
> >
> >> henri wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:32:58 -0400, "atlas bugged"
> >>> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [K00k sues G00gle.]
> >>>
> >>>>> Even money says you drop them, you little pussy.
> >>>> Hi, Kevin.
> >>>> *Even* money? Shit, you better get a real lawyer, like, soon.
> >>>> And everything I said was 100% true.
> >>> I dare you to serve that POS on Google. You're too much of a
pussy,
> >>> though.
> >> He'll never do it. Google would chew him up & spit him out.
> >
> >
http://www.google.com.au/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=charles+novins&btnG=Google+Search
> >
> > It already has.
>
> Oh dear. Poor Mr Novins.
> --
Ewe really shouldn't listen to that Michael Jackson "Look-Alike" lil
Ricky Mather......
Others have tried and "Paid the Price" !!
--
Your Pal,
KHJ
King John I of AUK
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>
> You will note they never can quite pin down the number of posts that
> define "no other life". Funny that...
Not near as funny as this:
Kaelin Cannon and Roz Ratzio:
http://www.ren.org/rafil/gpc/gpcpics/DSCF0002a.jpg
Hee....Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
--
Your Pal,
KHJ
King John I of AUK
"Fritz Wuehler" <fr...@spamexpire-200903.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
wrote in message
news:10d61c8fc86d7fc8...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> In article <2m858f....@news.alt.net>
> at your expense, they'll probably tell you to get lost.
Stupid "nerdy" humor like that can only come from Pinky Sue.......
--
KHJ
Gregory Hall
news:OcKdnR5COY9mt1HU...@centurytel.net...
Love that flower in 'her' hair. Bwahahhahahhahahahahhaha. And those shoes.
Manolo Blahnik's? Looks likes Kaelin Cannon spares no expense to dress up
his honey in style.
--
Gregory Hall
King John I of AUK
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
news:2mfaoh....@news.alt.net...
Isn't LUV wonderful ??
--
KHJ
King John I of AUK
"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
>
> Get over it.
> --
Kali wears a moo..moo...
--
KHJ
p.s. The following is a list of my favorite words and expressions (for
your information only):
skank
fat
cow
ugly
gay
stupid
idiot
liberal
so so teacher
low grades
bankruptsy
pussy licker
lonely
bitch
shit for brains
pervert
liar
chubbette
end of my personal list...Good Day...
*********************************************
Another list of misc. names that I like to say out-loud (for your
information only):
Kimberly Kay Barnard
Kimberly K. Barnard
Kim K. Barnard
Kym Barnard
Kay Barnard
K. Barnard
Kali
Dan
Jonathan
Andrew
Brant
Nate
Kymmiet
Colorado Carl
Art Deco
Pedo Deco
Peter "Eater" Ross
Tudy...I just Luv saying...........Tudy...
end of personal list....
**************************
If you missed this list then simply repost and I will send you another
copy !!
King John I of AUK
"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
>
> witchcraft and round up the Jews in Israel for the end days.
> --
> Kali
King John I of AUK
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
> "Jeff L" <jeffrey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gqh418$ab$1...@news.motzarella.org...
> > Gregory Hall wrote:
> >> The more they point the finger at somebody else the less they can
look at
> >> themselves. They do everything they can to keep from looking at
> >> themselves because they suspect and fear if they looked closely
they
> >> would see abomination.
> >
> > Writing from experience, are we?
>
>
>
> Yes, I am much older and wiser than you are, boy. Perhaps you should
> consider joining Barbara and I here on the light side instead of
spending
> your time there on the dark side which will bind you to it.
> --
> Gregory Hall
Peter "Eater" Ross (Master-bator of the Dark Side) will "brand" Jeffry's
ass with a "Hot Poker" !!
--
KHJ
King John I of AUK
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
> <barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
news:8b3dac00-5bf7-4c9d...@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 27, 7:27 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> > "Fatass Shrugged" <notnov...@comcrap.n3t> wrote in message
> >
> > news:6848f1c31e4fb869...@pseudo.borked.net...
> >
> > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:57:05 -0700 (PDT),
> > > barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > >>On Mar 26, 10:21 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:10:36 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks,
"Gregory
> >
> > >>You better have the evidence for your claims about me, Bob.
