Truth about Jews & their behaviors
MANOFTRUTH
Jews
Secular Jews dominate the production and distribution of porn. Just
like they've had a disproportionate role in the "white slave trade,"
and other forms of sex commerce.
In his 1992 book "Oh Canada! Oh Quebec! Requiem for a Divided
Country," Mordacai Richler writes about Jew hatred in Quebec: The late
Abbe Lionel Groulx, patron saint of the sovereignty advocates, is
revealed as an admirer of Mussolini who wrote in 1954 that Jews have
"a natural passion for money" and could "be found behind all
businesses, all shady enterprises, all the pornography operations. . .
."
Leading modern Jewish pornographers include Ron Braverman, John Bone,
Wesley Emerson, Paul Fishbein, Herbert Feinberg AKA Mickey Fine, Hank
Weinstein, Lenny Friedlander, Bobby Hollander, Rubin Gottesman, Fred
Hirsch and his children Steve and Marci, Paul "Norman" Apstein, Steve
Orenstein, Jack Richmond (Legend CEO), Theodore Rothstein, Reuben and
David Sturman, Ron Sullivan, Jerome Tanner, Armand Weston, Sam and
Mitch Weston (Spinelli).
Jews accounted for most of the leading male performers of the 1970s
and '80s. Hebrew studs include Buck Adams, Bobby Astyr, (Bobby
Charles) R. Bolla (Robert Kerman), Jerry Butler (Paul Siderman),
Seymore Butts (Adam Glasser), Roger Caine (Al Levitsky), David
Christopher (Bernie Cohen), Steve Drake, Jesse Eastern, Jamie Gillis
(Jamie Gurman), Ron Jeremy (Hyatt), Michael Knight, William Margold,
Ashley Moore (Steve Tucker), David Morris, George Payne, Ed Powers
(Mark Arnold aka Mark Krinski), Harry Reems (Herbert Streicher), Dave
Ruby, Herschel Savage (Harvey Cowen), Carter Stevens (Mal Warub), Marc
Stevens, Paul Thomas (Phil Tobias), Marc Wallice (Marc Goldberg),
Randy West (Andy Abrams) and Jack Wrangler.
A Jewish male performer writes Luke: "Why are most of the men that do
porno Jewish? JEWISH MOTHERS!
"Jewish men are taught to respect women and help them (very
codependent)... They also are nonthreathening to most women. Let's
face it, Ron Jeremy is not exactly Mike Tyson... You'll usually find
that the real mean bastards (physically violent) in the industry are
NOT Jewish (that includes, producers, directors, boyfriends, agents,
etc). Jewish guys are more manipulative...."
Jewish female performers include Avalon, Jenny Baxter (Jenny Wexler),
Busty Belle (Tracy Praeger), Chelsea Blake, Tiffany Blake, Bunny Bleu
(Kim Warner), J.R. Carrington, Lee Carroll (Leslie Barris), Blair
Castle/Brooke Fields (Allison Shandibal), Courtney/Natasha/Eden
(Natasha Zimmerman), Daphne (Daphne Franks), Barbara Dare (Stacy
Mitnick), April Diamond, Jeanna Fine, Alexis Gold, Terri Hall, Heather
Hart, Nina Hartley (Hartman), C.J. Laing (Wendy Miller), Frankie Leigh
(Cynthia Hope Geller), Gloria Leonard, Traci Lords (Nora Louise
Kuzma), Amber Lynn, Tonisha Mills, Melissa Monet, Susan Nero, Scarlett
O. (Catherine Goldberg), Tawny Pearl (Susan Pearlman), Nina Preta,
Tracey Prince, Raylene, Janey Robbins (Robin Lieberman), Mila Shegol,
Alexandra Silk, Susan Sloan, Annie Sprinkle (Ellen Steinberg), Karen
Summer (Dana Alper), Cindy West, Zara Whites (Amy Kooiman) and Ona Zee
(Ona Simms).
If the Torah [Pentateuch] commands Jews "to be a kingdom of priests
and a holy nation," and Judaism strongly opposes porn, why do Jews
dominate porn?
The main answer is simple. Jews in porn, like most Jews in academia,
media and entertainment, are Jewish in name only. They do little in
Jewish life, rarely belong to a synagogue and ignore the Torah.
Neither rooted in their own tradition or in that of the majority
Christian tradition, they live in a community of rebels.
Why does porn attract so many non-Jewish Jews?
· Used to hatred from society, Jews will do its dirty work - such as
money lending in the Middle Ages or porn today - to make money.
Persecuted for millennia in the various societies they've lived in,
many Jews developed an allegiance to their own survival as their
highest value and care little about the survival of the persecuting
society. Even when Jews live in a society that welcomes them instead
of harassing them, many Jews hate the majority culture.
· Because Jews frequently despise the majority culture, and despite
being traditional in most of their values and rituals, Jews seem open
to new ways of doing business. Not rooted in the status quo that
frequently hates them, Jews often lead the way in the application of
new technology - such as printing presses, radio, TV, cable
television, VCRs and computers. And the most popular application of
new technology for millennia has been porn.
· Because of Judaism's emphasis on education and verbal dexterity,
Jews dominate academia, entertainment and media generally.
· Belonging to the "Chosen Ones" brings self-confidence, and it takes
a strong sense of self to thrive in an industry like porn that is
disdained by the public. Male performers particularly need confidence
to achieve on camera erections.
Pornographer Seymore Butts attributes the large number of Jews in porn
to the desire for profits. "Jews gravitate towards money.
"We're smart people who've been persecuted throughout time. The weak
of our people were weeded out. The strong-willed Jews survived...from
Egypt to Germany.
"Blacks, for instance, are athletically superior (more muscle fiber
per square inch of flesh) because they were bred that way. We killed
the weak ones off. The ones that survived were the big ones, the fast
ones, the strongest ones, the fighters, the ones that could work the
most, with the biggest cocks... Jews same thing. We network, the one
thing that blacks don't do. They're still killing each other. We
support each other. The worst that we will do is sue each other.
"If four people compete for a job, and three of them are goyim
[non-Jews], the Jew, all things being equal, will get the job. That's
the way I work. If I've got three actors going for a part, and one of
them is Jewish, and they're all in the same ballpark... Sue me."
In his 2000 book "Bookleggers and Smuthounds: The Trade In Erotica
1920-1940," English professor Jay Gertzman writes about the
disproportionate influence of Jews in the sex book trade: "This
irrepressible insistence, seen as characteristic of Jewish merchants
in particular, and of ethnic middlemen minorities in general, helped
confer pariah status on the erotic book dealers. Here, the
one-hundred-percent moralist warned, was a tightly knit group of
workers single-mindedly driven to material success, an apparently
autonomous minority that had chosen to pursue its own "godless,
unAmerican" goals with a strange and foreign intensity. When added to
the disreputable nature of the business, as attested to by the
denunciations of various authority figures, and by police action
against the "promoters," as postal inspectors termed them, the
identity of the erotica distributor as clannish - employing "their own
kind" - and aloof - with their own, ethnic, allegiances - became
fixed. Here was a kind of "parasite" with whom one would, on occasion,
itch to deal, but would remain chary of trusting, especially because
the dealer was so good at what he did." (pg. 41)
Jews participating in the sex trade are not behaving Jewishly. They're
acting in a manner contrary to everything Jewish - the Torah, Israel,
God, synagogue and everything the Jewish tradition considers holy.
But to be a Jew, you simply have to be born of a Jewish mother, just
as you automatically become an American if you are born to American
parents. A Jew can hate Judaism and Israel, Moses and the Torah, and
still be a Jew. His values aren't Jewish but he's still a member of
the people Israel. To be a Christian, by contrast, one must affirm
Christ.
This explains how Jews can live un-Jewish lives.
While few Jews are radical, many radicals (and pornographers) are
Jews. Writes non-Jew Ernest van den Haag in his book The Jewish
Mystique, "Out of one hundred Jews, five may be radicals, but out of
ten radicals, five are likely to be Jewish."
Virtually all movements to change the world come from the Jews -
Christianity, secular humanism, Marxism, Socialism and Communism,
feminism, and the labor movement. That's part of the reason that Jews
are hated. The world doesn't want to be changed.
Rooted in nothing, radical Jews frequently seek to make others equally
rootless by tearing down their religious, national, communal and
traditional allegiances. Such Jews carry on the traditional Jewish
hatred of false gods but without offering anything to replace the
scorned allegiances.
Jewish domination of porn, banking, entertainment, media and academia
does not lead to discrimination against gentiles - most radical Jews
marry Gentiles. Nor does it lead to flattering portraits of Jews, as
Jews abound in self-criticism. Rather, the most important result of
the domination of non-Jewish Jews in these fields is their war on
traditional values. Porn is just one expression of this rebellion
against standards, against the disciplined life of obedience to Torah
that marks a Jew living Judaism.
