In article <d5aeaf12-8af1-43f6-bafc-
f412b9...@b6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>, Sir Francis wrote:
> I'm trying to find a word that has a meaning slightly more aggressive
> than "brevity" but not as negative sounding as "terse."
One question in my mind is that of whether you want to say that a
passage is admirably short, or whether you want to say that it is too
short. Different words carry different nuances.
The other is that of whether you are seeking a noun (as in your example
of "brevity") or an adjective (as in "terse").
If you're on the "admirably brief" track then "concise" is as good a
word as any to consider as adjective, or "consision" as noun (or
"conciseness", as has been noted, if you prefer ... but "concision" is,
well, more concise).
If your meaning is, rather, that of "too short" then you might consider
"spare" in the sense of "(The exercise of) economy or frugality". I
note that the SOED marks that usage as 'Archaic', but I think it's
still well enough known to stand. If you wanted a noun then "spareness"
would your man.
Cheers,
Daniel.