> >
> > > You're a certified nut case. Everyone but you knows it.
> >
> > Sorry, but you are wrong. Everybody doesn't know it. I, for one,
know
> > Barbara to be highly intelligent and resolute. And she's plenty
capable of
> > debating without having to hide behind anonymity. So sad that you
are
> > ashamed of who and what you are.
> >
> > So, in any Usenet debate where does that leave you? Three guesses 1)
out
> > in
> > the cold, 2) out in the cold, 3 out in the cold.
Bwahhahahahahahhahaha.
> >
> > --
> > Gregory Hall
>
> Who did the "certification"? The kooks in the word Kookologists? My,
> my.... what a verdict. ;)
>
>
> [REPLY]
>
> They even admit to rigging the vote. If they hate somebody enough they
throw
> away some votes for the competition. I've seen it and proved it.
> --
> Gregory Hall
Master-Fag Peter "Eater" Ross is about to have his own Gay Awards and he
will fix that election also !!
--
KHJ
atlas bugged
> <barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0bdfa3c6-ab11-4580...@z15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> <snippage>
> : I was just thinking that it appears as if most if not all defendants
> : of this case have no money to hire an attorney, and the court will
> : only assign attorneys in criminal cases to them. But I can't say that
> : I feel sorry for these people who provoke and defame others.
>
>
> They made their own beds. Now they must sleep in them as best as they may.
> Liberals like them never learn a lesson unless they have to suffer the
> consequences and they deny any consequences to their actions until these
> hit them right upside their heads and wake them up from their liberal
> stupor.
These are not the sharpest folks.
They are literally discussing this case publicly, calling it a "kooksuit."
Then they will try to convince a judge they've neither intended nor acted to
defame me.
It's as if Scott Peterson went to his trial and sat there holding a fishing
pole.
Barbara Schwarz
wrote:
> "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote in message
>
> news:2mr1t6....@news.alt.net...
>
> > <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:0bdfa3c6-ab11-4580...@z15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> > <snippage>
> > : I was just thinking that it appears as if most if not all defendants
> > : of this case have no money to hire an attorney, and the court will
> > : only assign attorneys in criminal cases to them. But I can't say that
> > : I feel sorry for these people who provoke and defame others.
>
> > They made their own beds. Now they must sleep in them as best as they may.
> > Liberals like them never learn a lesson unless they have to suffer the
> > consequences and they deny any consequences to their actions until these
> > hit them right upside their heads and wake them up from their liberal
> > stupor.
>
> These are not the sharpest folks.
>
> They are literally discussing this case publicly, calling it a "kooksuit."
>
> Then they will try to convince a judge they've neither intended nor acted to
> defame me.
>
> It's as if Scott Peterson went to his trial and sat there holding a fishing
> pole.
No, your defamers are anything but bright. I assume there will be a
rude awakening for them one day when the judge throws the books at
them.
Barbara Schwarz
atlas bugged
news:ee32c76a-e95e-4c18...@h28g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 31, 4:07 pm, <bor...@remailer.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:49:27 +0000 (UTC), imp <i...@tioat.net> wrote:
> >Barbara Schwarz wrote:
>
> >> Let's get back to the actual subject, which is this legal actions,
> >> filed by attorney Charles Novin against his defamers and libelers.
>
> >>http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/novins-v-cannon-lawsuit
>
> >> BTW, it doesn't need a rocket scientist to figure out that a newsgroup
> >> that calls itself alt.usenet.kooks and exists only for the purpose of
> >> defamation - will get in legal troubles sooner or later.
>
> >I this attorney filing charges against the newsgroup now?
>
> Yes. Everyone who has ever looked upon an AB post is a defamer and a
> libeler. Even people who never said anything mean to him are defamers
> and libelers. Chances are that when the judge throws his case out the
> judge will then be a defamer and a libeler.
>
> --
This is not what the attorney said. He just left a door open to add
more defamer and libelers to his law suit if he should obtain more
data regarding the identity of his defamers. He studied the laws.
--------
Exactly, it's standard pleading procedure, utterly routine.
No one's sued a "newsgroup," nor has anyone sued "everyone that offended
him."