"I have not yet met a Jewish guy who wasn't a horny rabbit," says Nina
Hartley. "Culturally it's ok for Jews to act and for WASPs it's
difficult. Many WASP men feel that acting is making a fool of
yourself. To go up there and have sex is seen as opening yourself up
to too much potential for failure. It's ok for Jews to be actors and
many of them are hams. They don't worry about the potential to look
silly. There is also a lack of guilt about sex that Jewish men have
generally. Plus, they get to have sex with all these beautiful blonde
women... Where else are you going to get a succession of shiksas [non-
Jewish women] to bed you down?" (Shmate)
The number of Jewish studs is "one of God's little jokes," says R.
Bolla who once allowed Jamie Gillis to stay at his New York apartment
for a few weeks if he promised "to never bring bacon home."
"Sex is the not the greatest sin in the Jewish religion," notes Bolla.
"I hope that porn is the most unrighteous thing I do. If we go out of
our way to be scumbags, that's the sin. When I do porn, I offend
Shakespeare more than God."
Ten Jewish porn stars interviewed by the late Screw reviewer Dan
Shocket in the early '80s, insisted that they maintained some Jewish
values. They sought to treat others in a dignified manner and demanded
the same treatment for themselves.
"If I'm in the cesspool," says Bobby Astyr, "I may as well be nice in
the cesspool. When I first got into the business, I felt the least I
could do was to get the dopers off dope and to help where I could. I
thought that I'm doing something wrong, so while I'm doing it, I'll
also do something nice. Selective morality."
Herschel Savage remembers bringing a girl with him to an interview
with a porn director. "This guy looked at the girl and said, 'Take
your top off.' She did. He then puts up his hands and says, 'Your tits
are too small. I can't use you.'
"I got so angry. I said, 'That's not the way you talk to a person. If
you don't like the way she looks, just say you can't use her right
now.'
"We're in his basement and he's standing behind the bar. All of a
sudden he puts his hand behind the bar as if he's going to get a gun.
I keep talking, telling him how to behave with people. I know I lost
the job, but I couldn't let him get away with that. The girl was
crushed.
"If the producer had said my cock was too small, I could've joked
about that. I know my worth. The guy couldn't hurt me. But that girl
couldn't defend herself."
Like many pornographers, Richard Pacheco refuses to use the word
pornography.
"Working in adult films is the most righteous thing I do. I take
enormous pains to treat people fairly, a revolutionary concept in this
business, which is hardcore in terms of exploitation. That we've
entrusted the sexual film to amateurs, criminals and drug addicts is
absurd. My commitment to the industry is to stop doing crap and start
doing stuff that elevates the human spirit."
Each of the ten Jews - except Marc Stevens - insisted they were actors
first, who happened to perform in X-rated movies.
"I'm feeling more guilty about doing this interview than I am about
being a porn star," Bolla told Dan Shocket. "I'm afraid this will
besmirch Jews.
"The men in this business are not as down and out as the women... For
women, this is sometimes a last resort. I feel it. For the men, it's
revenge at their parents."
"Through history, every established order has at one time or another
excluded and/or exterminated the Jews," writes Dan Shocket. "This has
given Jews a jaded view of the established order. All X-rated actors
interviewed bragged about their joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies
to the puritanical beast."
"I like the idea of testing the waters," says Bolla. "In the pond of
complacency, I'll throw something in. I like dichotomies. I go to
synagogue, I go to Israel when I can; I make porn films; I make
straight films; I'll stand for specific causes, and I'll give my life
to a cause worth dying for. Those contradictions throw people off."
Bobby Astyr remembers having "to run or fight for it in grammar school
because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career
is an 'up yours' to these people. It's also an 'up yours' to the
uncles with the pinky rings who got down on me as a kid for wanting to
be musician."
"Five years before I got my first part in an adult film," says Richard
Pacheco, "I went down to an audition for an X-rated film with my hair
down to my ass, a copy of Wilhelm Reich's Sexual Revolution under my
arm and yelling about work, love and sex, which were Reich's three
principles. These things have got to be in balance or your life is
going to fucked." Pacheco didn't get the job.
"Five years later I auditioned for another X-rated film. That very
day, I also interviewed at Hebrew Union Seminary to do rabbinical
study. I made the choice that the kind of rabbi I would be, if I
became one, was one that could have been performing in sex films as
part of his experience."
True-believing communist and porn star Nina Hartley wants everyone to
have a piece - a piece of sex and a piece of the means of production.
She descends ideologically from the Marxist Jewish philosopher Herbert
Marcuse who prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals
to achieve sexual satisfaction. Nina descends literally from a line of
radical Jews. Her grandfather (a physics professor) and her father (a
radio announcer) belonged to the Communist party. Her home celebrated
Hanukkah, Christmas, Passover and Easter as holidays rather than holy
days.
Like most of porn's Jews, Hartley received no formal religious
instruction. One of her brothers and her one sister - a doctor - came
to Orthodox Judaism as adults and barely relate to Nina, the family's
black sheep. In the mid '80s, Nina's parents became Zen Buddhist
priests.
"When my parents saw me speaking on the Phil Donahue show," says
Hartley, "they were shocked and upset. They are now more accepting.
They know I'm happy and healthy and still the person they know.
"One brother thinks my work is a hoot. Doesn't bother him at all. My
oldest brother can barely bring himself to say hello to me. He's very
upset with what I do. He's a practicing "born again" Orthodox Jew, so
we don't speak. Even before he found out what I did, we didn't have a
whole lot in common, because of his religious behavior. He's the
hardest case to crack."
Socialist Sheldon Ranz interviewed Nina for the Spring 1989 edition of
the radical New York journal Shmate. "I don't understand how a family
where the parents have a Communist background can raise a kid who
grows up to be an Orthodox Jew," said Ranz, a child of Holocaust
survivors. "How did that happen?"
Nina: "They're still asking themselves that very question. My brother
turned to it the way anyone turns to religion as an adult. Insecurity,
fear, a desire for community, a desire for roots, and identity. He
started out being interested in the history of Jewishness and Jewish
culture. He slowly got into the more religious aspects of it, buying
the t'fillin and the whole bit.
"My family doesn't understand exhibitionism or pornography. I'm Jewish
culturally but not religiously. I'm generally less subservient than a
typical WASP female.
"I grew up in Berkley, which is heavily influenced by [secular] Jewish
culture. It's an intellectual town. A lot of the people who set the
political agenda are Jewish.
"I'm proud of my heritage's intellectual history and its empathy with
the persecuted. But I'm no Zionist. Politically, I'm left wing. I want
everyone to have a job, everyone to have food, clothing, shelter,
medical care and education. Utopia might be communist but in the
meantime we have to have socialism. I want everyone to have a piece.
"I believe strongly in the heritage of Jews as educators. I feel very
proud of the fact that if it weren't for the Jews, half the world
would still be illiterate. I would like to know about Jewish religion
as history, but as an atheist, I see no reason to practice any
religion... because it is organized superstition...the opiate of the
masses.
"Israel doesn't figure in my identity, but I do think about it. As it
is now - a theocracy masquerading as a democracy - I don't think it
has a right to exist.
"That Israel denies basic civil rights to the Palestinians in the
occupied territories makes me angry at Israel. If Israel does not
clean up its act, it will become another graveyard for the Jews."
(Shmate)
Nina Hartley's husband Dave, who works as a gardener, and Nina's
'wife' Bobbie, grew up as liberal Methodists. "They like my energy, my
ability to be intellectual, which doesn't come easy to many WASP women
because they're not taught that it is valuable. My individual will, my
refusal to bow down and be subjugated by others is a Jewish trait.
"When I grew up, we had six people around the dinner table. We'd have
two or three conversations going on at one time. There'd be diagonal
conversations, straight-across conversations, next-to-yourself
conversations... When Dave and Bobbi grew up, one person spoke at a
time at the table and was finished, and then the next person spoke....
It flabbergasted me when I found this out...
"When Dave goes into a Jewish situation...he goes crazy because
everyone talks all at once to everybody else. The interruptions
infuriate him."
Hartley met Juliet Anderson at the O'Farrell in 1982 and broke her
porn cherry in the first movie that Juliet wrote, directed and
produced - Educating Nina. Nina, who looks like Goldie Hawn, moved on
to such videos as Amanda By Night 2, Ball Busters, and Rites of
Passion as well as the mainstream flick based on the life of John
Holmes - Boogie Nights. She usually appears in low-budget hardcore
rather than elegant couples fare, notes Steve Brent. "Watching a Nina
Hartley tape every once in a while is more an act of supportive
politics than a sensual experience."
