Where are all the true believers?!
Desertphile
defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Mr A Clarke
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:5u6o8553mrrqc6dp8...@4ax.com...
Desertphile
<aclar...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> I`m not here to entertain.
Yeah, but your few comments are usually entertaining.
harry k
>
> news:5u6o8553mrrqc6dp8...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> >I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> > defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
>
> > --
> >http://desertphile.org
> > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
>
> - Show quoted text -
You may not be here for that but you do do it very well. I check here
regularly to see if there is another belly laugh waiting.
Harry K
Desertphile
<turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 1:00�pm, "Mr A Clarke" <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
>> I'm not here to entertain.
> > "Desertphile" <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> > >I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> > > defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
> You may not be here for that but you do do it very well. I check here
> regularly to see if there is another belly laugh waiting.
My personal favortites are the magnet monkeys: the clowns who
believe if they place magnets JUST RIGHT, a miracle will happen.
> Harry K
harry k
wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:44:03 -0700 (PDT), harry k
>
> > On Aug 20, 1:00 pm, "Mr A Clarke" <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> >> I'm not here to entertain.
> > > "Desertphile" <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> > > >I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> > > > defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
> > You may not be here for that but you do do it very well. I check here
> > regularly to see if there is another belly laugh waiting.
>
> My personal favortites are the magnet monkeys: the clowns who
> believe if they place magnets JUST RIGHT, a miracle will happen.
>
> > Harry K
>
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
I understand that the trick is to hold your tongue in juuussstt the
right position while squinting when placing that last magnet. But
then noone has found out just what that position is.
Harry K
Mr A Clarke
Alright then, here`s another one:
"There`s more to Perpetual Motion than Magnets (or even machines)"!
"harry k" <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:445f3b12-40fd-46ab...@u20g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
harry k
> Alright then, here`s another one:
>
> "There`s more to Perpetual Motion than Magnets (or even machines)"!
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
There is nothing to perpetual motion _including_ magnets. Come on, I
know you can do it, offer a working theory of a PM machine. I need my
daily laugh.
Harry K
Desertphile
<aclar...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> Alright then, here`s another one:
>
> "There's more to Perpetual Motion than Magnets (or even machines)"!
You're right: that is very silly. But I still like the magnet
monkey nuts.
--
Desertphile
> There is nothing to perpetual motion _including_ magnets. Come on, I
> know you can do it, offer a working theory of a PM machine. I need my
> daily laugh.
Here is my attempt:
"Gods dunnit!"
If a per son prays reeeeeel hard, the laws of physics will be
altered to allow the machine to work. Of course it ceases to work
when a skeptic shows up: the gods don't like skeptics observing
miracles.
--
harry k
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thanks. That makes sense. I oftenwondered why I was never able to see
a miracle.
Harry K
Mr A Clarke
That`s the nicest thing anyone has asked me to do for most of my life!
(but to whome am I conversing with)?
"harry k" <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e61eec1d-21b2-4adf...@i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 22, 12:05 pm, "Mr A Clarke" <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> Alright then, here`s another one:
>
> "There`s more to Perpetual Motion than Magnets (or even machines)"!
>
> "harry k" <turnkey4...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Mr A Clarke
No, what has happened here is that I have taken myself on a voyage of
discovery in uncharted territory;
I have assumed nothing whilst being guided by correct physical laws. Point
to line to Area to Bauhause!
Perpetual Motion doesn`t defy the Laws of Physics, but expands on them.
It could prove to be too controversial for a religion, but not for a way of
life.
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:i531951ppla14hlja...@4ax.com...
Desertphile
<aclar...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> So, erm, Satan`s still got a bit of catching up to do then?
>
> No, what has happened here is that I have taken myself on a voyage of
> discovery in uncharted territory;
> I have assumed nothing whilst being guided by correct physical laws. Point
> to line to Area to Bauhause!
> Perpetual Motion doesn`t defy the Laws of Physics, but expands on them.
>
> It could prove to be too controversial for a religion, but not for a way of
> life.
