Re: Atty Charles Novins Seeks Changes In Law to Protect Innocents From Internet Vandals

["The Great One"]

"Fred Hall" <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:hherge$spg$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:02:46 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:19:01 -0800 (PST), in the land of news.groups,
> >Albert Ekman <atlasbug...@gmail.com> got double secret probation
> >for writing:
> >
> >>Atty Charles Novins Seeks Changes
> >
> >69.253.107.178
> >
> >Too bad Comcast uses sticky IP on their DHCP.
> >
> >Explain the Diversity rule as it applies to you case, Chuck:
>
> And thus the mighty Novins has fallen off the pedestal erected by
> Nellie, DisHonest John, tommigrlll Evans, and Russell *sock* Tavek.
>
> Pitiful, really.
>
> Fuck Novins, may he be amply rewarded for his k0oKiness
> --
> "Trailer-Trash" Hall

The process server is knocking on the moldy door of your ratzio infested trailer as we speak !!
--
HJ

["The Great One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:fdcnj5dns6nunamjk...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:45:01 -0800 (PST), in the land of news.groups,
> Robert Macy <ma...@california.com> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>
> >Rather than hold those responsible that 'transfer' information without
> >review, wouldn't it make more sense to hold the ORIGINATORS
> >responsible? Which means, remove anonymity. Maintain complete
> >tracking capability. Guess that won't work all the time either, since
> >there are situations where truth should surface and the person who
> >brings that truth forward should be protected.
> >
> >Any ideas how to do all this WITHOUT government intervention? Else,
> >there'll be a tax to pay for the 'service' of policing the 'net.
> >
> >
> How about we do it the easy way:
>
> 1. those who are functionally incapable of not reading that which
> upsets them, leave the interwebs.
>
> 2. those who require that all messages be to their liking, move to a
> moderated web board.
>
> 3. those who feel they need to control the words of others, fuck
> themselves with a spintered wooden spoon, then leave.
>
> The rest of us that have a modicum of common sense will remain.

That surely includes "you" leaving as you're almost as dumb as "Fat-Boi" Plow !!

No body could be dumber that the "Twinkie-Boi" !!
--
HJ

["The Great One"]

"Mad as a Box of Frogs" <unde...@news.vrx.net> wrote in message news:hhkqto$pal$1...@undertow.eternal-september.org...
> In article <9v2dnTNPXLaazqHW...@centurytel.net>,
> \"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> >
> >"Mad as a Box of Frogs" <unde...@news.vrx.net> wrote in message
> >news:hhgdfk$j4l$7...@undertow.eternal-september.org...
> >> In article <JISdnRYlZYKCK6bW...@centurytel.net>,

> >> I dunno, it's lookin' neck and neck between him and Fudd Hall.
> >> --
> >Good Point.........like the one on top of Hall's "microcephalic" head !!
> >HJ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Hey, we need some photos of Fudd for the "family" album, alongside ...
> the defendants. Trade'em if'n ya got'em.
> --
> Master of Puppets Direct line and fax: 206-339-7561
> DENSA Life Achievement ø Am I the only one with half a brain?

As ordered !!

http://www.thehumanmarvels.com/uploaded_images/zip-722664.gif
--
HJ

[Mad as a Box of Frogs]

In article <frmdnSp1eudTTaPW...@centurytel.net>,

>> DENSA Life Achievement � Am I the only one with half a brain?

>
>As ordered !!
>
>http://www.thehumanmarvels.com/uploaded_images/zip-722664.gif
>--
>HJ

HOLY SHIT!!!

He's must be related to this guy,

http://bayimg.com/gAjKdaacF

--
Master of Puppets Direct line and fax: 206-339-7561

DENSA Life Achievement � Am I the only one with half a brain?

[Da Babtister]

""The Great One"" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:frmdnSp1eudTTaPW...@centurytel.net...

> DENSA Life Achievement � Am I the only one with half a brain?

As ordered !!

http://www.thehumanmarvels.com/uploaded_images/zip-722664.gif
--
HJ

Up your ass.