Everyone, it seems, wants to be a lawyer on Usenet.
Maybe I'll trade with them. They can let me be a doctor on Usenet. My
rates are very low, and I'll treat the whole family!
Actually, no. Better would be if the people who need lawyers just call
lawyers, and the rest STFU. Not holdin' my breath, just FTR.
atlas bugged
On Mar 31, 7:23 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com>
wrote:> >news:f1b942dd-2965-4fe2...@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 27, 8:06 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> > <snipped Rhonda's lames>
> >> If you would get to know her better you would find out she's a very
> >> nice person. She's just fed up with the constant harassment she gets
> >> at the hands
> >> of stupid, ignorant and vindictive people. Some people give up and
> >> go into hiding. Some people choose to fight. She chooses to fight
> >> and she's damned good at it IMO.
>
> >> Thanks, Greg. I have very defined opinions of what I approve of and
> >> what not. I never give up. I have seen it with some people, they are
> >> attacked and defamed and then they join their attackers and defamers.
> >> Where are the principles and the pride here? Would never happen to
> >> me. Actually, I admire only stability in a person. Nothing great
> >> will ever come from people who are instable.
>
> >> Rhonda, I had no time to respond to your numerous postings but I
> >> reponded to at least a couple of them.
> >> I think you made a serious mistake howling with the wolves instead of
> >> taking a position against the kook defamation.
>
> > You waste your time. She's like talking to a brick wall. You can
> > confront her with the facts and she easily ignores them. Her mind is
> > shut.
>
> > Gregory Hall
>
> Fact: Not one of the defendants had anything to do with the creation or
> propagation of the post that is the basis of the complaint.
>
> Not one. That is the one shining fact in this entire fiasco. The
> plaintiff's intent seems clear: to harass. We'll see how that works out
> for him.
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
>
> "You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
> William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court- Hide quoted
>
> - Show quoted text -
Rhonda, attorneys need clients to make a living. If they are defamed,
people don't give them any business. You should have seen this case
coming... He doesn't harass by filing a lawsuit to get rid of
defamation against him and his lawfirm. He probably had no other
choice.
------------
Bingo, Barb.
These dolts have intended - and confessed!! - their purpose to get my name
up in the Google results, and have it linked to the defamation.
I would give even-odds that Rhonda could wind up with the highest judgment
against her in the case, even though others defamed more seriously.
I have far better things I'd like to do than this suit. They've forced me
into it, and no matter who wins, everyone will lose. That's AUK philosophy;
never add anything to the world, always make it worse.
Barbara Schwarz
wrote:
> "Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com> wrote in message
Anybody can see that you and your law firm is the target of a
defamation campaign, Charles. Judge and jury would be completely blind
not realizing what is going on and what harm such posters can do to
somebody's career.
They do this to all other kinds of people and businesses but I think
they are more than dumb picking an attorney for this kind of
defamation campaigns. Really, really stupid. Perhaps it is your fate
to get a handle on this lawlessness in Usenet.
>
> I would give even-odds that Rhonda could wind up with the highest judgment
> against her in the case, even though others defamed more seriously.
She doesn't want to see it, and I am afraid one day the judge or a
jury will tell her and the others how wrong their behavior is.
>
> I have far better things I'd like to do than this suit.
That is what I thought too. I understand why you sued them. If I put
myself in the shoes of a client and would google the attorneys names
or the name of the law firm and lots of kook stuff would come up, I
sure would be able to see that it is defamation campaign BUT (and here
it comes) as anybody is always so busy, I would not have the time to
figure out with those many postings what is going in there and then I
likely would go with a law firm who is not negatively mentioned... And
this means loss of business for you, and this is why I understand that
you sued your defamers.
Besides business, also family, neighbors, and friends count. Anybody
who checks your name wonders....
And there are also judges, police, and prosecutors, etc. You have to
work with them. If you don't sue and demand from your defamers to take
the defamation and libel down, they would wonder why you didn't do it
and if there is truth to it. They defamed your real name not just a
nick name that you are using. What other choice you have?
>They've forced me
> into it, and no matter who wins, everyone will lose. That's AUK philosophy;
> never add anything to the world, always make it worse.
