Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Little Hyperactive Student? Think METHAMPHETAMINE!

2 views
Skip to first unread message

lab-...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 5, 2005, 10:22:23 AM12/5/05
to
If you are a teacher of very young children who appear to be
hyperactive, these days you should be suspecting METHAMPHETAMINE...

...not that such first-graders are customers of dope dealers, and not
that they are popping pills or smoking meth or injecting it... but read
on...

While I was in building 6 of 7 drug lab infested residential buildings,
I had an opportunity to observe the behavior of four young children
from three different households, ages three thru eight.

All of these children acted overly giddy, hyperactive, and overly
aggressive with adults. I attributed this to methamphetamine dust in
the air and to other drug lab dusts and fumes.

One child, a seven-year-old girl, came prancing up upon me while I was
unlocking my apartment door, and she acted overly sexually aggressive
with me. Too shocked to respond with aplomb, I just ordered her to go
back to her apartment. I hid out in my apartment, too concerned to have
another encounter with her (She spent a great deal of time in the
hallways of the building).

The four-year-old sister of the seven-year-old was seen by me running
like a speed demon through the hallways and running up the stairs to
other floors. On a later date, this little girl came knocking on my
door so hard that you'd think that law enforcement was trying to gain
entry. This one was fielded to my mother who dealt with her. My mother
reported back to me that "that little girl is a maniac!"

NOTE WELL: I am NOT referring to a ghetto apartment building, but to a
rather upscale one where the rents were very high. And I am not saying
that any of these children resided in the households of the drug labs
themselves. What I am saying is that there can be enough drug lab fumes
and dusts in the air to adversely affect children *anywhere* in such an
apartment building.

FURTHER NOTE WELL: If you contact the parents of any hyperactive,
overly giddy little one, and they claim total ignorance of the possible
cause, this is because the drug labs of today are odorless or near
odorless. BE ESPECIALLY CONCERNED FOR CHILDREN WHO RESIDE IN HOTELS OR
IN THOSE EXTENDED STAY FURNISHED FACILITIES!!

bigtime...@yahoo.com

unread,
Dec 5, 2005, 11:20:33 AM12/5/05
to
Want to make Fast,Free,Easy Money? 100% GUARANTEED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I found this article stated below while doing some research online,
trying to find a way to make some extra money at home. I researched
several stay at home jobs working online, and came across this article.
So I decided to try it out for myself, as I hope you will too.

Basic Facts A while back, I was browsing these newsgroups, just like
you are now, and came across an article similar to this that said you
could make thousands of CASH within weeks with only an initial
investment of $6.00 plus stamps! So I thought, "Yeah, right, this must
be a scam!" But like most of us I was curious and kept reading. It said
that if you send $1.00 to each of the 6 names and addresses listed in
the article, you could make thousands in a very short period of time.
You then place your own name and address at the bottom of the list at
#6, and post the article to at least 300 newsgroups. (There are about
32,000 of them out there and that's quite a large market pool). No
catch, that was it. Even though the investment was a measly $6, I had
three questions that needed to be answered before I could get involved
in this sort of thing.
Pay Attention 1. IS THIS REALLY LEGAL? I called a lawyer first. The
lawyer was a little sceptical that I would actually make any CASH but
he said it WAS LEGAL if I wanted to try it. I told him it sounded a lot
like a chain letter but the details of the system (SEE BELOW) actually
made it a legitimate legal business.
2. IS OK WITH THE POST OFFICE OR IS IT MAIL FRAUD? I called them:
1_800_725_2161 and they confirmed THIS IS ABSOLUTELY LEGAL! (See 18, h
sections1302 NS 1341 of Postal Lottery Laws). This clarifies the
program of collecting names and addresses for a mailing list.
3. IS IT RIGHT? Well, everyone who sends me a buck has a good chance of
getting A LOT of CASH ... a much better chance than buying a lottery
ticket!!!
So, having these questions answered, I invested EXACTLY $7.92 ... six
$1.00 bills and six 32 cent postage stamps ... and boy am I glad I
did!!! Within 7 days, I started getting CASH in the mail! I was
shocked! I figured it would end soon and didn't give it another
thought. But the CASH continued coming in. In my first week I made
between $20 to $30. By the end of the second week I had a made a total
of $1,000.00. In the third week I had over $10,000.00 and it was still
growing. This is now my fourth week and I have made a total of just
over $42,000 and it's still coming in ..... It's certainly worth $6.00
and 6 stamps !!!
Also, make sure you print a copy of this article NOW, so you can get
the information off of it as you need it. I promise you that if you
follow the directions exactly, that you will start making more CASH
than you thought possible by doing something so easy!
Suggestion: Read this entire message carefully! Follow the simple
directions and watch the CASH come in! It's easy. It's legal. And, your
investment is only $6.00 (Plus postage)
IMPORTANT: This is not a rip off; it is not indecent; it is not
illegal; and it is virtually no risk it really works!!!! If all of the
following instructions are adhered to, you will receive extraordinary
dividends.
PLEASE NOTE: Please follow these directions EXACTLY, and $50,000 or
more can be yours in 20 to 60 days. This program remains successful
because of the honesty and integrity of the participants. Please
continue its success by carefully adhering to the instructions. You
will now become part of the Mail Order business. In this business your
product is not solid and tangible, it's a service. You are in the
business of developing Mailing Lists. Many large corporations are happy
to pay big bucks for quality lists. However, the CASH made from the
mailing lists is secondary to the income which is made from people like
you and me asking to be included in that list.
Here are the 4 easy steps to success:
STEP 1: Get 6 separate pieces of paper and write the following on each
piece of paper "PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR MAILING LIST." Now get 6 US $1.00
bills and place ONE inside EACH of the 6 pieces of paper so the bill
will not be seen through the envelope (to prevent thievery). Place one
paper in each of the 6 envelopes and seal them. You should now have 6
sealed envelopes, each with a piece of paper stating the above phrase,
your name and address, and a $1.00 bill. What you are doing is creating
a service. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY LEGAL! You are requesting a legitimate
service and you are paying for it! Like most of us I was a little
skeptical and a little worried about the legal aspects of it all. So I
checked it out with the U.S. Post Office (1_800_725_2161) and they
confirmed that it is indeed legal! Mail the 6 envelopes to the
following addresses:

#1) R. Hanson 1214 Junor Ave. Saskatoon, SK S7L 7K1, Canada
#2) Starr Luu 4500 South Monaco St. Apt. 622 Denver, CO 80237
#3) Jermaine Grant 21119 Bridgemeadows Ln. Katy, TX 77449
#4) Michael Briand 101 Broseley Rd, Toowong Brisbane, QLD 4066
Australia
#5) J. Daniel 552 Mountain View School Rd. Rogersville, TN 37857
#6) Ramkissoon Ramsumair, Alexander st. Bejucal Rd. Cunupia,Trinidad
,West Indies