Appears mental.
harry k
wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:24:13 +0100, "Mr A Clarke"
>
> > So, erm, Satan`s still got a bit of catching up to do then?
>
> > No, what has happened here is that I have taken myself on a voyage of
> > discovery in uncharted territory;
> > I have assumed nothing whilst being guided by correct physical laws. Point
> > to line to Area to Bauhause!
> > Perpetual Motion doesn`t defy the Laws of Physics, but expands on them.
>
> > It could prove to be too controversial for a religion, but not for a way of
> > life.
>
> Appears mental.
>
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Appears? I think he has proven it years ago.
Harry K
Desertphile
<turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 23, 6:51�pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:24:13 +0100, "Mr A Clarke"
> >
> > <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> > > So, erm, Satan`s still got a bit of catching up to do then?
> >
> > > No, what has happened here is that I have taken myself on a voyage of
> > > discovery in uncharted territory;
> > > I have assumed nothing whilst being guided by correct physical laws. Point
> > > to line to Area to Bauhause!
> > > Perpetual Motion doesn`t defy the Laws of Physics, but expands on them.
> >
> > > It could prove to be too controversial for a religion, but not for a way of
> > > life.
> >
> > Appears mental.
> Appears? I think he has proven it years ago.
I am used to free energy cult retards in YouTube, who just delete
the truth when it shows up in their videos' comment sections, and
then stick their thumbs in their ears so they can't hear reality.
Some of those clowns have spent many years and large sums of money
trying to make "perpetual motion," and they never bother learning
why "thier" ideas were thought of and failed CENTURIES ago.
> Harry K
--
spike
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:42:16 -0700 (PDT), harry k
> <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 23, 6:51 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net>
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:24:13 +0100, "Mr A Clarke"
>>>
>>> <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
>>>> So, erm, Satan`s still got a bit of catching up to do then?
>>>> No, what has happened here is that I have taken myself on a voyage of
>>>> discovery in uncharted territory;
>>>> I have assumed nothing whilst being guided by correct physical laws. Point
>>>> to line to Area to Bauhause!
>>>> Perpetual Motion doesn`t defy the Laws of Physics, but expands on them.
>>>> It could prove to be too controversial for a religion, but not for a way of
>>>> life.
>>> Appears mental.
>
>> Appears? I think he has proven it years ago.
>
> I am used to free energy cult retards in YouTube, who just delete
> the truth when it shows up in their videos' comment sections, and
> then stick their thumbs in their ears so they can't hear reality.
> Some of those clowns have spent many years and large sums of money
> trying to make "perpetual motion," and they never bother learning
> why "thier" ideas were thought of and failed CENTURIES ago.
>
>> Harry K
>
>
exists.
but you may are just right, if atoms cease to exist it can not be a
perpetuum mobile, i don't know if the atoms of this universe last forever.
Desertphile
wrote:
> Desertphile schrieb:
> > On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:42:16 -0700 (PDT), harry k
> > <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 23, 6:51 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:24:13 +0100, "Mr A Clarke"
> >>>
> >>> <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> >>>> So, erm, Satan`s still got a bit of catching up to do then?
> >>>> No, what has happened here is that I have taken myself on a voyage of
> >>>> discovery in uncharted territory;
> >>>> I have assumed nothing whilst being guided by correct physical laws. Point
> >>>> to line to Area to Bauhause!
> >>>> Perpetual Motion doesn`t defy the Laws of Physics, but expands on them.
> >>>> It could prove to be too controversial for a religion, but not for a way of
> >>>> life.
> >>> Appears mental.
> >
> >> Appears? I think he has proven it years ago.
> >
> > I am used to free energy cult retards in YouTube, who just delete
> > the truth when it shows up in their videos' comment sections, and
> > then stick their thumbs in their ears so they can't hear reality.
> > Some of those clowns have spent many years and large sums of money
> > trying to make "perpetual motion," and they never bother learning
> > why "thier" ideas were thought of and failed CENTURIES ago.
> the upspin and downspin of an atom is a perpetuum mobile as long as it
> exists.