I know, Charles. And I am sure they messed with the wrong person by
targetting you.
Once the name of the judge is known, they likely defame him too. They
are lose cannons. No pun intended.
Barbara Schwarz
King John I of AUK
"atlas bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2mrba4....@news.alt.net...
They are all like Art Deco. He's so stupid that he would have me hound
him for the rest of his pitiful life rather that just post three words,
"I am sorry".
Not one will apologize.......even in court......
Art is:
1. Extremely Sad (Ego too large & brain too little)
2. Unemployed (Large & nasty mouth)
3. Divorced (Gay and nasty mouth)
4 Extreme hypertension (1,2, &3)
5. Hiding under his bed (1 & 2)
While I'm having fun playing Poker Stars and posting on the side, with a
glass of iced tea....
--
KHJ
p.s. Deep down, I feel sorry for the wasted life of Art Deco.....He has
all my PITY !!
atlas bugged
It's not a "cabal" alright - it's really just a bunch of sad, immature
self-loathers.
>
> Not one will apologize.......even in court......
People sometimes do stuff in court...ya never know. The black robes 'n all
exist because people see them as much more.
>
> Art is:
>
> 1. Extremely Sad (Ego too large & brain too little)
>
> 2. Unemployed (Large & nasty mouth)
>
> 3. Divorced (Gay and nasty mouth)
>
> 4 Extreme hypertension (1,2, &3)
>
> 5. Hiding under his bed (1 & 2)
I do think he's a sad case. The tenor of his online reply to my service
really sounded like a guy coming apart at the seams.
>
> While I'm having fun playing Poker Stars and posting on the side, with a
> glass of iced tea....
> --
> KHJ
>
> p.s. Deep down, I feel sorry for the wasted life of Art Deco.....He has
> all my PITY !!
I am not without compassion myself...well, actually, it's close...
Just keep in mind that there is a legal system explicitly *because* of guys
like Deco.
If everyone could utilize human reasoning, there'd be minimal need for laws,
police, and all the rest.
Most law is like animal control departments. It may not be the rabid dog's
fault, but the animal has to be put down.
henri
> They are literally discussing this case publicly,
> calling it a "kooksuit."
> -- Atlas Bugdope
I prefer "Atlas Bugfuck."
Kadaitcha Man
ye cheeped:
> I am not without compassion
Crap. If you had compassion you'd neck yourself.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List
Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E
Join me for dinner. I'm cooking over-ripe buffalo rectum with tendon
seasoning with piggish llama wart with foreskin preserve, dished up in a
wriggling pail filled with putrescent remnants of onion in rat piss, a
side of beaver stomach and a goblet of pap smear scrapings.
King John I of AUK
I agree with this post !!
--
KHJ
Gregory Hall
news:es56t45cb77onsne3...@4ax.com...
Probably because you're gay?
--
Gregory Hall
barbaralov...@gmail.com
This is typical Rob Clark begging you in his twisted way to add him to
your law suit, Charles. He knows he sucks and subconscioulsy wants to
be put to justice.
Barbara Schwarz
King John I of AUK
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
Not "probably", henri is Gay !!
--
KHJ
metro-golden-meower
i've come to the conclusion that you want to be in some kind of usenet version of brokeback mountain and you want several
members of auk to be your love interest. good luck with that, cowpoke.
--
_
/ _ | _| _ _
|\/| _ |_ _ _ \_| (_) | (_| (/ | ) |\/| _ _ _ _
| | (/ \_ | (_) _/ ` | | (/ (_) |/|/ (/ |
` _.--'""""`--._ ` ' ' `
.-' S H P `-.
.' J _.--'""`--._ X `.
/ B .' ._ _. `. U \
_ / R / |\`. .'/| \ R \ _ _ . _ _
|\ | | | |/ |_ J / |_\----/_| \ N L |_ |_) /_\ |\ | / |_
| \| \_/ |\ |_ | Z J .'\|\/\/|/`. L Q | | | \ | | | \| \_ |_
| | |> (.)(.) <| | |
| | =====:|__|:===== | |
_.--'"\ J J =====::\/::===== F F /"`--._
.--. _.-' _\ \ \ \ \_/\_/ / / / /_ `-._ .--.
