Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

One State, One Vote

3 views
Skip to first unread message

SwiftBoatVet@MoveOnForAmerica

unread,
Oct 27, 2004, 10:36:14 PM10/27/04
to

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

It's a good thing for Kerry and the whining Democrats that our election
laws do not have a ONE STATE, ONE VOTE idea.
Because if it did, you can tell by the above web site that the majority of
states favor Bush. Very VERY few Kerry states and lots and lots of Bush
states. LOL
Irregardless, Bush will still win the election and I will have a grand old
time laughing at all the losers and low lifes who supported Kerry.
People like jet, JakeWK and KRUNK and all his sockpuppets support Kerry.
And they are going to lose. LOL
I would imagine that around about the end of Oct or the first of Nov, when
it REALLY becomes obvious that Kerry is going to lose, that is when the
Kerry supporters will start changing their tune and claim that they never
really supported Kerry. LOL


--

"We resent very deeply the false war crimes charges John Kerry
made coming back from Vietnam in 1971 and repeated in the book
"Tour of Duty." We think those cast an aspersion on all those
living and dead, from our unit and other units in Vietnam.
We think that he knew he was lying when he made the charges, and
we think that they're unsupportable. We intend to bring the truth
about that to the American people.
We believe, based on our experience with him, that he is totally
unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief."

~NortH~

unread,
Oct 27, 2004, 10:44:31 PM10/27/04
to

"SwiftBoatVet@MoveOnForAmerica" <swiftb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns958FE697ACD9Csw...@216.77.188.18...

>
> http://www.electoral-vote.com/
>
> It's a good thing for Kerry and the whining Democrats that our election
> laws do not have a ONE STATE, ONE VOTE idea.
> Because if it did, you can tell by the above web site that the majority of
> states favor Bush. Very VERY few Kerry states and lots and lots of Bush
> states. LOL
> Irregardless, Bush will still win the election and I will have a grand old
> time laughing at all the losers and low lifes who supported Kerry.
> People like jet, JakeWK and KRUNK and all his sockpuppets support Kerry.
> And they are going to lose. LOL

how could anyone who supports Kerry lose? they are voters... only Kerry can
win the election or lose it... not anyone here... are you that stupid? oh
yeah... you are.


> I would imagine that around about the end of Oct or the first of Nov, when
> it REALLY becomes obvious that Kerry is going to lose, that is when the
> Kerry supporters will start changing their tune and claim that they never
> really supported Kerry. LOL
>

thing is... we were all part of this newsgroup LONG before you came
around... and we will be here long after you leave... sux2bu...

Message has been deleted

sa...@basicreplica.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2004, 12:28:21 AM10/28/04
to
"There is no such thing necessarily in a dictatorial regime of iron-clad
absolutely solid evidence. The evidence I had was the best possible evidence
that he had a weapon."

-George W. Bush, Meet the Press, Feb. 8, 2004


"SwiftBoatVet@MoveOnForAmerica" <swiftb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns958FE697ACD9Csw...@216.77.188.18...
>

Funseeker

unread,
Oct 28, 2004, 9:00:12 AM10/28/04
to
no such word as "irregardless"
those who can't spell, shouldn't be preaching politics..

"SwiftBoatVet@MoveOnForAmerica" <swiftb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns958FE697ACD9Csw...@216.77.188.18...
>

SwiftBoatVet@MoveOnForAmerica

unread,
Oct 28, 2004, 9:21:25 AM10/28/04
to
"Funseeker" <zaj...@telusplanet.net> wrote in
news:w36gd.12810$VA5.11757@clgrps13:

> no such word as "irregardless"
> those who can't spell, shouldn't be preaching politics..


Those who put forth spelling lames shouldn't be in the newsgroups.

Juan Hung Lo

unread,
Oct 28, 2004, 10:03:58 AM10/28/04
to
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:21:25 GMT, "SwiftBoatVet@MoveOnForAmerica"
<swiftb...@hotmail.com> a.k.a. ShortBusVet
shortbusvet@ImTakingItUpThe*ssInADH.org
wrote:

>"Funseeker" <zaj...@telusplanet.net> wrote in
>news:w36gd.12810$VA5.11757@clgrps13:
>
>> no such word as "irregardless"
>> those who can't spell, shouldn't be preaching politics..
>
>
>Those who put forth spelling lames shouldn't be in the newsgroups.