Are You Paying Attention? Good. STEP 2: Now take the #1 name off the
list that you see above, move the other names up (6 becomes 5, 5
becomes 4, etc...) and add YOUR Name as number 6 on the list.
STEP 3: Change anything you need to, but try to keep this article as
close to original as possible. Now, post your amended article to at
least 300 newsgroups. (I think there are close to 32,000 groups) All
you need is 300, but remember, the more you post, the more CASH you
make! This is perfectly legal! If you have any doubts, refer to 18 Sec.
1302 & 1341 of the Postal lottery laws. Keep a copy of these steps for
yourself and, whenever you need CASH, you can use it again, and again.
PLEASE REMEMBER that this program remains successful because of the
honesty and integrity of the participants and by their carefully
adhering to the directions. Look at it this way. If you are a person of
integrity, the program will continue and the CASH that so many others
have received will come your way. NOTE: You may want to retain every
name and address sent to you, either on a computer or hard copy and
keep the notes people send you. This VERIFIES that you are truly
providing a service. (Also, it might be a good idea to wrap the $1 bill
in dark paper to reduce the risk of mail theft.) So, as each post is
downloaded and the directions carefully followed, six members will be
reimbursed for their participation as a List Developer with one dollar
each. Your name will move up the list geometrically so that when your
name reaches the #1 position you will be receiving thousands of dollars
in CASH!!! What an opportunity for only $6.00 ($1.00 for each of the
first six people listed above) Send it now, add your own name to the
list and you're in business!
___DIRECTIONS _____ FOR HOW TO POST TO NEWSGROUPS
Step 1) You do not need to re_type this entire letter to do your own
posting. Simply put your cursor at the beginning of this letter and
drag your cursor to the bottom of this letter, and select 'copy' from
the edit menu. This will copy the entire letter into the computer's
memory.
Step 2) Open a blank 'notepad' file and place your cursor at the top of
the blank page. From the 'edit' menu select 'paste'. This will paste a
copy of the letter into notepad so that you can add your name to the
list.
Step 3) Save your new notepad file as a .txt file. If you want to do
your postings in different settings, you'll always have this file to go
back to.
Step 4) Use Netscape or Internet explorer and try searching for various
newsgroups (on_line forums, message boards, chat sites, discussions.)
Step 5) Visit these message boards and post this article as a new
message by highlighting the text of this letter and selecting paste
from the edit menu. Fill in the Subject, this will be the header that
everyone sees as they scroll through the list of postings in a
particular group, click the post message button. You're done with your
first one! Congratulations...THAT'S IT! All you have to do is jump to
different newsgroups and post away, after you get the hang of it, it
will take about 30 seconds for each newsgroup!
**REMEMBER, THE MORE NEWSGROUPS YOU POST IN, THE MORE CASH YOU WILL
MAKE!! BUT YOU HAVE TO POST A MINIMUM OF 300**
That's it! You will begin receiving CASH from around the world within
days! You may eventually want to rent a P.O.Box due to the large amount
of mail you will receive. If you wish to stay anonymous, you can invent
a name to use, as long as the postman will deliver it. **JUST MAKE SURE
ALL THE ADDRESSES ARE CORRECT.**
Now the WHY part: Out of 300 postings, say I receive only 7 replies (a
very low example). So then I made $7.00 with my name at #6 on the
letter. Now, each of the 7 persons who just sent me $1.00 make the
MINIMUM 300 postings, each with my name at #5 and only 7 persons
respond to each of the 7 original 7, that is another $49.00 for me, now
those 49 each make 300 MINIMUM posts with my name at #4 and only 7
replies each, I will bring in an additional $343.00! Now, those 343
persons turn around and post the MINIMUM 300 with my name at #3 and
only receive 7 replies each, I will make an additional $2401.00! OK,
now here is the fun part, each of those 2401 persons post a MINIMUM 300
letters with my name at #2 and they each only receive 7 replies, that
just made me $16,807.00!!! Those 16807 persons will all deliver this
message to 300 newsgroups with my name at #1 and if still 7 persons per
300 Newsgroups react I will receive $117,649.00! With an original
investment of only $6.00! And some stamps. AMAZING! When your name is
no longer on the list, you just take the latest posting in the
newsgroups, and send out another $6.00 to names on the list, putting
your name at number 6 again. And start posting again. The thing to
remember is: do you realize that thousands of people all over the world
are joining the internet and reading these articles everyday? JUST LIKE
YOU are now!! So, can you afford $6.00 and see if it really works?? I
think so... People have said, "what if the plan is played out and no
one sends you the CASH? So what! What are the chances of that happening
when there are tons of new honest users and new honest people who are
joining the internet and newsgroups everyday and are willing to give it
a try?
Estimates are at 20,000 to 50,000 new users, every day, with thousands
of those joining the actual internet.
Remember, play FAIRLY and HONESTLY and this will really work.
** By the way, if you try to deceive people by posting the messages
with your name in the list and not sending the CASH to the rest of the
people already on the list, you will NOT get as much. Someone I talked
to knew someone who did that and he only made about $150.00, and that's
after seven or eight weeks! Then he sent the 6 $1.00 bills, people
added him to their lists, and in 4_5 weeks he had over $10k. This is
the fairest and most honest way I have ever seen to share the wealth of
the world without costing anything but our time!!! You also may want to
buy mailing and e_mail lists for future CASH. Make sure you print this
article out RIGHT NOW! Also, try to keep a list of everyone that sends
you CASH and always keep an eye on the newsgroups to make sure everyone
is playing fairly. Remember, HONESTY IS THE BEST POLICY. You don't need
to cheat the basic idea to make the CASH!! GOOD LUCK to all and please
play fairly and reap the huge rewards from this, which is tons of extra
CASH.
Please remember to declare your extra income. Thanks once again...
"People have asked me if this is really legal. Well, it is! You are
using the Internet to advertise your business. What is that business?
You are creating a mailing list of people who are interested in home
based computer and online business and methods of generating income at
home. Remember, people send you a small fee to be added to your mailing
list. It is legal. What will you do with your list of thousands of
names? That's up to you." So, build your mailing list, keep good
accounts, declare the income and pay your taxes. By doing this you
prove your business intentions. Keep an eye on the newsgroups and when
the cash has stopped coming (that means your name is no longer on the
list), you just take the latest posting at the newsgroups, send another
$6.00 to the names stated on the list, make your corrections (put your
name at #6) and start posting again.
NOTES: *1. In some countries, the export of the country's exchange is
illegal. But you can get the license to do this from the post office,
explaining the above statements (that you have an online business, etc.
You may have to pay an extra tax, but that's OK, the amount of the
incoming CASH is HUGE! And as I said, a few countries have that
restriction . *2. You may want to buy mailing and e_mail lists for
future CASH. (Or Database or Spreadsheet software.) *3. If you're
really not sure or still think this can't be for real, please print a
copy of this article and give it to someone who really needs the CASH,
and see what happens. *4. You will start getting responses within 1_2
weeks, it depends.
***ALSO REMEMBER*** SEND YOUR $1 OUT TO EVERYONE ON THE LIST, EVEN IF
THEY ARE NOT FROM THE U.S.