Thermal agitation, idiot, is not "perpetual motion;" it is not
free energy.
Good bloody gods.
> but you may are just right, if atoms cease to exist it can not be a
> perpetuum mobile, i don't know if the atoms of this universe last forever.
spike
on which sources do you rely for research?
"It is not uncommon for engineers to accept the reality of phenomena
that are not yet understood, as it is very common for physicists to
disbelieve the reality of phenomena that seem to contradict contemporary
beliefs of physics" - H. Bauer
Desertphile
harry k
wrote:
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
>
> - Show quoted text -
I see he is back again. Doesn't seem to have learned anything though.
Someday I just _have_ to tour that creche where these morons are bred.
Harry K
Desertphile
> > > > Good bloody gods.
Note he cut out my reply.
> > > on which sources do you rely for research?
> > Physicists, stupid.
> I see he is back again. Doesn't seem to have learned anything though.
> Someday I just _have_ to tour that creche where these morons are bred.
He listed a few crooks who have claimed to perform miracles (free
energy), and two scientists who never made the claim, and then
insisted magic is possible. Gods. I'll never understand the cult
mentality.
--
spike
crooks? miracles? "the claim"? magic? gods? cult?
you seem unfit to discuss the observation of natural phenomena.
here's the part where we get back to the real world....:
i take a certain amount of time to investigate these claimed strange
effects. i do not care if i am wrong, as long as we can quench out
something beneficial to FURTHER REFINE our current technological
worldview, i do not attempt to correct something that is correct. i want
to see if we overlooked something crucial in our conquer of explaining
our beautiful reality we live in.
"an error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor
does truth become error because nobody will see it." - mahatma gandhi
Desertphile
wrote:
> Desertphile schrieb:
> > He listed a few crooks who have claimed to perform miracles (free
> > energy), and two scientists who never made the claim, and then
> > insisted magic is possible. Gods. I'll never understand the cult
> > mentality.
> crooks?
Yes, crooks. Bedini for example.
> miracles?
Yes, "free energy."
> "the claim"?
Yes, the falsehood that magic happened.
> magic?
Yes, "free energy" is magic.
> gods?
Yes, the gods.
> cult?
Yes, the "free energy" cult.
> you seem unfit to discuss the observation of natural phenomena.
You are the one that has claimed magic happened. "Free energy" is
not a "observation of natural phenomena:" it is impossible because
one is always less than two.
> here's the part where we get back to the real world....:
Yeah, thank you for trying.
> i take a certain amount of time to investigate these claimed strange
> effects.
No you do not. You take time to find what you believe to be
support for your false and childish beliefs. "Free energy" is
impossible because 1<2.
> i do not care if i am wrong
Yes, everyone can see that.
> as long as we can quench out
> something beneficial to FURTHER REFINE our current technological
> worldview
Believing in magic and miracles is a giant leap backwards.
> i do not attempt to correct something that is correct.
Yes, instead you attempt to incorrect something that is correct.
> i want
> to see if we overlooked something crucial in our conquer of explaining
> our beautiful reality we live in.
The answer is "No." Magic is impossible.
harry k
>
> - Show quoted text -
No, you do not 'investigate'. Investigators start out by asking
what,where, when why, etc. Youstart out by "free engery exist" and
then discard everything that doesn't agree with that. Oddly you wind
up with zilch.
Harry K
Desertphile
<turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 10, 4:26�am, spike <sp...@darkhippies.ch> wrote:
(CUTS)
> > i take a certain amount of time to investigate these claimed strange
> > effects. i do not care if i am wrong, as long as we can quench out
> > something beneficial to FURTHER REFINE our current technological
> > worldview, i do not attempt to correct something that is correct. i want
> > to see if we overlooked something crucial in our conquer of explaining
> > our beautiful reality we live in.
> No, you do not 'investigate'. Investigators start out by asking
> what,where, when why, etc. Youstart out by "free engery exist" and
> then discard everything that doesn't agree with that. Oddly you wind
> up with zilch.