Those who have had their *ss handed to them on a platter by a very
large corporation and who can no longer post to said newsgroups under
their chosen nic shouldn't be in the newsgroups either, IMBECILE.


--

Any information contained in this post is merely a
restatement of information found in the news archives
of the newsgroups alt.dss.hack, alt.binaries.satellite-tv,
and alt.dbs.echostar.hack found on Google Groups. The person
making this post has no firsthand knowledge of bypassing
satellite security measures.

~NortH~

unread,
Oct 28, 2004, 10:40:54 AM10/28/04
to

"SwiftBoatVet@MoveOnForAmerica" <swiftb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95905F9F056FCsw...@216.77.188.18...

> "Funseeker" <zaj...@telusplanet.net> wrote in
> news:w36gd.12810$VA5.11757@clgrps13:
>
>> no such word as "irregardless"
>> those who can't spell, shouldn't be preaching politics..
>
>
> Those who put forth spelling lames shouldn't be in the newsgroups.
>

those who can not ever back up their claims and/or statements (yes YOU)
should not be allowed on a computer, let alone posting to usenet.


sa...@basicreplica.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2004, 3:02:52 PM10/28/04
to
Those who lie (and badly I might add) about actually being in the military
shouldn't parrot the same lies about people that actually served that George
W. does.
Also, people that pretend they can't check headers and accuse a bunch of
people on here as being the same person shouldn't be posting faux political
bullshit on a DSS newsgroup. But here's E.Q. anyway-just can't get enough.

"SwiftBoatVet@MoveOnForAmerica" <swiftb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95905F9F056FCsw...@216.77.188.18...

~NortH~

unread,
Oct 28, 2004, 3:13:19 PM10/28/04
to

"SwiftB...@MoveOnForAmerica.org" <sa...@basicreplica.com> wrote in
message news:tnbgd.19848$rs5.8...@news20.bellglobal.com...

> Those who lie (and badly I might add) about actually being in the military
> shouldn't parrot the same lies about people that actually served that
> George
> W. does.
> Also, people that pretend they can't check headers and accuse a bunch of
> people on here as being the same person shouldn't be posting faux
> political
> bullshit on a DSS newsgroup. But here's E.Q. anyway-just can't get
> enough.

i heard somewhere he is getting himself a T1 line... i love it... has to pay
400+dollars/month (USD) to have about half the speed i do... and i am paying
about 40/month (about 33 USD/month)

all to be able to talk online in backwater webforums, spam usenet and host
his personal websites that consist of BS and spewage (of the EQ style).

sad AND pathetic... i am guessing his little video/dvd rental idea got shot
down.. probably couldn't get the credit... after all... with the judgements
HE has hanging over his head...and the fact he lost his house... i mean..
c'mon.. a sherriff posting a forclosure notice on your front door?? ... yep,
i am betting he has REAL good credit <BSG>

maybe he will become a big-time ISP now... bwahahahahahahaha.. in a town of
under 1000 people... yep.... i see THAT happening LMAO

the money he throws away to get a little attention... more really to stroke
his own ego as he actually believes people think him a big man by having a
T1... to think... i average right about the 3meg mark and he will be hard
pressed to get 1.6... and he pays over 10 times what i do per month... now
that IS something to brag about ROTFLMFAO

he will never get it (he couldn't even get it by trying to pay for it )

~NortH~

~NortH~

unread,
Oct 29, 2004, 8:03:57 AM10/29/04
to

"~NortH~" <no...@south.east.west> wrote in message
news:gxbgd.19852$rs5.8...@news20.bellglobal.com...

wow, poor ol' EQ is busy wihing again LMAO

i guess in his little backwater webforums he has never ever heard of 3 and 4
meg DSL lines and dedicated IP addys... but then again... how smart has
anyone ever really thought he was LMAO

so, while i cruise around at an average of 3megs for 35$/month USD max, he
can cruise around at 1.54 for well over 400$.

and i ALSO see he is running a piece of linux software for a firewall...
opensource stuff... i ran that one for a while... it's intersting, not badly
done either... fully secure?? i wouldn't go that far.. and knowing EQ's
computer abilities...(you all remember the words... encrypted/offshore -
need i say more) i am quite positive he will be hacked again in no time....
maybe when he gets pln back up and running this weekend ... if he can push
his provider to get things done and online.