( `-| _..' _..._'.' \ `-..'` `. .-' / `.`_..._ `.._ |-' )
|`-.|_.-'.' .-' _) .-'`. `-.______.-' .'`-. (_ `-. `.`-._|.-'|
| ( .( .--(_!-' .'-._ .' `. _.-`. `-!_)--. ). ) |
`-.__.-'\-._!'|' \ _.' | == == | `._ / `|`!_.-/`-.__.-'
\ | `--' \`---.__| (`--') |__.---'/ `--' | /
`--' \.`-._____\ \ / /_____.-'./ `--'
`-._______`-..-'_______.-'
`-..-'
Lt. Colonel/1st Virginia Volunteers/Cesium Brigade
Alcotrol Labs Dept of R & D
mhm x v i x i i i
King John I of AUK
"metro-golden-meower" <metro-gol...@meowdot.org> wrote in message
news:6de7t4d8orc03cmpr...@4ax.com...
King John I of AUK
"metro-golden-meower" <metro-gol...@meowdot.org> wrote in message
news:6de7t4d8orc03cmpr...@4ax.com...
Krap, my cat jumped on my keyboard and made me shoot a blank....
I like to "laugh" at AUK Faggots....not Luv them !!
I would like it if all AUK Faggots came out of their "Gay-Phases" and
became Normal again....
Are you "praying" for this miracle to happen.....a "straight"
'alt.usenet.kooks'......?
--
KHJ
Sofa King
> "atlas bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Most law is like animal control departments. It may not be the rabid
>> dog's fault, but the animal has to be put down.
>
> Your analogy is flawed but revealing. You seem to be saying
> you know the people you sued didn't post the offending
> piece, but by Bob, you're gonna hurt them anyway.
>
yeah, maybe if you read too much into analogies some more it will all go
away.
King John I of AUK
"Sofa King" <ro...@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:1797571.Q...@127.0.0.1...
yeah, maybe if I fart, you'll go away, Sofee !!
--
KHJ
King John I of AUK
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message
> news:2mt4k3....@news.alt.net...
> > Gregory Hall wrote:
> >> "Dead Kitten" <ic9b...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:49d3...@news.x-privat.org...
> >>> Gregory Hall wrote:
> >>>> "Dead Kitten" <ic9b...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:49d1...@news.x-privat.org...
> >>>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
> >>>>>>> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Get a chacter and an IQ, idiot.
> >>>>>>> Get a psychiatric evaluation, bag lady.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is this any way to treat a lady?
> >>>>> Lady?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://tinyurl.com/dgwlwc
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looks like a dude in a wig, to me.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Photoshopped!
> >>>
> >>> You can tell from some of the pixels and from having seen lots of
> >>> Photoshops in your day, right?
> >>>
> >>>> It's a tiny photo but look at how the shirt collar is straight at
> >>>> the front. A real one would be round to match the neck.
> >>>
> >>> Or maybe she's just wearing a fucked up shirt.
> >>>
> >>>> And the bottom of the face doesn't match the top. somebody has
made
> >>>> it crooked and probably substituted
> >>>> the bottom part of a face from another.
> >>>
> >>> Or maybe she's just really, really ugly.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> She's beautiful in both physical and mental aspects. I wish I could
> >> meet her in person. Maybe someday I can be so lucky. But I have no
> >> chance with her. She will always love Marty Rathbun. Such a
beautiful
> >> and desirable woman should not take herself out of circulation like
> >> that but she's still in love with the man she married when she was
> >> 17-18 and who can blame her for holding onto her first love. She
will
> >> not likely find any greater love, ever!!
> >>
> >> I would marry her but no second place for me.
> >
> > You lose points for over-emoting.
>
> What's the matter, Rhonda? Have you forgotten actual friendly human
> interaction being a long-term denizen of AUK?
> --
> Gregory Hall
She says that she's married.....don't you believe her ??
--
KHJ
Sarah Ehrett
<atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>These are not the sharpest folks.