Exactly. If these "free energy" cult retards wanted to engage in
science, they would try to falsify their claims just like
scientists do. Instead they just believe the impossible, and then
ask why the world's entire body of psycicists and engineers don't
believe in the impossible also.
mark krawczuk
ha ha ha
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:5u6o8553mrrqc6dp8...@4ax.com...
>I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
>
>
Desertphile
<kraw...@adam.com.au> wrote:
> "Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> news:5u6o8553mrrqc6dp8...@4ax.com...
> >I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> > defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
> hey faggot, why dont you come on on here and PROVE that it aint true...
Why are you posting your homosexual fantasies here? Don't you
freaks have your own newsgroups?
Mr A Clarke
alright, I don`t have the neccessity to go out and sell myself.
Ever wondered where the economy is going?
It`s going on Free Information taken from individuals with ideas and resold
to those with the means to gloss it over!
The faggot will get his fill of evidence in due course, meanwhile all he is
capable of is name calling. Hey "Faggot", I like that (better than "Idiot
Desertphile").
What is there to defend here? Secrets?
"mark krawczuk" <kraw...@adam.com.au> wrote in message
news:CeCdneUeqstvhY3Q...@adnap.net.au...
Ha Ha Ha...
Desertphile
<aclar...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> Don`t worry I have my own creep stalkers, they know my inventions work
> alright
Odd how you keep your "inventions" secret. LOL! Meanwhile, 1 is
still less than 2.
Mr A Clarke
which they
can make a quick and easy buck on; Including intellectual property.
Where did I say 1 was greater than 2?
It`s a big world out here - remember.
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:7oo2h61bg3iijihrq...@4ax.com...
Desertphile
<aclar...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> "Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> news:7oo2h61bg3iijihrq...@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:22:44 -0000, "Mr A Clarke"
> > <aclar...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Don`t worry I have my own creep stalkers, they know my inventions work
> >> alright
> >
> > Odd how you keep your "inventions" secret. LOL! Meanwhile, 1 is
> > still less than 2.
> It isn`t odd at all, it`s called selectivity. People will only steal that
> which they can make a quick and easy buck on; Including intellectual property.
So, you managed to violate the laws that govern the universe, and
the miracle is worth m,any trillions of dollars..... but you keep
it hidden. LOL! You're what, eight years old?
> Where did I say 1 was greater than 2?
See above.
harry k
> It isn`t odd at all, it`s called selectivity. People will only steal that
> which they
> can make a quick and easy buck on; Including intellectual property.
>
> Where did I say 1 was greater than 2?
> It`s a big world out here - remember.
>
>
> news:7oo2h61bg3iijihrq...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:22:44 -0000, "Mr A Clarke"
> > <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
>
> >> Don`t worry I have my own creep stalkers, they know my inventions work
> >> alright
>
> > Odd how you keep your "inventions" secret. LOL! Meanwhile, 1 is
> > still less than 2.
>
> > --
> >http://desertphile.org
> > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
>
> - Show quoted text -
Sure is odd that 4 months after your last post in this thread there
isn't one bit of news about your amazing discovery. If you are going
to hide it out, why are you posting here? Anyone with a working over-
unity thingy would be an instant billionaire but you are still stuck
in that old house.
Harry K
Desertphile
<turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 11:23 am, "Mr A Clarke" <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> > It isn`t odd at all, it`s called selectivity. People will only steal that
> > which they
> > can make a quick and easy buck on; Including intellectual property.
> >
> > Where did I say 1 was greater than 2?
> > It`s a big world out here - remember.
> >
> > "Desertphile" <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
> >
> > news:7oo2h61bg3iijihrq...@4ax.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:22:44 -0000, "Mr A Clarke"
> > > <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> Don`t worry I have my own creep stalkers, they know my inventions work
> > >> alright
> >
> > > Odd how you keep your "inventions" secret. LOL! Meanwhile, 1 is
> > > still less than 2.
> Sure is odd that 4 months after your last post in this thread there
> isn't one bit of news about your amazing discovery. If you are going
> to hide it out, why are you posting here? Anyone with a working over-
> unity thingy would be an instant billionaire but you are still stuck
> in that old house.