["The Great One"]

"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message news:slrnhk7mr...@pjr.motzarella.org...
> In news.groups on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0800, Aratzio

> <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:45:01 -0800 (PST), in the land of news.groups,
> > Robert Macy <ma...@california.com> got double secret probation for
> > writing:
> >
> >>Rather than hold those responsible that 'transfer' information without
> >>review, wouldn't it make more sense to hold the ORIGINATORS
> >>responsible? Which means, remove anonymity. Maintain complete
> >>tracking capability. Guess that won't work all the time either, since
> >>there are situations where truth should surface and the person who
> >>brings that truth forward should be protected.
> >>
> >>Any ideas how to do all this WITHOUT government intervention? Else,
> >>there'll be a tax to pay for the 'service' of policing the 'net.
> >>
> >>
> > How about we do it the easy way:
> >
> > 1. those who are functionally incapable of not reading that which
> > upsets them, leave the interwebs.
> >
> > 2. those who require that all messages be to their liking, move to a
> > moderated web board.
> >
> > 3. those who feel they need to control the words of others, fuck
> > themselves with a spintered wooden spoon, then leave.
> >
> > The rest of us that have a modicum of common sense will remain.
>

> I want the people who are English and Gay to remain.
> --
> Peter "Eater" Ross > :-o<==8

Stop talking to yourself in the mirror......that's Creepy, Ross !!

["The Great One"]

"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message news:slrnhk7mm...@pjr.motzarella.org...
> [newsgroups line changed. I suspect Novins is spamming, given the
> random nature of his crossposting.]
>
> In news.groups on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:19:01 -0800 (PST), Albert Ekman
> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Atty Charles Novins Seeks Changes In Law to Protect Innocents From
> > Internet Vandals
> >
> > Charles Novins, Esq.,
>
> Why are you referring to yourself in the third person, kook?
>
> > has received apologies from several of the
> > anonymous internet thugs attempting to libel him.
>
> 1. Nobody has attempted to libel you except BowTie, who is one of your
> staunchest allies in your famous and very funny kooksuit.
>
> 2. You haven't received any apologies. You *have* received a couple of
> countersuits, filed with the assistance of competent lawyers, that
> would terrify you if you weren't totally delusional at this stage of
> your self-inflicted professional and social suicide.
>
> > The perpetrators
> > posted libelous musings about drug use and sex crimes, all outright
> > lies. Rather than face legal prosecution, most have backed down.
>
> You get high by snorting powdered badger tusks, and your wife is a
> prepubescent octopus whom you'd rape regularly if you'd experienced
> even one erection since your hero Joe McCarthy died.
>
> Sue me for that, Mister Lawyer Man.
>
> I've been inviting you to sue me for *years* now, but it seems that
> I'm just too scary for you to send your real-life kookery in my
> direction.
>
> > Novins is a
> ludicrously delusional kook who is quite likely to be disbarred soon.
>
> Yep! He sure is!

> --
> Peter "Eater" Ross > :-o<==8

Move to America and say that, Coward !!
--
HJ

["The Great One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:huv7k517p7jdhatas...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 00:38:16 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
> alt.usenet.kooks, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> got double secret

> probation for writing:
>
> >In news.groups on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:05:49 -0800, Aratzio
> ><a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:45:01 -0800 (PST), in the land of news.groups,
> >> Robert Macy <ma...@california.com> got double secret probation for
> >> writing:
> >>
> >>>Rather than hold those responsible that 'transfer' information without
> >>>review, wouldn't it make more sense to hold the ORIGINATORS
> >>>responsible? Which means, remove anonymity. Maintain complete
> >>>tracking capability. Guess that won't work all the time either, since
> >>>there are situations where truth should surface and the person who
> >>>brings that truth forward should be protected.
> >>>
> >>>Any ideas how to do all this WITHOUT government intervention? Else,
> >>>there'll be a tax to pay for the 'service' of policing the 'net.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> How about we do it the easy way:
> >>
> >> 1. those who are functionally incapable of not reading that which
> >> upsets them, leave the interwebs.
> >>
> >> 2. those who require that all messages be to their liking, move to a
> >> moderated web board.
> >>
> >> 3. those who feel they need to control the words of others, fuck
> >> themselves with a spintered wooden spoon, then leave.
> >>
> >> The rest of us that have a modicum of common sense will remain.
> >

> >I want the people who have no common sense to remain, so I can
> >continue to laugh a lot at their expense.
>
> That is a given, they don't know they don't have common sense.