>
>They are literally discussing this case publicly
And isn't that exactly what you yourself are doing? Seriously, any
competent attorney would advise you to cease and desist all contact
with the people here. If I were the judge I'd be hard pressed to
see how you can claim damages when you've continued to be an active
participant in newsgroup banter with the folks you claim have libeled
you.
barbaralov...@gmail.com
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:36:12 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>
> >These are not the sharpest folks.
>
> >They are literally discussing this case publicly
>
> And isn't that exactly what you yourself are doing? Seriously, any
> competent attorney would advise you to cease and desist all contact
> with the people here. If I were the judge I'd be hard pressed to
> see how you can claim damages when you've continued to be an active
> participant in newsgroup banter with the folks you claim have libeled
> you.
Charles is an attorney, Sarah. Filing a law suit doesn't mean that you
can't make any use of your constitutional right of freedom of speech
anymore.
There is a high possibility that when Charles would not more post
anymore that his defamers and libelers would think that he is not
present and would defame him and his law firm even more than before.
Barbara Schwarz
miguel
barbaralov...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Apr 1, 10:49 pm, Sarah Ehrett <ninety...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:36:12 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>>
>> <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >These are not the sharpest folks.
>>
>> >They are literally discussing this case publicly
>>
>> And isn't that exactly what you yourself are doing? Seriously, any
>> competent attorney would advise you to cease and desist all contact
>> with the people here. If I were the judge I'd be hard pressed to
>> see how you can claim damages when you've continued to be an active
>> participant in newsgroup banter with the folks you claim have libeled
>> you.
>
>Charles is an attorney, Sarah. Filing a law suit doesn't mean that you
>can't make any use of your constitutional right of freedom of speech
>anymore.
That's not the issue, Barbara. Attorney ethics require that an
attorney not communicate directly with an opposing party represented
by counsel.
Bob Larter
The catch here is that Bugged/Novins isn't a competent attorney.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Larter
More Usenet legal genius from Barbara 'Babbles' Schwarz.
atlas bugged
She knows it's all crumbling down. I got a truckload of info on her today.
She knows I have it, it's as simple as counting from 3 to 6.
There's a lot of misconduct in the file - lying about her address, living
with various men, all stuff you'd expect.
Texas addys, Florida addys, NJ addys, just what you'd expect of a transient
on the run.
There's a real Kevin Fries that probably won't appreciate Rhonda's identity
theft, or more precisely hijacking.
Service is still dodgy - she's an unemployed transient. But she's about to
see a truckload of info published that she ain't going to like.
That doesn't happen if she simply has her lawyer accept service, and she's
repeatedly told us all how bad it will be for me when she counterclaims.
Curious why she's furiously dodging this opportunity to take me down.
I'd think living a life of lies and bitterness would be more difficult than
simply facing up to what you've become.
But that's just me
Anyone know who this Allard guy is, he keeps popping up in the file?
--
The Atlas Bugged Experience
<http://kukpedia.notlong.com>
knoxy
says...
be sued for that alone. It's obvious that she's some kinda deviant that
shouldn't be let loose on society.
> Texas addys, Florida addys, NJ addys, just what you'd expect of a transient
> on the run.
>
Or it could just be another typical american moving around.
> There's a real Kevin Fries that probably won't appreciate Rhonda's identity
> theft, or more precisely hijacking.
>
Is she calling herself Kevin Fries now? Oh my!
> Service is still dodgy - she's an unemployed transient. But she's about to
> see a truckload of info published that she ain't going to like.
>
Published where? On usenet?
Hey, are you the lawyer they based that lawyer with an office in the
mall at in the Simpsons? You sound like you're pretty much at the same
level as him.
> That doesn't happen if she simply has her lawyer accept service, and she's
> repeatedly told us all how bad it will be for me when she counterclaims.
>
> Curious why she's furiously dodging this opportunity to take me down.
>
> I'd think living a life of lies and bitterness would be more difficult than
> simply facing up to what you've become.
>
What has she become? Kevin Fries, since you claim she stole his
identity?
> But that's just me
>
> Anyone know who this Allard guy is, he keeps popping up in the file?
Maybe he's one of the various men she's been living with before she
started pretending to be a man named Kevin Fries.
I would never hire you as a lawyer, but for some light entertainment on
usenet, you're doing pretty well.
--
. \
/| | , , __ __. _ .- , .