Hell, we ain't talking merely billions and billions of dollars:
such an amazing discovery would be worthy many trillions of
dollars.
And yet all he does is post nearly incoherent comments in
usenet....
> Harry K
Mr A Clarke
"harry k" <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:81bd0a04-0650-4b6d...@29g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
Mr A Clarke
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:atr5h657hvsd81ttb...@4ax.com...
mark krawczuk
ENERGY DOESNT EXIST......
DESERTPHILE IS A NEWBIE AND SO HE CANT ..
OH , WAIT , HE GOT A F IN SCIENCE SO THE TEACHER KICKED HIM OUT OF
CLASS, NOW HE`S REALLY PEEED OF, CAUSE HE DOESNT KNOW ANYTHING TO DO WITH
SCIENCE,,, HE`S THE KID WHO TRIES TO PUT A SQUARE PEG IN A ROUND HOLE...
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:5u6o8553mrrqc6dp8...@4ax.com...
>I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
>
>
mark krawczuk
>> Where did I say 1 was greater than 2?
>> It`s a big world out here - remember.
HERE YOU RETARDED APE LOVER
> What does the sun have to do with over-unity? If you have sun input,
> you do not have over-unity. You will never have over-unity in anycase
> no matter how you tuck you tongue into your cheek trying to get that
> last magnet position juuuussssttt soooo.
Indeed that's one of the reasons I did not reply: his mentioning
solar fusion tends to suggest he doesn't know what "over unity" is
supposed to be.
If "over unity" exists then 1 is greater than 2.
> Harry K
harry k
> ii wish some tossers and NEWBIES LIKE DESERTPHILE WOULD PROVE THAT FREE
> ENERGY DOESNT EXIST......
>
> DESERTPHILE IS A NEWBIE AND SO HE CANT ..
>
> OH , WAIT , HE GOT A F IN SCIENCE SO THE TEACHER KICKED HIM OUT OF
> CLASS, NOW HE`S REALLY PEEED OF, CAUSE HE DOESNT KNOW ANYTHING TO DO WITH
> SCIENCE,,, HE`S THE KID WHO TRIES TO PUT A SQUARE PEG IN A ROUND HOLE...
>
>
> news:5u6o8553mrrqc6dp8...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> >I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> > defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
>
> > --
> >http://desertphile.org
> > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
>
> - Show quoted text -
So now you insists on him "proving a negative" An impossibility known
by any intelligent person.
You can prove him, me, and all of science wrong simply, just produce
an example of it and we will shut up.
From your few posts I suspect you did not do well in school and are
abut the mental age of ...oh...16 to give you _some_ credit.
Harry K
harry k
> How?
>
> "harry k" <turnkey4...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
That is your reply? One word that is meaningless in this context?
One word that doesn't answer the question?
Here is my answer to your qustion: "how?" - move the rock by pickign
it up.
See, I can also put in soemthing totally OT.
Harry K
Desertphile
<deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote:
> I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
Still no-shows for these idiot clowns. Yet there are hundreds of
crooks selling "plans" for these imaginary devices on the
internet, and thousands of victims have been swindled. Why doesn't
one of them step forward and show their "free energy" device
working? What could be the hold-up?
LOL!
mark krawczuk
doesnt exist.
"harry k" <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:708f3af0-628d-49cd...@35g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
harry k
> well, if he wants proof of free energy , maybe we want him to prove it
> doesnt exist.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
WTH? That sentence doesn't even make sense in the context of the
discussion. And please join the rest of the world and _quit top
posting_.
Harry K.
Desertphile
<deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote:
> I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
Still no "free energy" nuts out there willing to step forward and
show their miracles. And yet tens of thousands of victims have
"invested" in the faith-based "technology." Aren't you stupid
shits upset at being robbed?
mark krawczuk
keep thinking inside the box,
like i said , what happens in theory DOESNT ALWAYS HAPPEN IN PRACTICE YOU
WANNA BE WANKER.
