Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Pre- or Ante-

664 views
Skip to first unread message

MC

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 10:42:02 AM3/23/03
to
Pre-Columbian and pre-prandial, but antebellum and antediluvian...

Is there any difference between the prefixes (antefixes?) and is there
any logic or pattern to which gets used?

Mark Wallace

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 2:43:09 PM3/23/03
to
MC wrote:

'Pre' is Latin, and 'ante(i)' is Old English or Greek; so 'pre' is more
likely to be used before words of Latin extraction.
I think that's about as much logic as you'll get out of it.

--
Mark Wallace
-----------------------------------------------------
For the intelligent approach to nasty humour, visit:
The Anglo-American Humour (humor) Site
http://humorpages.virtualave.net/mainmenu.htm
-----------------------------------------------------

Frances Kemmish

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 3:11:16 PM3/23/03
to
Mark Wallace wrote:
> MC wrote:
>
>
>>Pre-Columbian and pre-prandial, but antebellum and antediluvian...
>>
>>Is there any difference between the prefixes (antefixes?) and is there
>>any logic or pattern to which gets used?
>
>
> 'Pre' is Latin, and 'ante(i)' is Old English or Greek; so 'pre' is more
> likely to be used before words of Latin extraction.
> I think that's about as much logic as you'll get out of it.
>

But you get ante-natal care in the UK, but pre-natal care in the USA.

Professor Redwine

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 3:17:21 PM3/23/03
to

"MC" <copeS...@ca.inter.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:copeSPAMZAP-F255...@newsfeeder.total.net...

In terms of a pattern, I suggest (just from instinct, without
taking time to reflect on this) that "pre" is used in referring
to a single event or item or to a (relatively short) period with
both a beginning and an ending clearly defined, whilst "ante"
refers to (relatively long) periods of time where only the ending
is defined, and not at all to events. But that is just tired,
horribly sober and completely uninformed instinct speaking. And
by "relatively" I mean relative to the "post" period.

--
Redwine
Germany


MC

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 4:09:11 PM3/23/03
to
In article <b5l31n$2av800$1...@ID-51325.news.dfncis.de>,
"Mark Wallace" <mwal...@dse.nl> wrote:

> MC wrote:
>
> > Pre-Columbian and pre-prandial, but antebellum and antediluvian...
> >
> > Is there any difference between the prefixes (antefixes?) and is there
> > any logic or pattern to which gets used?
>
> 'Pre' is Latin, and 'ante(i)' is Old English or Greek; so 'pre' is more
> likely to be used before words of Latin extraction.
> I think that's about as much logic as you'll get out of it.

According to AHD:

pre- prefix
1. a. Earlier; before; prior to: prehistoric. b. Preparatory;
preliminary: premedical. c. In advance: prepay.
2. Anterior; in front of: preaxial.
[Middle English, from Old French, from Latin prae-, from prae, before,
in front.]

ante- prefix
1. Prior to; earlier: antenatal.
2. In front of; before: anteroom.
[Latin, from ante, before.]


If this is correct, both can claim Latin roots...

MC

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 4:11:33 PM3/23/03
to
In article <b5l4lq$29mu6m$1...@ID-48569.news.dfncis.de>,
"Professor Redwine" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

I found a word that takes both prefixes:

prenatal and antenatal

1)

Is there any difference between them? And if so, I wonder if the
difference supports your instinct in some way.

2)

Are there any other such words?

Dena Jo

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 4:56:56 PM3/23/03
to
On 23 Mar 2003, MC posted thus:

> I found a word that takes both prefixes:
>
> prenatal and antenatal
>
> 1)
>
> Is there any difference between them?

Yeah. A pondian difference.

--
Dena Jo

(Email: Replace TPUBGTH with denajo2)

Mark Wallace

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 5:20:58 PM3/23/03
to

Actually, I'd be quite worried if I needed either, what with me being male
and all.

Mark Wallace

unread,
Mar 23, 2003, 5:24:16 PM3/23/03
to

Yikes!
OED says the same. It must have either been added to Latin from Greek, or
worked its way into Old English and Greek from Latin.
It would probably be a nightmare, trying to find out the details.

meirman

unread,
Mar 24, 2003, 1:54:04 AM3/24/03
to
In alt.english.usage on Sun, 23 Mar 2003 15:11:16 -0500 Frances
Kemmish <fkem...@optonline.net> posted:

That's because there was a shortage of n's during in the US after
WWII, until around 1970. They felt that ante-natal couldn't be used
it would have required 2 of them.

Or maybe it was a shortage of r's in the UK.


s/ meirman If you are emailing me please
say if you are posting the same response.

Born west of Pittsburgh Pa. 10 years
Indianapolis, 7 years
Chicago, 6 years
Brooklyn NY 12 years
Baltimore 17 years

rewboss

unread,
Mar 24, 2003, 5:26:06 AM3/24/03
to
Mark Wallace <mwal...@dse.nl> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
b5lcfn$2aqm0v$1...@ID-51325.news.dfncis.de...

> MC wrote:
> > If this is correct, both can claim Latin roots...
>
> Yikes!
> OED says the same. It must have either been added to Latin from Greek, or
> worked its way into Old English and Greek from Latin.
> It would probably be a nightmare, trying to find out the details.

am = "ante meridian", which is, I believe Latin. The Greek "anti", of
course, means something entirely different.


Matti Lamprhey

unread,
Mar 24, 2003, 6:41:55 AM3/24/03
to
"rewboss" <rew...@hotmail.com> wrote...

>
> am = "ante meridian", which is, I believe Latin.

A pedant will be along any moment to assure you that "meridiem" is
really the word, but I couldn't possibly comment.

Matti


Mark Wallace

unread,
Mar 24, 2003, 7:48:13 AM3/24/03
to

Well, the Greek used it as 'plus' or 'and', so I can't really argue with
that.

danf...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 26, 2018, 7:08:01 PM12/26/18
to
Before posting a comment and showing the world that you don't know what you're writing about, it might be a good idea to checking a dictionary first, maybe?
0 new messages