In article <
58e801de-6f32-494d...@googlegroups.com>,
Pavel314 wrote:
> In stories set in England, a character will sometimes have "a chop"
> for dinner.
It might help to know the period in which these stories are set. Times
and tastes do change ...
> Here in the U.S. we generally qualify this as a pork chop
> or a lamb chop. What is a chop without an adjective?
It'll be from a pig or a sheep -- or just possibly a goat -- a cow or a
horse would be too big.
I'm inclined to say that "a chop" would be pork, because chops from lamb
or mutton are smaller and one might expect to eat two ... but that
depends a lot on historical context. If food -- and especially meat --
is scarce or expensive then a single lamb chop might be seen as a lavish
meal.
> I have a feeling that it might refer to a mutton chop.
Nowadays, sheep are usually slaughtered as soon as they reach an
economical size, so sheep meat will almost always be lamb rather than
mutton. Old sheep that have been farmed primarily for their wool are
generally not considered fit for human consumption. Any mutton you do
find offered for sale will be from sheep farmed for meat that have been
held back from slaughter to allow the flavour of the meat to become
stronger. It's good meat, but tends to be expensive.
In the past, though, mutton from old sheep farmed for wool would have
been a cheap meat for poor people, and would certainly have been eaten.
So, it does depend very much on the setting.
--
Cheers,
Daniel.