Was Elvis intelligent?
John
he declined to answer questions about draft dodgers and women's liberation.
Did he really prefer not to comment or did he not feel he could articulate
an intelligent response to the questions. I sort of get the feeling he was
a shy person and not that confident in smaller settings.
M@G! got Lunch?
according to RESEARCH.. elvis was told to 'behave himself' and keep
his political views and other views that may hinder his image and the
colonels... to himself.
and some of elvis' veiws weren't let's just say... a positive
image... (according to what some have said after his death.)
as elvis was told.. and he had replied saying many times.. "i'm just
an entertainer.."
that's why he didn't piss off too many folks during his co-existance
with other lifeforms.
folks want to escape reality with elvis... not get tugged into it..
he also kept his religious views to himself.. that would've been
seriously a damaging move.
M@G! got Lunch?
here some shit says elvis had an i.q. of 70... but if elvis was
elvis.. he probably just filled out the form to get it over as soon as
possible for like with the rest of us.. school is more bullshit
propaganda to keep us kids involved during the day with teachers who
can't teach worth a good god damned about anything.... i doubt that
study or say analisis about his ratio was accurate.
elvis was seriously bored by school... though it was told he
excelled in math and literature?
but we'll never know... i believe e's i.q. could have been more 110
ish than 70.. but at that time studies were pretty bad off and so
where most children of the south... elvis did hold jobs while
going to school to help make the ends barely meet at home and not
staying at one place too long as in e's situation.. his priority
wasn't an report on his configurative thought organization more than
staying alive and having a roof over one's head.
so the i.q. report is more or less non-abundant requirement of how
intelligent the guy was.... but then again he did surround himself
with fucktards and a cunt for a wife... so who knows.
iquaontin
in news:s9Kdndq-l6kMxhDa...@comcast.com:
Elvis's IQ was measured at 88 when he was in the army. Which is to
say, he was either not very intelligent or did not do well on IQ
tests.
---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to 100,000+ newsgroups
Jim Gibbons
keep his own personal views on that to himself. I think that was a great
way to answer the question.
Look at what talking about personal views has done for Tom Cruise for
example.
Jim
>
"John" <jonndaeeeeeiiiiiiii...@comcast.net> wrote in
message news:s9Kdndq-l6kMxhDa...@comcast.com...
Baldoni
His gift was being able to perform and entertain people. He was also a
perfectionist when it came to cutting records. Some people have more
intelligence in certain areas and vice versa. Every neighborhood has a
guy who has never read a book but can take on anything technical and
fix things.
I put on my CV that I can hit a moving target from 400 yards from the
back of a galloping camel.
--
Count Baldoni
Marty
You're answering the same troll who changes his name everytime he posts some
inane drivel on here.
As I have mentioned before, there is a dead giveaway on every message he
posts no matter what name he uses.
He must be either 12 years old or live a miserable worthless life to spend
so much time sending that kind of shit.
On top of that he probably thinks he's clever and funny.
Marty
"Jim Gibbons" <ji...@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:NKWdnd5aTeqwChDa...@cablespeedwa.com...
M@G! got Lunch?
> "John" <jonndaeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiipppppeeeeeee...@comcast.net> wrote
> innews:s9Kdndq-l6kMxhDa...@comcast.com:
>
> > I'm watching the Madison Square Garden Press Conference and at
> > least twice he declined to answer questions about draft dodgers
> > and women's liberation. Did he really prefer not to comment or did
> > he not feel he could articulate an intelligent response to the
> > questions. I sort of get the feeling he was a shy person and not
> > that confident in smaller settings.
>
> Elvis's IQ was measured at 88 when he was in the army. Which is to
> say, he was either not very intelligent or did not do well on IQ
> tests.
>
considering the average i.q. is 90....
so what are we doing now? making fun of elvis' brain this time
instead of his penis?
why not do a search on that in this group.. you'll find assholes like
blair and his lot bragging about how their's are much larger than
elvis'.... fuckin' assholes.
but like we were there? hummm?
ok... elvis had a small brain too ha ha let's all crack jokes about
that now.
boredom.. it does the brain wonders don't it?