After reading this article, I had to give it a try, as I hope you will
too and become a millionare within 3 months time, GUARANTEED!!!!!! Many
people throughout the world are doing this and are successful.Your life
is about to change!!!!!!!!!

Bob LeChevalier

unread,
Dec 5, 2005, 3:38:52 PM12/5/05
to
lab-...@hotmail.com wrote:
>If you are a teacher of very young children who appear to be
>hyperactive, these days you should be suspecting METHAMPHETAMINE...
>
>...not that such first-graders are customers of dope dealers, and not
>that they are popping pills or smoking meth or injecting it... but read
>on...
>
>While I was in building 6 of 7 drug lab infested residential buildings,
>I had an opportunity to observe the behavior of four young children
>from three different households, ages three thru eight.
>
>All of these children acted overly giddy, hyperactive, and overly
>aggressive with adults. I attributed this to methamphetamine dust in
>the air and to other drug lab dusts and fumes.

Note that if there was enough "methamphetamine dust" in the air to
affect the kids, then you also were high as a kite. Dust and fumes
are hardly age-selective, and since you had an apartment there, you
were at least as exposed as the kids were.

Of course the concept that upscale residential apartments are
"drug-lab-infested" is itself indication that you are high on
something.

Maybe they are just normally-behaving kids, and you just don't
remember how energetic young children can be. Any parent could
correct you.

lojbab

lab-...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 6, 2005, 9:49:00 AM12/6/05
to

Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> lab-...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >If you are a teacher of very young children who appear to be
> >hyperactive, these days you should be suspecting METHAMPHETAMINE...
> >
> >...not that such first-graders are customers of dope dealers, and not
> >that they are popping pills or smoking meth or injecting it... but read
> >on...
> >
> >While I was in building 6 of 7 drug lab infested residential buildings,
> >I had an opportunity to observe the behavior of four young children
> >from three different households, ages three thru eight.
> >
> >All of these children acted overly giddy, hyperactive, and overly
> >aggressive with adults. I attributed this to methamphetamine dust in
> >the air and to other drug lab dusts and fumes.
>
>
> Note that if there was enough "methamphetamine dust" in the air to
> affect the kids, then you also were high as a kite. Dust and fumes
> are hardly age-selective, and since you had an apartment there, you
> were at least as exposed as the kids were.

> lojbab


Actually, the developing brains of young children and even adolescents
are very different from the brains of adults. This is a scientifically
proven fact.

Also, it was stated on television that one can become addicted to
methamphetamine by being exposed to drug lab fumes and dusts.

Lastly, if you have a hyperactive child on your hands, you may want to
test for methamphetamine *and* for mercury poisoning. Mercuric chloride
dust is a very common byproduct of drug lab operations. USA Today
recently pointed out the danger of allowing infants to crawl on
mercuric chloride carpeting in contaminated hotel rooms.

It seems that there is a correlation between the ever rising incidence
of autism and the ever rising incidence of illicit drug labs.

lab-sick

Bob LeChevalier

unread,
Dec 6, 2005, 4:19:51 PM12/6/05
to
lab-...@hotmail.com wrote:
>Bob LeChevalier wrote:

>> Note that if there was enough "methamphetamine dust" in the air to
>> affect the kids, then you also were high as a kite. Dust and fumes
>> are hardly age-selective, and since you had an apartment there, you
>> were at least as exposed as the kids were.
>

>Actually, the developing brains of young children and even adolescents
>are very different from the brains of adults. This is a scientifically
>proven fact.

Not in the sense of being more reactive to psycho-active drugs. The
biochemistry of a child's brain is quite the same as the biochemistry
of an adult brain. The neurons are just not yet wired in their
eventual form.

>Also, it was stated on television that one can become addicted to
>methamphetamine by being exposed to drug lab fumes and dusts.

If you were living there, and there was enough exposure to cause
addiction, then there is no reason why you would not be affected to as
great a degree as a child would. Indeed more so, since the brain of a
child has somewhat higher capability to repair damage over a long
period of time.

>Lastly, if you have a hyperactive child on your hands, you may want to
>test for methamphetamine *and* for mercury poisoning. Mercuric chloride
>dust is a very common byproduct of drug lab operations. USA Today
>recently pointed out the danger of allowing infants to crawl on
>mercuric chloride carpeting in contaminated hotel rooms.

Again, you would have been exposed as well.

>It seems that there is a correlation between the ever rising incidence
>of autism and the ever rising incidence of illicit drug labs.

There's also a correlation with a zillion other things that have
increased in modern times, such as the amount of ill-considered
speculation on Usenet newsgroups. Maybe Usenet causes autism.

lojbab

gpsman

unread,
Dec 6, 2005, 5:29:04 PM12/6/05
to
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> There's also a correlation with a zillion other things that have
> increased in modern times, such as the amount of ill-considered
> speculation on Usenet newsgroups. Maybe Usenet causes autism.
> -----

No shit! Kids acting like kids... DRUGS must be to blame!

Panic now and avoid the rush...
-----

- gpsman

Message has been deleted

Sumbuny

unread,
Dec 31, 2005, 2:53:09 PM12/31/05
to


<tariq....@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
news:1136056327....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> how many others find that the forced ballyhoo on 12/31 makes you want
> to hang yourself?
>

For some, *any* celebration can bring on sad feelings...perhaps you might
want to look into this with a therapist?

--
Buny

" Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be
normal."
~ Albert Camus


Jerry Beeler

unread,
Dec 31, 2005, 3:25:37 PM12/31/05
to
<tariq....@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message
news:1136056327....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> how many others find that the forced ballyhoo on 12/31 makes you want
> to hang yourself?
>

Hell, it's just another day.... if others want to go get drunk out of their
minds that's fine - I just hope that they do it in such a fashion that it
doesn't harm others ... if they want to blow a few firecrackers that's
fine - as long as they do not harm or cause harm to others.

Myself? I've got some fresh collard greens that I'm going to start cleaning
(a pain in the butt), some black-eyed peas, and I'm going to mix up a batch
of cornbread. THAT's "celebration" enough for me.

Much more depressing to me was this year's emphasis on "Happy Holidays".
Can't say "Merry Christmas", can't say "Christmas Holidays" at school ,
can't even HINT as to the religious nature of the holidays ... it's a
"Winter Vacation". How long will it be before the young ones of today won't
even know that the basis of all of this is the birth of Jesus Christ.
<MERCY> Can I even say that ... after all this is a public forum.

I'll say it .... Happy Birthday Jesus.

General Bubba

Sumbuny

unread,
Dec 31, 2005, 3:30:41 PM12/31/05
to


"Jerry Beeler" <jerry...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:5PBtf.40506$7h7....@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...