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:g8fnh6lu2i3ejhk83...@4ax.com...
mark krawczuk
theres no contact email on his gay website , ha ha what a loser//
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:5u6o8553mrrqc6dp8...@4ax.com...
>I wish some "free energy" fucktards would wander in here and
> defend their cult beliefs. That would be amusing.
>
>
mark krawczuk
SO YOU NEWBIE CRETAN.. IF U AND DESERTPHILE THINK OVER UNITY DONT EXIST ,
AND YOU THINK YOU CAN PROVE IT , WHY THEN DONT YOU MAKE SOMETING
TO IMPROVE ENERGY OUT PUT , MMMMMMM THOUGHT NOT........
"harry k" <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:338998e1-1987-4cc3...@l34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
mark krawczuk
meaning of the word " miracle " one meaning is : One that evokes great
surprise and admiration
so indian lover , if your daughter , son , wife or gay lover got buried
under meters of rubble and survived ( as often happens , if u watch tv..)
would you call that a miracle ???
mmmmmmmm
so beleiving in miracles is a step backwards ???
your a retarded indian lover
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:3k9jf5lvnfc6cc6ba...@4ax.com...
harry k
> wow desertphile ( you indian lover....) looks like you dont know the
> meaning of the word " miracle " one meaning is : One that evokes great
> surprise and admiration
>
> so indian lover , if your daughter , son , wife or gay lover got buried
> under meters of rubble and survived ( as often happens , if u watch tv..)
> would you call that a miracle ???
>
> mmmmmmmm
>
> so beleiving in miracles is a step backwards ???
>
> your a retarded indian lover
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Have you located that brain you dropped while playing with it? You
need to get help as demonstrated by:
1. Digging up very old posts which is bad enough
2. Top posting - the real sign of a retard.
Harry K
Desertphile
<turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Have you located that brain you dropped while playing with it? You
> need to get help as demonstrated by:
>
> 1. Digging up very old posts which is bad enough
> 2. Top posting - the real sign of a retard.
Damn, I hope I didn't miss an amazing miracle (free energy) just
because I have the insane whacko in my killfile. :-)
harry k
wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:21:36 -0800 (PST), harry k
>
> > Have you located that brain you dropped while playing with it? You
> > need to get help as demonstrated by:
>
> > 1. Digging up very old posts which is bad enough
> > 2. Top posting - the real sign of a retard.
>
> Damn, I hope I didn't miss an amazing miracle (free energy) just
> because I have the insane whacko in my killfile. :-)
>
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Nah, he just keeps on keeping on with his idiocy, posts of no content,
etc.
I just like to poke him with a stick occasionally - he appreciates
that sooo much - let's him know someone still doesn't care
Harry K
Desertphile
<turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 4:51 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:21:36 -0800 (PST), harry k
> >
> > <turnkey4...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Have you located that brain you dropped while playing with it? You
> > > need to get help as demonstrated by:
> >
> > > 1. Digging up very old posts which is bad enough
> > > 2. Top posting - the real sign of a retard.
> >
> > Damn, I hope I didn't miss an amazing miracle (free energy) just
> > because I have the insane whacko in my killfile. :-)
> Nah, he just keeps on keeping on with his idiocy, posts of no content,
> etc.
>
> I just like to poke him with a stick occasionally - he appreciates
> that sooo much - let's him know someone still doesn't care
Like Creationists and global warming deniers: they seem to
out-number the sane people.
> Harry K
--
no one
NLO I THOUGHT NOT .
THERES NOT A DAMN THING YOU CAN DO TO STOP ME TOP POSTING .. HA HA YHOU
MUST BE ONE OF THESE MENTAL RETARDS THAT THINK U HAVE TO SAY " AITCH "
TO PRONOUNCE THE LETTER " H " H .. INSTEAD OF SAYING " HAITCH " WHEN IN
FACT TH EOXFORD DICTIONARY SAYS ITS " HAITCH " ANYWAYS ..
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
I GONNA TOP POST ALL I WANT
"harry k" <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:338998e1-1987-4cc3...@l34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...