Thanks, Bob
However, I think you're right. I might "lean against" a wall of a
building, but am more likely "lean on" a waist-height garden wall.
I reckon it depends on how much upward support the leaned-on object
supplies.
--
Ian
Here in New York, I do. I might still make some distinction--leaning
against the wall, my body would be mostly straight and tilted toward it;
leaning on the wall, I might instead be slouching against it.
ŹR
I lean against the wall; I lean on my buddy.
GFH
It's the same in the UK. You lean against a high wall and lean on a low
one. You lean your bicycle against either a high one or a low one. And you
lean over a low one to reach something. You lean on a table for support and
you lean across it for the salt (until you've been taught either to ask for
it politely or to renounce salt altogether).
Peter (UK)
I don't know of any Pondian difference. To me it seems the distinction
is in the orientation of the supporting surface: one leans *on*
more-or-less horizontal surfaces (which would include the top of a low
wall) but *against* vertical ones.
--
Odysseus
> I don't know of any Pondian difference. To me it seems the distinction
> is in the orientation of the supporting surface: one leans *on*
> more-or-less horizontal surfaces (which would include the top of a low
> wall) but *against* vertical ones.
There is the metaphorical to consider. We all need someone we can lean
on, as the Rolling Stones tell us, but I am not sure whether we all
need someone we can lean against.