Why not...growing up, we celebrated it with a birthday cake <G>

Rick Fey

unread,
Dec 31, 2005, 3:58:43 PM12/31/05
to
Jerry Beeler wrote:

> Much more depressing to me was this year's emphasis on "Happy Holidays".
> Can't say "Merry Christmas", can't say "Christmas Holidays" at school ,
> can't even HINT as to the religious nature of the holidays ... it's a
> "Winter Vacation". How long will it be before the young ones of today won't
> even know that the basis of all of this is the birth of Jesus Christ.
> <MERCY> Can I even say that ... after all this is a public forum.

What a load! 90% of the population are Christian but FOX thinks it's an
oppressed minority. I didn't hear one person complain about the use of
the word Christmas throughout the whole business! Not one. It's a
made-up issue, and we have the fools, being pulled by their noses,
buying right in. What a load!

as ever,

toto

unread,
Dec 31, 2005, 8:39:33 PM12/31/05
to
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:25:37 GMT, "Jerry Beeler"
<jerry...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>How long will it be before the young ones of today won't
>even know that the basis of all of this is the birth of Jesus Christ

Since *Jesus* if he was a historical person was probably born
before the winter season (there were flocks in the fields according
to Luke and sheep were never in the field by night in Palestine after
the third week of October), Christ's birth isn't the basis of *all
this.*

Despite the beliefs about Christ that the birth stories expressed,
the church did not observe a festival for the celebration of the
event until the 4th century. The date was chosen to counter the
pagan festivities connected with the winter solstice; since 274,
under the emperor Aurelian, Rome had celebrated the feast of
the "Invincible Sun" [or Saturnalia] on December 25. (Christmas,
The 1995 Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia)


--
Dorothy

There is no sound, no cry in all the world
that can be heard unless someone listens ..

The Outer Limits

Message has been deleted

toto

unread,
Dec 31, 2005, 9:05:52 PM12/31/05
to
On 31 Dec 2005 18:01:26 -0800, tariq....@spamgourmet.com wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>for me it was a bummer to see some happy people heading toward another
>building with cases of beer in arms. i would have detested that
>gathering, but i envied their apparent anticipation. i have nothing to
>anticipate. will be drinking tea tonight and reading.

Two of my favorite activities - reading and drinking tea.

Nothing is wrong with being alone and doing something you
want to do all by yourself, you know.

sf

unread,
Jan 1, 2006, 3:36:39 PM1/1/06
to
On 31 Dec 2005 11:12:07 -0800, tariq....@spamgourmet.com wrote:

> x-no-archive: yes
>

> how many others find that the forced ballyhoo on 12/31 makes you want
> to hang yourself?

I like the ballyhoo and will continue to like it in spite of the month
from hell that they called December 2005.

1. My mother died at the beginning of the month
2. My husband wrecked his knee so badly, he literally couldn't move
for days and missed all the xmas festivities as a result.
3. My next door neighhbor of over 25 years, the father of a close
friend and "adopted" grandparent of my children.... who used to joke
and call me his other daughter, died at the end of the month - his
burial is Wednesday.
4. The ship is literally sinking at my school. We're going down and
it's just a matter of time.

So, you think you've had a hard time and want to whine about a little
ballyhoo? Oh, boohoo for you.

PATRICIA BURNS

unread,
Jan 1, 2006, 8:54:42 PM1/1/06
to
Jerry Beeler wrote:

> ------------%<---------


> Myself? I've got some fresh collard greens that I'm going to start cleaning
> (a pain in the butt), some black-eyed peas, and I'm going to mix up a batch
> of cornbread. THAT's "celebration" enough for me.
>

> ------------%<-------------
>
> General Bubba

What IS IT with collard greens and black eyed peas?! I was offered that exact
menu for lunch today by a friend (I passed). She said she ALWAYS has greens and
black eyed peas on New Year's day, ever since she was little (she's 80 now).
She has no idea why other than that's what HER mother always served.

--
Patricia Burns
(Just one s)


Jerry Beeler

unread,
Jan 1, 2006, 9:04:59 PM1/1/06
to
"PATRICIA BURNS" <patr...@burns.net> wrote in message
news:43B887E1...@burns.net...

> What IS IT with collard greens and black eyed peas?! I was offered that
> exact
> menu for lunch today by a friend (I passed). She said she ALWAYS has
> greens and
> black eyed peas on New Year's day, ever since she was little (she's 80
> now).
> She has no idea why other than that's what HER mother always served.

What IS IT? ... my mother always served it ... as did her mother.

For some reason eating black eyed peas is supposed to bring you good luck
during the new year but I have no earthly idea as to the origin.

Good eatin' though ... especially fresh collard greens.

General Bubba


Serial Killfiler

unread,
Jan 2, 2006, 11:10:49 PM1/2/06
to
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 12:36:39 -0800, sf <see_repl...@nospam.com>
wrote:

First, my condolences for your loss, sf. You have had a terrible
month. Not that there is ever an easier time for such things to
happen, but I know they are even harder at this time of year.

That said, the pain people feel from loneliness can be considerable,
even if they have not suffered a personal loss. That is what he was
talking about. If you are alone, that is already hard enough. But to
be alone during the holidays is an even worse feeling, and that should
not be overlooked. People were not made to be alone, and it affects a
person's health. I think it hurts men even more than women.

TSK
===================================
alBOTBLO...@BOTBLOCKyahoo.com
Pray for our third way
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1213/p06s02-wome.html

lab-...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 4, 2006, 10:25:06 AM1/4/06
to

Bob LeChevalier wrote:

> Note that if there was enough "methamphetamine dust" in the air to
> affect the kids, then you also were high as a kite. Dust and fumes
> are hardly age-selective, and since you had an apartment there, you
> were at least as exposed as the kids were.

There are a number of possibilities that you failed to consider:

First, I did not spend as much time as the children in the hallways of
the building.

Secondly, I had an air purifier with a HEPA filter and a carbon
pre-filter running in my apartment most of the time. It should have
captured most, if not all, of the methamphetamine dust that
contaminated the air.

Thirdly, the children in question may very well have been residing in
the apartment units where there was drug lab activity. In one of three
cases, this was a virtual certainty.


> Of course the concept that upscale residential apartments are
> "drug-lab-infested" is itself indication that you are high on
> something.

There was a major article in Newsweek magazine about how
methamphetamine is going upscale. It noted one case in which a woman
who was earning a six figure salary left her husband, children, and job
to take up with a sleazeball man to run a meth lab.

It was also noted in media reports repeatedly that the gay glitterati
of New York and Los Angeles are now very heavily into methamphetamine.

> Maybe they are just normally-behaving kids, and you just don't
> remember how energetic young children can be. Any parent could
> correct you.

Maybe NOT! When I said "hyperactive" I meant ABNORMAL.

When I said "overly giddy" I mean ABNORMAL.

When I said "overly aggressive with adults," I meant ABNORMAL.

Tell me, how frequently has a seven-year-old girl come a'prancing up to
you asking, "Mister, have you got a banana for me?"

For those of you who have missed the original post, here it is:

If you are a teacher of very young children who appear to be
hyperactive, these days you should be suspecting METHAMPHETAMINE...