anyone up for a game of *what's on EQ's computers this time?" - no worries,
i am sure someone will post the goodies... it was done more than enough
times before ROTFLMFAO@EQ

maybe i should see if he wants a good system admin... LOL... or maybe he
should hire the guy who CAN hack his system, or has in the past... that
would be his best security.

well, who ever gets in there first... make sure you post your results for
all to see - and if anyone needs some insider info on his firewall, or the 2
possible routers he is considering... just holler... i am sure someone
probably has the info needed ;)

have a happy meal... by the look of EQ's pic of him and the tuna... he has
had MORE than his share of happy meals... probably the Filet O' Fish

~NortH~

unread,
Oct 29, 2004, 8:30:29 PM10/29/04
to

"~NortH~" <no...@south.east.west> wrote in message
news:Lkqgd.22415$Qs6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

well, it looks like i have EQ dancing like a little monkey again LMAO...
running to all his *friends* in the backwater forums begging for legal
help... he must really have his panties in a bunch and be horrified of
getting his system hacked LMAO.

i wonder if he will yet again post a bunch of webserver log files and call
it being hacked LMAO - i should repost that one just for everyone to laugh
at once more!

anyways... check out this post in WuMarkus... it is a riot... he posted it
today... he is scared... REAL scared!
*************************

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:31 pm Post subject: Attn Lawyers In Da House.
Criminal Intent?

Can I get some input from the lawyer's in the house. Would the following
post constitute proof of criminal intent? Would it be prosecutable if the
person making the post followed thru with his threats?

=========================


wow, poor ol' EQ is busy wihing again LMAO

i guess in his little backwater webforums he has never ever heard of 3 and 4
meg DSL lines and dedicated IP addys... but then again... how smart has
anyone ever really thought he was LMAO

so, while i cruise around at an average of 3megs for 35$/month USD max, he
can cruise around at 1.54 for well over 400$.

and i ALSO see he is running a piece of linux software for a firewall...
opensource stuff... i ran that one for a while... it's intersting, not badly
done either... fully secure?? i wouldn't go that far.. and knowing EQ's
computer abilities...(you all remember the words... encrypted/offshore -
need i say more) i am quite positive he will be hacked again in no time....
maybe when he gets pln back up and running this weekend ... if he can push
his provider to get things done and online.

anyone up for a game of *what's on EQ's computers this time?" - no worries,
i am sure someone will post the goodies... it was done more than enough
times before ROTFLMFAO@EQ

maybe i should see if he wants a good system admin... LOL... or maybe he
should hire the guy who CAN hack his system, or has in the past... that
would be his best security.

well, who ever gets in there first... make sure you post your results for
all to see - and if anyone needs some insider info on his firewall, or the 2
possible routers he is considering... just holler... i am sure someone
probably has the info needed

have a happy meal... by the look of EQ's pic of him and the tuna... he has


had MORE than his share of happy meals... probably the Filet O' Fish

==================

Ignoring all the childish insults and other useless crap, does this provide
evidence of criminal intent?

I know, I know, the best advice would be to ignore these people. However,
that doesn't work as is proven by the fact that the follow me from forum to
forum and actively keep tabs on what I do and when I do it.

Any advice would be appreciated. Please respond in PM, if at all possible.
No sense in bogging down this forum TOO much with this crapola.


EQ

**********************

in one reply to his post the guy told him to shut up --- well here is the
post for everyone to laugh at :) >>>

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:41 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I just talked to our attorney and he said you should shut up. We both
agreed the number 1 thing to do is to stop letting us know, on WU, about
these people who are stalking you.