/ | ___ | / |' `. .' \ \,' | `
/__| ___\ |-< | | | | /\ | |
@@ e\ / / \_ / | `._.' / \ `---|.
@@@ { / \___/
@@.-<.-----__/
/ / ) )--./-/' knoxy
`.\) ( mhm34x10
.>) \ smeeter #6
/ \ #6 on mimus wanted poster list
/ | Best Newbie in alt.flame 2005
J | Snarky's Gutter Chix0rz #13
__`-._____/_\ ___________________________________________________
` made by VK kn...@post.com
atlas bugged
news:ce48115cc10a5f23...@pseudo.borked.net...
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 06:34:58 -0400, atlas bugged wrote in
> Message-Id: <2mupts....@news.alt.net>:
>
> [snip]
>
> You're doing a really good job of promoting yourself. A Google search for
> Charles Novins now shows, "Law Offices of Charles Novins hires drug
> addicts to
> fill your legal needs" as the second hit. Keep up the good work! Never
> know,
> with a bit more effort it might preceed your own website.
Really? I had no idea. You must be really, really smart.
So if you were Charles Novins, would you take, ahhh, some action if the
whole "drug addicts" bit was false?
>
> Anyway, fuck you. You deserve all the evil publicity you get, and you're
> gonna
> get a lot.
Actually, I want to thank you for your assistance.
And I have noticed that clients seem to like a lawyer who fights for truth,
never stops, that kinda' thing.
Does and says things consistently. Understands his clients' needs and
advocates for them...almost as he would for himself.
Tends to attract top-rate staff, and other honest professionals.
Does this all sound whacky or what?
Bob Larter
Indeed. And the stuff he's saying about Rhonda sure sounds defamatory to me.
Bob Larter
You really shouldn't smoke crack before posting to Usenet, Mr Novins.
Bob Larter
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 06:34:58 -0400, Charles Novins, ESQ. posting as
> "atlas bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But she's about to
>> see a truckload of info published that she ain't going to like.
>>
>> That doesn't happen if she simply has her lawyer accept service, and she's
>> repeatedly told us all how bad it will be for me when she counterclaims.
>
> both?
Blackmail, I believe. There are even laws against that sort of thing.
Agent Wiggs
> me.
That and threatening to publish personal information about her, isn't that
invasion of privacy?
I certainly wouldn't hire this clown, he's in danger of getting this case
thrown out if anyone decides to present his own inflammatory postings in
court!
At least I assume threatening defendants is considered bad practise for a
legal professional.
I dunno, I'm an ICT professional, not too big on law.
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Well, he hasn't called me a pedophile.
Bob Larter
OTOH, he has accused you of identity theft, & being an unemployed transient.
Gregory Hall
news:49d4424e$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> barbaralov...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Apr 1, 10:49 pm, Sarah Ehrett <ninety...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:36:12 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>>>
>>> <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> These are not the sharpest folks.
>>>> They are literally discussing this case publicly
>>> And isn't that exactly what you yourself are doing? Seriously, any
>>> competent attorney would advise you to cease and desist all contact
>>> with the people here. If I were the judge I'd be hard pressed to
>>> see how you can claim damages when you've continued to be an active
>>> participant in newsgroup banter with the folks you claim have libeled
>>> you.
>>
>> Charles is an attorney, Sarah. Filing a law suit doesn't mean that you
>> can't make any use of your constitutional right of freedom of speech
>> anymore.
>>
>> There is a high possibility that when Charles would not more post
>> anymore that his defamers and libelers would think that he is not
>> present and would defame him and his law firm even more than before.
>
> More Usenet legal genius from Barbara 'Babbles' Schwarz.
She's far more qualified to comment on legal issues than you are. All you
seem to be able to do is resort to name-calling.
--
Gregory Hall
Bob Larter
I doubt it. She's never won a case, & I'm smart enough not to be suing
people in the first place.
> All you
> seem to be able to do is resort to name-calling.
Oh, you poor baby.
Gregory Hall
Probably that's because you are only a pedophile slurper.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
> Fatass Shrugged wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 06:34:58 -0400, Charles Novins, ESQ. posting as
>> "atlas bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> But she's about to see a truckload of info published that she ain't
>>> going to like.
