"Pedicatio" & "Irrumatio"
fatte...@yahoo.com
I came across the words "pedicatio" and "irrumatio". I tried numerous
reference sources, but unfortunately I wasn't able to locate a
definition for either word. If any one might know what these words
mean, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know. Thanks in advance for
your help.
Garry J. Vass
news:a16a70e5.02021...@posting.google.com...
Hi fatted_male!
Further to your enquiry...
"Irrumatio" is a backward metonymic-coinage referring to "irrumate".
"Irrumate" comes from the Latin, "to give suckle to". This hasn't been used
in proper context since the 17th century. Of course its motive usage is
continuous...
Hope this helps!
Kind regards,
GJV
John Dean
Here's the first page of Google refs for pedicatio :-
http://www.google.com/search?q=pedicatio&hl=en&start=0&sa=N
It seems to be a term for anal intercourse, particularly used by German
speakers
Ditto irrumatio
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=irrumatio&btnG=Google+Search which
seems to be the term for fellatio amongst German speakers.
--
John Dean
Oxford
De-frag to reply
Gary Vellenzer
official.com says...
insertion (usually forceful) at the other end of the alimentary tract.
Gary
Gary Vellenzer
says...
work. If the insertee is, it's fellation. If the inserter is, it's
irrumation.
See Allen, "Latin Sexual Vocabulary" for details.
Gary
Henry Churchyard
<fatte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
It's an allusion to Catullus poem #16 -- "Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo /
Aureli pathice et cinaede Furi..." View on-line at:
http://www.fh-augsburg.de/~harsch/cat_016.html
http://tabula.rutgers.edu/cocoon/latintexts/catullus/cat16.xml
http://www.obscure.org/obscene-latin/carmina-catulli/16.html
etc.
--%!PS
10 10 scale/M{rmoveto}def/R{rlineto}def 12 45 moveto 0 5 R 4 -1 M 5.5 0 R
currentpoint 3 sub 3 90 0 arcn 0 -6 R 7.54 10.28 M 2.7067 -9.28 R -5.6333
2 setlinewidth 0 R 9.8867 8 M 7 0 R 0 -9 R -6 4 M 0 -4 R stroke showpage
% Henry Churchyard chu...@crossmyt.com http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/
John Dean
"Gary Vellenzer" <gvell...@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.16d38b871...@news.easynews.com...
No, that's OK. I'll take your word for it.
Dr Robin Bignall
Me, too. Now I understand the reason for some information being
classified by 'need to know'. I'm not sure I needed to know that! :)
--
wrmst rgrds
RB...(docrobi...@ntlworld.com)
Gary Vellenzer
docr...@red.sylvania says...
better off across the way in alt.usage.electric.kettles. :-)
Gary
Gary Vellenzer
be happier across the way in alt.usage.electric.kettles. :-)
Gary
Gary Vellenzer
Gary
John Dean
Gary Vellenzer
says...
and kept telling me it hadn't been sent. I stopped believing the
newsreader after the third time.
Gary
Earle Jones
Dr Robin Bignall <docr...@red.sylvania> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:32:54 -0000, "John Dean"
> <john...@frag.lineone.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Gary Vellenzer" <gvell...@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
> >news:MPG.16d38b871...@news.easynews.com...
> >> In article <a4cdck$jfa$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk>, john...@frag.lineone.net
> >> says...
[...]
> >> Whether an action is fellation and irrumation depends on who's doing the
> >> work. If the insertee is, it's fellation. If the inserter is, it's
> >> irrumation.
> >>
> >> See Allen, "Latin Sexual Vocabulary" for details.
> >
> >No, that's OK. I'll take your word for it.
>
> Me, too. Now I understand the reason for some information being
> classified by 'need to know'. I'm not sure I needed to know that! :)
*
"Pious Jews have a category of questions that can harmlessly be
allowed to go without an answer until the Messiah comes. I suspect that
this is one of them."
--Joseph C. Fineman
earle
*
Gary Vellenzer
earle...@attbi.com says...
Gary
Dr Robin Bignall
<gvell...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>In article <a4k83b$kq0$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk>, john...@frag.lineone.net
>says...
[..]
>> Perhaps we could all meet up in alt.annoying.triple-posting?
>> --
>You're lucky it was only 3 times. My newsreader was balking at sending it
>and kept telling me it hadn't been sent. I stopped believing the
>newsreader after the third time.
>
'They' say that if you preface something with "I say this three times"
it automatically becomes true. Your newsreader obviously reads widely.
--
wrmst rgrds
RB...(docrobi...@ntlworld.com)
Michael J Hardy
> 'They' say that if you preface something with "I say this three times"
> it automatically becomes true. Your newsreader obviously reads widely.
That's not "They"; that's the Bellman in a Lewis Carroll poem.
Mike Hardy
david56
The Hunting of the Snark, IIRC.
--
David
=====
traveling with a temporary .sig - Copenhagen at the moment
Robert Lipton
david56 wrote:
> Michael J Hardy wrote:
>
>> Dr Robin Bignall (docr...@red.sylvania) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>'They' say that if you preface something with "I say this three times"
>>>it automatically becomes true. Your newsreader obviously reads widely.
>>>
>> That's not "They"; that's the Bellman in a Lewis Carroll poem.
>>
>
> The Hunting of the Snark, IIRC.
Indeed.
Fit the First - The Landing
"Just the place for a Snark!" the Bellman cried,
As he landed his crew with care;
Supporting each man on the top of the tide
By a finger entwined in his hair.
"Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
That alone should encourage the crew.
Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
What I tell you three times is true."
Bob
Evan Kirshenbaum
But I believe that you don't learn that it's a *proof* until
Fit the Fifth - The Beaver's Lesson
...
"'Tis the voice of the Jubjub!" he suddenly cried.
(This man, that they used to call "Dunce.")
"As the Bellman would tell you," he added with pride,
"I have uttered that sentiment once.
"'Tis the note of the Jubjub! Keep count, I entreat.
You will find I have told it you twice.
'Tis the song of the Jubjub! The proof is complete.
If only I've stated it thrice."
The Beaver had counted with scrupulous care,
Attending to every word:
But it fairly lost heart, and outgrabe in despair,
When the third repetition occurred.
It felt that, in spite of all possible pains,
It had somehow contrived to lose count,
And the only thing now was to rack its poor brains
By reckoning up the amount.
"Two added to one- if that could but be done,"
It said, "with one's fingers and thumbs!"
Recollecting with tears how, in earlier years,
It had taken no pains with its sums.
"The thing can be done," said the Butcher, "I think
The thing must be done, I am sure.
The thing shall be done! Bring me paper and ink,
The best there is time to procure."
The Beaver brought paper, portfolio, pens,
And ink in unfailing supplies:
While strange creepy creatures came out of their dens,
And watched them with wondering eyes.
So engrossed was the Butcher, he heeded them not,
As he wrote with a pen in each hand,
And explained all the while in a popular style
Which the Beaver could well understand.
"Taking Three as the subject to reason about-
A convenient number to state-
We add Seven, and Ten, and then multiply out
By One Thousand diminished by Eight.
"The result we proceed to divide, as you see,
By Nine Hundred and Ninety and Two:
Then subtract Seventeen, and the answer must be
Exactly and perfectly true.
"The method employed I would gladly explain,
While I have it so clear in my head,
If I had but the time and you had but the brain-
But much yet remains to be said.
--
Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------
HP Laboratories |When all else fails, give the
1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |customer what they ask for. This
Palo Alto, CA 94304 |is strong medicine and rarely needs
|to be repeated.
kirsh...@hpl.hp.com
(650)857-7572