M@G! got Lunch?
> Jim,
>
> You're answering the same troll who changes his name everytime he posts some
> inane drivel on here.
>
> As I have mentioned before, there is a dead giveaway on every message he
> posts no matter what name he uses.
>
> He must be either 12 years old or live a miserable worthless life to spend
> so much time sending that kind of shit.
>
> On top of that he probably thinks he's clever and funny.
>
> Marty
>
>
> news:NKWdnd5aTeqwChDa...@cablespeedwa.com...
>
>
>
> > Elvis was Intelligent enough to say he's an Entertainer & would prefer to
> > keep his own personal views on that to himself. I think that was a great
> > way to answer the question.
> > Look at what talking about personal views has done for Tom Cruise for
> > example.
> > Jim
>
> > messagenews:s9Kdndq-l6kMxhDa...@comcast.com...
> > > I'm watching the Madison Square Garden Press Conference and at least
> twice
> > > he declined to answer questions about draft dodgers and women's
> > > liberation.
> > > Did he really prefer not to comment or did he not feel he could
> articulate
> > > an intelligent response to the questions. I sort of get the feeling he
> > > was
>
> - Show quoted text -
marty doesn't know what he's talking about.. these assholes are coming
from another group... they came in through the bruce springstein and
the dylan group over that whole 5 songs end of the world shit and that
hitler crap from liberator... among other things.
you don't know jack and dick nor can you read a header... if you're
placing the blame on me or that baldo guy.. think again you puss
bucketed little meal ticket murderer asshole. what's wrong killing
elvis wasn't satisfying enough?
of course looking at you would be enough to make someone slice
lengthways across their arms.
M@G! got Lunch?
hey baldo.. marty says this is us doing all this anti elvis crap.
M@G! got Lunch?
>
> As I have mentioned before, I am cluess on format and header information. I don't even bother doing research on my claims nor do I do a complimentary search on header information using SamSpade tools or any other Whois tools online. I am an assuming asshole who has destroyed an incredible man such as Elvis. Soon I will have my havoc here and everyone will suffer my pillage. This is about me, not Elvis and I will not leave, just ask my buttbuddy Blair who likes to make asshole comments about Elvis and did some stupid ass shit about Elvis' penis and kept braggin' how his was a microbe larger than Elvis'.>
> I be either 12 cm long or live a miserable worthless life to spend all the money I never earned that Elvis bled for because of meal moochers like myself and the Colonel.
> I like to think of blair while wasting so much time sending that kind of shit.
>
> On top of that I like to think that he probably thinks I'm a serious fat ass and when I fart I sweat.
>
> Marty: You can do without me but don't count on that.
>
> "Jim Gibbons" <j...@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
>
> news:NKWdnd5aTeqwChDa...@cablespeedwa.com...
>
>
>
> > Elvis was Intelligent enough to say he's an Entertainer & would prefer to
> > keep his own personal views on that to himself. I think that was a great
> > way to answer the question.
> > Look at what talking about personal views has done for Tom Cruise for
> > example.
> > Jim
>
> > "John" <jonndaeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiipppppeeeeeee...@comcast.net> wrote in
> > messagenews:s9Kdndq-l6kMxhDa...@comcast.com...
> > > I'm watching the Madison Square Garden Press Conference and at least
> twice
> > > he declined to answer questions about draft dodgers and women's
> > > liberation.
> > > Did he really prefer not to comment or did he not feel he could
> articulate
> > > an intelligent response to the questions. I sort of get the feeling he
> > > was
M@G! got Lunch?
>
> You're answering the same troll who changes his name everytime he posts some
> inane drivel on here.
>
> As I have mentioned before, there is a dead giveaway on every message he
> posts no matter what name he uses.
>
> He must be either 12 years old or live a miserable worthless life to spend
> so much time sending that kind of shit.