Bill Margold ranks Hartley as the most popular person in porn. She
treats her fans with courtesy. "I validate their desires. Unlike many
other women in the business, I don't look on fans as icky perverts. I
treat them as full human beings.
"We celebrate sex. I tell them, "Isn't this great?" I've seen my fans
through many stages of life, from bacherlorhood to marriage and
children."
Hartley became porn's leading star after the retirement of Ginger Lynn
in 1986. One of Nina's best known flicks is Debbie Duz Dishes,
produced and directed by WASP Damon Christian (Richard Aldrich). She
plays a sexually insatiable Jewish housewife who enjoys sex with
anyone who rings the doorbell.
Unlike Hollywood producers, pornographers show Jewish women who enjoy
sex, a sharp contradiction to the JAP stereotype.
Sheldon Ranz writes: "Prof. Steven Martin Cohen (one-time editor of
Response magazine) who surveys trends like intermarriage also surveys
poitical affiliations and views of Jewish voters. Years ago, he popped
the porn question to Jewish respondents as well to control groups of
African-Americans and other Gentiles. He found that US Jews were the
only group with a majority opposed to anti-pornography laws.
"At the time, some people with whom I had discussions thought this was
due to the strong liberal Jewish commitment to civil liberties. At
first, I agreed, but then I noticed something bizarre...the same Jews
did NOT support the right of neo-Nazis to march in public. The ACLU
crowd does support that right, so how to make sense of the results?
"The explanation that fits all the facts is that most US Jews do not
think of pornography as a problem, or at least a big one. And here is
where that tiny, hard band of brave Orthodox dissenters may fit in."
After graduating with a degree in photography from the Rochester
Institute of Technology, Mal Whorb began work in 1965 at the largest
independent film processing laboratory in the country - MovieLab in
New York which made the American prints for I Am Curious (Yellow) as
well as exploitation fare for such producers as David Friedman. It
refused hardcore.
Mal wanted to direct but first he needed to gain experience. So under
the name Carter Stevens he made the 1972 porno The Collegiates
starring Harry Reems. Two years later Carter directed Lickety Split,
which was Screw's number six film of 1974. It ranked among Variety's
top 50 grossing films for 1974. One week in New York it was the city's
highest grossing movie.
"Before I got into adult, I talked it over with my mother. She wanted
to know if it would hurt my career. 'What career?' I said.
"My parents had liberal attitudes. My mother used to say about sex,
'When it's great it's great and when it's lousy, it ain't too bad'.
"Gerry Damiano came from a Catholic background and his films are
obsessed with guilt. I'm Jewish. We don't have that problem. You won't
see obsessions with guilt in my work or that of other Jews. Damiano
and I had fascinating discussions on this theme."
Mal's younger brother practices Orthodox Judaism. Owning a Masters
Degree in philosophy, Avraham published two arcane books on Jewish
theology.
After moving from New York to Los Angeles in 1980, Bobby Hollander
developed the shot-on-video vignette format in the early '80s with
such series as Touch, Centerfold Celebrity and Bubble Butts. Bobby
discovered Shauna Grant and spoke on a PBS documentary about her
suicide, earning criticism for his sleazy appearance and comments.
Hollander threw dozens of wild cocaine parties during the 1980s. After
years "living the life" he lost his health in the '90s. Though down to
one lung, he keeps smoking.
"There are lots of [Jewish] heavies in the industry," says Wally
Wharton about tough guys like Bobby, "who know that Jewish guys have a
wimpy reputation. And they know that people [in porn] don't
necessarily respond to "I'll sue your pants off," because these people
[porn business owners] can always file bankruptcy. You can't get blood
out of a turnip, right? So instead, they do the strong-arm thing.
"I'll have your fucking legs broken, buddy." A lot of them [Jews in
porn] pretend to be Italian [Mafia types]. They affect the tan, gold
chains, big collars, steel grey hair and open shirts."
Porn-again Jews who wish to be Italian include Hollander, Lenny
Friedlander, and Paul Norman.
"The Mafia is a comfortable persona to hide behind," explains Wally,
"because then you're able to victimize women... It's your job. Genuine
Italians like John Stagliano don't draw on the Mafia phenomenon like
the posers do."
What values unite Eden, Alexandra Silk, Mila, Annie Sprinkle, C.J.
Laing and J.R. Carrington? Nice Jewish girls, they "love" to be fucked
in the ass.
Jewish anal queen archetype C.J. Laing blazed the trail later followed
by Sprinkle and company. Many of Laing's movies contain fisting and
bondage and hence didn't made it to video. CJ gets raped in Sex Wish,
1974, and Taking of Christina, 1975.
Newport Beach resident and Jewish mother JR Carrington provides for
her family by taking big thick ones up her every orifice.
Ambivalent about her work and wild life, she frequently leaves the
biz, only to return needing money.
One of the better results of plastic surgery, the big-breasted blonde
doesn't mind sucking down an unwashed penis immediately after it
pounded her in the ass. "Any porn queen worth her salt in the sex
drenched '90s is an anal queen," writes Jeremy Stone. "Sure, there's
your actresses in the adult movie industry, but they are so few and
far between that they don't turn up in enough videos to satisfy the
insatiable thirst the porn consumer has for ass fucking, dick sucking
dollies who don't say no and look straight into the camera as they
catch a copious pop shot in the kisser... No one personifies that
image more completely than JR Carrington... She's a non-stop ass
fuckee sure enough about her anal orgasmic potential that she makes
vaginal sex seem like a tedious form of foreplay. We love unloading to
her in many of her ass-bang best..." (AFW 96D.)
Carrington grew up in Newport Beach with rich, culturally conservative
Jewish parents. After her divorce in early 1994, JR lived in South
Lake Tahoe and regularly commuted to Reno to strip. Someone sent a
photo of her to Mark Carriere at Leisure Time and he invited her back
to Southern California. They dated regularly and eventually Carrington
spread her legs for the camera.
Beginning nude photography in the late 1950s, Ron Vogel's credits
include over 800 porno boxcovers and 1000 layouts in sex magazines,
including the first pictorials of Traci Lords and Ginger Lynn. Because
the soft-spoken photographer-gaffer rarely uses profanity or says or
does anything crude, Ron works with much of the new talent to ease
their journey into porn.
Born 10/7/31 to Jewish parents who later converted to Christianity,
Vogel grew up in San Francisco. Ron met his future wife Audry
Pomerantz at age 14. They dated for four years before eloping.
With the 1956 submission of color photos of his wife in a bikini to a
fledgling mens magazine published by Alan Stern, Ron entered the sex
business. In Audry's second shoot, published in Escapade, her nipples
pop into view.
Ron shot his first Playboy Playmate - Lari Laine - for the May 1958
issue and then shot another nine centerfolds for the magazine over the
next decade. Many of them appear in the 1979 Playboy issue that
features Ron's nude photos of his daughter Alexis.
"Father Knows Best," reads the headline. "Photographer Ron Vogel has
been snapping pictures of his daughter ever since she was a baby. At
21, she's still his favorite model."
Playboy displays a nude shot of three year old Lexi.
"Shortly after he began shooting for Playboy, Ron and his wife Audry
had a girl who soon began imitating the poses of the naked ladies in
her father's studio.
"Once," Audry recalls, "when Ron was shooting a Playmate, Lexi came
into the living room and said, 'You can shoot me now, Daddy.' She was
three at the time and she had nothing on, just long red curls down her
back. She just decided she was going to be shot in the nude, too. She
had the cutest little tush."
Over the years, Ron took "hundreds of pictures of Lexi in various
states of undress. She has youth and vitality greater than most of the
models I've worked with and her coloring is extraordinary; she has
earthy tones and dark penetrating eyes."
Lexi: "I was a ham. I'd try to get my dad's attention away from the
models."
As she grew into a woman, Lexi developed few inhibitions about posing
nude. "It's always been casual around here. We've always been a nudist
family, so I never had any problems posing that way for my father."
"Posing nude for me throughout the years has made Lexi very free about
herself," says Ron. "As a child, she was a good actress."
At the time of her Playboy pictorial, Ron and Lexi appeared on many
talk shows explaining their behavior. Many persons expressed concern
that nude photography violates a child's dignity and displays
incestous overtones.
Now married, Alexis runs Playboy's makeup department.
In 1959, Vogel worked his first "adult" movie set for the Ted Paramore
softcore flick Not Tonight, Henry. As the sex industry became
increasingly explicit, Ron moved with it, zooming in for the demanded
gynecological close-ups.
Ron and Audrey separated in 1976 and divorced in 1986.
After the effective legalization of porn production in California in
1989, Vogel built LA porn's first major studio now known as Trac Tech.
11/3/99
Greg Savitt writes to Luke:
Damn, dude - you got a comprehensive site. I especially like the
Jewish tangent, where you talk about sluts and studs of the tribe. It
always seemed to me that the orientation of every lasting society has
been superintended (some would say infested) by its Hebrew portion -
be it in communications, finance, etc. - so I find it within the norm
that Jesus' relatives should be in the cockpit of anal-bead
debauchery. Now 'fess up - you're a convert, so you probably have
comparisons - Jewish girls dent the bed, don't they. Hell, a
tight-twat, bad-girl Jewess like J.R. Carrington beats some pasty,
gingham-apron Baptist any day. There's got to be some greedy son of
Abraham out there who's willing to help me propel my secret, fervent
dream into 3-day rental reality: get this, Luke, an all-Jew-cast XXX
series. Yeah, Ron Jeremy, J.R., eveyone who's willing to reveal their
heritages and their asses (not in that order). Tell me this wouldn't
be the most popular video franchise in GrindLand . Do you think it's
viable? If I run out of Hannukah 'hos, I'll bring the old ones out of
retirement, run ads in the Valley, South Florida and Brooklyn. And you
know what? Gentiles are gonna lick these things up like ham juice. I
mean, who do you think buys
all those black videos and asian flicks... blacks and Asians? No way.
It's Joe Johnson who wants to see how people outside of Idaho and Iowa
fuck.
Also, triple-eXthnics serve his teenage geisha/concentration camp
commandant/border patrol/plantation owner fantasies. JewiX actors are
the best, anyway. All the others are damaged individuals and psychos
who were molested when they fourteen or have a crack hobby. Most Jews
are fucking talented, or are from well-to-do backgrounds - they're in
it because they wanna be nasty as hell, take it in the ass, and walk
off with something time-honored in their culture - money. Ugly,
stinkin' cash. And, as you've pointed out, the check-writers are among
their own - even better. The cycle is intact.
Johnathan, a Jew who graduated from Yale, writes Luke: Just wanted to
add that I appreciate what you're doing by mentioning Jewish
involvement in porn. The usual reaction is to stifle "negative"
comments because outsiders will view "us" in a bad light. If black
Americans, for example, could talk openly about their community
failings, they might actually improve.
I think it's terrible that so many Jews are in porn. It says bad
things about so-called secular Jews that their lack of involvement
with God - whatever the level of their involvment with tradition -
could lead them so far into what is obviously destructive to the
psychological and emotional health of the performers, producers, etc.
I say this as a reform Jew with a deep, abiding acceptance of God and
a reasoned understanding of tradition. One need not be Orthodox or,
God forbid, Haredim, but the absence of the central tenets of Judaism
from these peoples' lives is both sad and devastating.
David Segal writes Luke: "I read your section on Jews in porn, which I
found riveting, not to mention remarkably encyclopedic. I'm afraid I
can't add any original insights to the discussion there. My sense is
that Jews are disproportionately represented in just about every
money-making, entertainment-oriented enterprise and porn is simply no
exception. Don't forget that the Jews built Hollywood, ran all the
major studios and were the brains and financial muscle behind just
about every great film made before 1960. (Take at look at "An Empire
of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood" by the superb Neal
Gabler.) I'm not saying that Steve Hirsch is simply a latter-day,
lower rent version of David O. Selznick, but both of these gents are
businessmen making a buck by filming and then peddling fantasies to
the masses. In addition, Judaism never stigmatized sex the way it is
in some forms of Christianity."
Louie writes: "Hey Luke- LOVED your article about Jews in porn, you're
pursuing a sociological issue from a thoughtful and intelligent
perspective. The marginalization of Jews through both subtle and overt
anti-semitism is a clear connection to the subsequent discovery of
Jewish influence (disproportionate to pop.) in marginalized and
revolutionary fields. How ironic that the more society pisses on Jews,
the more Jews give back to society innovations of epic stature (not
Porn, heheheh), from Nobel Prize discoveries (I believe 1 in 5 Nobel
winners in the sciences is Jewish) to psychology (Freud), philosophy
(Spinoza) literature (Kafka) Film directing (Kubrick, Speilberg), etc.
etc. etc, the list goes on and on. Would that Jews were
accepted/embraced by non-Jews, my guess is a far less interesting race
of people (and I call Judaism a race intentionally).
"What I like about your writing is how you're NOT twisting this
approach as a slant to boost anti-semitism, as many do (ie: Jews have
too much power, lets look at "why" under the guise of sociological
critique, but really because we hate them), but to genuinely
understand better how our culture works. Porn being an extreme, yet
potent example. Anyway, excellent piece, I again salute you. You're
asking the questions that need to be asked, and are all too aware of
how dangerous words can be. Many will twist any view of Jews being
disproportionately successful towards hatred and accusions of
collusion, lying, dishonest business practice, manipulation, etc..
However the former can not be denied, and the latter must not be
tolerated. For example: Jews "run" Hollywood? Well, there are a lot of
Jewish people in Hollywood, but the two biggest powerholders are
Rupert Murdoch and Ted Turner. So I think not. It's convenient for the
bullshit sociology investigator to find what they "want" to see, ie:
Jews in hollywood in power, and overlook what they don't want to see.
It's the rocharch test of racism. Hold up any area of society
disproportionally filled with a minorty, see if people react to only
those examples matching their generalization."
Jewish Pimps Traffic In Christian Flesh
Amalek writes 9/99: I hear that Luke, one of the more painful things
that anyone can do is look at his own failings, whether as an
individual, or as a member of the larger group(s) to which he belongs.
And who better to point out one's shortcomings than one's enemies?
One of the most fanatically antisemitic organizations in the United
States today - and clearly the most dangerous, for reasons that I will
get into in a moment - is The National Alliance. It was founded, not
by some cracker inbreed from the deep south, but by a PhD physicist
named William Pierce, who also wrote "The Turner Diaries". This now
infamous book, written over 20 years ago, served as a template for the
terrorist cell known as "The Order," which was responsible for a
number of high-profile killings in the early 80's, as well as a number
of bank robberies; the book also inspired the Oklahoma City Federal
Building attack of a few years back. If you want to know what Pierce
would like to do to Jews and others not to his liking, read "The
Turner Diaries", and you will begin to see the thinking that animated
the architects of the Nazi death camps 60 years ago. Clearly this man
is NOT good For the Jews.
All of which makes the following commentary, taken from his web site,
that much more painful. I am a fairly well read fellow - no arrogance
or false modesty here - and can affirm that at least some of the
assertions he makes in the essay are correct. The media in this
country is, in fact, disproportionately Jewish (for example, the
recently announced merger of Viacom and CBS is merely the transfer of
media assets from one Jewish boss, Sumner Redstone, to another, Mel
Karmizan); and the media often do chose not to report the depredations
of non-whites on whites, even as they gleefully seize upon any
instance of white-on-black crime as proof of white racism in need of
further amelioration through affirmative action and the like. The
"Russian" mafia is, in fact, wildly disproportionately jewish (my
source for this is the disproportionately Jewish Village Voice, and
the excellent Jewish newspaper, The Forward, which every serious
student of the Jewish world should read for its unvarnished
reporting).
Russian-Jewish pimps are indeed trafficking in Christian flesh,
importing thousands of blond-haired, gentile girls into what is little
better than sexual slavery in Israel and Western Europe. (You are in a
better position than I to comment on the prevalence of Jews in
pornography, be it as intellectuals defending the practice, or as
practitioners.) They are bleeding Russia dry (although on this point,
I think Pierce is wrong to ignore the Communist-era nomentaclura of
non-Jewish descent who are doing the same) and god knows what they
will do when they get established here.
The Village Voice is a weekly publication that should be available at
your local or regional library; its articles on the "Russian" mafia
appeared (I think) in the last year. You may want to check out their
web site. The Forward has run stories on "White Slavery" and the
Russian/Jewish mafia also over the last year. Surely some jewish
library in the LA area has back issues of this weekly. You might want
to call them directly in New York to get particular dates.
Finally, the New York Times has run lengthy articles on the "Russian"
mafia and prostitution in Israel and Western Europe, however, I am
pretty sure that they did not identify the "Russians" as Jewish. On
the other hand, for the informed reader, the inference is there to be
had, for how, other than by the Law of Return, which applies only to
jews, could these characters have such unfettered access to Israel.
Finally, it bares noting that the vast, vast majority of russian jews
who settled here over the last few decades are smart, hard-working,
LAW ABIDING people. Whether the good that a majority of people do
outweighs the harm that a minority within that group may be
responsible for is, as always, an open question.
So, what are we to make of the assertions contained in the following
essay? Does the knowledge that its author REALLY wants literally to
kill every Jew on the face of the earth (pay heed to the last line of
the essay, Luke - he means it) suffice to disprove each and every
assertion that it contains?
American Dissident Voices Broadcast of September 11, 1999
Shuffling Toward the Slaughterhouse by Dr. William Pierce
Last week we talked about some specific examples of the way in which
the bosses of the controlled media deliberately give most Americans a
severely distorted perception of what is happening in the world around
them, of what is fashionable, and so on. In particular, I talked about
the crooked way in which the media bosses report interracial crime.
They heavily overemphasize any attacks on non-Whites by Whites and
minimize or ignore attacks on Whites by non-Whites. They do this in
order to create the false impression in the public's mind that most
interracial crime is White on non-White, whereas in fact exactly the
opposite is true. The reason the media bosses deliberately create this
false impression in the public mind is to generate a sense of racial
guilt in Whites, to keep them on the defensive in all matters relating
to race, to keep them off balance and confused as the non-White
assault on America continues through immigration and other means. The
aim is to persuade White Americans to give up their freedom -- their
freedom of speech, their freedom of association, their freedom to keep
and bear arms for self-defense -- in order to relieve their sense of
White guilt and gain a false sense of security by stamping out dissent
on racial matters. In summary, the aim of the media bosses in
distorting their coverage of the news is to silence and disarm White
Americans and keep them on the defensive.
And that is their aim because they are Jews, and they are reaching for
even more control than they already have. This is the historic modus
operandi of the Jews. They are outsiders everywhere except in Israel,
and when they first appear in any Gentile society and begin reaching
for power they are resisted. The society treats the Jews as outsiders,
as aliens, and attempts to keep them from gaining control. The Jewish
method of countering this opposition is to work quietly to accumulate
as much wealth as possible. At the same time they work to corrupt the
society's leaders with money and to sow dissension among the masses,
to set one social class against another, to break up the society's
solidarity and its cohesiveness, so that there will be less resistance
to their penetration of the society.
During the latter half of the 19th century and the first part of the
20th century fomenting class warfare has been their most successful
technique in Europe. In Russia, for example, they would have had
difficulty in corrupting the enormously wealthy aristocracy with
bribes, but their technique of fomenting class warfare succeeded in
destroying Russian society and letting the Jews seize control through
their Marxist movement. In the United States, on the other hand, where
the political leaders are essentially hucksters and lawyers and the
working class is relatively well off compared to Russia, the Jews have
had much more success with corruption than with their attempts to
foment classwarfare. Many people who have studied the history of
communism and have become aware of the enormously disproportionate
presence of Jews in that movement have come to the erroneous
conclusion that Jews are inherently communists.
The truth of the matter is that Jews are no more inherently communist
than they are inherently capitalist. Jews are inherently acquisitive,
ethnocentric, and cohesive, and they have a parasitic mode of
existence. They become communists when that serves their purpose of
breaking into a Gentile society and gaining control, and they become
capitalists when capitalism serves their purpose better than
communism.
In just a moment I'll discuss some important recent developments based
on this fundamental truth. First, however, I want to add a bit to our
discussion of last week. The Jews' aim, remember, is to destroy
Gentile solidarity, to sow confusion, to generate feelings of guilt,
to morally disarm White society so that it will be easy pickings, and
in the last half of the 20th century their principal weapon for this
purpose, more important than corruption or class warfare, has been
their control of the mass media of news and entertainment. For week
after week I've cited very specific evidence of the way in which they
use their control of the media to confuse and demoralize the White
public. Before I get to the new developments I mentioned, I just want
to bring you up to date with another example.
On August 13 a 50-year-old White man, Gregory Griffith, was beaten,
kicked, and stomped into a coma by a group of young Blacks in
Jacksonville, Florida. The Blacks had been standing around on the
sidewalk jiving among themselves, and they decided to kill the next
White person who came along. Gregory Griffith was it. Griffith died
from the stomping on August 26 in Jacksonville's University Medical
Center. Have you heard anything about this murder? I'll bet you
haven't, unless you live in the immediate vicinity of Jacksonville. Do
you think you would have heard anything if Griffith had been Black and
a group of White skinheads had decided to kill the next Black who came
down the sidewalk? I'll bet you wouldn't have heard anything but that
since August 13. It would have been on network television every single
night. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno and the head of every major Jewish
so-called "human rights" organization would have been on television
too, looking grim and waving a stern forefinger at us and lecturing us
about "White racism" and "hate crime."
You remember that last week I told you about the three Indians who
tied a rope around a White man's neck and dragged him behind their
pickup truck in South Dakota until they thought he was dead. There's
been very little media coverage of that dragging since then, and what
coverage there has been has consisted mainly of arguments as to why it
wasn't really a so-called "hate crime." In the Jacksonville case there
can be no doubt whatsoever. The arrested Blacks confessed to police
that they killed Griffith solely because he was White, that they had
agreed among themselves to kill the next White person who came down
the sidewalk. So don't expect to see anything about it on television.
They certainly wouldn't want to spoil all of the propaganda they're
planning for the upcoming trial in Bryan, Texas, of the second
defendant in last year's Jasper dragging case.
So you tell me, why do the Jewish media bosses do this sort of thing
if it's not for the purpose of keeping the White couch potatoes
feeling guilty and defensive about being White? Really, confusion and
moral disarmament and social breakdown are their purpose. Television
makes it much easier for them, but they were at it long before
television came along.
Let me read you something which has been a part of their tradition for
more than 2,700 years. This was written by one of the Jews' most
revered religious leaders, Isaiah. In the 19th chapter of the Book of
Isaiah he spelled out the formula the Jews always have used to break
up a Gentile society and gain control. Isaiah wrote: "And I will set
the Egyptians against the Egyptians, and they shall fight everyone
against his brother and everyone against his neighbor, city against
city and kingdom against kingdom. And the spirit of Egypt shall fail
in the midst thereof, and I will destroy the counsel thereof, and they
shall seek to the idols and to the charmers and to them that have
familiar spirits and to the wizards." That was the formula 2,700years
ago.
Now, for some new developments. I've told you on several earlier
broadcasts about the growing problem of Jewish organized crime in
America. So let me tell you again: it's still growing -- fast. This
problem is interesting to us far beyond the interest we might have in,
say, a resurgence of the Mafia. A resurgence of the Mafia would simply
be a crime story: interesting, but not absolutely critical for our
survival. The growth of Soviet-Jewish organized crime -- the
"Organizatsiya," they call it -- is interesting to us first, for the
same reason the non-reporting by the Jewish media of the racial murder
of Gregory Griffith in Jacksonville is interesting. The media bosses
simply do not like to talk about the Organizatsiya, despite the fact
that its operations in the United States already dwarf those of all
the other criminal organizations operating here.
When they do talk about Jewish organized crime they never refer to it
as "Jewish"; they always call it "Russian" organized crime. And you
know, this refusal to talk honestly about Jewish organized crime is
more than an attempt to protect their fellow Jews who happen to be
gangsters, just like the refusal to talk honestly about interracial
crime is more than an attempt to shield Black criminals. The real aim
in both cases is to maintain a false image, a false belief, which they
have created in the minds of most White Americans. In the case of
interracial crime the false belief is that in most interracial crimes
heterosexual White males are the offenders and non-Whites are the
victims. In the case of Jewish organized crime the false image is that
of the Jew as gentle and inoffensive, as more cultured and more moral
than his Gentile neighbors, and especially as a victim rather than as
an aggressor orpredator. We all read news stories occasionally about
rabbis caught smuggling drugs or laundering money, but the way they're
reported makes the offenders seem like exceptions to the rule of
Jewish rectitude and inoffensiveness.
However, when one looks closely at what Jewish organized crime has
done and is doing to Russia -- and what it is beginning to do to the
United States -- an entirely different image of the Jews and their
relationship to their hosts emerges. Let's look first at Russia. The
Organizatsiya literally runs the country. It is bleeding Russia of its
remaining wealth, pulling hundreds of billions of dollars out of the
country and stashing it in other countries. The rule in the Russian
government today is total corruption. The police know who the
gangsters are. The Russian Army and the Russian police could have
every organized criminal in Russia, from billionaire media mogul Boris
Abramovich Berezovsky on down, hanging from meat hooks within 48
hours, if they were permitted to act. But Russian President Boris
Yeltsin and the other politicians around him will not permit it.
Yeltsin protects the Organizatsiya, and the Organizatsiya supports and
enriches him.
Do you remember back in 1996 how the Clinton government was pushing as
hard as it could for Yeltsin's re-election? There were promises of
financial assistance for Russia if Yeltsin remained as president, and
hints that there would be none if he were defeated. And of course, the
big television networks in Russia were solidly behind Yeltsin. Today
much is made of the rivalry between media moguls Boris Berezovsky, who
controls the largest network, ORT, and Vladimir Gussinsky, who
controls NTV, the second largest. But in 1996 both ORT and NTV were
100 per cent for Yeltsin -- and of course, both Berezovsky and
Gussinsky are Jews. Gussinsky, in fact, is the titular head of
Russia's entire Jewishcommunity. In 1996 the big fear of the media
bosses and the Clintonistas here was that a genuine Russian patriot, a
Russian nationalist, might win. The Russian people, unfortunately,
don't seem to be much more perceptive or farsighted than the American
people, and the solid support of Russia's Jew-dominated television
plus the promise of more financial aid from America kept Yeltsin in
power -- or to be more accurate, Yeltsin remained in office, and the
Jewish gangsters around him remained in power.
Whenever any Russian official begins to make a move against the
gangsters, Yeltsin fires him and brings someone else in. And the
gangsters continue bleeding Russia dry at the rate of hundreds of
billions of dollars a year. The Central Intelligence Agency repeatedly
warned the Clinton administration that any financial aid money sent to
Russia with Yeltsin in office would end up in the hands of the Jewish
thieves who are effectively running the country. To the Clintonistas
so long as the thieves are Jewish, that's A-OK.
In September 1997 the Global Organized Crime Project at Washington's
Center for Strategic and International Studies released a report
titled "Russian Organized Crime." The Global Organized Crime Project
was headed by Judge William Webster, who formerly had headed both the
FBI and the CIA. Both Bill Clinton and Al Gore dismissed Webster's
report on organized crime in Russia, and other members of the Clinton
administration were ordered to ignore the report and the CIA's
warnings. Billions of dollars from the International Monetary Fund
kept pouring into Russia and into the hands of the Jewish thieves
around Boris Yeltsin. And the Russian people became poorer and
hungrier. The Jewish media in this country would have liked to have
kept the situation in Russia covered up, but the lid is beginning to
come off a bit now. Such huge sums of money are being taken out of
Russia by the Jews -- including most of the emergency aid provided by
the IMF -- and being laundered in Israel and America that people are
noticing.
The scandal involving the laundering by the Bank of New York and
BankBoston Corporation of tens of billions of dollars stolen from the
Russian people by Jewish crime bosses with the connivance of Boris
Yeltsin has made headlines recently, following an FBI sting operation
that the Clinton administration inadvertently failed to halt. The
stories about the massive money-laundering operation which appeared in
the New York Times and USA Today late last month referred to all of
the criminals as "Russians" rather than as "Jews," of course. You have
to read the Israeli papers like Ha'aretz and Yediot Ahronot to see
them identified as Jews. One would think that someone in the Congress
would insist on a full-scale Congressional investigation. I mean, here
is the Clinton administration solidly tied to massive international
corruption, tied to the impoverishment and destabilization of a
foreign nuclear power, tied to the bringing of racketeers and
racketeering money into the United States on a huge scale, and the
Clintonistas cannot claim that they didn't know, that they weren't
warned. What a wonderful campaign issue for the Republicans to use! So
why are all of the Republican politicians sitting on their hands and
pretending not to notice what's going on, just like the Democrats? Are
they trying to avoid embarrassing a bunch of crooked -- quote --
"Russians" -- unquote -- ? Hardly. Are they already on the take from
the Jewish crime bosses, like the Democrats are? Probably not -- yet.
But they all understand -- all of them -- that this is not a "Russian"
issue; it's a Jewish issue. They all understand that, and so they're
afraid to touch it.
What does this mean for our future? For one thing it means that the
Organizatsiya will continue building its presence in America. It's
already by far the largest and most dangerous criminal organization in
America, and it is now clear that America's government will not move
against it, and America's news media will not rouse the people against
it. The Jews have softened up America, have broken down American
society, have corrupted American institutions, to the point where
there will be almost no resistance to their further penetration and
takeover. No Republican politician, from George Bush, Jr., on down
will stand against them. Instead, the Republicans will have their
hands out for their share of the loot, just the way the Democrats do,
and just the way Boris Yeltsin does.
One difference between the behavior of the Jewish crime bosses
relative to America and their behavior relative to Russia that we will
see is that the Jews are pulling money out of Russia and bringing it
to the United States. They have bled Russia almost dry, but there's
still much blood to be sucked from America. America will be the next
center for Jewish organized crime.
And in America we'll be seeing much more of the viciousness and
violence with which these Jews operate, as they gain self-confidence
here: the same sort of murderous thuggery which characterizes their
presence in Russia, in Germany, and in other places where they
dominate criminal activity and where they butcher whole families with
the same callousness displayed by a slaughterhouse worker butchering a
herd of cattle. When they have trouble with some of their White slaves
-- with some of the girls they have forced into prostitution -- they
think nothing of slitting the throats of a dozen of them in order to
terrify the others back into submission. I mean, these girls are only
goyim, only shiksas, so why not treat them like the cattle they are?
For a while the FBI will carry on its investigations of the
Organizatsiya, and the CIA will issue its warnings, and there will be
stories in the New York Times about -- quote -- "Russian" -- unquote
-- gangsters, but by and large no real move will be made to stop them
or to warn the American people. The American political system already
has been corrupted beyond the point of no return, and the mass media
which are used to control the thinking and the behavior of the
American masses already are almost completely in Jewish hands.
Just to be on the safe side, however, the Jews are continuing to wrap
up a few loose ends in the area of media control. An example was the
takeover this week of CBS by Viacom and its boss Sumner Redstone. Not
that CBS wasn't already thoroughly Jewish, but there was always the
danger that some very rich Gentile maverick might try to buy it and
change its flavor. Now it's safely in the hands of the Jewish media
boss who gave us MTV, Sumner Redstone.
To reiterate: the classic Jewish technique for infiltrating and
softening up a Gentile society so that it can be taken over is
reaching its final stages in America. No mainstream American
institution will put up any substantial resistance to the completion
of this process -- not the government, not the Christian churches, not
the military leadership, and certainly not the mass media. All have
been corrupted or taken over. And the American people will continue
shuffling meekly toward the slaughterhouse so that the beast can drain
the last drop of blood from them. Just as they were afraid to speak
out against the massive non-White immigration which has changed the
racial complexion of America for fear of being called "racists," so
will they also remain silent and non-resisting as Jewish organized
crime spreads its tentacles over America for fear of being called
"anti-Semitic." If the beast is to be killed, we'll have to do it
ourselves.
9/23/99
Porno's Untapped Pedagogical Value
Amalek writes: Luke, a snippet of dialogue on your web site today
suggests certain business possiblities: "Luke: "Do you think Hitler
was wrong?" Kendra Jade: "No... I probably would've dated him. My
horrible taste in men.""
This suggests an entire line of educational porn videos, in which porn
stars have fictional meetings with various figures from history and
make sweet romantic love to them (to appeal to the women), while the
men lecture them on their role in history. This could be an entire new
genre of porn, not involving spitting, slapping, or the like,
something edgey Gen-Xers and Y-ers, ever on the lookout for the hip
and the ironic, as well as the hanky crowd could appreciate as porn
for Smart Hip Intelligent Trendoids (SHIT, for short). S.H.I.T. would
really go for this stuff.
If only I had not been raised as I had been, and had more balls, I
would move out to the coast and immediately begin production of this
line of videos. I am certain that I could sell the entire line to all
the public schools that give away condoms to their students. Hey,
maybe this is the scam I need to hook up with that heretofore mythical
disease-free porn queen! Can you find me one of them with intellectual
pretensions equal to or greater than my own who would act in such a
video? (Maybe by trolling the co-eds at UCLA?) My identity suitably
hidden with masks and makeup, I might consider being the male star of
some of them.
Among the possible titles:
"My Dinner with Adolf"
"Das Kapital und die Hookeiren"
"Capitalism and Freedom and Three Nymphos" (Of course, you will
recognize that the subjects of two of these initial three videos are
jews, but lets keep that under our yarmulkes.)
Luke, the following is not for publication...
Luke: Can I quote you anonymously?
Amalek: OK - but please use the some-what edited down version. I
frankly feel somewhat uneasy having this much communication with the
people who read your web site (unless it enables me to hook up with
the mythical CDC/NIH-approved adult virgin porn chick), few of whom
can possibly have any interest in anything that I have written to you.
Luke, I note that from time-to-time you fairly taunt the Jews of Porn
(JOPs, who overlap not at all with JAPs) about their yiddishkeit or
lack thereof, and the possible consequences to other jews of their
deeds. I seldom see any response from the JOPs. Is this because they
are conveyed to you in private, or because there are no responses to
pass on?
And what about the so-called intellectual JOPs, like some of those
older JOPs whose names escape me, (wasn't one of them in Boogie
Nights, and then there is that other one - Nina Hartley? who is a
self-described communist, according to an interview she gave a few
years back to Shmatte Magazine.) - do they ever address this issue? Or
do they assume that the dumb goyim (DG's) will never find out, so that
it need never be addressed?
Please keep up the good work of rubbing everyone's collective nose in
it. (You should legally change your name to Luke Schpielberg and then
give unauthorized talks on this topic in Liberal Establishment Temples
throughout the LA area.)
Luke: Most of the Jews in porno are highly uncomfortable with it being
pointed out that they are jews and that these jewish goyim dominate
porno...They are like the jews in hollywood... Nina Hartley does
discuss it articulately and some others do too at times.
Chaim Amalek writes: Luke: Will the constant ravaging of Christian
girls by swarthy, often diseased, middle aged Jewish atheists turn
public opinion against die Juden? Ask yourself - did the
disproportionate role played by Jews (Boesky, Milliken, Levine, etc.)
in the great Wall Street scams of the 80's turn the hearts of the
goyim against the Jews? NO! And why not? Easy - because Jews have
control over the very media that might otherwise have drawn attention
to the disproportionate presence of Jews among the guilty. (CBS,
Viacom, Disney, ABC, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington
Post, Time Warner - all headed by Jews, all disproportionately staffed
by Jews). Also, Jews are smart enough, with enough group cohesion, to
know that it would be a bad thing for the goyim to learn the ethnic
identity of those involved. For this reason discussions of porners
(and I often wish I was one - blow jobs on the job? Where do I sign
up!) seldom mention that these malefactors are disproportionately
Jewish, just as Jewish criminal gangs from the old USSR are usually
referred to as "Russian" instead of Jewish.
Of course, maybe it is for the best that the goyim don't know. Suppose
they knew - what good would come of it? Would other Jews, 99.9% of
whom are not remotely involved such activity, move to exert pressure
on their benighted brethren to change their ways and return to god?
Maybe, but so what? Even if they did act, it would have little effect.
Most Jewish criminals and sleazoids are secular and just do not give a
shit. So nothing good would come of it, and quite possibly a lot that
is very bad.
Luke, you know that individual Jews used their influence to get the
Romans to kill Jesus Christ (believed by hundreds of millions of
people to be their personal lord and savior), invented communism,
Freudian philosophy, created havoc in the middle east through their
meddling, and are responsible, through the actions of a few Jews, for
much of the social decay in the west (as Hitler himself noted and you
presently observe) as well as most bad television. Why then do you
continue seek acceptance as a Jew? Why not go Mormon (Mormon chicks
are REALLY hot, if somewhat clueless), or catholic or Wiccan or
Scientologist?
PS - If you were a producer of porn, and chose to suffer the social
marginalization that that entailed, wouldn't you seek compensation by
getting laid with the paid help? (Actually, I may have described your
present position in life.) The moral problem of making porn is making
porn, and not in then treating women who copulate for money as though
they were prostitutes. After all, aren't they?
Luke Too Many Jews
Shivon Tuoni at Larry Flynt Publications writes Luke: Are there too
many Jews on porn? As far as I can tell, there's just one too
many—and, truth be told, that person isn't even a real Jew. Know who
I'm talking about? It's you, you pathetic excuse for a human being. So
do yourself a favor and take your girlie little pistol ( a real man
would choose a Glock 9mm. or a Colt .45 and not the pathetic snubnose
.38 you've chosen), load the chamber, stick the barrel in your mouth
or up your ass (two orifices which I'm sure have received other long,
hard objects) and pull the fuckin' trigger. With any luck, you'll be
dead by morning.
Anonymous writes: Dear Mr. Ford: There are a few themes which appear
repeatedly on your web page that I'd like to comment on.
1. You are preoccupied with Jewish pornographers who have sex with the
actresses. You, yourself, do exactly the same thing. Specifically, you
have sex with the actresses when they make themselves available to
you. How are you any different from the people you excoriate on your
web page? The only difference seems to be that you get on a soap box
and tell people you abhor pornography. Yet your conduct is not
different, in any meaningful way, from those whom you criticize. Is
that not so? [Luke: True.]
2. You allege that Jews dominate the pornography industry. Even if
this were true, there can't be more than 200 pornographers out of a
Jewish U.S. population of 5,000,000. Thus, your reporting creates a
twisted image of a people.
I receive newsletters from the Southern Poverty Law Foundation. Their
newsletters track racist neo-nazi groups, and describe the racist
propaganda published by these groups. They encourage wackos who then
go out and shoot up Jewish community centers and the like. Why do you
do their propagandizing work for them? Don't you think that's a tad
bit irresponsible?
One could argue that Jews dominate certain fields, for example, comedy
(e.g. Charlie Chaplain, the Three Stooges, Henny Youngman, the Marx
Brothers, Woodie Allen, Seinfeld, Mel Brooks, Milton Berle, etc.) Are
we an ethnic group of stand-up comics? Are we an ethnic group of
physicists (Einstein, Curie, Bohr, Feynman, Teller)? Classical
musicians (Itzhak Perlman, Isaac Stern, Philip Glass, Leonard
Bernstein, etc.)? What a bizarre picture of an ethnic group you could
paint. You paint an unfair, dangerous and irresponsible picture, sir.
Why the Jews?
Before Luke Ford reveals the true reason people hate Jews, he will
first dismiss the fraudulent reasons frequently offered.
Luke will summarize and quote from the excellent book by Dennis Prager
and Rabbi Joseph Telushkin, Why the Jews? The Reason For Antisemitism:
For nearly all of Jewish history people recognized that antisemitism
was a reaction to the Jews and Judaism. But today Jew-hatred is
generally attributed to factors having little to do with Jews and
Judaism. The causes of antisemitism are generally held to be
economics, political use of the Jews as scapegoats, general ethnic
prejudice, the psychopathology of hate, and human irrationality - all
of which dejudaize Jew-hatred.
Among those most committed to these dejudaizing interpretations of
Jew-hatred are secular and non-Jewish Jews [the Jews of porn] who are
committed to the notion that Jews are not essentially different from
all other people. Accordingly, they want to believe that antisemitism
is but another form of bigotry, that it is not permanent, that in the
secular world it will die out, that there are no rational reasons for
Jew-hatred, and/or that antisemitism is a sickness...
* Scapegoats... That Jews are merely convenient targets for a society
in trouble... Yes Jews have been used as scapegoats but that does not
explain Jew hatred. Why the Jews?
* Economics. Because Jews are rich. But then why not hate all rich
people? And not hate poor Jews? For instance, Jews were not hated
because they lent money. They lent money because they were hated.
* Psychology. While there is little doubt that Adolf Hitler and many
of his associates were psychologically disturbed, this fact did not
cause antisemitism, let alone the Holocaust. Were the tens of millions
of Germans and other Europeans who supported Nazi antisemitism also
sick? Did tens of millions of Christians in medieval Europe hate Jews
because they were sick? Is Soviet antisemitism a funciton of some
psychosis? Is the Muslim world pathological because it wants the
Jewish state destroyed?
The ultimate cause of Jew hatred is that which makes Jews Jewish -
Judaism.
For thousands of years Judaism has consisted of three components: God,
Torah, and Israel; that is, the Jewish (conception of) God, Jewish
law, and Jewish nationhood. Jews' allegiance to any of these
components has been a major source of antisemitism because it has
rendered the Jew an outsider, and most important, it has been regarded
by non-Jews (often correctly) as challenging the validity of the
non-Jews god(s), law(s), and/or national allegiance.
By affirming the one and only God of all mankind, thereby denying
legitimacy to everyone else's gods, the Jews entered history at war
with other people's most cherished values. The Jews compounded this
hostility by living by their own all-eoncompassing laws in addition to
or even instead of the laws of their non-Jewish neighbors. And by
continually asserting their own national identity in addition to or
instead of the national identity of the non-Jews among whom they
lived, Jews have created hatred of Jews.
From its earliest days Judaism's reason for being has been to change
the world for the better, (in the words of the ancient prayer Aleinu)
"to perfect the world under the rule of God." This attempt to change
the world, and to challenge the gods, religious or secular, of the
societies around them, and to make moral demands upon others (be it
through Judaism, communism, feminism, etc) has constantly pissed off
non-Jews.
Judaism also holds that the Jews were specially chosen by God to
improve the world.
As a result of Jews living Judaism, they have led higher quality lives
than their non-Jewish neighbors. Jews have nearly always been better
educated; Jewish family life has usually been far more stable; Jews
aided one another more than their non-Jewish neighbors helped each
other; and Jews have been far less likely to become drunk, beat their
wives, abandon their children...
Chaim Amalek writes about anti-Semitism: Well, to quote Al Goldstein
associate Steve Gruber (who was, probably unknowingly, quoting a mayor
of Vienna from Hitler's time there - Karl something or another), its
"Hating the jews more than they deserve to be hated."
But why hate them at all? One explanation may simply be racial/tribal.
Jews are a race, which immediately places them in the minority
wherever they go (outside of Israel, Manhattan, and Hollywood). Human
beings being tribal, he who is not of my tribe is a potential
competitor/enemy. Add to this the fact that despite the fondest wishes
of Hollywood jews, we are not all alike - jews are different.
It is an empirical fact that jews have higher I.Q.s than other racial
groupings (e.g., negroes, central American indians, the Aboriginal
people of Australia). And this is itself a source of trouble. You see,
as a highly intelligent race, Jews inevitably come to become a
disproportionate presence in every field of interest to them that is
open to them, be it banking, porn, media, law, financial crime, etc.
Jews also become a disproportionate presence in the great intellectual
movements of the day, left or right, and sometimes (as in Russia
during the Trotsky years - ask your communist jewish friend Nina
Hartley about it) with horrific results. All of this is certainly
going to piss off lots of gentiles on the outside looking in. This is
the sort of anger that Patrick Buchanan is playing off of when he
suggests affirmative action for white christians at Harvard. Jews and
Asians, although together making up only 5% of the total population of
the U.S.A., make up about 60% of the undergraduate enrollment at
Harvard. Add to that the slots reserved for favored racial minorites,
and it is simple arithmetic that white gentiles MUST be severely
under-represented at Harvard.
At this time in history, Jews have enough power in the media to
prevent an honest discussion of these issues, but that power won't
last forever, given high jewish rates of assimilation and the very low
birth rates of secular jews. At some point in the 21st century, the
demographic map of America will have tipped to the point that
sufficient numbers of people who do not give a damn about jews or the
lessons of the holocaust will come to dominate once again, and we will
be in for a new bout of antisemitism, directed against a much smaller
jewish population.
PS You are dead right about the almost comical reaction of many jews
to Christian prosletyzers, a reaction I do not see from the rank and
file of the really relgious (except regarding "Jews for Jesus", who
are engaged in a bit of intellectual fraud via their very name). I
think what scares these people so is that having failed to make the
case for being jewish, they are terrified at the sight of competitive
theologies making the case for not being jewish. And a loss of
adherents translates directly into a loss of power, which is what this
is really about.
You know Luke, you are fast approaching a cross-roads in your life
with this Jewish stuff. Either you will come to see that Jews are
responsible for much that is bad in the world and flee the faith and
its people in a vain attempt to rid your soul of what you will come to
regard as their moral stink, or you will abandon porn, go to
rabbinical school, and become a fire-breathing reformer (not a
"reform" rabbi!), a jewish Martin Luther (so sorely needed by this
moribund, ossified faith).
PPS - If you feel the urge to post this stuff on the web, then you
really should set up a web site more suitable to the discussion than
one that often seems centered on very weird pet stories.
5/26/00
Jews In Porn
Luke: "Is it tough being a non-Jew in a Jew dominated business?"
Mike South: "You want to know the truth Luke? It is a pain in the ass
getting all these Jew cocksuckermotherfuckers to pay me on time."
Chaim: I then warned you that there would be repercussions to such
hate on the web. Hate is bad. Hate must not go unchallenged. Lawyers
are engaged, faxes are being sent - more later. Until then, make
yourself a gut yontif. The Jewish persons at the ADL are nothing if
not vigilant in the war against hate on the internet. They have
responded to your viciously antisemitic canard in advance of the
sabbath. (That you continue to publish such filth tells us all we need
to know about the validity of your "conversion.")
From the Anti-Defamation League:
Alleged Jewish 'Control' of the American Sex Industry
For centuries, anti-Semitic propaganda has demonized the Jew as a
conspiratorial, manipulative outsider, often with powers and designs
of world domination. From the Middle Ages through the Holocaust,
fabricated accusations against Jews as poisoners and corrupters have
led to horrendous suffering for the Jewish people.
In more recent years, the anti-Semitic notion of Jew as corruptor of
the world through mastery of popular culture as resurfaced across the
extremist spectrum in discussions of pornography and prostitution.
Contemporary sexual anxieties and distrust of national cultural elites
have given new life to this timeworn myth. The world of sexual
politics is an area of complexity, if not mystery, to most Americans,
and confusions can easily be manipulated and suspicions aroused. The
bigot's rationale is often conveyed in inflated images of intricate,
stealthy "conspiracies.
Indeed, for the better part of this century, anti-Semites have alleged
that American Jews have conspired with their co-religionists to
"control" the pornography and prostitution industries in the United
States and Europe. (Indeed, one of the first to make this lurid
accusation was Adolf Hitler in "Mein Kampf".)
The assertion that Jews "control" pornography, or Hollywood generally,
the media, banking and finance, among other things, is an anti-Semitic
canard which dates back more than 70 years to an anti-Jewish campaign
waged in the 1920s by the Dearborn Independent, a long-defunct
publication backed by the late industrialist Henry Ford Sr. The
Dearborn Independent had mounted a seven-year anti-Semitic campaign
based on the notorious and fraudulent book, The Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion.
(In 1927, and again in 1942, Ford apologized to the American Jewish
community for the harm done by his newspaper's campaign. Since then,
the Ford family and the Ford Motor Company have engaged in numerous
projects and endeavors in the public interest that have been
supportive of Jewish concerns.)
Conspiracy Theory Persists
To the present day, anti-Semites have continued to allege that Jews
are engaged in a conspiracy to "control" pornography. Indeed, the
Dearborn Independent's anti-Jewish writings continue to be circulated
by anti-Semitic entities such as Liberty Bell Publications under the
title The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem.
Even a reputable British magazine in 1994 revived the stereotype of
Hollywood in which an alleged "Jewish cabal" controls the industry.
The article, in The Spectator, authored by William Cash, a Hollywood
correspondent for the conservative British newspaper The Daily
Telegraph, contended that Jews have created an "invidious and
protective culture" that denies employment to non-Jews in the making
and distribution of pornography.
The Anti-Defamation League expressed outrage at the article, saying
that it raised the age-old canard of Jewish control and conspiracy and
was reminiscent of classic anti-Semitic propaganda of the past hundred
years.
"Those Jews who enter the pornography industry have done so as
individuals pursuing the American dream, not as representatives of
their religious group," commented ADL National Director Abraham H.
Foxman. "Moreover, anti-semites never seem to take note of the fact
that the most prominent pornographers in America are Hugh Hefner and
Larry Flynt, neither of whom is the least bit Jewish. Finally, though
individual Jews may play a role in pornography, Jewishness does not."
In fact, the pornography industry is controlled by consumers of
pornography through the market place, which is 98% gentile.
While statistics and studies on the subject are not readily available,
the Anti-Defamation League believes that the recitation of numbers and
percentages is not the answer to the false charges of Jewish "control"
of the sex industry, or, indeed, of similar accusations involving the
media, banking, finance and other businesses. Reliance on statistics
alone plays into the hands of anti-Semites. Generally, Jews involve
themselves in non-religious and non-political activity as individuals,
not as Jews. ADL takes the position that the number of Jews involved
in a particular field bears no relationship to "Jewish power" or
"Jewish control" of that industry. ADL does not accept the notion that
Jews in any field act in concert with other Jews similarly situated
simply because they happen to be Jewish. To believe otherwise is to
accept a conspiracy theory that is the anti-Semites' stock-in-trade
and relegates Jews to a kind of second-class citizenship.
In other words, American Jews have as much right as any other citizens
of the United States to work in the pornography trade, in the banking
industry, and in any other profitable businesses. Moreover, it bears
repeating that those Jews who involve themselves in the sex industry
do so as individuals, not as representatives of their religious group
or with an aim to act in some coordinated conspiratorial manner.
The charge that "Jews control the production of pornography" is a
classic example of the hatemonger's paranoid-style exploitation of
legitimate concerns — in this case, the nation's moral health.
Moreover, the wide appeal of this anti-Semitic conspiracy theory among
all kinds of extremists strikingly demonstrates how the agendas of
otherwise opposing hate groups meet on common ground: the scapegoating
of Jews.