Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

White House admits it played us for fools to sell Iran deal

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Leroy N. Soetoro

unread,
Oct 31, 2021, 3:00:59 PM10/31/21
to
https://nypost.com/2016/05/05/playing-the-press-and-the-public-for-chumps-
to-sell-the-iran-deal/

Congratulations, liberals of the Washington press corps and elite
organizations: You’re a bunch of suckers. We all know this because the
Obama White House just told us so.

In an astounding New York Times piece by David Samuels, senior White House
officials gleefully confess they use friendly reporters and nonprofits as
public relations tools in the selling of President Obama’s foreign policy
— and can do it almost at will because these tools are ignorant, will
believe what they’re told, will essentially take dictation and are happy
to be used just to get the information necessary for a tweet or two.

Their greatest triumph, according to Samuels, was selling a misleading
narrative about the nuclear deal with Iran — the parameters of which were
set a year before the administration claimed and which had nothing to do
with the fact that a supposedly more accommodating government had risen to
power.

The mastermind of the Obama machine is Ben Rhodes, a New Yorker who joined
the Obama campaign as a speechwriter in 2007 and has risen to become the
most influential foreign-policy hand in the White House.

Rhodes drips with contempt for almost everyone but his boss. He consigns
all those who do not share every particular of the Obama-Rhodes foreign-
policy perspective to a gelatinous mass called “The Blob” — including,
Samuels writes, Hillary Clinton.

He thinks as little of them as he does of the journalists he and his team
must spoon-feed. “The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and
their only reporting experience consists of being around political
campaigns,” Rhodes says. “They literally know nothing.”

Then there are others his assistant Ned Price refers to as “force
multipliers,” more senior reporters and pundits who parrot what they’re
told. “I’ll give them some color,” Price says, using the journalistic term
for juicy bits of inside-baseball detail, “and the next thing I know, lots
of these guys are in the dot-com publishing space, and have huge Twitter
followings, and they’ll be putting this message out on their own.”

A foreign-policy reporter named Laura Rozen, the most credulous conveyor
of pro-Iran-deal news last year, is given a specific shout-out by White
House digital guru Tanya Somanader. “Laura Rozen was my RSS feed,”
Somanader tells Samuels. “She would just find everything and retweet it.”

The Iran deal, you may recall, was wildly unpopular with the American
people. To ensure senators didn’t cast a two-thirds vote against it and
kill it, the White House set up a digital response “war room” whose
purpose was relentlessly to make the case that a vote against the deal was
a vote for war.

It could only work if water-carriers did the White House’s job for it, and
nonprofit water-carriers did their faithful duty. “We created an echo
chamber,” Rhodes tells Samuels about the journalists and think-tankers who
were discussing the Iran deal based almost entirely on information given
to them by the White House. “They were saying things that validated what
we had given them to say.”

Little did these denizens of Rhodes’ echo chamber know their loyalty would
be seen as servility and would become the subject of post-victory
gloating. “We had test drives to know who was going to be able to carry
our message effectively, and how to use outside groups like Ploughshares,
the Iran Project and whomever else,” Rhodes says. “So we knew the tactics
that worked.”

The storyline they peddled was that the Iran deal had been negotiated in a
furious round of back-and-forthing in 2014 and 2015, with the United
States getting far better terms out of Iran than it expected due to the
flexibility of a newly moderate government in Tehran.

It was, Samuels says, a deliberately misleading narrative. The general
terms were actually hammered out in 2012 by State Department officials
Jake Sullivan and William Burns, rooted in Obama’s deep desire from the
beginning of the administration to strike a grand deal with the mullahs.

Why on Earth was such conduct remotely acceptable? Because, Samuels makes
clear, Rhodes and Obama believe they’re the only sensible thinkers in
America and that there’s no way to get the right things done other than to
spin them. “I mean, I’d prefer a sober, reasoned public debate, after
which members of Congress reflect and take a vote,” he tells Samuels. “But
that’s impossible.”

Impossible? There was a sober, reasoned public debate over the Iran deal.
Its opponents were deadly serious. In the end, 58 senators voted against
it on sober, reasoned grounds.

What the Samuels piece shows is that the Obama administration chose to
attempt to get its way not by winning an argument but by bringing an
almost fathomless cynicism to bear in manipulating its own clueless
liberal fan club.



--
"LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
recover with no after effects.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.n...@mail.house.gov

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.
0 new messages