Kinda like you, Roz !!
--
HJ

["The Great One"]

<Meat Plow> wrote in message news:3gpfli.5...@news.alt.net...
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:58:24 -0700, Lamey the Cable Guy
> <lame...@mail.com>wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:53:15 -0500, Meat Plow <.> wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:45:30 -0700, Lamey the Cable Guy
> >><lame...@mail.com>wrote:

> >>
> >>>On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 00:35:36 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross
> >>><p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>[newsgroups line changed. I suspect Novins is spamming, given the
> >>>>random nature of his crossposting.]
> >>>>
> >>>>In news.groups on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:19:01 -0800 (PST), Albert Ekman
> >>>><atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Atty Charles Novins Seeks Changes In Law to Protect Innocents From
> >>>>> Internet Vandals
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Charles Novins, Esq.,
> >>>>
> >>>>Why are you referring to yourself in the third person, kook?
> >>>

> >>>Look who's talking. You and your ilk have turned this newsgroup to
> >>>shit. You're the k00k. You're so happy to libel Novins online, so
> >>>long as your coward ass is 6 time zones and an ocean away.
> >>
> >>Ummm this newsfroup was always and will always be "shit"
> >>Don't set your sites so high bro.
> >
> >
> >I have to agree with you there.
>
> Ayup.
>
> Also, I have a plausible theory as to why Novins flipped out. And it
> didn't start with the anon libelous post. It started with a certain
> "someone" fraternizing with him lulling him into a false friendship.
> Basically fucking big time with his head in the end. This "someone"
> should be obvious by the list of defendants. When you fuck with fire
> you'll eventually get burnt.

What the fuck are you talking about you Morbidly Obese Fat-Fuck ??

All the sugar in those Twinkies have given you dementia !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ

["The Great One"]

"Mad as a Box of Frogs" <don't.sock.my.socks....@my.place.eh> wrote in message news:hksuj3$cm2$1...@undertow.eternal-september.org...
> In article <sar3n59p094do1p9f...@4ax.com>,

> miguel <mig...@insurgent.org> wrote:
> >On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:45:30 -0700, Lamey the Cable Guy
> ><lame...@mail.com> wrote:
> >

> >snip

> >
> >>>You *have* received a couple of
> >>>countersuits, filed with the assistance of competent lawyers, that
> >>>would terrify you if you weren't totally delusional at this stage of
> >>>your self-inflicted professional and social suicide.
> >

> >>So you agree "Bowtie" or somebody libeled Novins, but you're happy to
> >>see him get sued, and you think he's "delusional". Doesn't sound to
> >>me like you have a very tight grip.
> >
> >Somebody libeled Novins. It wasn't any of the people Novins sued, or
> >at least Novins has no proof that it was any of those he sued. Novins
> >has himself libeled several people, including me. At one point, if I
> >recall correctly, he posted on his web page that I was disbarred for
> >murdering somebody, or at least he speculated that this was the case.
> >I had a slam dunk case against him and could have drug him to
> >Washington State to defend it. That suit, at least, would have had
> >merit.
>
>
> Which begs the question.....
>
> >
> >I don't think anybody thought the original libel of Novins was funny,
> >or cute, and it was certainly kooky. But Novins' reaction, especially
> >considering his own past misdeeds, was certainly over the top. In my
> >opinion he filed a meritless lawsuit to try to bully certain people,
> >and perhaps that has worked out well for him in the past. Time will
> >tell how well it works out here.
>
> No future tense about it. Time has already told it worked out good.
>
> As the defendants come crawling back one by one you can rest assured
> their words will be chosen rather wisely.
> --
> Master of Puppets

There's still two missing:
1. Deco
2. Pinky

Yell if you see either of these Ko0kie-Ko0kologists !!
--
King John I of 'AUK',
KJ I

["The Great One"]

"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message news:xr2dnesf36-IYOzW...@scnresearch.com...

> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:45:30 -0700, Lamey the Cable Guy wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 00:35:36 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross
> > <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >>[newsgroups line changed. I suspect Novins is spamming, given the random
> >>nature of his crossposting.]
> >>
> >>In news.groups on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:19:01 -0800 (PST), Albert Ekman
> >><atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Atty Charles Novins Seeks Changes In Law to Protect Innocents From
> >>> Internet Vandals
> >>>
> >>> Charles Novins, Esq.,
> >>
> >>Why are you referring to yourself in the third person, kook?
> >
> > Look who's talking. You and your ilk have turned this newsgroup to
> > shit. You're the k00k. You're so happy to libel Novins online, so long
> > as your coward ass is 6 time zones and an ocean away.
>

> I've never seen pjr libel Novins. Perhaps you should take a better
> look around.
> --
> Pandora

That normal for you as you always have hairy balls hanging over your eyes, penis breath !!
--
HJ

["The Great One"]

"Mad as a Box of Frogs" <&*!#0\/*+%~=@(,)(,).sid> wrote in message news:hl45ho$d81$1...@undertow.eternal-september.org...
> In article <3h0bvl.9...@news.alt.net>, <Meat Plow> wrote:
> >On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:08:10 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs
> ><&*!#0\/*+%~=@(,)(,).sid>wrote:
> >
> >>In article <3gujcu....@news.alt.net>, Meat Plow <.> wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs
> >>><&*!#0\/*+%~=@(,)(,).sid>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In article <3gu3o3....@news.alt.net>,
> >>>>Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote:
> >>>>>Meat Plow wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:50:57 +0000 (UTC), #Mad as a Box of Frogs
> >>>>>> <%*!#0/*%~=@(,)(,).sid>wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Because I don't like to litigate unless I have to. Why put in
> >>>>>>>> hundreds of hours of litigation over stupid shit like that?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Christ Almighty talk about pulling teeth.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He's practicing for when he gets the chance to get his attorney
> >>>>>> license back if he ever does.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>He has his license...but you knew that.
> >>>>
> >>>>How do we know that?
> >>>>
> >>>>More attorneys in this thread than a barrel full of monkeys.
> >>>>We appear to have one actual attorney, and one pretend-attorney.
> >>>>Even that seems contentious.
> >>>>
> >>>>One maintains he chose not to persue his case because he didn't
> >>>>see fit to "put in hundreds of hours of litigation over stupid shit
> >>>>like that". The other...well Rhonda knows more about that some of the
> >>>>rest of us.
> >>>>
> >>>>My interest as always of course lies in accountability. I'm one of
> >>>>those finicky shoppers that insists that the shoes have to fit before
> >>>>the green crosses the palm.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Are you aware that you're boring as hell?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Over to Meat Plow.
> >>>
> >>>RhonDumb always was one to make idiotic assumptions. Like the one I
> >>>knew the Outing Filth miguel had his license. I neither knew nor
> >>>really gave a flying fuck or currently give a flying fuck what the
> >>>cocksucking cunt has or does. One thing though it is nice to see him
> >>>hidning under RhonDumb's skirt. How he stands the smell I don't know.
> >>>Maybe used to it?
> >>
> >>
> >>Well that was fairly clear. Always nice to see the a little
> >>accelerant tossed on a bonfire to warm things up.
> >>
> >>Nice sexy graphics towards the end of that rant too.
> >
> >
> >No need for accelerant where these drama-whores are concerned.
> >Just toss them a piece of flint and iron and they'll strike up enough
> >of a blaze to roast themselves over a pit of red hot coals.
> >
> >This whole k00ksuit thing was caused by RhonDumb. Had she not fucked
> >with a certain "unstable" attorney's head he would not have gone
> >ballistic. You can tell she feels this way by how she posts.
>
>
> Rhonduh's a cat that got caught in a mouse's trap. Crafty mouse that can
> catch a cat. Now all the mouse must do is avoid being caught by the dog.
> --
> Master of Puppets

"They" don't make a trap big enough to catch Meat Plow's FAT-ASS !!
--
HJ

["The Great One"]

<Meat Plow> wrote in message news:3h36uj.9...@news.alt.net...
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:59:43 +0000 (UTC), Mad as a Box of Frogs
> <&*!#0\/*+%~=@(,)(,).sid>wrote:
>
> >Winding back the clock since Miguel seems to have vanished like a dozen
> >fresh donuts. Based on that and the limping masses contributing to this
> >thread I'll check my bet to the power.
>
> Miggy does that when his 1 person fan club fails to rescue him from
> himself.
> --
> Fatty P.

Fatty Plow, you're an Idiot !!
--
HJ