>>>
>>> That doesn't happen if she simply has her lawyer accept service, and
>>> she's repeatedly told us all how bad it will be for me when she
>>> counterclaims.
>>
>> You're a lawyer, right? Tell us. Is that extortion or blackmail or
>> both?
>
> Blackmail, I believe. There are even laws against that sort of thing.
Hey, stupid people, it's called negotiation. There is no "threat." There is
only statement of fact.
Fact: information will be published,
Fact: negotiate and information might not be published in consideration.
Get a clue, biased losers.
--
Gregory Hall
Bob Larter
blackmail - 7 results
black⋅mail
/ˈblækˌmeɪl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [blak-meyl] Show IPA
–noun
1. any payment extorted by intimidation, as by threats of injurious
revelations or accusations.
2. the extortion of such payment: He confessed rather than suffer the
dishonor of blackmail.
3. a tribute formerly exacted in the north of England and in Scotland
by freebooting chiefs for protection from pillage.
–verb (used with object)
4. to extort money from (a person) by the use of threats.
5. to force or coerce into a particular action, statement, etc.:
*************************************************************
The strikers claimed they were blackmailed into signing the new contract.
<http://dictionary.reference.com/dic?q=blackmail&search=search>
HTH, HAND!
Meat Plow
<atlasbug...@gmail.com>wrote:
>"Atlas Borked" <who....@somwhere.invalid> wrote in message
If you meant wacky, yes. I suppose being able to correctly spell
common words is also a prerequisite for attracting clients?
...heh
Bob Larter
If Novins really does advocate for his clients "...almost as he would
for himself", his clients are screwed. ;^)
Sgt.P...@hotmail.com
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Bob Larter wrote:
> >> knoxy wrote:
> >>> atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com says...
> >>>> "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote in message
> >>>>news:2mtba6....@news.alt.net...
> >>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:2mt4k3....@news.alt.net...
> >>>>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
> >>>>>>>news:49d3...@news.x-privat.org...
> >>>>>>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
It's not nice to Snitch, Lionel!
--
Sgt.
Sarah Ehrett
barbaralov...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Apr 1, 10:49 pm, Sarah Ehrett <ninety...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:36:12 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>>
>> <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >These are not the sharpest folks.
>>
>> >They are literally discussing this case publicly
>>
>> And isn't that exactly what you yourself are doing? Seriously, any
>> competent attorney would advise you to cease and desist all contact
>> with the people here. If I were the judge I'd be hard pressed to
>> see how you can claim damages when you've continued to be an active
>> participant in newsgroup banter with the folks you claim have libeled
>> you.
>
>Charles is an attorney, Sarah.
And he can, if he so chooses to, speak for himself, "Barbara".
Nothing in my comment suggested I am interested in your input.
Sarah Ehrett
wrote:
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:36:12 -0400, "atlas bugged"
>> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> These are not the sharpest folks.
>>>
>>> They are literally discussing this case publicly
>>
>> And isn't that exactly what you yourself are doing? Seriously, any
>> competent attorney would advise you to cease and desist all contact
>> with the people here. If I were the judge I'd be hard pressed to
>> see how you can claim damages when you've continued to be an active
>> participant in newsgroup banter with the folks you claim have libeled
>> you.
>
>The catch here is that Bugged/Novins isn't a competent attorney.
At the very least I can see where he has not exercised the best
judgment. He may have already done irreparable damage to his libel
suit when and if a Judge ever sees the posts he's made these past few
weeks.
Sarah Ehrett
wrote:
Let's get a clear answer on two questions please:
Are you Charles Novins spokesman?
Does he know what you are claiming in his name?
barbaralov...@gmail.com
Crap, Miguel. Charles Novin is not under a gag order by the judge.
Moreover, you don't know if he will represent himself as his own
attorney in the case or if he will be represented by another attorney.
Barbara Schwarz
--
The Aims of Scientology, as stated by L. Ron Hubbard, the Founder of
the Scientology religion, are:
"A civilization without insanity, without criminals and without war,
where the able can prosper
and honest beings can have rights, and where man is free to rise to
greater heights."
- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -