This is funny
christian miller at his best
You've just posted a binary to a non-binary newsgroup, a serious
violation of internet protocol, and can be justified as a reason for
Deja News to not archive anything from rec.org.mensa, and possible
negative repercussions could result from servers that carry this
newsgroup as well.
Due to his violation, your abuse department has been notified.
A full copy of your post is included.
Gareth Gee wrote:
>
> Look at Miller!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
--
| TJ "Spark" Miller jr.
n Formerly of the 37th TFW, USAF. _\/^\/_
___[(_)]___Now residing in the heart of the Ozarks.___/[]/_\[]\___
o O o * * *
____________________________________________________
"My center gives way, my right is pushed back, situation excellent;
I am attacking." -Ferdinand Foch
____________________________________________________
"War is the realm of chance. No other human activity gives it
greater scope; no other has such incessant and varied dealings with
this intruder. Chance makes everything more uncertain and
interferes with the whole course of events"
-Karl Von Clausewitz
[...]
: Gareth Gee wrote:
: >
: > Look at Miller!
: >
: > ---------------------------------------------------------------
: > [Image]
"Hey, I just made a funny picture of this guy I want to get back at
for saying I can't write well, so I want you to log on and then get to
this URL, then download this thing, and then you'll see a funny picture
of this guy that I made so I could get back at him and..."
Good. Delayed indirect third-party flames, thrice removed.
Your victim will only be able to notice they've been attacked if they're
psychic and have an extremely large amount of free time with nothing to
do.
When I reviewed your writing via e-mail, God only knows how much of a
tantrum you would have had if I'd seen this last lame-assed flame attempt
of yours.
--
_________________________________________________
________ _____ ______
__ ____/______ ______________ __ /____ /_
_ / __ _ __ `/__ ___/_ _ \_ __/__ __ \
/ /_/ / / /_/ / _ / / __// /_ _ / / /
\____/ \__,_/ /_/ \___/ \__/ /_/ /_/
http://www.j-sltd.demon.co.uk/
The idiots of rec.org.mensa!
Check this out
http://www.j-sltd.demon.co.uk/rom.htm
Yeah and I'm not ever going to let you forget that either. No matter
what internet provider I'm on I'm never going to forget you!
This is comming from the guy with boyfriend who believes in myths!
: Yeah and I'm not ever going to let you forget that either. No matter
: what internet provider I'm on I'm never going to forget you!
That makes him a hell of a lot different than punctuation, spelling,
grammar and post construction.
: This is comming from the guy with boyfriend who believes in myths!
You should preface all your posts.
It's heartwarming the way these relationships get started
on usenet.
_____________________________________________________________________________
|Respectfully, Sheila ~~~Word Warrior~~~ gr...@pipeline.com|
|Obligatory tribute to the founding fathers of the United States of America:|
| This is not to be read by anyone under 18 years of age, who should read up|
| on history and the First Amendment to the Constitution, as an alternative.|
| *Animals, including humans, fart, piss, shit, masturbate, fuck and abort.*|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is typical of the iron lady to twist peoples words. A bit better
than some of the shit you write!
And you should have a wash, you stink!
Don't you blather Gmark, what's that ringing in my eyes ... oh just
another Gmark.
>(->~*^W/ord-W/ArrioR!^*~<-) wrote:
>> Gareth Gee <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk>attests to his
>> undying, eternal devotion to his idol Spark:
>> > ... No matter
>> >what internet provider I'm on I'm never going to forget you!
>> It's heartwarming the way these relationships get started
>> on usenet.
>... A bit better
>than some of the shit ...
"Make new friends, but keep the old;
one is silver and the other's gold."
Sheila sent Garetthsp mail?
Sheila, I'm jealous.
>Technical Support wrote:
>> Gareth Gee wrote:
>> > (->~*^W/ord-W/ArrioR!^*~<-) wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Gareth Gee <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk>attests to his
>> > > undying, eternal devotion to his idol Spark:
>> > > > ... No matter
>> > > >what internet provider I'm on I'm never going to forget you!
>> > >
>> > > It's heartwarming the way these relationships get started
>> > > on usenet.
>> > >
>> >
>> > This is typical of the iron lady to twist peoples words. A bit better
>> > than some of the shit you write!
>>
>> Sheila sent Garetthsp mail?
>Sheila, I'm jealous.