...not that such first-graders are customers of dope dealers, and not
that they are popping pills or smoking meth or injecting it... but read
on...

While I was in building 6 of 7 drug lab infested residential buildings,
I had an opportunity to observe the behavior of four young children
from three different households, ages three thru eight.

All of these children acted overly giddy, hyperactive, and overly
aggressive with adults. I attributed this to methamphetamine dust in
the air and to other drug lab dusts and fumes.

One child, a seven-year-old girl, came prancing up upon me while I was

Bob LeChevalier

unread,
Jan 4, 2006, 12:31:43 PM1/4/06
to
lab-...@hotmail.com wrote:
>Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>> Note that if there was enough "methamphetamine dust" in the air to
>> affect the kids, then you also were high as a kite. Dust and fumes
>> are hardly age-selective, and since you had an apartment there, you
>> were at least as exposed as the kids were.
>
>There are a number of possibilities that you failed to consider:

There are even more possibilities that you failed to consider.
Furthermore, two assertion you are stating as things I did not
consider are contradictions to your original claim. So I admit that I
did not consider that you were LYING in your original post. That is
one possibility. "One" is a number. Your statement is therefore
true. (of course "zero" is also a number)

>First, I did not spend as much time as the children in the hallways of
>the building.

Why would time matter? A drug is a drug. If you breathed even one
breath of "methamphetamine dust", it plausibly had some effects on
you.

>Secondly, I had an air purifier with a HEPA filter and a carbon
>pre-filter running in my apartment most of the time. It should have
>captured most, if not all, of the methamphetamine dust that
>contaminated the air.

If you saw kids running in the halls then you weren't hermetically
sealed in your air-filtered cocoon - unless you live in a glass-walled
apartment.

>Thirdly, the children in question may very well have been residing in
>the apartment units where there was drug lab activity. In one of three
>cases, this was a virtual certainty.

So? It is a virtual certainty that if you lived in that apartment
complex, and there was "methamphetamine dust" in the halls, then you
were exposed to it as well.

>> Of course the concept that upscale residential apartments are
>> "drug-lab-infested" is itself indication that you are high on
>> something.
>
>There was a major article in Newsweek magazine about how
>methamphetamine is going upscale. It noted one case in which a woman
>who was earning a six figure salary left her husband, children, and job
>to take up with a sleazeball man to run a meth lab.

But did they do so in an upscale residential apartment complex?

>It was also noted in media reports repeatedly that the gay glitterati
>of New York and Los Angeles are now very heavily into methamphetamine.

But did they have meth labs in their upscale apartment complexes, or
did they, like most people on drugs, buy them from a connection.

>> Maybe they are just normally-behaving kids, and you just don't
>> remember how energetic young children can be. Any parent could
>> correct you.
>
>Maybe NOT! When I said "hyperactive" I meant ABNORMAL.

What makes you an expert on what is abnormal?

>When I said "overly giddy" I mean ABNORMAL.
>
>When I said "overly aggressive with adults," I meant ABNORMAL.

You provide no evidence that you have a clue what is normal.

>Tell me, how frequently has a seven-year-old girl come a'prancing up to
>you asking, "Mister, have you got a banana for me?"

I would not be surprised in the least. Nor would I suspect drugs; I
would strongly suspect child sexual abuse if it were clearly a sexual
reference. But child sexual abuse takes place without drugs and thus
is not evidence of "methamphetamine dust"

>All of these children acted overly giddy, hyperactive, and overly
>aggressive with adults. I attributed this to methamphetamine dust in
>the air and to other drug lab dusts and fumes.

You did so without an air sample and a chemistry lab.

>The four-year-old sister of the seven-year-old was seen by me running
>like a speed demon through the hallways and running up the stairs to
>other floors. On a later date, this little girl came knocking on my
>door so hard that you'd think that law enforcement was trying to gain
>entry. This one was fielded to my mother who dealt with her. My mother
>reported back to me that "that little girl is a maniac!"

Again, I am not surprised. I was myself a proverbial bull in a china
shop at that age, and I wasn't even hyperactive - just clumsy and
prone to tuning out things

>NOTE WELL: I am NOT referring to a ghetto apartment building, but to a
>rather upscale one where the rents were very high. And I am not saying
>that any of these children resided in the households of the drug labs
>themselves.

Note that above you contradicted this, unless "virtual certainty" is
not such a claim.

>What I am saying is that there can be enough drug lab fumes
>and dusts in the air to adversely affect children *anywhere* in such an
>apartment building.

Yet you claim they couldn't affect you in your apartment which was in
that apartment building. Again your story changes.

>FURTHER NOTE WELL: If you contact the parents of any hyperactive,
>overly giddy little one, and they claim total ignorance of the possible
>cause, this is because the drug labs of today are odorless or near
>odorless.

And yet you know that there were drug labs in the building and that
furthermore, those drug labs were putting out "dust" capable of
affecting behavior in kids (but not you) all without being detectable
by odor.

And your expertise in detecting the odorless byproducts of meth labs
is ...

lojbab

lab-...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 5, 2006, 9:45:57 AM1/5/06
to

Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> lab-...@hotmail.com wrote:

> >FURTHER NOTE WELL: If you contact the parents of any hyperactive,
> >overly giddy little one, and they claim total ignorance of the possible
> >cause, this is because the drug labs of today are odorless or near
> >odorless.
>
> And yet you know that there were drug labs in the building and that
> furthermore, those drug labs were putting out "dust" capable of
> affecting behavior in kids (but not you) all without being detectable
> by odor.
>
> And your expertise in detecting the odorless byproducts of meth labs
> is ...


Check out the buzz in the appropriate USENET newsgroups among the drug
culture set. It's that if a drug chemist knows what he is doing, then
there will be no smell.

For an interesting news article on the subject, refer to one written by
Jody Lawrence-Turner for the Statesman Journal of Salem, Oregon, in
which convicted meth cook, Jack Johnson bragged , "The way I made it,
there was no smell. I made it in motel rooms," Johnson said. "If I got
away with it, other people can, too." For the article, go to:

http://159.54.226.83/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050228/NEWS/502280324/1001

Furthermore, I COULD TASTE THE CONTAMINATION, and at times the
contamination in the very long hallway of the upscale building where
rents were in the neighborhood of $4,000 per month was so thick you
could cut it with a knife from one end of the hallway to the other.

Prior to the 11-12 year period during which I was in seven multiple
dwellings, all of which were infested with drug lab activity, I resided
in a single family home in a very upscale suburban neighborhood where
the home values, AT THAT TIME, were from $350,000 to $650,000. Just a
seven minute walk away was the next neighborhood where there were
so-called MacMansions starting at about $1.2Million. AT THIS TIME, the
property values in those areas must have tripled. I had a corner house
facing south. The house around the corner was behind me and faced west.
That house had crazy behavior the likes of which I don't have time to
describe with people coming and going around the clock. I didn't know
much about drug labs and meth at the time, but in retrospect, I'd have
to say that those crazies were doing and dealing meth. That household
had some kind of environmental disaster that needed cleanup; I don't
know what, but it could have had to do with drug lab operations.