********************

this is a total riot... he is dancing like a monkey over there, scared
shitless about *someone* hacking his systems... is trying to get *free*
legal help (can't afford an attorney any more, after that last fiascal...
and he is the PRO of *ProSe* LMAO)

and... i have *proven* he is HERE in adh... and have proven i OWN
him... he is so fricking terrified of me ... this is an absolute RIOT.

dance my little money(EQ), DANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

~NortH~

PS: if anyone wants a copy of his post last year or the year before
where he claims i hacked his systems and uses webserver access logs as proof
LMAO.. and said he was getting me thrown in jail for "computer crimes" and
"data theft" or something along those lines.. i will be glad to post it for
all to see/laugh at again.

oh yeah... when ARE those cops coming to take me to jail... EQ - you
have YET to live up to that threat... no worries... i WILL repost it for all
to see... it IS worth it ;)


~NortH~

unread,
Oct 29, 2004, 8:48:41 PM10/29/04
to

"~NortH~" <no...@south.east.west> wrote in message
news:BgBgd.37188$rs5.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

here was his email to me, and my resposes back to him in regards to his
stupidity... everyone have a good laugh at his expense LMAO ... it's been
over 2 years now... LMAO... accusing me of hacking his system... and now he
is back at it again... and look at what his evidence is... webserver logs of
all things LMAO.... he has yet to back up his claims or make good on his
threats... and back then i was a sock named AhSole i guess too... he just
never quits... even more proof of his ways..

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michale" <mic...@eqstuff.org>
To: "NortH" north...@xxx.xxx.com
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: I know it was you, Ah Sole


> Sean, or whatever your name is..

below i am a "M. Shim", make up your mind already would ya?

>
> I have proof that it was you who got into my computer and stole those
> files
> and posted them to that Web Archive Site.

You have NO proof i posted anything anywhere, as it wasn't me who did
anything of the sort :)

>
> LOGS:

(meaningless webserver logs, i know them well Michale)

>
> [17/May/2002:11:53:27 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET /
> HTTP/1.1 200 366
> [17/May/2002:11:53:27 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET
> /home2/midis/WHOLEN~3.MID HTTP/1.1 404 293
> [17/May/2002:11:53:27 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET
> /home2/midis/WHOLEN~3.MID HTTP/1.1 404 293
> [17/May/2002:11:53:36 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET /esi
> HTTP/1.1 404 272
> [17/May/2002:11:53:39 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET
> /home2/midis/WHOLEN~3.MID HTTP/1.1 404 293
> [17/May/2002:11:53:39 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET
> /home2/midis/WHOLEN~3.MID HTTP/1.1 404 293
> [17/May/2002:11:53:43 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET /?
> HTTP/1.1 200 366
> [17/May/2002:11:53:43 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET
> /home2/midis/WHOLEN~3.MID HTTP/1.1 404 293
> [17/May/2002:11:53:44 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET
> /home2/midis/WHOLEN~3.MID HTTP/1.1 404 293
> [17/May/2002:11:53:49 216.58.91.204 i216-58-91-204.igs.net GET
> /home2/midis/WHOLEN~3.MID HTTP/1.1 404 293
>
>
>
> And it goes on and on for hundreds of entries, showing what you accessed
> and what you transferred. Your access started at 17/May/2002:11:53:27
> and continued on til 17/May/2002:13:38:18.


What this proves is that i viewed your website, and that is all - nothing
more, nothing less.

>
>
> I have already filed complaints with Web Archive and with Google
> Groups and they have already started their investigation. It was my
> intention to contact the St Johns County Sheriff's Office on Monday
> and file a complaint for computer hacking and theft of data.

There was no hacking nor was there any theft - you ran a publicly accessible
webserver which i and many others accessed, as your logs most definately
show.
Feel free to file a complaint with whoever you wish.

>
> However, when I discovered it was you, I decided to offer you a deal.
>

no need to make any offers or deals, i won't be accepting them anyways.


> I will contact Google and Web Archive tomorrow morning and tell them
> that I have made personal arrangements and that the situation is
> rectified and no longer a concern. I will also forgo contacting the
> Sheriff's Office and will not file a complaint. I know that you,
> residing in Canada and all, you think that it is not a big deal, but
> it could become one. At the very list, I could turn over all the info
> to IGS.NET and you would at least, lose your access. There is also
> the possibility of contacting authorities in Waterloo as well. So,
> don't think you are completely safe...

I AM completely safe, as nothing i did was even remotely illegal.
And please feel free to contact IGS, i am sure they need a good laugh also.

>
> Anyways, in exchange for the above, you agree to publicly post in ADH,
> exactly what happened, your part in it and why you did it. You will
> apologize for it and you then LEAVE ME ALONE. No posts about me, no
> posts TO me, no posts to others about ME or anything of the sort.