Don't be. I don't email =anyone=; I use
my accounts to let students turn in their
assignments, and little else.
Don'y listen to that bullshit,
she's a liar, she invites students
into her house and sexually abuses them.
Well, she need some sort of sexual outlet.
Shelly before you alter this last line let me
do it for you ....
... need some ... sexual outlet.
It still aplies to you however.
--
_________________________________________________
________ _____ ______
__ ____/______ ______________ __ /____ /_
_ / __ _ __ `/__ ___/_ _ \_ __/__ __ \
/ /_/ / / /_/ / _ / / __// /_ _ / / /
\____/ \__,_/ /_/ \___/ \__/ /_/ /_/
http://www.j-sltd.demon.co.uk/
"What a load of Spallone!"
Perhaps ....
>-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> Technical Support <ste...@innographx.com> wrote:
>> >Sheila sent Garetthsp mail?
>> You must be joking.
>Perhaps ....
So you claim.
>-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>>
>> Spark The Heretic <tjmi...@nwark.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Technical Support wrote:
>> >> Gareth Gee wrote:
>> >> > (->~*^W/ord-W/ArrioR!^*~<-) wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Gareth Gee <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk>attests to his
>> >> > > undying, eternal devotion to his idol Spark:
>> >> > > > ... No matter
>> >> > > >what internet provider I'm on I'm never going to forget you!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > It's heartwarming the way these relationships get started
>> >> > > on usenet.
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> > This is typical of the iron lady to twist peoples words. A bit better
>> >> > than some of the shit you write!
>> >>
>> >> Sheila sent Garetthsp mail?
>>
>> >Sheila, I'm jealous.
>>
>> Don't be. I don't email =anyone=; I use
>> my accounts to let students turn in their
>> assignments, and little else.
>Don'y listen to that bullshit,
You can't prove otherwise.
I've certainly never emailed you.
You list your problems, but not
succinctly enough:
>... a liar...
>... sexually abuses ...
>Shelly
Posting to your imaginary friends
makes you look silly.
>It still aplies
You can, after all, only speak for yourself.
As you do.
I wouldn't violate protocol to prove this but
you know the truth, you've emailed me loads
of times.
> You list your problems, but not
> succinctly enough:
> >... a liar...
> >... sexually abuses ...
> >Shelly
>
> Posting to your imaginary friends
> makes you look silly.
>
Shelly's refering to her halucinations due to not
taking her medication. We've been through this loads
of times, it's getting rather boring now.
> >It still aplies
>
> You can, after all, only speak for yourself.
>
>
True but in your case it's better to have an adult
to speak for you.
>-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
Go ahead: violate any 'protocol' you want,
but I've never emailed you and you have
no email from me.
If you can't identify a forgery, get someone
to show you how.
>> You list your problems, but not
>> succinctly enough:
>> >... a liar...
>> >... sexually abuses ...
>> >Shelly
>> Posting to your imaginary friends
>> makes you look silly.
>Shelly's refering to her halucinations due to not
>taking her medication. We've been through this loads
>of times, it's getting rather boring now.
Your imaginary friends have hallucinations:
perhaps that's the only reason =you= exist.
>> >It still aplies
>> You can, after all, only speak for yourself.
>True but in your case it's better to have an adult
>to speak for you.
Substantiation unspecified; fallacious regardless.
>-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> "Gareth \"the gink\" Gee" <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> >> Technical Support <ste...@innographx.com> wrote:
>> >> >Sheila sent Garetthsp mail?
>> >> You must be joking.
>> >Perhaps ....
>> So you claim.
>As you do.
Substantiation unspecified; fallacious regardless.
Good try. I don't think so some how.
> but I've never emailed you and you have
> no email from me.
>
Liar!
> If you can't identify a forgery, get someone
> to show you how.
>
Don't try to wriggle out of this one Miss Tub of Lard.
> >> You list your problems, but not
> >> succinctly enough:
> >> >... a liar...
> >> >... sexually abuses ...
> >> >Shelly
> >> Posting to your imaginary friends
> >> makes you look silly.
> >Shelly's refering to her halucinations due to not
> >taking her medication. We've been through this loads
> >of times, it's getting rather boring now.
>
> Your imaginary friends have hallucinations:
> perhaps that's the only reason =you= exist.
>
You've sent me 9 emails over the last 3 months.