Bob LeChevalier

unread,
Jan 5, 2006, 3:17:09 PM1/5/06
to
lab-...@hotmail.com wrote:
>Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>> lab-...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> >FURTHER NOTE WELL: If you contact the parents of any hyperactive,
>> >overly giddy little one, and they claim total ignorance of the possible
>> >cause, this is because the drug labs of today are odorless or near
>> >odorless.
>>
>> And yet you know that there were drug labs in the building and that
>> furthermore, those drug labs were putting out "dust" capable of
>> affecting behavior in kids (but not you) all without being detectable
>> by odor.
>>
>> And your expertise in detecting the odorless byproducts of meth labs
>> is ...
>
>Check out the buzz in the appropriate USENET newsgroups among the drug
>culture set. It's that if a drug chemist knows what he is doing, then
>there will be no smell.
...

>Furthermore, I COULD TASTE THE CONTAMINATION,

Hint: if there is no odor, then there also will be no taste, unless
you are in the habit of licking the surfaces. The two tend to go hand
in hand. Our sensory system is wired that way.

Furthermore, if you could taste such contamination, then you were
certainly receiving a large enough dosage for it to affect you as well
as the kids.

>I didn't know
>much about drug labs and meth at the time, but in retrospect, I'd have
>to say that those crazies were doing and dealing meth. That household
>had some kind of environmental disaster that needed cleanup; I don't
>know what, but it could have had to do with drug lab operations.

It could have been a lot of other things too. You are speculating, in
absolute ignorance.

lojbab

lab-...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 10, 2006, 12:51:28 PM1/10/06
to
Authors note: For those of you who have missed the original post, it is
included at the end of this one.

Bob LeChevalier wrote:

> Hint: if there is no odor, then there also will be no taste, unless
> you are in the habit of licking the surfaces. The two tend to go hand
> in hand. Our sensory system is wired that way.


Interesting! So, Bob, do you go around smelling your table salt?

It's a known scientific fact that while some people can detect over
25,000 odors, others can sense only 15,000. It is similar with taste;
some people can taste things that others cannnot.


> Furthermore, if you could taste such contamination, then you were
> certainly receiving a large enough dosage for it to affect you as well
> as the kids.

The gaseous contamination is different from the dusts produced by drug
labs.

The following is what people should be on the alert for regarding meth
labs (or other drug labs) in their proximity...

If you have any of the following ill health effects which are
uncharacteristic of you and which go unexplained for any other reason,
then you probably have an illicit drug lab in your vicinity:

1. Headaches which can be excruciating
2. Toothaches which can be excruciating
3. Earaches which can be excruciating
4. Perforation of the eardrum (due to strong acidic or alkaline fumes
in the air)
5. Eye redness and burning
6. Discoloration of the lips
7. Irritation of the lips
8. Irritation of the throat (so bad as to result in a growth forming)
9. Rosacea (redness of the facial skin with visible arteries)
10. Facial welts and/or reddened lesions
11. Cysts
12. Oral lesions (due to mercuric chloride dust in the air)
13. Tooth decay (due to strong acidic fumes in the air)
14. Coughing
15. Sensitivity to cold air with violent coughing
16. Congestion of the lungs
17. Inability to breathe seemingly due to a lack of oxygen
18. Burning of the tongue during sleep or burning of the roof of the
mouth
19. Sensation as if all of your teeth are falling out
20. Vomiting by humans and pets (or even just acid reflux)
21. Oddball intestinal malaise
22. Gut pain
23. Liver/pancreas pain
24. Colo-rectal/anal pain or intense burning
25. Rectal bleeding
26. Bladder pain
27. Testicular pain
28. Sever constriction of the esophagus
29. Aggravation of joint pain and tendonitis
30. Muscle/ligament/bone pain or any oddball pain anywhere in the body
(e.g. the feeling as if an ice pick is poking you in the belly or feet
or anywhere else.)
31. Extreme muscle cramps
32. Muscle spasms anywhere on the body
33. Extreme eyeball pain
34. Blacken, painful toes; or burning toes
35. Seeping of blood through the skin
36. Chronic fatigue (a symptom of insecticide poisoning)
37. Guillain-Barre syndrome (paralysis of arms due to loss of myelin
sheathing of the nerves due to, again, insecticide poisoning)
38. Neurological sensations such as electrical sensations in the
extremities or spinal "quaking" (insecticide poisoning)
39. Lingering chemical taste in the mouth even while you are
off-premises
40. Chemical "heat" in the mouth upon exhaling
41. Chemical odors exuded from various bodily areas, or vastly altered
bodily scents
42. Excessive flatulence to expel poisons
43. The need to defecate 3, 4, 5, or even 6 times per day to expel
poisons
44. Yellow feces (indicating a poison-damaged liver)
45. Altered vision in unusual ways
46. Sensation of an impending nosebleed
47. any other unexplained oddball ailment

Long term effects include any and all forms of cancer and even death in
your sleep. (Death may very well be a short term effect as well.)

Furthermore, you should be attentive to:

1. Chemical fumes arising from sink drain openings. These fumes may be
ODORLESS, but, nonetheless, you may still be able to taste them or
otherwise feel them in your mouth, nose, or lungs. One such odorless
fume from drug labs is phosphine gas which is deadly! Right now, what
should be of particular concern is a chemical odor like iodine coming
from the drain; iodine is used by drug lab operators. There can be
other odors as well as strong repelling ODORLESS fumes. Be on the alert
for the odor of propane gas which is commonly used by drug lab
operators. Other possibilities are faint and frequent odors like lye,
lime, or Draino;

2. A conspicuous absence of insects and spiders in your living space
even though you have not exterminated;

3. Mercuric chloride dust (as in "mercury") which has a salty, spicy,
metallic taste and which causes oral lesions, bone cancer, and brain
damage - this, of course, is very detrimental to children;

4. Open windows at the location of the drug lab during cold weather
particularly during the night and particularly if a window fan is in
service; (pay attention to the casing for the wall unit air
conditioner; the air conditioner may be replaced by exhaust fan(s));

5. Fires; explosions;

6. Frequent visits by plumbing personnel to repair drain pipes which
have been breached by the dumping of highly corrosive toxic waste by
the drug lab operator(s);

7. Suspect nocturnal activity (or noises) like excessive water usage or
toilet bowl flushing indicating illegal disposal of toxic waste down
the drain pipes;

8. Strange mechanical noises (most likely nocturnal) which may be due
to a pill press in operation;

9. If the drug lab is more commercial in nature as opposed to a
do-it-yourself operation, you will probably see a stream of visitors
coming and going to/from the drug lab unit;

10. Young children who reside in the building who are hyperactive,
overly giddy, and overly aggressive with adults;

11. and more.