>
> On top of that he probably thinks he's clever and funny.
>
> Marty
>
>
> news:NKWdnd5aTeqwChDa...@cablespeedwa.com...
>
>
>
> > Elvis was Intelligent enough to say he's an Entertainer & would prefer to
> > keep his own personal views on that to himself. I think that was a great
> > way to answer the question.
> > Look at what talking about personal views has done for Tom Cruise for
> > example.
> > Jim
>
> > messagenews:s9Kdndq-l6kMxhDa...@comcast.com...
> > > I'm watching the Madison Square Garden Press Conference and at least
> twice
> > > he declined to answer questions about draft dodgers and women's
> > > liberation.
> > > Did he really prefer not to comment or did he not feel he could
> articulate
> > > an intelligent response to the questions. I sort of get the feeling he
> > > was
>
> - Show quoted text -
i also like to know who one really can change their name here. how
does he know that these individuals are doing that? i look and these
are new assholes... new information and i trace them back to other
groups and their names are still the same and have been for least say
last june for two of them if not longer.
these are new guys... you're dragging them in and blaming us.
this denial shit runs deep, don't it martin?
you know what i mean... that poor fucker you killed with all the
leeching, lying and abusing... you know elvis?
denial.. you'll take it to the grave with you...
marty also denies the fact he was trying to get into cilla's pants in
the 60s and elvis kicked his ass for it.
Baldoni
I know because Marty has just about enough intelligence to configure
his newsreader. Let him carry on and make himself look simple. The
best part of it all is that the ad carried by the changelings free
server gives him away and Marty still don't get it.
There are a few around and Lacker accredits it all to us. If he was
not from NYC I would say he is the epitome of the ignorant redkneck.
--
Count Baldoni
Lucky
He was a redneck.
Baldoni
If fat arse had kept quiet and not spouted off at them they would never
have returned. It is his fault and he is far to stupid to realize it.
He would not know how to read a header. It took him a week to
configure OE.
--
Count Baldoni
Nearverit
3a5f-42a3-9f0...@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
> marty also denies the fact he was trying to get into cilla's pants
>in the 60s and elvis kicked his ass for it.
That's the dead giveaway that Marty makes up 95% of the crap he says
about Elvis on AEK. Have you ever heard any of the rest of the
Memphis Mafia spout on so much about The King?
Marty hates Elvis's loved ones with a passion. He hates Priscilla.
He hates Lisa Marie. He hates Elvis's cousins. He hates everyone
whom Elvis loved best. All he does is tear them down. He has a
secret hatred for Elvis. BUT...
We will never let Marty tear Elvis down!
---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to 100,000+ newsgroups
elp...@yahoo.com
The same guys who use IQ tests that require knowledge to complete are
the same guys who say that IQ may be inherited. Imagine that,
inheriting knowledge. Now that's a philosophical subject in and of
itself is it not. I believe Plato alluded to this many centurys ago.
However IQ should be based on your ability to learn not on what you
have learned.
Anyone with at least a normal intelligence would be able to tell that
Elvis IQ was much higher than 70 regardless of how it is measured.
elp...@yahoo.com
Why spend so much time revisiting the obvious?
Instead of using a filter why not ignore it?
Oh, sorry I guess that is obvious also.
Carry on.
On Jan 16, 8:39 am, "Marty" <moon7...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> You're answering the same troll who changes his name everytime he posts some
> inane drivel on here.
>
> As I have mentioned before, there is a dead giveaway on every message he
> posts no matter what name he uses.
>
> He must be either 12 years old or live a miserable worthless life to spend
> so much time sending that kind of shit.
>
> On top of that he probably thinks he's clever and funny.
>
> Marty
>
> "Jim Gibbons" <j...@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
>
> news:NKWdnd5aTeqwChDa...@cablespeedwa.com...
>
>
>
> > Elvis was Intelligent enough to say he's an Entertainer & would prefer to
> > keep his own personal views on that to himself. I think that was a great
> > way to answer the question.
