Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Jesus (who?)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Solomon

unread,
Nov 29, 2005, 2:35:21 PM11/29/05
to
Virtually every contemporary Christian concept (especially, around
salvation) is, most inherently, flawed. Christian spirituality seems
quite corrupt. Absolutely all Christian eschatology remains invalid.
In perpetuity!

Anyone's absolute goal, eternal salvation, is to yet remain genuinely
attached (after some fashion) unto any, established, human gene pool;
so, the soul's hope; for eternal "salvation" now becomes much more
assured upon faithful believers genetically becoming related to thus
anyone, somehow ever found worthy of being chosen as, Hebrew!
I'll demonstrate.

Xtianity can only lead to one's perdition; The dreaded: Second Death;
Human (E)xtinction! AKA: PERDITION!

To personally assure one's eternal salvation, genuinely, meek souls
shall now humbly send the most clever candidates (yet, unto Hebrew
Election) hopefully well furnished, and: at least with a minimal
amount of perhaps the absolute finest oracular lamp oil available,
definitely only the most superb one's household income might find most
readily affordable even to acquire?
Now this, shall be faithfully noticed as the most pro-active effort,
for improving ever so slight chances of attracting the particularly
desired attention, from truly God-fearing Hebrews that, one, might
possibly ever wish to extend?
I'll elaborate.

Current levels of (human) consciousness remain parable to common
houseflies? Hypothetically, the perspective flies yet crawl upon the
illustrious surface of Michaelangelo's Sistine Chapel, in Rome. "(!)"
NOW upon interacting with other organisms, the minimal consciousness
of absolutely all creatures (no matter how well advanced) can most
dependably be revealed upon understanding that flies, indeed all
insects, inherently possesses three, specific, reasoning capabilities:
1)Might "I" eat, of "this" as, for one's: sustenance?
2)Might "this" eat, of "ME" as, should one: flee?
3)Might "I" mate, with "this" as, to possibly: reproduce?

SO houseflies (upon any ceiling) are typically capable of reasoning
specifically only three, basic, sanctions (Perhaps like so few men?)
but THIS particular fly cannot possibly understand any profound
magnificence in any immediate surroundings; upon which it, yet so
briefly, dwells? It couldn't yet possibly care, any less; that some
higher intelligence carefully prepared so wonderful a thing, as the
ceiling of: The Sistine Chapel; upon which any, art illiterate fly,
might thrive? No! Not even upon taking to wing (Just as souls do, upon
dreaming?) might any "fly" ever remarkably comprehend any fuller view,
of the BIG picture? Why not?

What can never possibly be permitted, would be, for any "flies" to
somehow comprehend the very concept of pest control strips, these
curators definitely seem to have secreted, all over the place;
(HINT) to solely rely upon such obviously tampered with "scripture"
yet for personally deciding one's most critical eschatological issues,
simply matters into one's wasting yet more live time hopelessly mired,
within a premeditated, psychological, TRAP!

Does anyone, living, really concern themselves very much beyond these
three, most basic of, decisions? Certainly, this remains only about as
far many, entire demographic majorities, seem capable of reasoning,
upon any reliable basis? Perhaps this "fly" parable just maybe
approximates to what lengths souls, ever surrealistically hoping to
thus spiritually somehow thrive, around Xtians, might eventually need
to comprehend personally shifting certain, eschatological paradigms,
practically everyone, most assuredly seems to have been, conceived
with?

Send out your most innocent, of all, even to now comprehend fully
amazing secrets; yet unto the very foundations of the world!
VAST SECRETS: Not typically demonstrable, except unto those, most
innocent!


Shalom!

www.HebrewRastafarian.com

0 new messages