DON'T BE FOOLED! While drug labs of the past had a reputation for
emitting strong and foul odors, drug lab operators of today use methods
and ingredients which produce little or no odors, so be alert and be on
the lookout for telltale signs of criminal activity, which, by media
accounts, is growing by leaps and bounds every year.


And if you believe that you have a drug lab in your building, don't be
surprised if you have *two* or *three* drug labs in your building!

THE ORIGINAL POST STARTS HERE>>>

If you are a teacher of very young children who appear to be
hyperactive, these days you should be suspecting METHAMPHETAMINE...

...not that such first-graders are customers of dope dealers, and not
that they are popping pills or smoking meth or injecting it... but read
on...

While I was in building 6 of 7 drug lab infested residential buildings,
I had an opportunity to observe the behavior of four young children
from three different households, ages three thru eight.

All of these children acted overly giddy, hyperactive, and overly


aggressive with adults. I attributed this to methamphetamine dust in
the air and to other drug lab dusts and fumes.

One child, a seven-year-old girl, came prancing up upon me while I was


unlocking my apartment door, and she acted overly sexually aggressive
with me. Too shocked to respond with aplomb, I just ordered her to go
back to her apartment. I hid out in my apartment, too concerned to have

another encounter with her (She spent a great deal of time in the
hallways of the building).

The four-year-old sister of the seven-year-old was seen by me running
like a speed demon through the hallways and running up the stairs to
other floors. On a later date, this little girl came knocking on my
door so hard that you'd think that law enforcement was trying to gain
entry. This one was fielded to my mother who dealt with her. My mother
reported back to me that "that little girl is a maniac!"

NOTE WELL: I am NOT referring to a ghetto apartment building, but to a


rather upscale one where the rents were very high. And I am not saying
that any of these children resided in the households of the drug labs

themselves. What I am saying is that there can be enough drug lab fumes


and dusts in the air to adversely affect children *anywhere* in such an
apartment building.

FURTHER NOTE WELL: If you contact the parents of any hyperactive,


overly giddy little one, and they claim total ignorance of the possible
cause, this is because the drug labs of today are odorless or near

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Jan 10, 2006, 1:58:12 PM1/10/06
to
In article <1136915488.7...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> lab-...@hotmail.com writes:
> Authors note: For those of you who have missed the original post, it is
> included at the end of this one.
>
> Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>
> > Hint: if there is no odor, then there also will be no taste, unless
> > you are in the habit of licking the surfaces. The two tend to go hand
> > in hand. Our sensory system is wired that way.
>
>
> Interesting! So, Bob, do you go around smelling your table salt?
>
> It's a known scientific fact that while some people can detect over
> 25,000 odors, others can sense only 15,000. It is similar with taste;
> some people can taste things that others cannnot.
>
>
> > Furthermore, if you could taste such contamination, then you were
> > certainly receiving a large enough dosage for it to affect you as well
> > as the kids.
>
> The gaseous contamination is different from the dusts produced by drug
> labs.
>
> The following is what people should be on the alert for regarding meth
> labs (or other drug labs) in their proximity...
>
> If you have any of the following ill health effects which are
> uncharacteristic of you and which go unexplained for any other reason,
> then you probably have an illicit drug lab in your vicinity:

Well, lessee here. I have, or have had recently, fifteen of
your forty-seven symptoms -- and I live in the middle of
the Sonoran desert, well separated from any other dwelling.
Either my cats are running a secret meth lab, or else
what you're handing us here is a hypochondriac's wish list,
a compendium of sypmtoms so common and so general that
almost anyone can find himself in it, and more than
once. Rather like a horoscope in that regard.

lab-...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 21, 2006, 1:47:01 PM1/21/06
to
Cary Kittrell wrote:

> Well, lessee here. I have, or have had recently, fifteen of
> your forty-seven symptoms -- and I live in the middle of
> the Sonoran desert, well separated from any other dwelling.
> Either my cats are running a secret meth lab, or else
> what you're handing us here is a hypochondriac's wish list,
> a compendium of sypmtoms so common and so general that
> almost anyone can find himself in it, and more than
> once. Rather like a horoscope in that regard.


My, my, there are so many detractors when one wants to enlighten others
about the existence of illicit drug labs.

Must be government agents!

No kidding! THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT WANT THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO KNOW
ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF ODORLESS DRUG LABS and how they are infesting
multiple dwellings and hotels.

What follows are a three of my write-ups on the subject:

What the Gov't Doesn't Want You to Know about Odorless Drug Labs

What the government doesn't want you to know about odorless drug labs
is that they are ODORLESS!

Actually it would be more accurate to say, "virtually odorless,"
because there may be odors that are faint and few and far between... so
elusive as to be difficult to connect to criminal activity.

It's been this way for more than a dozen years, YET...

If you had the opportunity to interact with numerous governmental
agencies on the subject, you'd put 2 and 2 together and come up with
the conclusion that the GOVERNMENT DOES NOT WANT THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO
KNOW ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF ODORLESS DRUG LABS.

These odorless drug labs are absolutely infesting multiple dwellings
and hotels in the New York metro area. Why, there may be well over
100,000 of them in the New York metro area, yet you will never hear of
a single drug lab bust in this region of the country!!

Moreover, the news media seems to be acting in concert with the
government on this because every time you hear of a drug lab story in
the news, they always make mention that drug labs emit pungent, foul
odors, yet the NEWS WILL SAY NOTHING, NOTHING ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF
ODORLESS DRUG LABS!!

I have sent out over 200 emails on this subject to various news
organization and individual reporters, YET I HAVE YET TO GET A SINGLE
REPLY. If I released a totally bogus news story to them, I am sure I
would have gotten several replies.

END OF FIRST WRITE-UP

The following is the second write-up and this is what constituted the
email message which was sent out 200 times to news organizations:

What's Wrong With This Picture: Odorless Drug Labs?

Don't kid yourself!

While illicit drug labs of the past emitted strong, foul odors, today's
drug lab operators utilize ingredients and methods that produce little
or no odors. These near-odorless labs are infesting multiple dwellings
- including hotels - in NY and NJ!

Now, I am going to posit that there is a government conspiracy behind
this development.

Why?

Because, based on my experiences with law enforcement agencies on the
local, state, and federal levels, I can tell you beyond a shadow of a
doubt, that the government actively WANTS drug lab crimes to be
committed.

Why, the government in NY/NJ gives the drug lab criminals the
green-light-go-ahead while laying out the red carpet and opening a wide
umbrella of cover-up protection for them... AND all the while playing
an informant and complainant like me for a rank fool with lies,
contradictions and utter nonsense.

Some things to consider:

1.) If you examine drug lab crime statistics of other states, you'd
estimate, conservatively, that, at this time, the tri-state area of
NY/NJ/CT must have at least 100,000 active drug labs, yet the number of
annual drug lab busts in these three states is micro-minuscule.
(Absolutely NONE are heard of in NYC where drug abuse is rampant. The
_Newark Star-Ledger_ recently reported that the first drug lab in
TWENTY-FIVE years was busted in Sussex County, NJ. Why, there must be
1,000 drug labs in Sussex County!)