> >> >It still aplies
> >> You can, after all, only speak for yourself.
> >True but in your case it's better to have an adult
> >to speak for you.
>
> Substantiation unspecified; fallacious regardless.
>
Stop lying!
--
_________________________________________________
________ _____ ______
__ ____/______ ______________ __ /____ /_
_ / __ _ __ `/__ ___/_ _ \_ __/__ __ \
/ /_/ / / /_/ / _ / / __// /_ _ / / /
\____/ \__,_/ /_/ \___/ \__/ /_/ /_/
http://www.j-sltd.demon.co.uk/
"Neuron = Moron = Neuro-Nerd!"
As you do ...
Damn Shiela, he reacted just like some little kid caught in a lie... A
whole bunch of ahining and squealing with absolutely no basis in fact
whatsoever, although the abuse thing sounds like fun; where do I sign up
for this class ~;)
Then Gareth cuts his own electronic throat with this line:
>
> ... need some ... sexual outlet.
Amazing.
>-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> "Gareth \"the gink\" Gee" <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> >> "Gareth \"the gink\" Gee" <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> >-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> >> >> Technical Support <ste...@innographx.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >Sheila sent Garetthsp mail?
>> >> >> You must be joking.
>> >> >Perhaps ....
>> >> So you claim.
>> >As you do.
>> Substantiation unspecified; fallacious regardless.
>As you do ...
You really need to learn how to use software.
I've never emailed you and you couldn't post
proof to the contrary if your life depended
on it. So you're just a liar is all.
Too bad for you.
>-->Smelly Fat Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> "Gareth \"the gink\" Gee" <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> >> "Gareth \"the gink\" Gee" <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> >-->Word Warrior<-- wrote:
>> >> >> Spark The Heretic <tjmi...@nwark.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >Technical Support wrote:
>> >> >> >> Gareth Gee wrote:
>> >> >> >> > (->~*^W/ord-W/ArrioR!^*~<-) wrote:
>> >> >> >> > > Gareth Gee <Gar...@j-sltd.demon.co.uk>attests to his
>> >> >> >> > > undying, eternal devotion to his idol Spark:
>> >> >> >> > > > ... No matter
>> >> >> >> > > >what internet provider I'm on I'm never going to forget you!
>> >> >> >> > > It's heartwarming the way these relationships get started
>> >> >> >> > > on usenet.
>> >> >> >> > This is typical of the iron lady to twist peoples words. A bit better
>> >> >> >> > than some of the shit you write!
>> >> >> >> Sheila sent Garetthsp mail?
>> >> >> >Sheila, I'm jealous.
>> >> >> Don't be. I don't email =anyone=; I use
>> >> >> my accounts to let students turn in their
>> >> >> assignments, and little else.
>> >> >Don'y listen to that bullshit,
>> >> You can't prove otherwise.
>> >> I've certainly never emailed you.
>> >I wouldn't violate protocol to prove this but
>> >you know the truth, you've emailed me loads
>> >of times.
>> Go ahead: violate any 'protocol' you want,
>Good try. I don't think so some how.
You can't put up, so you might as well shut up.
>> but I've never emailed you and you have
>> no email from me.
>Liar!
I guess you are. I hadn't thought that of you.
>> If you can't identify a forgery, get someone
>> to show you how.
>Don't try to wriggle out of this one Miss Tub of Lard.
Those who have seen me know I'm slim.
Those who don't get email from me
couldn't post any regardless.
>> >> You list your problems, but not
>> >> succinctly enough:
>> >> >... a liar...
>> >> >... sexually abuses ...
>> >> >Shelly
>> >> Posting to your imaginary friends
>> >> makes you look silly.
>> >Shelly's refering to her halucinations due to not
>> >taking her medication. We've been through this loads
>> >of times, it's getting rather boring now.
>> Your imaginary friends have hallucinations:
>> perhaps that's the only reason =you= exist.
>You've sent me 9 emails over the last 3 months.
I've never sent you any email at all.
>> >> >It still aplies
>> >> You can, after all, only speak for yourself.
>> >True but in your case it's better to have an adult
>> >to speak for you.
>>
>> Substantiation unspecified; fallacious regardless.
>Stop lying!
I'm not.
If you can't identify header information,
that's your problem.
You're a liar and and slag!
The empty claim is yours.
That is useless to you.