> > Look at what talking about personal views has done for Tom Cruise for
> > example.
> > Jim
>
> > "John" <jonndaeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiipppppeeeeeee...@comcast.net> wrote in
> > messagenews:s9Kdndq-l6kMxhDa...@comcast.com...
> > > I'm watching the Madison Square Garden Press Conference and at least
> twice
> > > he declined to answer questions about draft dodgers and women's
> > > liberation.
> > > Did he really prefer not to comment or did he not feel he could
> articulate
> > > an intelligent response to the questions. I sort of get the feeling he
> > > was
einsteinmeinstein
4353-a6c3-e...@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
> The same guys who use IQ tests that require knowledge to complete
are
> the same guys who say that IQ may be inherited. Imagine that,
> inheriting knowledge.
IQ tests are designed to evaluate your level of problem solving
ability, NOT background knowledge. A tv show like Jeopardy has zero
to do with IQ, but mucho to do with collected background knowledge.
You're assbackwards.
Now that's a philosophical subject in and of
> itself is it not. I believe Plato alluded to this many centurys
ago.
It sounds as though you haven't read much Plato.
> However IQ should be based on your ability to learn not on what you
> have learned.
Hey newbie, that IS what IQ tests measure. So I infer yours to be...
about 72ish, perhaps 65-72, tops.
Now back to the drawing board...
elp...@yahoo.com
wrote:
> "elpr...@yahoo.com" <elpr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:059d0ff8-3d5b-
> 4353-a6c3-ea977e083...@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
> > The same guys who use IQ tests that require knowledge to complete
> are
> > the same guys who say that IQ may be inherited. Imagine that,
> > inheriting knowledge.
>
> IQ tests are designed to evaluate your level of problem solving
> ability, NOT background knowledge. A tv show like Jeopardy has zero
> to do with IQ, but mucho to do with collected background knowledge.
> You're assbackwards.
Well here is just one simple example of a question on a real IQ test:
3. Two of the following numbers add up to thirteen.
1, 6, 3, 5, 11
True or False
Sorry there bud but answering this question requires background
knowledge on mathematics. This is just a simple one. Some of them
get involved with much higher math.
An example I'd say of really measuring IQ is figuring out that you
can't put a square peg into a round hole.
And a show like Jeopardy realizes on one's IQ and ability to acquire
bacground knowledge.
>
> Now that's a philosophical subject in and of> itself is it not. I believe Plato alluded to this many centurys
>
> ago.
>
> It sounds as though you haven't read much Plato.
Enough to know that Plato believed that people already know everything
that they can know. And that all you have to do is bring it back to
your memory. He used this in is his philosophical examples or at
least one of them.
I also know enough to understand that it is debatable as to wether
this concept originated with Plato or Socrates.
Since most of what we know about Socrates comes from what Plato wrote.
What does your statement sound like?
>
> > However IQ should be based on your ability to learn not on what you
> > have learned.
>
> Hey newbie, that IS what IQ tests measure. So I infer yours to be...
> about 72ish, perhaps 65-72, tops.
>
> Now back to the drawing board...
Most IQ tests as I've already outlined to you above measure your
ability to learn based on what you have already learned. That is
quite different from Intelligence that you are born with. Of course
it can be debated on hereditary intelligence or not but I believe that
is quite possible. Intelligence being in your DNA as such.
I pose this question: What does you thinking I am new to this board,
your use of foul language and ill attempt at putting others down say
about your own intelligence? Just curious.
Broadway
>
> - Show quoted text -
Marty Marty Marty Marty Marty...oh, is it time for another post
already?
M@G! got Lunch?
>
> - Show quoted text -
apparently your lust is showing.
next thing it'll be his boyfriend blair going on too... god it's like
a porn, i wish they'd take this gay shit elsewhere.
M@G! got Lunch?
listen i.q. tests are only as good as you interest... if you're not
interested the test will be faulty. i just can't imagine elvis
wanting to take the time. it shows, i'm sure elvis' i.q. was
a bit stronger than the results.