2.) You have to wonder: who contrived odorless drug lab methods and
formulations, and what would motivate him (them) to disseminate the
info far and wide for others to follow? Well, if you have, as I have,
observed the government with its mantra of "let the criminality go on;
let the criminality go on; let the criminality go on," and its efforts
at cover-up, cover-up, cover-up, then your answer to the question
herein would have to be: THE GOVERNMENT!

3.) The next question to ask is: "What kind of educational program has
the government conducted to alert the general public about clues for
which they should be on the look-out regarding the possibility of
nearby illicit odorless drug lab(s)?" You should know the answer to
this; it's ABSOLUTELY NONE!

4.) I have been in seven - count 'em: S-E-V-E-N! - multiple dwellings,
almost consecutively, where conditions, at times, made those dwellings
seem like gas chambers. The number of drug lab chemists in these cases
far exceeded seven, and in *all* cases, it was absolutely heartbreaking
how deplorably the government conducted itself while raking ME, ME, ME
over the coals and essentially running me out of home and town.

5.) Did illicit drug labs of the past EVER really emit strong, foul
odors, or was this assertion just pure malarkey designed to serve as a
smokescreen to throw people off the track from suspecting the existence
of odorless drug labs in their urban and suburban multiple dwellings
and hotels?

END OF SECOND WRITE-UP

Newborn Infants in Gas Chambers... IN THE UNITED STATES!!

I saw it with my own eyes!

Proud parents traveling on the road with their newborn infants
apparently on the way to show off their newborns to friends and
relatives.

These parents stop with their newborns at hotels where, little to their
knowing, there is a tremendous risk of their rooms being turned,
overnight, into potentially deadly gas chambers by illicit drug lab
activity in neighboring rooms.

Then months later, these parents are shocked to discover that their
little bundles of joy are in a mindless vegetative stupor, and the
parents are clueless as to the cause.

Why are they so clueless? BECAUSE ILLICIT DRUG LABS THESE DAYS ARE
[NEAR] ODORLESS!! (Actually, it's been this way for over a decade.)

That's right! ODORLESS!!

For the most part, the government and the media would have you believe
that drug labs emit a pungent, foul odor, and so drug lab operators
prefer the isolation of rural areas. NOT TRUE!! Odorless drug labs are
infesting all sorts of multiple dwellings and hotels these days.

For an interesting news article on the subject, refer to one written by
Jody Lawrence-Turner for the Statesman Journal of Salem, Oregon, in
which convicted meth cook, Jack Johnson bragged , "The way I made it,
there was no smell. I made it in motel rooms," Johnson said. "If I got
away with it, other people can, too." For the article, go to:

http://159.54.226.83/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050228/NEWS/502280324/1001

I know of three hotels in Morris County, NJ, where the innkeepers show
no compunction, no scruples, no hesitation, and no conscience when it
comes to allowing newborns on to their premises even though they are
fully aware that their premises are absolutely INFESTED with illicit
drug lab activity.

All three hotels have been reported to numerous governmental regulatory
agencies. Here's a partial list: the local police, the NJ State Police,
the FBI, the DEA, the U.S. Attorney, the County Prosecutor, the EPA,
and the NJ Department of Environmental Protection. To date, there has
been absolutely NO appropriate action taken on any of this high
criminality - nadda, zippo, zero, zilch.

All that you get from government is the royal runaround and your being
played for a rank fool.

Who are the drug lab suspects?

They can be redneck hillbilly types, truckers, blond blue-eyed surfer
types, single women, or even families with their own children. They can
be black, white, Oriental, or Indian. In a nutshell: they can be any or
all types!

Do not think for a minute that you can escape from the problem by going
to a pricey upscale hotel, because you cannot!

If you haven't already gleaned it by now from the above, BE WARNED:
don't buy a condo; you may be buying a gas chamber. Don't rent an
apartment you may be renting a gas chamber.

Drug lab fumes CAN be deadly! The news media recently reported that
there are 21 deaths per year in the U.S. from drug lab fumes. The real
number must be more than 100 times that. All too frequently, medical
examiners fail to determine the true cause of death... or there is a
cover-up.

If there is any good news in any of this... you may not die in your
sleep from odorless drug lab fumes; you may just develop any and all
forms of cancer.

END OF THIRD WRITE-UP

lab-...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 21, 2006, 1:47:28 PM1/21/06
to
Cary Kittrell wrote:

> Well, lessee here. I have, or have had recently, fifteen of
> your forty-seven symptoms -- and I live in the middle of
> the Sonoran desert, well separated from any other dwelling.
> Either my cats are running a secret meth lab, or else
> what you're handing us here is a hypochondriac's wish list,
> a compendium of sypmtoms so common and so general that
> almost anyone can find himself in it, and more than
> once. Rather like a horoscope in that regard.

Must be government agents!

END OF FIRST WRITE-UP

Don't kid yourself!

Why?

Some things to consider:

END OF SECOND WRITE-UP

That's right! ODORLESS!!

For an interesting news article on the subject, refer to one written by


Jody Lawrence-Turner for the Statesman Journal of Salem, Oregon, in
which convicted meth cook, Jack Johnson bragged , "The way I made it,
there was no smell. I made it in motel rooms," Johnson said. "If I got
away with it, other people can, too." For the article, go to:

http://159.54.226.83/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050228/NEWS/502280324/1001

I know of three hotels in Morris County, NJ, where the innkeepers show

Gray Shockley

unread,
Jan 22, 2006, 2:56:41 AM1/22/06
to
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:58, lab-...@hotmail.com writes:

>> FURTHER NOTE WELL: If you contact the parents of any hyperactive,
>> overly giddy little one, and they claim total ignorance of the possible
>> cause, this is because the drug labs of today are odorless or near
>> odorless. BE ESPECIALLY CONCERNED FOR CHILDREN WHO RESIDE IN HOTELS OR
>> IN THOSE EXTENDED STAY FURNISHED FACILITIES!!


Hm,m,m - is it okay if the kids from
Katrina come over to your house?

++ gray

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Jan 23, 2006, 12:28:39 PM1/23/06
to
In article <1137869221.0...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> lab-...@hotmail.com writes:
> Cary Kittrell wrote:
>
> > Well, lessee here. I have, or have had recently, fifteen of
> > your forty-seven symptoms -- and I live in the middle of
> > the Sonoran desert, well separated from any other dwelling.
> > Either my cats are running a secret meth lab, or else
> > what you're handing us here is a hypochondriac's wish list,
> > a compendium of sypmtoms so common and so general that
> > almost anyone can find himself in it, and more than
> > once. Rather like a horoscope in that regard.
>
>
> My, my, there are so many detractors when one wants to enlighten others
> about the existence of illicit drug labs.


Yeah, well, long-term addiction to logic sometimes has that side-effect.

I will say, however, that you are an excellent writer. I enjoy your
work.

-- cary

0 new messages