Energy Solutions
giorgio.a...@hotmail.com
It's quite obvious that we all need to change our ways in order for
our survival. Oil will not last forever, but sunlight and wind are the
probably the most obvious renewable energy we know of. If you are
interested in changing, please visit my blog where I have some
information, and if you feel like checking it out, I would highly
suggest it.
http://energysolutionideas.blogspot.com/
Please consider doing your part to help change the world. We can do
this!
Mr A Clarke
Renewable energy is a fad.
Over-Unity will change our ways automatically when we discover there
is no alternative energy source. Alternative energies will never provide
enough for a growing global population. The Moon will make a good
intermediate platform to the rest of Space and Earth can be visited at
Weekends!
<giorgio.a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:283684fc-b932-44ed...@m12g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
Humans will require conditioning too much to "change"; still, if that`s
what you want?
Ashley Clarke
Desertphile
<aclar...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> This is the future. This is also an Over-Unity Newsfeed!
It's a newsgroup, shit-for-brains, not a "newsfeed."
> Over-Unity will change our ways automatically when we discover there
> is no alternative energy source.
There is no such thing as "over unity:" it is impossible.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
7b
One of the main problems facing anyone in search of an "over-unity" system
is that most
people are too uneducated to conceptualize what a "ground" wire actually
does.
It takes excess electrical energy from a circuit and directs it to the
earth,
making it completely impossible to gather "extra" energy from a system
because anything extra
is being thrown away like garbage energy that can't be used because it's
"too dangerous"
The only thing impossible about over unity is achieving it with a ground
wire attached to the system.
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:0r8mr4h4v1fa7fv7b...@4ax.com...
Desertphile
wrote:
> Several "impossible" things turn out not to be..
No: nothing impossible has ever "turned out not to be."
> One of the main problems facing anyone in search of an "over-unity" system
... is that there is no such thing, and never will be: it's
Desertphile
> Please consider doing your part to help change the world. We can do
> this!
Idiot.
Desertphile
> Over-Unity will change our ways automatically when we discover there
> is no alternative energy source
There is no such thing as "over unity." Sorry.
7b
>> Several "impossible" things turn out not to be..
>
> No: nothing impossible has ever "turned out not to be."
It used to be "impossible" to sail around the globe.
It was never technically impossible, hence the quotes.. possibility relies
on the understanding of the observer.
There's probably a whole lot of impossible things in your world.
Teleportation is "impossible" for science, and every part of every atom is
capable of it spontaneously.
Just consider the rules of science.. and the ability of something not to
occur, and you should at least grasp the concept.
You might be too lazy or stupid to find the answer, but that doesn't mean it
hasn't occured.
>
>> One of the main problems facing anyone in search of an "over-unity"
>> system
>
> ... is that there is no such thing, and never will be: it's
> impossible.
>
By what definition of impossible do you keep attempting to apply it like a
"Void" stamp to anything you don't understand?
Desertphile
wrote:
>
> >> Several "impossible" things turn out not to be..
> >
> > No: nothing impossible has ever "turned out not to be."
> It used to be "impossible" to sail around the globe.
No: it has never been impossible to sail around the Earth.
> It was never technically impossible, hence the quotes.. possibility relies
> on the understanding of the observer.
Exactly. However, "over unity" is impossible and always will be.
> There's probably a whole lot of impossible things in your world.
Nope: just everything that is prohibited by the laws of phyiscs.
See, for example, "over unity."
> Teleportation is "impossible" for science, and every part of every atom is
> capable of it spontaneously.
Idiot.
> Just consider the rules of science.. and the ability of something not to
> occur, and you should at least grasp the concept.
The laws of physics. Very good. Now then: apply that to the "free
energy" cult.
> You might be too lazy or stupid to find the answer, but that doesn't mean it
> hasn't occured.
You might be too lazy of stupid to understand "free energy" is
impossible.
> >> One of the main problems facing anyone in search of an "over-unity"
> >> system
> > ... is that there is no such thing, and never will be: it's
> > impossible.
> By what definition of impossible do you keep attempting to apply it like a
> "Void" stamp to anything you don't understand?
Idiot.
7b
I'm not quoting all that but I agree with you, free energy is impossible.
There are however a lot of energy sources which are completely ignored by
science
and why? Because some fucknut like you called a theory a Law.
Simply put, the calculations made in the founding principles of Physics are
flawed
as they are incomplete. They fail to take several very influential factors
into account,
which is why scientists are all so horny about putting things into vacuums.
They know
they are missing something, so instead of trying to explain or understand
it, they just
try their best to eliminate it from the equation.
You'll never get free energy from anything, it Always has a source..
You'll never get more energy out of an electrical system than physics
suggests,
Unless you remove that damn ground wire.
Desertphile
wrote:
> phew..
> I'm not quoting all that but I agree with you, free energy is impossible.
>
> There are however a lot of energy sources which are completely ignored by
> science and why?
Please give an example of a energy source that has been completely
ignored. Thank you.
> Because some fucknut like you called a theory a Law.
If you mean me, then the answer is "No." I have never called a
theory a law. Theories are never laws: theories are made up of
laws.
Free energy is impossible; "over unity" is impossible.
no one
MACHINES..) WOULDNT FLY. AND ARE IMPOSSIBLE ........ BUT LOOK THEY DO !!!
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:0r8mr4h4v1fa7fv7b...@4ax.com...
no one
AND FREE ENERGY IS POSSIBLE...... WHAT ABOUT SOLAR YOU RETARD
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:btdgs41dkcfgsvnip...@4ax.com...
harry k
> FREE ENERGY WILL BE POSIIBLE...
>
> AND FREE ENERGY IS POSSIBLE...... WHAT ABOUT SOLAR YOU RETARD
>
>
> news:btdgs41dkcfgsvnip...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:37:27 -0600, "7b" <sexoffen...@live.ca>
> > wrote:
>
> >> phew..
> >> I'm not quoting all that but I agree with you, free energy is impossible.
>
> >> There are however a lot of energy sources which are completely ignored by
> >> science and why?
>
> > Please give an example of a energy source that has been completely
> > ignored. Thank you.
>
> >> Because some fucknut like you called a theory a Law.
>
> > If you mean me, then the answer is "No." I have never called a
> > theory a law. Theories are never laws: theories are made up of
> > laws.
>
> > Free energy is impossible; "over unity" is impossible.
>
> > --
> >http://desertphile.org
> > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
>
> - Show quoted text -
Point out where the input of solar _energy_ is in anyway "over-
unity". Perhaps you should study up on what constitutes an over-unity
system and pay particular attention to the "closed system" part.
BTW you don't need to be issueing insults to prove your stupidity,
your posts do that very well without them.
Harry K