Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Partially, today starts tomorrow

5 views
Skip to first unread message

ҀѺѸѠѾѢѤѦѪѨѬѮѰѲѶ

unread,
Jun 17, 2012, 9:14:59 AM6/17/12
to Staagge...@gmail.com
Did you mean "midterms" by any chance?
How am I doing?

Hieronymous House wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2:01 pm, "THE COLONEL" <asiantra...@caribbeancity.net>
> wrote:
> > "Hieronymous House" <hieronymous...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:3b0383f7-95fb-4f95...@z19g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jun 13, 10:39 am, "THE COLONEL" <asiantra...@caribbeancity.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Hieronymous House" <hieronymous...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > >news:f6849c78-ceb5-47a2...@n42g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Jun 12, 5:46 pm, Bit <bit...@nomailnone.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > > After serious thinking THE COLONEL wrote :> "Homeless Lisa"
> > > > <l...@perations.com> wrote in message
> > > > >news:XnsA070AE201Q53C...@130.133.4.11...
> > > > >> And I have to be there extra early to do paperwork. I
> > > > >> should
> > > > >> probably leave at 7:45. That's a time of day I rarely
> > > > >> see. The cat
> > > > >> usually has me up at 9.
> >
> > > > > With all those illegal meds you consume, is it any
> > > > > wonder?
> >
> > > > Drugs didn't ruin my career.
> >
> > > > Drug TESTS did!
> > > > --
> > > > That's what happens when you take on the limp dicks of AUK.
> >
> > > Drug TESTS prevent me from employing returning vets who use cannabis
> > > and cognitive therapy to deal with their PTSD; drug TESTS implemented
> > > for the purpose of reducing insurance rates; drug TESTS that have
> > > shown no correlation to any increase in workplace safety, or even any
> > > reduction in workplace drug usage. People aren't stupid. People STUDY
> > > for drug TESTS. In fact, drug STUDY kits are almost as big a business
> > > as the drug TESTS are. I'm obviously in the wrong business.
> >
> > > Your business is monkey business.
> >
> > How considerate.
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > --
> > GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME HEAD!
>
> Did you make that up, or are you simply aping something you
> overheard?
> http://aliberaldose.blogspot.com/2009/04/give-m

THE COLONEL

unread,
Jun 17, 2012, 11:29:03 AM6/17/12
to
"ҀѺѸѠѾѢѤѦѪѨѬѮѰѲѶ" <odra...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:465177b3-e01b-4db6...@oe8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
> http://lemonparty.org

Here’s a little info on USE2BE, i.e., Cindy the Texas Whore, and Dave, aka:
Squiggles the Assworm.

LOL



First, Carl said:

“Cindy (use2be) is a fucktard of the lowest order. Her moral conscience
consists of supporting idiot trolls like Dave (that’s the % assworm) and
ArgueFag (a frenchy faggot) wrecking groups like ASH. While she (use2be)
shouts cheap slogans (which costs her nothing) from the sidelines: "NO,
DON'T DO IT,” the fact that she is [in any way] involved in the education
and social/moral development of young children is even more disturbing. If
you know anyone who has a child in the Texas school district which employs
this person, please do your utmost to make sure that no children are exposed
to her questionable influence.”



Then Carl said on May 21, 2012:

“Yeah. And we get to be treated with the likes of Cindy and Dave, who troll
suicide groups and post in groups for depressed people, the only people to
whom they can compare themselves in order to get off by calling themselves
‘winners.’”



Then Lurker said on May 12, 2012:

“Don't trust her Ninner she's a back stabbing bitch. Dave and Cindy have
been working as a tag team for many years. For example, depressed and
suicidal people confide privately in Cindy. Cindy informs Dave privately.
Dave posts the personal embarrassing information to the group, driving away
the target with the usual shouts of "Yay" and "I only use you for my post
count.”



Then Invalid said: “Cindy (used2be) stabbed in the back another poster by
divulging private info to %, so % could use that info to attack the poster.”



Let’s take a gander at that one, shall we <giggle>:



On Dec 4, 5:35 pm, "Rhiannon" <rhia...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

“I've been having trouble figuring out why you didn't just email me and ask
me privately why I was, what was it, oh, ‘slinging mud at persent’ rather
than tell him something you never should have just because you ‘were mad’
and thought I deserved it? Because you wanted to prove to him that I wasn't
perfect, and bringing up that personal information was the only way you felt
you could do so. I formed a friendship with Rhiannon before you ‘divulged
my secret,’ and she knows about what happened, so she asked. I never
discussed my posts about privacy and trust with anyone, including her. I
don't fault her for asking. I was ‘royally screwed’ back when *you*
betrayed my trust, and then you're GREAT friend, who you asked to keep this
all private, was foaming at the mouth and couldn't wait to lynch me here.
To be fair you apologized many times, but those apologies were almost always
mingled with your reasons justifying why you did what you did, and turning
things back onto me saying that I was looking for a reason to hate you.



“As for Rhiannon ‘supposedly being my friend,’ she is my friend. You are
the one who was supposedly my friend, and after you divulged that
information about me behind my back you continued to post your kind little
replies to me as if nothing had happened, never giving me any hint that you
were so much as upset with me about anything.”



~Rose

eddi...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 19, 2012, 11:44:38 PM6/19/12
to
Today is tomorrow. Tomorrow is today.

EJ Eddie

unread,
Aug 17, 2012, 6:42:43 PM8/17/12
to august...@fastmail.fm
On 1999 Jun 20, 11:55 am, eddie...@gmail.com wrote:
> GULLY GULLY?

ligther or darker
0 new messages