On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 2:52:02 AM UTC-5, BillyRayF wrote:
> On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 4:00:23 PM UTC-5, dick. wrote:
> >
> >> BRF wrote [with some editing]
> >> BRF:> "Visions Would Be [an] Off-Topic Post Here In /alt.dreams"
> >
> > Dick:> Except that the post was on dreams AND visions
> > and how they relate with each other with respect to the dreamer.
> > I'd argue that visions are merely dreams of the future, thus remain
> > "on topic" in alt.dreams, but to continue:
> BRF:> Not relate with each other
> with respect to A Dreamer.
> one is You A Sleep [Dreams]
> and the other Is You Are Awake
> With Eyes Open Is [ A Visions]
Ah. Yes, the eyes open as in a vision, closed as in a dream. That's one way to define it, sure, but what is a vision, other than a waking dream? And many dreams are of the future (as in "premonitions") so the basic gist of what I was originally getting at (eventually the actual text will slip from my memory) is that dreams have two basic directions: forwards (as visions / premonitions, apocalyptic events, such as the Book of the Revelation of Saint John of Jesus Christ) or backwards (from the present-now to a past-now) which is often a *very quiet* type of experience) or (more commonly) of the past up to the present (as a kind of summary of the past.)
This also ties in with "astral body projections" / OOBEs, although those are typically so intense / vivid that there is no question one was taking part in such.
So here's the thing, Billy, this is all (of course) the perspective I have chosen to share on these matters. Certainly, your perspective (as well as that of others) *may* differ. Such is Life 👍
> >> BRF:> <snip>
> >> so I when to [lay down upon the embankment and looked up at the Night sky]
> > Dick:> (Was this much during the dream, or preceding the dream?)
> BRF:> Dick I was Awake Eyes And Not Dreaming
OK, so this gets into the dual possibility of 1) seeing something unexplained in the night sky, as well as 2) a vision, which is essentially the same thing, as in "that which is viewed." The real question becomes, "Can it be explained as a sighting of SkyLab?" (as you mention later this was in 1972.)
The Skylab space station launched May 14, 1973, from NASA's Kennedy Space Center by a huge Saturn V launch vehicle --
So it's not the ISS (which occurred *decades* later) and (if you have reported 1972 accurately) is NOT Skylab. However, being as Oklahoma is *relatively* close to the *average* orbital path of *many* man-launched space satellites (not just from the secret military, but *also* from other countries.)
Here's the next step:
As you have written regarding directions in the sky regarding north/south, east and west, let's look at this next section first:
> >> BRF:> "[lo, I] See Two Big Stars Side By Side
> >> Off To The right Of The Moon
> >> A Good Three Hands A Way
> >> About [Middle] In The North Sky"
> >>
> > Dick:> A few preliminary questions: is this from the perspective of the Southern or Northern hemisphere?
>
> BRF:> Dick It Was Northern hemisphere
> The Moon To The East
> The Stars To The West Of the Moon
Here's where the focus begins:
On that date (8/24/72) in the northern hemisphere (Oklahoma) the moon was so close to the ecliptic plane (the imaginary east-west line of the galaxy across the night sky) that after just checking a chart (on another computer) the position of the moon was ("is") so close to the ecliptic that saying it was in the "northern" or "southern" half of the sky is largely irrelevant: for all *practical* intents and purposes, it was traveling directly across the middle.
(You can check for yourself at
https://skyandtelescope.org/interactive-sky-chart but it takes a bit of playing to find the actual "view.")
To be clear, the moon was *barely* in the northern hemisphere of the night sky, and *smack dab in the middle* of the constellation Aquarius, "rising in the east" shortly after sunset.
Focusing in on:
BRF:> "Two Big Stars Side By Side Off To The right Of The Moon"
(That would be to the west of the moon, followed by:)
BRF> "The Moon To The East The Stars To The West Of the Moon"
Sure enough, on that date, shortly after sunset (sunset being one of the best times to fish) the moon would be rising in the east. The only "big stars" would have to be in the constellation of Aquarius itself, as it takes an allowance of increasing the brightness of surrounding stars before anything even remotely begins to "pop" (shine / become noticeable) in that area. Moonrise (FULL moon, age 14 days!) was around 8:05 PM, with twilight ending (darkness beginning) around 8:10 PM.
BRF>
> Kay County
> Oklahoma 74601
> 36.70488054840553, -97.14323862356248
>
> > Dick:> Anything being near the moon (to the right) in the [northern] sky would likely be in the summer (in the northern hemisphere)
> > but I'm uncertain as to how that would play out in the Southern hemisphere (South of the Equator.)
> BRF:> Being Summer August 24, 1972
> >> BRF:> "Then One Star [Moved] away From [the other]
> >> Toward The Moon Who Was Full At The Time
> >> And [Moved] Behind It
> >> To [Not Be Seen afterward]"
> >
> > Dick:> (That last line had to be cleared up in that manner, otherwise, it grammatically had all *sorts* of "holes" in it.)
***OK, new question: the star that moved: had it been stationary (sitting still) in the night sky for any time *before* it was observed to be moving?
> >> BRF:> "Now Know This
> >> That The Moon And All Stars
> >> But One Was Of The True Night Sky
> >> Only That One Star Was Of The Vision"
<snip and edit from previous conversation>
> > It is *very* possible for [ANY orbital object] to "disappear* from view depending upon the rotation of the earth with respect to the sun.
> > I've seen [the ISS] "wink out" in the middle of an orbital flight path over my home once upon a time (somewhere within the past 5 years?)
> > because the station had passed into the earth's shadow from the sun.
> > If I'd not been out [deliberately] looking for the station at that time,
> > it would possibly have confused me to no end! Fortunately,
> > I've spotted the station on numerous occasions (before and since.)
> BRF:> Aug 21 US orbiting astronomy observatory Copernicus launched
> I Know It Was Not The Copernicus It was Not Big As
> Jupiter was the Big Star ⚹ And The Vision Star ⚹ Was Just As Big
Jupiter was *half way across* the sky that night.
> The Full Moon On Thursday, 24 August 1972, 07:21:42 pm
> 50 Years Ago
While not willing to go as far as to research the Daylight Saving Time schedule for that area in that time period, please know that *currently* the map of that time & place shows Moonrise around 8:05-8:15 PM (*with* DST in effect. Take away DST, and sure, 7:21 PM would "fit." Likely a *very* scenic full moon at that time of year!)
<snip>
> >> BRF:> "After The Manifest Come To Pass
> >> My Step-Father got up And Walk Over To Me A Said
> >> Look Like The Fish Are Not [Biting] Bait [Tonight]"
> >
> > Dick:> When the fisherman says it's time to turn in, it's time to turn in ✔
> >
> >> BRF:> "In Fishing batting (noun) the action of hitting A Lure"
>
> > In American English, this is referred to as "biting"
> > (like taking repeated bites out of an apple.)
> BRF:> Batting Lure Good For Full Moon
> <
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.cOY54u1M-c2Am_Rr10YbGAHaC5?w=349&h=137&c=7&r=0&o=5&pid=1.7 >
So I'm getting the impression that "batting" is a colloquial expression of some kind. New to me here in Tennessee.
>
> In Okie, It's Just The Play On Words
> Y'ay'a Will Come To Banish Evil LaIa
>
> Like Y'ay'a = n : The Creator or Great Spirit.
> The term Y'aY'a or I'aI'a means Spirit of Spirits.
<snip>
Light eliminates darkness, for sure! (Darkness obscures light by some physical means.)