ѱѥѳѥѵѥѱѥѳѥѵѥѷѱѥѳѥѵѥѱѥѳѥѵѥѷѱѥѳѥѵѥ

exactor

unread,

Jul 15, 2012, 10:36:43 AM7/15/12

to

On 14 jul, 13:24, Timothy Sutter <a202...@lycos.com-> wrote:
> happy bastille day
>
> "vive le bastille"

"Se tomó la Bastilla"
"Vive la diference!"

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 15, 2012, 10:51:22 AM7/15/12

to

> Timothy Sutter wrote:

> > happy bastille day
> > "vive le bastille"

exactor wrote:

> "Se tom� la Bastilla"
> "Vive la diference!"

and do not harm the oil and the wine

exactor

unread,

Jul 16, 2012, 5:10:29 AM7/16/12

to

DO NO HARM

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 17, 2012, 10:05:34 AM7/17/12

to

> > Timothy Sutter wrote:

> > > happy bastille day
> > > "vive le bastille"

> exactor wrote:

> > "Se tom� la Bastilla"
> > "Vive la diference!"

Timothy Sutter wrote:

> and do not harm the oil and the wine

the "new" gurglegroops is much more difficult to navigate
and you can't pinpoint a reference URL to a specific
entry in a thread anymore: among other things,
that are crappier now than "olde gurglegroops"

blech...[thumbs down on "new" gurglegroops]

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 17, 2012, 10:16:53 AM7/17/12

to

they really need to bring back the "more options" button.

and it wouldn't hurt bring back the "view profile" button.

where you could see a poster's entire posing history
and not just group snapshots

if google didn't hold the archives, i wouldn't care.

i don't post from google.

but, if they're going to keep an archive

they should at least keep it navigable.

as of now, you have to sift through an entire thread

to see an -archived- post you may want to see.

which can be much more trouble thn it's worth

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 17, 2012, 10:21:26 AM7/17/12

to

> > the "new" gurglegroops is much more difficult to navigate
> > and you can't pinpoint a reference URL to a specific
> > entry in a thread anymore: among other things,
> > that are crappier now than "olde gurglegroops"

> > blech...[thumbs down on "new" gurglegroops]

> they really need to bring back the "more options" button.
> and it wouldn't hurt bring back the "view profile" button.
> where you could see a poster's entire posing history
> and not just group snapshots

> if google didn't hold the archives, i wouldn't care.
> i don't post from google.
> but, if they're going to keep an archive
> they should at least keep it navigable.
> as of now, you have to sift through an entire thread
> to see an -archived- post you may want to see.
> which can be much more trouble thn it's worth
> blech...[thumbs down on "new" gurglegroops]

and you can't set up a 'tinyurl' to such a specific
post within a thread, like you could before.

so, it's no 'improvement'

but maybe that's what they want.

to make it so crappy that people will vacate the premises entirely.

no big deal...

maybe you should give the archives back to deja-news

or just stop keeping them at all.

if you weren't going to keep an archive, i wouldn't care

but you do, and now it's very difficult to naigate.

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 17, 2012, 10:35:01 AM7/17/12

to

> and you can't set up a 'tinyurl' to such a specific
> post within a thread, like you could before.

> so, it's no 'improvement'

> but maybe that's what they want.

> to make it so crappy that people will vacate the premises entirely.

> no big deal...

> maybe you should give the archives back to deja-news
> or just stop keeping them at all.
> if you weren't going to keep an archive, i wouldn't care
> but you do, and now it's very difficult to naigate.
> blech...[thumbs down on "new" gurglegroops]

but deja-news, which has become gurglegroops

used to be a =Usenet= archive [gurgle bought deja-news]

and =Usenet= still exists and is different from gurglegroops

and not -everyone- uses Usenet as a chatroom

albeit, you -can- use Usenet as a chatroom, fine..

if you were going to dump it all after three weeks,

that would be fine

but you are still archiving =Usenet=

and doing a pisspoor job of it...now.

eddi...@gmail.com

unread,

Jul 17, 2012, 1:21:58 PM7/17/12

to

√€£¢®°

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 17, 2012, 10:39:29 PM7/17/12

to

> > and you can't set up a 'tinyurl' to such a specific
> > post within a thread, like you could before.

well, you can do this, but, i never have liked gurgle anyway,

so there. there's other things that are crappy

yeah yeh yeah, there is other things...perfectly good sentence

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 18, 2012, 9:51:45 AM7/18/12

to

this picture looks like a person made of trees

http://twitter.com/Timothy_Sutter/status/225586891007852544/photo/1
http://tinyurl.com/7962rgu

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 18, 2012, 10:07:15 AM7/18/12

to

> this picture looks like a person made of trees

> http://twitter.com/Timothy_Sutter/status/225586891007852544/photo/1
> http://tinyurl.com/7962rgu

and speaking of luck dragons, it almost looks like the
big rock eating creature from the never ending story...

yeah, i've seen that, so what?

Timothy Sutter

unread,

Jul 18, 2012, 10:20:53 AM7/18/12

to

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0VxGRWPh28&feature=player_embedded#at=45

looks sort of like this guy, only, made of trees.