Not LIKELY, your threat carries NO weight as i am not guilty of anything.


>
> I don't think this is asking too much. I am asking you to come clean
> and to leave me alone.

Ask what you like, but you are asking far to much - blackmail only works if
you have something on the other person, and you sir, do not.

>
> Now, if you don't accept this deal, keep in mind, that I DO know
> things about you.
>

LMAO - you DO????????????????????

> M Shim
> xxx-xxx-xxx
> 123 xxx St W
> Waterloo, ON

as i have told you many times, i am not nor have ever been a "M. Shim" and
that is not anywhere close in address to me.
A word of advice to you, the reverse phone number lookup service you are
using online has not updated it's database :)
But feel free to dillusion yourself as much as you want to fulfil your
needs.

>
> I know you run or have a computer service business or work for one.

So, in other words, you know i am involved in computers somehow LMAO.
Brilliant deduction Watson - now wait a minute, i gave you that information,
and i was just starting to think you may have intelligence above and beyond
that of a banana slug.


>
>
> But you don't have to worry.. I am not like you. I won't attack your
> family or your friends. I will just come after you... Completely and
> unequivocally.

You're right, i DON'T have to worry, and you are NOTHING like me, thank God!
Come after me Michale, but don't make threats unless you can back them up,
and if you make threats against my person, be prepared for any consequences
which may follow :)

>
> This deal expires at midnight tonight 19 May 2002. After that, Web
> Archive will continue their investigation, Google will continue theirs
> and St Johns County SO will be contacting the authorities in Waterloo
> for computer crime...

The deal was never in existence, but this email did provide humorous reading
for me and many others.
computer crime............................ LMAO - you will have to point out
to me again which crime you break when viewing online webpages, as i know
the whole world had best be investigated for "computer crime..."


>
> The choice is yours..

There was no choice to make, aside from whether to stop laughing long enough
to respond or not.

~~NortH~~

Just as a note to you, any further emails from you will result in the
banning of your ip for spamming and harrassment - i have said before your
emails are not welcome and your continued harrassment will no longer be
tolerated. :^) have a happy..............

******************

Now, was that a "blast from the past" or what? bwahahahahahahahahahaha

he is as insecure and scare now as he was then... and you can see and read
an awful lot of likenesses in that post/email from him of over 2 years ago
as what you can see here daily from a *different?* poster... coincidence?
unlikely


bwahahahahahahahahaha


~NortH~

unread,
Oct 29, 2004, 8:57:13 PM10/29/04
to

"~NortH~" <no...@south.east.west> wrote in message
news:FxBgd.37202$rs5.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

and this... his latest post on WuMarkus (he is getting a lot of private
info... support in email/private messages?... does THAT sound familiar?..
read on, you will see what i mean)

**************Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:07 pm Post subject:

vandree wrote:
EQ:

you do realize that whoever wrote that obviously reads your posts here? So
my first suggestion is not to post any information that has to do with your
computer setup, security settings or network details.


Yes, I do realize that.

However, for me to do as you suggest, then these scumbags win.

Any time someone uses threats, intimidation and criminal activities to
supress the free flow of information, the ONLY way to beat such actions is
to keep on keeping on.

To put it into a context that everyone can readily identify with, it is like
not discussing strageties and not helping each other out with DTV related
litigation, just because DTV lawyers read these forums.

The minute you start to give in to ALL of these scumbags, the scumbags start
winning.

Now, of course, I am not going to start posting passwords or detailed
strageties in the public forums. That would be silly.

But to NOT ask for help, just because the slimeballs of alt.dss.hack stalk
me from forum to forum, well... That would be equally silly.

I appreciate your concern, V and I do realize you have my best interests at
heart..

I am getting a lot of private info that is extremely helpful. I think that
this go 'round said scumbuckets are going to be in for a little surprise.