M@G! got Lunch?
>
> - Show quoted text -
broadway: ha ha elvis was stupid hey blair did you know our i.q.
together equals that of a empty toilet paper roll! that's more than
elvis ha ha we win right blair! again we prove to be higher men
than elvis!
come on say it like all those other times.
fucktard.
M@G! got Lunch?
>
> - Show quoted text -
marty hasn't contributed shit here since he stepped in.
that's cuz he's a fake.
M@G! got Lunch?
no elvis was a hillbilly, is everyone's study of elvis this faulty?
M@G! got Lunch?
>
> - Show quoted text -
he needs us. otherwise he would've moved on and done some very
comprehensive elvis presley education in this group but nope that'll
never happen.
M@G! got Lunch?
wrote:
> "elpr...@yahoo.com" <elpr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:059d0ff8-3d5b-
> 4353-a6c3-ea977e083...@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
> are
> > the same guys who say that IQ may be inherited. Imagine that,
> > inheriting knowledge.
>
> IQ tests are designed to evaluate your level of problem solving
> ability, NOT background knowledge. A tv show like Jeopardy has zero
> to do with IQ, but mucho to do with collected background knowledge.
> You're assbackwards.
>
> Now that's a philosophical subject in and of> itself is it not. I believe Plato alluded to this many centurys
>
> ago.
>
> It sounds as though you haven't read much Plato.
>
> > However IQ should be based on your ability to learn not on what you
> > have learned.
>
> Hey newbie, that IS what IQ tests measure. So I infer yours to be...
> about 72ish, perhaps 65-72, tops.
>
> Now back to the drawing board...
>
newbie? lmfao.. all newbies go on and on about newbies.. what's
the inferiority complex?
M@G! got Lunch?
wrote:
> "elpr...@yahoo.com" <elpr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:059d0ff8-3d5b-
> 4353-a6c3-ea977e083...@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
> are
> > the same guys who say that IQ may be inherited. Imagine that,
> > inheriting knowledge.
>
> IQ tests are designed to evaluate your level of problem solving
> ability, NOT background knowledge. A tv show like Jeopardy has zero
> to do with IQ, but mucho to do with collected background knowledge.
> You're assbackwards.
>
> Now that's a philosophical subject in and of> itself is it not. I believe Plato alluded to this many centurys
>
> ago.
>
> It sounds as though you haven't read much Plato.
>
> > However IQ should be based on your ability to learn not on what you
> > have learned.
>
> Hey newbie, that IS what IQ tests measure. So I infer yours to be...
> about 72ish, perhaps 65-72, tops.
>
> Now back to the drawing board...
>
also those rankings are impossible. you're using the word infer
incorrectly also.
M@G! got Lunch?
>
> - Show quoted text -
he's calling out to his lover!
Marty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty
Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty Martyv
oh please marty come to me!
says broadway in an anguished plea!
Marty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty
Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty
MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty
Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty
Marty MartyMarty Marty Marty Marty Marty
Baldoni
> I'm watching the Madison Square Garden Press Conference and at least twice
> he declined to answer questions about draft dodgers and women's liberation.
> Did he really prefer not to comment or did he not feel he could articulate
> an intelligent response to the questions. I sort of get the feeling he was
> a shy person and not that confident in smaller settings.
Marty will know because he would have lifted the top off Elvis' head
and gave his brain a quick check over back in the day.
The above is as credible as anything else you may get in reply to this
nonsensicle question.
What do you really think John ?
I think it is safe to say Elvis' "forte" was not debate.
--
Count Baldoni
M@G! got Lunch?
no, but here since none of these hormone eating production types it
would be a debate.... it's the weakening of soceity as you know.
weak genes.. steroids.. hormones.. the super chicken of the 50s and
all that marketing.... all over, weak mings.. weak limbs and empty
calories.
why eat that salad when you can have a krispy kreme!
here's to obecity!