Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Which is correct: "names list" , "name's list" or "names-list"?

3,554 views
Skip to first unread message

derek...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jan 17, 2001, 11:36:11 AM1/17/01
to
Which of the following is a correct rephrase of "list of
names": "names list" or "name's list"? I would think the latter is not
correct given that the "names" do not possess the list; the plural
noun "names" is being used as an adjective to describe the list, or
perhaps it should be a compound noun, "names-list"? Can someone point
me to a reference for the correct usage so I can settle a friendly
dispute with a colleague?


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

Alan Jones

unread,
Jan 17, 2001, 1:58:05 PM1/17/01
to

<derek...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:944hlq$3mv$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
"Names list" is the best of the three you suggest, with "names" used
attributively to modify "list". Perhaps "name list"? After all, a "book
shelf" or a "book shop" holds more than one book. But what is wrong with
"list of names"?

Alan Jones


derek...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jan 18, 2001, 3:02:51 AM1/18/01
to
I agree, "names list" looked correct to me...and, yes, "list of names"
avoids the problem altogether. I was just trying to resolve a dispute
with my boss who insisted that it should be "name's list". Actually,
that was just a simplified case of the actual dispute which
was "predecessors list" vs. "predecessor's list" or "predecessors'
list". I know that "list of predecessors" would have been better
phrasing, but now that the issue has come up, I wanted to get a
definitive answer, and provide a reference if possible to prove my
point. Unfortunately, I was not convincing in my argument that the
predecessors did not own the list, they made up the list--seemed like a
good argument to me.

In article <1Xl96.3812$pp2.4...@news3.cableinet.net>,

Daniel James

unread,
Jan 18, 2001, 7:32:45 AM1/18/01
to
In article <944hlq$3mv$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, wrote:
> Which of the following is a correct rephrase of "list of
> names": "names list" or "name's list"?

"Name list". Definitely. As in "book list", "song list", etc..

> I would think the latter is not correct given that the "names"

> do not possess the list ...

Right, but ... "name's list" would mean a list that belonged to a
single name. If the list belonged to several names it would be the
"names' list", and if the list belonged to a single thing called
"names" it would be "names's list".

Cheers,
Daniel.

s.venk...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 15, 2017, 4:01:41 AM11/15/17
to

Bill McCray

unread,
Nov 15, 2017, 8:46:53 AM11/15/17
to
A noun modifying another noun is usually singular (e.g. used car lot),
so I would call it a name list.

Bill in Kentucky

Anton Shepelev

unread,
Nov 15, 2017, 8:51:50 AM11/15/17
to
Bill McCray:

>A noun modifying another noun is usually singular
>(e.g. used car lot), so I would call it a name
>list.

There are exceptions, such as "systems programming"
and "human resources manager."

--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived]
0 new messages