EQ
*************************

suprise suprise............ sorta like over 2 years ago.... LMAO

face it EQ, you lost then and haven't got over it.. it's a long time ago,
try and live with it would ya? you lose *every* time you take a go at me...
i have beat you down like a dog, and just for the fun of doing it, at any
and every whim i have had.

go back to school, get an education, learn a little about computers, then...
maybe something about the law... then come back and we can play.... until
then... you are not entitled to play in my sandbox... and for safety's
sake.. you probably should stay outta my sandbox... a cat may mistake you
for something (not to hard to do) and try and bury you ;)

and i loved that post where the guy said something about you eating to many
filet of fish... suited you perfectly

~NortH~


~NortH~

unread,
Oct 30, 2004, 1:13:45 AM10/30/04
to

"~NortH~" <no...@south.east.west> wrote in message
news:FFBgd.37210$rs5.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

some info for EQ..... i know he needs this info... and EQ... if you need
help setting one up, feel free to get ahold of me.. i currently have one
running... and i would suggest putting it ahead of softwall.

here... some reading for you... i know your comprehension skills are
limited, so this is a fairly simplistic overview/description

A honey pot is a computer system on the Internet that is expressly set up to
attract and "trap" people who attempt to penetrate other people's computer
systems. (This includes the hacker, cracker, and script kiddy.) To set up a
honey pot, it is recommended that you:
Install the operating system without patches installed and using typical
defaults and options
Make sure that there is no data on the system that cannot safely be
destroyed
Add the application that is designed to record the activities of the invader
Maintaining a honey pot is said to require a considerable amount of
attention and may offer as its highest value nothing more than a learning
experience (that is, you may not catch any hackers).

if you need to know what app to run for logging... there are plenty out
there, i can recommend a few... also, make *sure* it has the most current AV
software... as since you are using it to *attract* hacking attempts and log
them, it is also an attraction to worms etc and can pass them on to your
network.

When setting up your firewall, a basic simple system is more than enough.. i
have run softwall on a pp200 with 128 ram and barely anything else... but,
since it is your front line defense... it NEEDS to have AV protection.. not
for it(for the most part), as it is linux, but it the entry to your network
and getting a good linux based, server AV software will save you much
grief... but you should also at all times run AV software on all other
machines at the same time... server based AV is good, but it is strongly
suggested to also run stand-alone AV apps on each machine on the network.

also, your network is only as safe as the operators of the machines to....
you would be amazed how easy it is to get in to networks because a family
member or employee *lets* or *invites* the hacker in. always keep that in
mind.

you know, some of the most serious hacks in history had the easiest acces to
the systems... although said systems were of the most secure possible....
sometimes all it takes is a phone call.... HI, i am so and so from so and so
ISP... we are having problems with your line and need to access blah blah
blah... and bingo... some secretary or low level tech hands out a password
.... very very simple... or... Hi this is Bill from the IT dept. - i have a
message here you guys are having problems on the fourth floor.. what is your
username and pass and i will get on the server and get it all fixed up in a
heartbeat. - this happens all the time in the real world... hacking isn't
necessarily the ability with a computer or how much of a comp. genious you
are... hacking is how *smart* you are... brute force hacking is old and over
with... now it hacking by cunning and smarts.

since you are so new to this world... i thought i would give you some things
to ponder... since i KNOW i/we have your attention over here now... i have
proven that :)

NOTHING is unhackable.. NOTHING... and think about the honey pot... if
something is to easy to get in to... there is a reason... nowadays
*everyone* has the latest patches and security upgrades on their systems...
pots are so easy to see... probe a few ports... if the old standards are
open, and not patched like even the most simple windows install with the
current windows updates... then it's pretty obvious... honey pots catch
junior hackers and script kiddies... anyone who can hack can see a honey pot
long before ever leaving a footprint in the system.

i figure you need an education at some point.. so consider this installment
one... "Introduction to the REAL world 101"

when you get some basic comp knowledge and basic network understanding,
maybe we can have a chat.. what IS an interesting thought is you with a WiFi
system at your dvd rental...internet cafe.. whatever your new scam scheme
is... look up a thing called *war driving*, find some lists.. see if you can
find a familiar nickname - come back when you have something... i will be
here ... still laughing.

computers are but a game.... and as you can see... even with all your hot
air and threats of me losing any ISP i have been with, actually my complete
NET ACCESS, as you said.. and what were the charges?? oh yeah... theft of
data and "computer crimes"?? wtf is that one anyhow?? ... anyways... point
is.. i am still here after all your promises, threats and hot air
(remember.. the St. John's County SO, Waterloo Police... jail... Google, Web
Archives... yeah.. you remember LMAO the things you threatened and promised,
but could never pull off)... and you have been run off... that makes it very
clear you are not playing up to my level... you never were, you never will
be able to... but you are allowed to fantasize ;)

think about it... you may just get it.

you could always walk away, forget me, never mention me.. i may be inlined
to do the same... but i know you are incapable of that... so until you do...
i will be right here... and i will always be a step ahead and far smarter :)

sometimes the best joke is the one that never comes... but then again.. you
can never be sure

Juan Hung Lo

unread,
Oct 30, 2004, 12:56:33 AM10/30/04
to
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:30:29 -0400, "~NortH~" <no...@south.east.west>
wrote:

That is too funny! Oh no, SwiftBoatVet isn't EQ, is he? If it walks
like a duck and talks like a duck then it is probably a duck. Do I
hear EQ quacking?

P.S. Crossposted to his favorite hangouts so that they can have a good
laugh AT him too!

Juan Hung Lo

unread,
Oct 30, 2004, 1:04:13 AM10/30/04
to
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:48:41 -0400, "~NortH~" <no...@south.east.west>
wrote:

Nawwww, you couldn't possibly be implying that SwiftBoatVet is Michale
"EQ" Worley, now could you? ROTFLMFAO@EQ!!!

He will never "get it".

(crossposted so that the rest of his "friends" can get a good laugh AT
him too)

Juan Hung Lo

unread,
Oct 30, 2004, 1:09:42 AM10/30/04
to
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:57:13 -0400, "~NortH~" <no...@south.east.west>
wrote:

American Express needs to get the ideas for their commercials here
because THIS is priceless!!! Further proof that the 'ole SwiftBoatVet
ain't so swift after all. EQ, the king of the IMBECILES and card
carrying kook.

Juan Hung Lo

unread,
Nov 4, 2004, 9:05:44 PM11/4/04
to
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:09:42 -0500, Juan Hung Lo
<ask_me_for_it@I_dont_do_spam_at.all> wrote:

I hereby nominate Michale Sean "EQ" Worley for AUK's Balsa Gavel award
due to his posts in alt.dss.hack and to the WuMarkus forums for legal
advice to stop people from posting about him in alt.dss.hack, for his
advice to persons being sued by DirecTV to fight pro se in federal
court, and for the many threats he has made to have people's ISP
accounts pulled or to have people jailed for everything from wanting
to meet him to supposedly hacking his servers.

~NortH~

unread,
Nov 4, 2004, 9:27:30 PM11/4/04
to

"Juan Hung Lo" <ask_me_for_it@I_dont_do_spam_at.all> wrote in message
news:f8nlo0ht3nb6hiqml...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:09:42 -0500, Juan Hung Lo
> <ask_me_for_it@I_dont_do_spam_at.all> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Michale Sean "EQ" Worley for AUK's Balsa Gavel award
> due to his posts in alt.dss.hack and to the WuMarkus forums for legal
> advice to stop people from posting about him in alt.dss.hack, for his
> advice to persons being sued by DirecTV to fight pro se in federal
> court, and for the many threats he has made to have people's ISP
> accounts pulled or to have people jailed for everything from wanting
> to meet him to supposedly hacking his servers.
>

i will second that motion LOL... i can't think of a more deserving person

~NortH~

Message has been deleted

Phat Finger

unread,
Nov 5, 2004, 11:55:24 PM11/5/04
to
Juan Hung Lo <ask_me_for_it@I_dont_do_spam_at.all> wrote:

>On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:09:42 -0500, Juan Hung Lo
><ask_me_for_it@I_dont_do_spam_at.all> wrote:
>
>I hereby nominate Michale Sean "EQ" Worley for AUK's Balsa Gavel award
>due to his posts in alt.dss.hack and to the WuMarkus forums for legal
>advice to stop people from posting about him in alt.dss.hack, for his
>advice to persons being sued by DirecTV to fight pro se in federal
>court, and for the many threats he has made to have people's ISP
>accounts pulled or to have people jailed for everything from wanting
>to meet him to supposedly hacking his servers.
>

*********** fourthed ******************

This has to be an all Usenet psycho ex-cop kOOkie Boi

--
Phat

0 new messages